PDA

View Full Version : Fraud Upon the FISA Court Confirmed




Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6

goldenequity
01-11-2018, 07:39 AM
continued from here: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?518161-Rep-Jim-Jordan-18-questions-in-2018-about-Russia-and-the-FBI

=====================

FRAUD upon the COURT :mad:

Confirmation: DOJ and FBI Used “Steele Dossier” for Application To FISA Court for Search Authority on Trump Campaign…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/10/confirmation-doj-and-fbi-used-steele-dossier-for-application-to-fisa-court-for-search-authority-on-trump-campaign/#more-144424

Don't miss it: This is a very concise and thorough article on HOW
the entire system was 'played' (not JUST FISA) and what Nunes has discovered.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6gfo5EQkxs

Sara Carter and Fox News are both confirming the DOJ and FBI used the Steele Dossier to get FISA-702 Data Surveillance Authority
allowing them to spy on Trump campaign officials.

In the latest developments, as reported by Sara Carter and Fox News,
the DOJ and FBI used the sketchy ‘Steele Dossier’ as the foundation for their FISA application.

(and they KNEW it was all bullshiit when they did it.. not just ONCE (it was denied by court) but TWICE.. dropping it in Obama's lap to PUSH it through FISA court. What's (so far) LOST in media/congressional reporting is not JUST the FBI's role... but the CIA's collusion as well. They (CIA) were the GENESIS.)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bol8RXk1zw

-------

What you need to know:

A warrant implies advanced judicial approval to begin surveillance and collecting emails and phone calls etc.
Like a traditional Title III DOJ / law enforcement search warrant. But that’s not how FISA-702 works.

The FISA database, run by the NSA hub, already holds all the information, all the emails, texts, phone calls etc.
The information already exists in a database. There are two steps to access the database of information:

♦Step One is to “Query” the database for your subject.
That search needs a factual legal reason to take place; like an ongoing investigation. (this is where the ABUSE happens. :mad:)

That search then returns an outcome, a set of information based on the “query” parameters.
If the user gets a positive response to the “query” then Yes, the database holds information related to what they are looking for. Remember, there has to be a preexisting investigation to do the query.

♦Step Two is to “Open” the data set.
That’s the step that needs a “search warrant” to be legal.
That second step, the ‘looking at the information’ is where an approval from the FISA court is needed.
The investigator must fill out a FISA application and go to the FISA Court for approval.
In order to get a FISA Court approval the investigator must show a valid reason for the search.

Example (not real):

•Step One: The DOJ/FBI official puts “Jared Kushner” into the search query. This generates a number of responses. Perhaps his emails, phone call logs, actual intercepted recordings of his calls, or text messages, etc. (everything the NSA hub captures “about” Jared Kushner). There has to be a valid investigative reason in this step. An investigation of Jared Kushner must be underway.

•Step Two: The DOJ/FBI official then quarantines the returned information and applies to the FISA Court for permission to review it. The FBI/DOJ official has to tell the court why they want to look, ie. the FISA application. The FISA court grants the application and gives the FBI/DOJ official the approval. The application must have a legal basis as presented to the court – similar to that needed for a search warrant.

In 2016 NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers noted there were numerous FISA-702(17) unauthorized “About Queries” being conducted by the intelligence community. These are queries that did not have an underlying investigation to support their taking place.













What Americans don't know (and Media isn't saying)

►The 'Trump' Dossier Fraud is merely a SAMPLE of what goes on every day in the....

'Fusion' Centers

This 'about Query' scam is NOT 'shut down'... (as the article maintains)
in fact... it is the basis for the police state known as JTTF/FBI/FUSION CENTERS for reprisals and intimidation programs on americans.
George describes...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wzU3PKATaE

goldenequity
01-11-2018, 11:12 AM
Understand this:
They want us to believe that 'money' launched the dossier.
Wrong.
The background was ALREADY created. Done.
THEN given to Steele/Fusion GPS to 'market'.

It wasn't 'commissioned'... it was simply SOLD (DNC was a 'duped' CUSTOMER)
Who better to 'blame' if the whole thing went South?

It's the criminal network operating at the helms of power in Government agencies protecting ITSELF...
THROWING false 'bread crumbs' out... like 'DNC,DNC,DNC'/'RUSSIA,RUSSIA,RUSSIA'/'HEZBOLLAH,HEZBOLLAH,HEZBOLLAH'
and STONEWALLING (meta data 'redactions') via the (current) Justice Department...
trying to keep the House Intel Committee and Senate Justice investigations
from drilling down to the core.

I believe Trump thinks it can all be taken care of 'internally' to keep the sheep 'calm'.
Over my dead body. :mad:

Jamesiv1
01-11-2018, 12:34 PM
It's like everything the Trump haters have been doing since Day 1 is a mountain of total bullsh*t.

goldenequity
01-11-2018, 06:28 PM
Cassandra


Politico
Sessions creates team to focus on Hezbollah financing and drugs
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/11/jeff-sessions-justice-department-hezbollah-team-336396
(Hezbollah Hezbollah Hezbollah) (Obama Obama Obama)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Z3irgBnztw


This is (still) 'surface' reporting.
When will we get to 'what lies beneath?'
When?

goldenequity
01-12-2018, 10:18 PM
Uranium Ratline: first domino


George was way ahead of the curve on this one..

October 21st, 2017 to be exact
@ 6:25 he FIRST mentions 'Lambert'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmvX7HkoRtY


He literally 'dug' the name up by his own research... then did the background...
tracked him down to a distillery he owns in Maryland,
then visited and spoke w/ the guy and his wife a month ago and taped it...

George predicted the guy might get thrown under the bus.
Well...
He was. Today.


Mark Lambert Indicted

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bMQIkCcijRk/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEXCPYBEIoBSFryq4qpAwkIARUAAIhCGAE=&rs=AOn4CLAM-jvnPFKKEnUk9llbgF_jZY4yKw

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-president-maryland-based-transportation-company-indicted-11-counts-related-foreign
https://truepundit.com/feds-file-first-russian-uranium-linked-indictment-bribery-money-laundering-kickbacks/
https://www.fredericknewspost.com/news/crime_and_justice/cops_and_crime/feds-indict-dragon-distillery-owner-for-international-financial-crimes-tied/article_909ce3bb-9e43-5862-876d-af2897cbf1d5.html





This is what McCabe and Mueller & 'friends' always do and have ALWAYS done..
they throw an expendable, compromised underling under the bus to take the hit.
(or use em/suicide em.. or 'lean' on them for 'donations' or 'votes' or 'favors' or name it.)

He's (of course) 'guilty'... but he HAS a 'story' to tell.
Will he be 'gag ordered' like Manafort by the court?
Will he 'plea' down the charges in exchange for SILENCE?

It's just another brick on a very full load and more bricks are coming.
There's simply too much to 'quash'. Fun times ahead.





Now.. because of all the incredible work done by the crowdsourced documentation.. (kudos to 911bodysnatchers.. she did all the transcriptions)
It becomes SIMPLE to 'catch up' (for you, for journalists, for lawyers, for Congressmen, anyone... to unravel the pieces)

If you want to explore this uranium ratline further via George...
here is a link to all the hits on 'Lambert' both vids and transcripts
https://www.reddit.com/r/TruthLeaks/search?q=Lambert&restrict_sr=on

Try 'Transportation Logistics' for even more...
https://www.reddit.com/r/TruthLeaks/search?q=%27Transportation+Logistics%27&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all

and 'Tenex'
https://www.reddit.com/r/TruthLeaks/search?q=%27Tenex%27&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all

**You can use Cntrl 'F' to launch 'Find' and highlight where in the transcripts you find the word(s) :)

goldenequity
01-14-2018, 05:41 AM
George expanding/linking Cassandra with Uranium One...
(pushing out the connections to Session's task force team.. they don't miss an episode either. :) )


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpPIot7nFGQ


'Q' sez 'Hi'/Shout Out to George (that's better than a Pulitzer :D )


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDp5zPvpXRk

goldenequity
01-14-2018, 10:51 PM
Understand this:
They want us to believe that 'money' launched the dossier.
Wrong.
The background was ALREADY created. Done.
THEN given to Steele/Fusion GPS to 'market'.

It wasn't 'commissioned'... it was simply SOLD (DNC was a 'duped' CUSTOMER)
Who better to 'blame' if the whole thing went South?

It's the criminal network operating at the helms of power in Government agencies protecting ITSELF...
THROWING false 'bread crumbs' out... like 'DNC,DNC,DNC'/'RUSSIA,RUSSIA,RUSSIA'/'HEZBOLLAH,HEZBOLLAH,HEZBOLLAH'
and STONEWALLING (meta data 'redactions') via the (current) Justice Department...
trying to keep the House Intel Committee and Senate Justice investigations
from drilling down to the core.

George wants the core. :)



TRUE GENISIS


George continues to trace the CIA initiated 'footsteps' that ended up being 'packaged' and 'sold' as the 'the dossier'...

Smoking Gun (if this doc is authenticated)
With a newly disclosed GCHQ document corroborating the contact meetings between
US CIA Director John Brennan and UK/GCHQ DirectorRobert Hannigan

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DTgFPTvX0AcSuy1.jpg:large

George fits together the timeline sequences of what then transpired consequent to that meeting.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTLRWB3FjM8

Pay attention to Susan Rice footage. This is her/CIA covering their ass... and Nunes KNOWS it.
This is them USING the 'Foreign Intelligence loophole' by employing the UK GS4 operatives on US soil...
to 'legalize' the domestic surveillance on Trump et al LONG before the FISA actions.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xj8f-fdwbwU


==========

Congressman Ron DeSantis Discusses Request To Ryan For Declassification of Dossier Documents…


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQTZbXkpzqs

Watch it. You can see how far behind the curve the 'public' is (still) being mushroomed and slow footed.
Amazing ain't it.

=========

This is a pretty good write-up published today
#FusionCollusion – Congress Takes 3-Prong Approach To Surround Corrupt Intelligence and Justice Officials…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/14/fusioncollusion-congress-takes-3-prong-approach-to-surround-corrupt-intelligence-and-justice-officials/#more-144547

excellent summation of the dossier 'published parts'...
but
it's still only half the story and half the players. :)

goldenequity
01-15-2018, 09:21 AM
Uranium One
more Uranium One breadcrumbs from George....





Beyond Mark Lambert....
Is Pavel Kroupnik the next Uranium One domino? (to get to Meuller, McCabe, Rosenstein, Comey)
(Pavel Kroupnik runs US Enrichment Corp.) (Lambert married Roman Kroupnik's daughter)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ur6aEGkvCo




Nellie & Uranium?
Did Nellie Ohr have an Iridium Phone?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omZk4LRb6JA

Is the Uranium ratline now using Spacex (Iridium) Payloads to install their own (independent) Global Transport Tracking System?
(duplicating/replacing/obviating the 'need' for smuggling by using the US Naval Intelligence system)
By using the Aireon payloads, Harris (another CIA cutout company) created the Exact View RT system (to monitor/catalog Air & Sea traffic)



Unraveling The Ratline as a Business


How to 'Optimize' The Five Fingers of Uranium - HEU, EU, LEU, DU, W


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3cUO6Tw7Uw





Congressional CYA: "I Was Mis-Led!"

Since 'exposed'... the yellow cake operations were quickly suicided.. aka Trucking and Ore Reduction
and now comes the mad scramble in Western States Political Circles (Co-Conspirators)
to claim 'innocence'.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dz1UeM8u850

goldenequity
01-17-2018, 01:08 AM
953314308997505024

goldenequity
01-18-2018, 05:32 PM
Rep Matt Gaetz on FISA Corruption Memo: “Very Foundations of Our Democracy” At Risk…

Reviewing 'eyes only' summary report from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, (Nunes)
including a memo held in the Congressional Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF)
that contained previously-undisclosed information involving the Federal Bureau of Intelligence (FBI) and Department of Justice (DOJ).


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsYygeervbM



more delay & slofooting of crucial FISA corruption information KEPT hidden from US AND Congress
until AFTER the 702 vote.


[…] There will be no copies of the report handed out to House members.
Instead, a copy will be made available for them to read in a secure room in the Capitol.
They won’t be able to take the report out of the room.
But they will know the answers to the questions.

The House itself can declassify documents under certain conditions.
If enough members support declassifying the House Intel report,
then the House as a body could move to declassify the information in it.
And then the public would know.



and note that they suppressed it anyway...
DESPITE the Jan. 9 letter from DeSantis calling for its IMMEDIATE disclosure:

950822748842070021

AZJoe
01-18-2018, 07:53 PM
This thread is stacked with information.

Cleaner44
01-18-2018, 08:52 PM
Things are about to get real bad for Democrats.

I will be increasing my bet that Republicans hold the house in 2018.

pcosmar
01-18-2018, 09:21 PM
So,, is anything changing other than ownership of resources.

can I expect that the "do not detain" order has been lifted?

Can I buy a gun yet?

Cleaner44
01-18-2018, 10:01 PM
‘SH*T IS ABOUT TO HIT THE FAN’: Ex-Secret Service Agent Warns ‘Devastating’ FISA Memo Set To ‘Expose’ Obama
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/sht-hit-fan-ex-secret-service-agent-warns-devastating-fisa-memo-set-expose-obama/

GOP lawmakers demand that 'alarming' memo on FISA abuses be made public
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/18/gop-lawmakers-demand-alarming-memo-on-fisa-abuses-be-made-public.html

goldenequity
01-18-2018, 10:44 PM
If you've been reading this thread you know a LOT more than is being said here...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Q1K-ARVmq0

AZJoe
01-19-2018, 07:10 AM
#ReleasetheMemo (https://twitter.com/hashtag/ReleasetheMemo?src=hash)

“It is so alarming the American people have to see this. It's troubling. It is shocking,”” Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan

“Part of me wishes that I didn't read it because I don’t want to believe that those kinds of things could be happening in this country that I call home and love so much.” North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows

“I believe the consequence of its release will be major changes in people currently working at the FBI and the Department of Justice,” Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz

"not only will the release of this memo result in DOJ firing, but people will go to jail." Rep. Matt Gatetz

AZJoe
01-19-2018, 07:14 AM
954185054430924801

AZJoe
01-19-2018, 07:15 AM
954163652650782720

954194729511636992

954199802790768644

954135581247684609

954154734658707457

954098030457663488

954475100262354944

AuH20
01-19-2018, 07:32 AM
I seriously doubt the memo gets released. The republicans are in on it.

AuH20
01-19-2018, 07:39 AM
This is how it will break down. There will be calls from McCain and others that the sacred offices of the FBI & DOJ must be spared from the public outcry. In other words, don't expect any memo.

I wish some renegade HoR member would release it illegally, just for amusement.

timosman
01-19-2018, 01:32 PM
This is how it will break down. There will be calls from McCain and others that the sacred offices of the FBI & DOJ must be spared from the public outcry. In other words, don't expect any memo.

I wish some renegade HoR member would release it illegally, just for amusement.

Why doesn't one of the congresscritters just read it on the floor of the congress?

FSP-Rebel
01-19-2018, 02:41 PM
http://i65.tinypic.com/2im0qx5.jpg

Swordsmyth
01-19-2018, 04:36 PM
House GOP members have approached Speaker Paul Ryan about incorporating a vote to make public an explosive new FISA abuse memo (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-18/explosive-shocking-and-alarming-fisa-memo-set-rock-dc-end-mueller-investigation) as part of government shutdown negotiations.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-19/house-conservatives-want-bombshell-memo-released-part-shutdown-talks

phill4paul
01-19-2018, 04:39 PM
I seriously doubt the memo gets released. The republicans are in on it.

I'm in agreement. When was the last time heads have rolled in Washington for anything? Nobody will condemn another because they fear condemnation themselves.

TER
01-19-2018, 04:56 PM
It is coming out today. The Day of reckoning for the Deep S. T A T. E

Be safe everyone!

TER
01-19-2018, 05:00 PM
I'm in agreement. When was the last time heads have rolled in Washington for anything? Nobody will condemn another because they fear condemnation themselves.

When was the last time we had a Patriot in the White House?

Let the draining of the swamp commence!

phill4paul
01-19-2018, 05:07 PM
When was the last time we had a Patriot in the White House?

Let the draining of the swamp commence!

Lol.

Swordsmyth
01-19-2018, 05:08 PM
When was the last time we had a Patriot in the White House?

Let the draining of the swamp commence!

I will join your enthusiasm when something substantive happens, until then I remain merely open minded and reliant on GOD and his wisdom to decide what is the best outcome that our country deserves.

TER
01-19-2018, 05:08 PM
Lol.

:)

REMEMBER THIS DAY

TER
01-19-2018, 05:13 PM
I will join your enthusiasm when something substantive happens, until then I remain merely open minded and reliant on GOD and his wisdom to decide what is the best outcome that our country deserves.

Of course we remain reliant upon God. That goes without saying.

I think we shall see some big things happening in the VERY near future. Be optimistic! The satanist are on the run! The pedophiles are now the prey! The swamp has already started to be drained... build the case, get all the ducks in the row, and then round them up. This is a war and requires strategy and timing.

By the end of this year, the swamp will be drained significantly. For this we should praise God.

TER
01-19-2018, 05:17 PM
This is how it will break down. There will be calls from McCain and others that the sacred offices of the FBI & DOJ must be spared from the public outcry. In other words, don't expect any memo.

I wish some renegade HoR member would release it illegally, just for amusement.

The President has the authority to declassify it. That is the trump card in his hand.

This memo will be released, and the world will see who the criminals are and where the real collusion is.

phill4paul
01-19-2018, 05:21 PM
The President has the authority to declassify it. That is the trump card in his hand.

This memo will be released, and the world will see who the criminals are and where the real collusion is.

Why hasn't it been?

Swordsmyth
01-19-2018, 05:22 PM
Of course we remain reliant upon God. That goes without saying.

I think we shall see some big things happening in the VERY near future. Be optimistic! The satanist are on the run! The pedophiles are now the prey! The swamp has already started to be drained... build the case, get all the ducks in the row, and then round them up. This is a war and requires strategy and timing.

By the end of this year, the swamp will be drained significantly. For this we should praise God.

I want you to be correct but nothing ever happened about the Roy Moore voter fraud that was supposed to be some kind of trap set by Sessions.

TER
01-19-2018, 05:23 PM
Why hasn't it been?

He is against an entire machine, with the weight of trillions of dollars behind it and the entire mainstream media and online social website industrial complexes (twitter, Facebook) against him.

It has to come out because of the outcry of the people. By the representatives of the people. By the House intelligence Committee. That is the most effective way and must be first attempted because the fallout will be huge.

TER
01-19-2018, 05:26 PM
I want you to be correct but nothing ever happened about the Roy Moore voter fraud that was supposed to be some kind of trap set by Sessions.

Don’t be so sure. The DHS is now involved. They don’t need to get the State’s permission to get the voter data.

This is all going to plan. It will play out in the coming months as we approach the midterms...

Gaddafi Duck
01-19-2018, 05:39 PM
Why hasn't it been?

Because Trump is incredibly shrewd. I know people like to think they're smarter than him, but he's an incredibly sharp individual. If I were in his shoes, I would have declassified and dumped all of this months ago--however, he's playing it much better. He's having a "hands-off" approach to this. That way his critics cannot have anything to point to him ceasing the investigation into him. He knows he cannot directly fire Mueller without that starting impeachment proceedings. So, he's having Congress do the work for him. Methodically, the truth is coming out and is grinding away at the Democrats' narrative. Memos are coming out gradually that are neutering the Mueller investigation.

Many people ridicule Jeff Sessions for his impotence. I differ. I think he's behind the scenes disarming the Deep State. He made the mistake by hastily recusing himself, but perhaps in the long-run it was for the best.

I've always thought Trump was either incredibly smart or incredibly lucky because many things seem to break his way. Remember, this guy not only beat Hillary Clinton with Obama spying on his campaign, but he bested 16 or 17 other of the top Republicans in the primaries with the RNC rigging it. I think he's very shrewd---I think it's waaaay too coincidental that Rosenstein appointed Mueller, and based on the talk around this FISA memo, Rosenstein will be fired (and may go to jail), and based on the IG report about Uranium One, Mueller will be implicated. This story is way too perfect to be coincidental---I have to think Trump is having a hand in all of this behind the scenes with Jeff Sessions.

The brilliance of Trump is that he keeps his opponents from getting their footing and keeps them guessing. To everyone else, he seems volatile and changes his mind every 2 minutes when in reality he doesn't. He just makes you THINK he does. So you spend more time thinking about his position than yours. Time after time his opponents fall into this trap. And people refuse to give him credit because to them it's insulting to think he is that smart...and yet, he's the President of the United States. That's not easy to do given he was accused of everything under the sun and STILL won.

TER
01-19-2018, 05:42 PM
Because Trump is incredibly shrewd. I know people like to think they're smarter than him, but he's an incredibly sharp individual. If I were in his shoes, I would have declassified and dumped all of this months ago--however, he's playing it much better. He's having a "hands-off" approach to this. That way his critics cannot have anything to point to him ceasing the investigation into him. He knows he cannot directly fire Mueller without that starting impeachment proceedings. So, he's having Congress do the work for him. Methodically, the truth is coming out and is grinding away at the Democrats' narrative. Memos are coming out gradually that are neutering the Mueller investigation.

Many people ridicule Jeff Sessions for his impotence. I differ. I think he's behind the scenes disarming the Deep State. He made the mistake by hastily recusing himself, but perhaps in the long-run it was for the best.

I've always thought Trump was either incredibly smart or incredibly lucky because many things seem to break his way. Remember, this guy not only beat Hillary Clinton with Obama spying on his campaign, but he bested 16 or 17 other of the top Republicans in the primaries with the RNC rigging it. I think he's very shrewd---I think it's waaaay too coincidental that Rosenstein appointed Mueller, and based on the talk around this FISA memo, Rosenstein will be fired, and based on the IG report about Uranium One, Mueller will be implicated. This story is way too perfect to be coincidental---I have to think Trump is having a hand in all of this behind the scenes with Jeff Sessions.

Very observant.

And Mueller has been promised a pardon and is playing ball now for the white hats.

dannno
01-19-2018, 05:54 PM
The swamp has already started to be drained... build the case, get all the ducks in the row, and then round them up. This is a war and requires strategy and timing.

But Trump said he would drain the swamp on the first day in office!!

http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/cartoonhalloffame/images/8/8e/247980000000000084.png/revision/latest?cb=20130702230124


(Actually, no he didn't)

Gaddafi Duck
01-19-2018, 05:58 PM
Don’t be so sure. The DHS is now involved. They don’t need to get the State’s permission to get the voter data.

This is all going to plan. It will play out in the coming months as we approach the midterms...

Yep, I think DACA was punted to 2018 to put pressure on RINOs and make the primaries about immigration. It then makes Democrats look ridiculous they want amnesty for illegals to appease their Leftist base. There won't be a DACA deal, which will encourage even further Leftist Democrats to run, which won't win in a 2018 general vs. a Republican.

Also, I think drawing out the misery in the scandals Congress/IG is looking into is going to be a cold shower on Democrats. They're very arrogant at the moment, and I think 2018 may go completely the other direction from what people are anticipating.

TER
01-19-2018, 06:00 PM
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/0a805e00499bf813335ef97ceab87862bff9605ceb2980fd69 fdfbb45074d3b8.png

TER
01-19-2018, 06:05 PM
Yep, I think DACA was punted to 2018 to put pressure on RINOs and make the primaries about immigration. It then makes Democrats look ridiculous they want amnesty for illegals to appease their Leftist base. There won't be a DACA deal, which will encourage even further Leftist Democrats to run, which won't win in a 2018 general vs. a Republican.

Also, I think drawing out the misery in the scandals Congress/IG is looking into is going to be a cold shower on Democrats. They're very arrogant at the moment, and I think 2018 may go completely the other direction from what people are anticipating.

I am anticipating a GOP landslide in November. The democrats are leaderless, have lost any meaningful focus as a party, have pitted themselves against the blue collared workers and whites in general, and will be crippled by the scandals which will be revealed in full in the course of this year.

I don’t think we see a Democrat majority in the House for a long time...

TER
01-19-2018, 06:09 PM
Also, the most corrupt politicians from both sides have lost their funding from the Saudis. The fake resistance parties like Antifa have also lost significant funding (bye bye Soros). The Rothschilds are on the run. The puppet strings are being cut and that is why a record amount are not seeking re election or being forced out because of “sexual misconduct” (read: we have the goods on you, go out with sexual misconduct or we will expose your more serious sins (treason) to the world).

TER
01-19-2018, 06:12 PM
http://thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/official-gop-lawmakers-request-release-classified-explosive-fisa-memo/

BREAKING=> It’s Official! Ten GOP Lawmakers Petition Chairman Nunes to Release Classified and Explosive FISA Memo #ReleaseTheMemo

timosman
01-19-2018, 06:16 PM
..

Valli6
01-19-2018, 06:33 PM
If this is really so bad, why didn't they release it before voting to reauthorize FISA?

TER
01-19-2018, 06:45 PM
What do you mean?

goldenequity
01-19-2018, 07:45 PM
If this is really so bad, why didn't they release it before voting to reauthorize FISA?
That of course is a great question... we can only guess.
Most of us will guess the same thing. :cool:

What may still be interesting to watch:
Trump STILL has to sign the extension into law... and
I think he will... but
the timing of the memo release (if very soon)
will cause the eyes and minds of the Nation (and select anti 702 voices)
to turn directly to and challenge Truimp to NOT sign it.
That would be fun.

==========

too late..

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/trump-tweet-fisa-2.jpg

FSP-Rebel
01-19-2018, 08:06 PM
954489206344175617
954490221172789248

FSP-Rebel
01-19-2018, 08:15 PM
954530939539017728

Mach
01-20-2018, 02:10 AM
A collection of Fox clips, everyone is so shocked they can't believe it. :eek:

I have to say, I'm pumped...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Hb-RIGA-Mk

AZJoe
01-20-2018, 06:42 AM
63 House law makers sign petititon (http://thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/official-gop-lawmakers-request-release-classified-explosive-fisa-memo/) to release the memo

RJB
01-20-2018, 07:37 AM
I am anticipating a GOP landslide in November. The democrats are leaderless, have lost any meaningful focus as a party, have pitted themselves against the blue collared workers and whites in general, and will be crippled by the scandals which will be revealed in full in the course of this year.

This is why they lost. For years their bread and butter was the blue collar working class. In this last election the working man became the uneducated redneck in their eyes. I know a few die-hard union workers who never voted republican in the past (NEVER), who voted for Trump. If anything the democrats didn't learn their lesson, in fact their rhetoric has increased.

I don't quite share your optimism, but regardless, there are interesting times ahead.

AZJoe
01-20-2018, 07:46 AM
https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/trump-tweet-fisa-2.jpg

954336411129442304

Leave it to Trump to continue the police state total surveillance, enabling more future abuses.

He says the total surveillance/FISA/police state was abused. FISA is an abuse itself. NSA total surveillance is an abuse itself.

KingNothing
01-20-2018, 09:43 AM
Because Trump is incredibly shrewd. I know people like to think they're smarter than him, but he's an incredibly sharp individual. If I were in his shoes, I would have declassified and dumped all of this months ago--however, he's playing it much better. He's having a "hands-off" approach to this. That way his critics cannot have anything to point to him ceasing the investigation into him. He knows he cannot directly fire Mueller without that starting impeachment proceedings. So, he's having Congress do the work for him. Methodically, the truth is coming out and is grinding away at the Democrats' narrative. Memos are coming out gradually that are neutering the Mueller investigation.

Many people ridicule Jeff Sessions for his impotence. I differ. I think he's behind the scenes disarming the Deep State. He made the mistake by hastily recusing himself, but perhaps in the long-run it was for the best.

I've always thought Trump was either incredibly smart or incredibly lucky because many things seem to break his way. Remember, this guy not only beat Hillary Clinton with Obama spying on his campaign, but he bested 16 or 17 other of the top Republicans in the primaries with the RNC rigging it. I think he's very shrewd---I think it's waaaay too coincidental that Rosenstein appointed Mueller, and based on the talk around this FISA memo, Rosenstein will be fired (and may go to jail), and based on the IG report about Uranium One, Mueller will be implicated. This story is way too perfect to be coincidental---I have to think Trump is having a hand in all of this behind the scenes with Jeff Sessions.

The brilliance of Trump is that he keeps his opponents from getting their footing and keeps them guessing. To everyone else, he seems volatile and changes his mind every 2 minutes when in reality he doesn't. He just makes you THINK he does. So you spend more time thinking about his position than yours. Time after time his opponents fall into this trap. And people refuse to give him credit because to them it's insulting to think he is that smart...and yet, he's the President of the United States. That's not easy to do given he was accused of everything under the sun and STILL won.


I agree with all of this, and I'd add that the beauty of things from Trump's perspective is that he really doesn't have to be a genius to do anything that he's done so far in politics. He simply needs to be clean and aware of how those around him are not. If he just holds his cards close to his vest and never overplays his hand, sooner or later his opponents are forced to reveal theirs -- and because they've got literally decades of corruption and incompetence behind them, they can NEVER actually win.

goldenequity
01-20-2018, 11:13 AM
What's (so far) LOST in media/congressional reporting is not JUST the FBI's role... but the CIA's collusion as well. They (CIA) were the GENESIS.


It wasn't 'commissioned'... it was simply SOLD (DNC was a 'duped' CUSTOMER)


TRUE GENISIS
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?518365-Fraud-Upon-the-FISA-Court-Confirmed&p=6574820&viewfull=1#post6574820

this morning/True Pundit...

954380611808088064

goldenequity
01-20-2018, 12:18 PM
The Comey Memos



►Understand that the 'Comey memos'; his 'interview with Trump' birthed the Mueller investigation.

►Understand that the 'Comey memos' have never seen the light of day.

►Understand That New York justice system is obstructing...


New York court breaks rules, refuses investigation into James Comey
https://truepundit.com/new-york-court-breaks-rules-refuses-investigation-james-comey/

https://i0.wp.com/truepundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/170509-james-comey-feature.jpg?resize=1200%2C575&ssl=1


The New York courts have refused to pursue an investigation against former FBI Director James Comey and several other major figures involved in the Clinton email scandal, seemingly breaking their own rules in the process.

Ty Clevenger, a lawyer, had filed grievances against Mr. Comey and three others saying they violated fundamental rules of lawyers’ ethics by the way they handled the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails.

The New York grievance commission, in a letter dated earlier this month, rejected all of the complaints without comment.

Under the commission’s own rules it is supposed to provide “a brief description of the basis for the determination,” so the move to dismiss the grievances without any reason was striking.

“The independent review has now taken place and I have been formally advised that the committee decided not to proceed further with your complaints,” Jorge Dopico, the chief attorney for the disciplinary committee’s first judicial department, said in the Jan. 9 letter.

“Accordingly, we cannot be of further assistance in these matters,” he concluded.


►Understand That Sessions Justice Department is obstructing...


Fitton: One Step Closer to Facts About James Comey Memos
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/01/18/one-step-closer-facts-comey-memos/


U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg has given us an important victory in our quest for the truth about former FBI Director James Comey and his infamous memos.

Boasberg ruled that the FBI must turn over to the court for in camera, non-public review of Comey’s memos allegedly detailing conversations he had with President Donald Trump.

The court, in seeking to review the documents, shows it does not trust the FBI or Justice Department’s representations about the memos. We hope now that Americans are one step closer to knowing the facts about these memos, which were written and leaked for pernicious purposes to target a sitting president with a criminal investigation. It’s high time they begin to see the light of day. We’re glad the court followed up on our specific suggestion that it review the documents directly.

The court order tells the government to turn over the Comey memos for review by January 18. In doing so, the court rejects arguments by the Sessions Justice Department to dismiss the lawsuits seeking the Comey information.



==========
KingNothing Gaddafi Duck

I don't know what this guy has been smoking... but you'll probably like it. :)



Combating The Deep State Online (https://truepundit.com/combating-deep-state-online/)

AZJoe
01-20-2018, 12:33 PM
The Comey Memos
►Understand that the 'Comey memos'; his 'interview with Trump' birthed the Mueller investigation.
►Understand that the 'Comey memos' have never seen the light of day.
►Understand That New York justice system is obstructing...
►Understand That Sessions Justice Department is obstructing...
Combating The Deep State Online (https://truepundit.com/combating-deep-state-online/)

https://i.imgflip.com/231lcb.jpg

AZJoe
01-20-2018, 02:05 PM
Enough with the political circus and show-boating. Someone needs to go Adam Schiff and just leak the memo and the supporting evidence.

goldenequity
01-21-2018, 07:05 PM
FBI Mysteriously “Loses” Five Months of Text Messages Between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/21/fbi-mysteriously-loses-five-months-of-text-messages-between-peter-strzok-and-lisa-page/
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/21/fbi-failed-preserve-anti-trump-texts/

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/mccabe-page-baker-w-strzok-inset.jpg?w=640&h=400

a disclosure by top FBI officials that text messages between Strzok and Page have gone missing.

According to information relayed to Senator Ron Johnson, the period of time the FBI has “lost”
is from December 14th, 2016 to May 17th, 2017, the exact day that Special Counsel Robert Mueller was assigned to lead the Russia collusion probe.

Stephen Boyd, the assistant attorney general for legislative affairs at the Justice Department attributed the failure to:

“misconfiguration issues related to rollouts, provisioning, and software upgrades that conflicted with the FBI’s collection capabilities.”

“The result was that data that should have been automatically collected and retained for long-term storage and retrieval was not collected,”


===========

TER
01-21-2018, 07:22 PM
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/6930ad90bc6f24488bea94bf6bc9b7b7de96431abd82b7013b 3009db119afcbf.jpeg

TER
01-21-2018, 07:23 PM
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/d07efa9cf74b0dd8a50290ba4bfa649cfd0f47e900b8eeaf60 fbb82305bc9106.png

TER
01-21-2018, 07:34 PM
FBI Mysteriously “Loses” Five Months of Text Messages Between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/21/fbi-mysteriously-loses-five-months-of-text-messages-between-peter-strzok-and-lisa-page/
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/21/fbi-failed-preserve-anti-trump-texts/

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/mccabe-page-baker-w-strzok-inset.jpg?w=640&h=400

a disclosure by top FBI officials that text messages between Strzok and Page have gone missing.

According to information relayed to Senator Ron Johnson, the period of time the FBI has “lost”
is from December 14th, 2016 to May 17th, 2017, the exact day that Special Counsel Robert Mueller was assigned to lead the Russia collusion probe.

Stephen Boyd, the assistant attorney general for legislative affairs at the Justice Department attributed the failure to:

“misconfiguration issues related to rollouts, provisioning, and software upgrades that conflicted with the FBI’s collection capabilities.”

“The result was that data that should have been automatically collected and retained for long-term storage and retrieval was not collected,”


===========

“Nothing is ever truly deleted/erased”

goldenequity
01-21-2018, 08:25 PM
FBI Mysteriously “Loses” Five Months of Text Messages Between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/21/fbi-mysteriously-loses-five-months-of-text-messages-between-peter-strzok-and-lisa-page/
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/21/fbi-failed-preserve-anti-trump-texts/



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YALiXy8nuXo

Zippyjuan
01-21-2018, 08:53 PM
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/d07efa9cf74b0dd8a50290ba4bfa649cfd0f47e900b8eeaf60 fbb82305bc9106.png

Except they aren't releasing the memo. WikiLeaks is offering $1 million for a copy (what, their hackers aren't good enough to get one?)

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/954185054430924801

It is real- they just don't want people to see what it actually says- might be different from what they claim it does. (though Republicans also wrote the memo- including Nunes).


Even the most plugged-in news consumer could be forgiven for thinking the classified memo is an executive branch document that exposes wrongdoing within the Justice Department and the FBI. It isn’t.

The document, which alleges abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act during the FBI’s quiet counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign in the final months of the 2016 election, was actually compiled by Republican staffers on the House Intelligence Committee. That committee voted along partisan lines this week to allow any member of Congress to take a peek at the document themselves. Republican members soon flocked to a secure room to read the memo written by their allies — and then ran to tell the press about it.


Is there actually a new bombshell in the report? It’s possible. But the motives and track records of the Republican lawmakers behind the media blitz surrounding the memo suggest there may be less to it than they claim.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), who chairs the committee that cooked up the document, had been the public face of the GOP push to undermine the Mueller probe, although he’d taken a backseat as of late. Last year, Nunes was involved in an embarrassing episode in which he briefed President Trump on information he received from a source he wouldn’t name. It later turned out he’d met that person on White House grounds.

TER
01-21-2018, 09:03 PM
How about this Zippy.

If they don’t release the memo in the next two months, I will never post on this site again.

If they do release the memo in the next two months, you will never post on this site again.

Deal?

TER
01-21-2018, 09:17 PM
Uh, Zippy, would you like to shake on it?

Zippyjuan
01-21-2018, 09:19 PM
Uh, Zippy, would you like to shake on it?

Politicians are too darned unpredictable to be worth betting on. Who would have thought that Nixon would go to China? Or that Trump would, well, have dinner with China?

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-russia-mueller-fbi-doj-house-gop_us_5a613a58e4b01d91b25446b5


Some conservatives have urged caution, worrying that Republicans are overhyping a secret document. Republicans “should not oversell” the report, conservative commentator Hugh Hewitt wrote. Over at the conservative blog Hot Air, Ed Morrissey wondered if it was a “set-up for a let-down.” He argued the memo should be released, but warned conservatives to “not go all-in on it until we have a chance to see it for ourselves. In the meantime, remember that most things that seem too good to be true usually are.”

TER
01-21-2018, 09:27 PM
Politicians are too darned unpredictable to be worth betting on. Who would have thought that Nixon would go to China? Or that Trump would, well, have dinner with China?

Please enlighten us as to why you are here.

goldenequity
01-22-2018, 12:51 AM
What you (really) need to understand...
is that the continuing 'obstruction' within agency circles, intelligence circles and DOJ...
is not about 'partisanship' or 'trump revenge' syndrome.

Sure. They were all pro-Hillary/anti-Trump... but WHY???
Because of some progressive ethic or liberal ethos?
Don't make me laugh. They didn't & don't give a rat's ass.

We know EXACTLY why... and we know (more) of 'what' they are (still) trying to 'protect'.
It sure as HELL isn't the 'democratic ideals' of the Obama admin, Chuck Schumer or Adam Schiff.

It's a crime enterprise.
It's theft at it's very root.
and (I'm convinced/starting to understand) the TAP root is Uranium.
The theft and piracy in that single element FAR transcends 'Uranium One' by decades.

It's the perfect commodity... radioactive gold.
A quarter pound of simple 'LOW enriched' is $8M.
'Highly' enriched is much, much more.

Best of all....
You have to have 'color of law' to even go NEAR it... never mind 'lead suits' hahaha.
It's perfect.

What if someone were to tell you..
that the '20% to Russia' Uranium One 'deal' was being done to try and BACKFILL
Uranium LONG since stolen.....
to 'quietly' try and REPLACE missing stock piles of uranium...

Ha! It gives an entirely new meaning to the word 'depleted' uranium.

But wait! There's More! :)

Put a small chunk 'on top' and transport it. To/From US ports.
What could you (also) put 'underneath' it?
ans: ANYTHING that would fit.
See where we're going with this????

timosman
01-22-2018, 01:15 AM
What you (really) need to understand...
is that the continuing 'obstruction' within agency circles, intelligence circles and DOJ...
is not about 'partisanship' or 'trump revenge' syndrome.

Sure. They were all pro-Hillary/anti-Trump... but WHY???
Because of some progressive ethic or liberal ethos?
Don't make me laugh. They didn't & don't give a rat's ass.

We know EXACTLY why... and we know (more) of 'what' they are (still) trying to 'protect'.
It sure as HELL isn't the 'democratic ideals' of the Obama admin, Chuck Schumer or Adam Schiff.

It's a crime enterprise.
It's theft at it's very root.
and (I'm convinced/starting to understand) the TAP root is Uranium.
The theft and piracy in that single element FAR transcends 'Uranium One' by decades.

It's the perfect commodity... radioactive gold.
A quarter pound of simple 'enriched' is $8M.
'Highly' enriched is much, much more.

Best of all....
You have to have 'color of law' to even go NEAR it... never mind 'lead suits' hahaha.
It's perfect.

What if someone were to tell you..
that the '20% to Russia' Uranium One 'deal' was being done to try and BACKFILL
Uranium LONG since stolen.....
to 'quietly' try and REPLACE missing stock piles of uranium...

Ha! It gives an entirely new meaning to the word 'depleted' uranium.


You have to admit these whores are cheap. I wonder if they use it in their defense - well, we fucked up the entire country many times over, but we only got a few millions for ourselves out of it. Are you still mad?:confused:

goldenequity
01-22-2018, 03:41 AM
You have to admit these whores are cheap. I wonder if they use it in their defense - well, we $#@!ed up the entire country many times over, but we only got a few millions for ourselves out of it. Are you still mad?:confused:

hahaha... yes. we're VERY mad. :mad:
and don't get this wrong... I'm only talking about a 'tap root'... all the other 'roots' and entrepreneurial spin offs are still there... 'secrets', sex, drugs, weapons etc. etc.
The 'whole thing' is what's at stake for these parasites... and yes Virginia, that includes sloppy steve.

goldenequity
01-22-2018, 08:06 AM
But wait! There's More! :)

Put a small chunk 'on top' and transport it. To/From US ports.
What could you (also) put 'underneath' it?
ans: ANYTHING that would fit.
See where we're going with this????

http://www.wnti.co.uk/media/4246/31.jpeghttp://www.wnti.co.uk/media/29524/uranium-concentrate-drums.jpeg
http://docplayer.net/docs-images/40/12527664/images/page_20.jpg

goldenequity
01-22-2018, 11:45 AM
Question: Guess who the World's top producer of Uranium is?




January 16, 2017
Trump welcomes Kazakhstan president to White House
https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation-politics/trump-welcomes-kazakhstan-president-to-white-house/

https://mapi.associatedpress.com/v1/items/86b65d2d0c1c42d18a13eb9cf46a713e/preview/preview.jpg?s=690x


(Kazakhstan climbed to the top position on the uranium production ranking in 2009 with almost 28% of the total world’s output,
then 33% in 2010,
rising to 41% in 2014)

========


Jan. 10, 2017
World’s top uranium producer Kazakhstan to cut output by 10%
http://www.mining.com/worlds-top-uranium-producer-kazakhstan-to-cut-output-by-10/
(they're not stupid...)

WAPO
August 29, 2017
A uranium bank just opened in Kazakhstan
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/a-uranium-bank-just-opened-in-kazakhstan-to-stop-the-spread-of-nukes/2017/08/29/fd19fc9a-8c63-11e7-a2b0-e68cbf0b1f19_story.html?utm_term=.657277a65d7d

https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1484w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2017/08/29/Others/Images/2017-08-29/IMG_3674.JPG?uuid=vyvYDIzEEeecU2oWm-sJUw

The International Atomic Energy Agency’s low-enriched uranium bank, opened Tuesday in Kazakhstan.

The Washington-based non-profit provided the initial funding for the bank
courtesy of a $50 million investment from American billionaire investor Warren Buffett.

The agency, which will run the “bank” independently of any country, (oh.. thank goodness! :) )
will purchase and store.....
(U235)low-enriched uranium, fuel for civilian reactors
but not an ingredient for nuclear weapons. (ya just gotta spin it up to U238 :cool: )



Think 'gold' instead of Uranium.

goldenequity
01-22-2018, 12:36 PM
Did you KNOW: You can 'reverse' HIGHLY back to LOW?

It's called 'down blending'.

Why would you do that?

Same reason you would 'cut' PURE Heroin with lactose or powdered sugar....
it creates MORE of it to sell.

Uranium Christmas

1991: When the Soviet Union was being sold off by the pound...
Russian oligarchs were being created over night.
Should I fill in the blanks 4 you?
U238/HIGHLY was being moved around the globe like candy.


==========

►Guess which agency is tasked with all Uranium 'security' in the US? (since 1992 +/-)

The FBI :D (hello Bob, Andy)

►Guess who is tasked with monitoring the 'transport' of all US Uranium worldwide?

NASA

►Guess who is the biggest 'customer' (by far) in the United States for Uranium?

Navy

►Guess where the 'creation' of the CIA came from?

Naval Intelligence (hello steve)

Swordsmyth
01-22-2018, 04:13 PM
FBI Mysteriously “Loses” Five Months of Text Messages Between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/21/fbi-mysteriously-loses-five-months-of-text-messages-between-peter-strzok-and-lisa-page/
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/21/fbi-failed-preserve-anti-trump-texts/

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/mccabe-page-baker-w-strzok-inset.jpg?w=640&h=400

a disclosure by top FBI officials that text messages between Strzok and Page have gone missing.

According to information relayed to Senator Ron Johnson, the period of time the FBI has “lost”
is from December 14th, 2016 to May 17th, 2017, the exact day that Special Counsel Robert Mueller was assigned to lead the Russia collusion probe.

Stephen Boyd, the assistant attorney general for legislative affairs at the Justice Department attributed the failure to:

“misconfiguration issues related to rollouts, provisioning, and software upgrades that conflicted with the FBI’s collection capabilities.”

“The result was that data that should have been automatically collected and retained for long-term storage and retrieval was not collected,”


===========

FBI Says 5 Months Of Texts "Lost," Yet IG Horowitz Says His Office Received Them In Augusthttps://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-22/whos-lying-fbi-says-5-months-texts-lost-yet-ig-horowitz-says-his-office-received

enhanced_deficit
01-22-2018, 04:49 PM
Is this same material that is supposedly in the explosive memo that is not being released to public?

If so, as noted elsewhere this could be potentially very good news for Trump and respected WH advisor Jared Kushner as this could negate the very basis of witchhunt "Russia gate" scandal.


Quote:
If the claims being made about this memo are factual, that could undermine the very basis for Mueller investigation ?

IF that turned out to be the case, then all the secondary gates/scandals linked to/stemmed from original "Russia gate" (such as Israel-Flynn gate (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?517312-Breaking-Flynn-says-Trump-directed-him-to-make-contact-with-Russians&), Bannon claimed Kushner money laundering gate (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?518162-The-Kushner-s***-is-greasy-Bannon-predicts-Mueller-will-roll-up-president-s-son-in-law&), latest Peggy Peterson-Michael Cohen (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?518567-Never-Trumpers-doing-excessive-Stormy-Daniels-porn-searches&p=6576479&viewfull=1#post6576479) gate etc) would also become moot?

This would be huge news if confirmed.

goldenequity
01-22-2018, 06:15 PM
With the above background in mind.. we can (also) turn attention to this...



Gulftainer - Port Canaveral (A 'greased' 35 year no-bid no-vetting lease on American soil to... you won't believe it. :) )



Published on Jan 18, 2018

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c74R87RBw0A




►https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Port_Canaveral_Occasional_Paper_12-23-16.pdf



==================

►http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/11/04/saddam-hussein-port-canaveral/
►https://www.1776channel.com/2017/11/16/national-security/port-canaverals-gulftainer-in-joint-venture-with-russian-club-k-container-missile-exporter/
►http://www.themaritimestandard.com/gulftainer-co-hosts-sharjah-business-summit/
►https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2006/2/17/187920/-
►http://edition.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/08/port.security/
►https://www.thebusinessyear.com/sharjah-2016/strong-in-choppy-waters/interview
►https://www.menaherald.com/en/money/finance-investment/gulftainer-co-hosts-sharjah-business-summit-spotlights-supply-chain
►https://alsharqi.co/sharjah-business-summit-2017/
►https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/10/28/ned_ryun_put_cfius_members_under_oath_to_explain_w hy_they_approved_uranium_one_deal.html
►►►http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/obama-era-uranium-deal/
►https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/nov/23/new-systems-must-be-put-in-place-that-can-detect-m/
►https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Railroad#/media/File:NASA_KSC_Railroad_map.png
►►►http://theamericanreport.org/2016/09/22/obama-clinton-handed-port-canaveral-to-brother-of-saddam-husseins-nuclear-bomb-mastermind/
►http://www.sharjahupdate.com/tag/gulftainer/
►https://www.reuters.com/article/us-gulftainer-russia-port/uaes-gulftainer-to-buy-stake-in-russias-ust-luga-port-report-idUSBRE90L06020130122

**Credit: Zeeda Andrews For this Research.

AuH20
01-22-2018, 06:18 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8nnD17ZNrg

AuH20
01-22-2018, 06:21 PM
Hmmmm.


In the meantime, some Republican senators are curious about the memo’s contents.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., made an effort to gain access to the memo, but was rejected, his spokesman, Sergio Gor, confirmed to the Washington Examiner on Saturday.

Swordsmyth
01-22-2018, 06:26 PM
Hmmmm.

Source?

it sounds like they know he will see to it that it gets out one way or another and they want to keep that power.

goldenequity
01-22-2018, 06:53 PM
thanx to DamianTV for the heads up...

FOX has scrubbed the source material for the OP (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?518365-Fraud-Upon-the-FISA-Court-Confirmed&p=6573133&viewfull=1#post6573133) (Sara Carter piece as well)

Here is the source article: (https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/10/confirmation-doj-and-fbi-used-steele-dossier-for-application-to-fisa-court-for-search-authority-on-trump-campaign/#more-144424) (see 4 yourself :mad: )

The critical importance of Sarah''s piece as well as the FOX video interviewing Sarah...
was laying out how the 'about query' scam was (and IS) being run.

That is a VITAL understanding... not for the dossier (only)..
but exactly HOW agents and agencies are and have been using it
to set up 'color of law' sting operations on deep state targets across the country
using the Fusion centers and JTTF.

Swordsmyth
01-22-2018, 07:27 PM
DOJ Begins Probe Of 'Missing' Anti-Trump FBI Texts, "Will Leave No Stone Unturned"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-22/doj-begins-probe-missing-fbi-texts-will-leave-no-stone-unturned

goldenequity
01-22-2018, 08:15 PM
another 'slight' check on executive power is now gone....

House Spending Bill Changes Law to Let Trump Administration Secretly Shift Intelligence Money
https://theintercept.com/2018/01/17/section-504-house-spending-bill-changes-law-to-let-trump-administration-secretly-shift-intelligence-money/

FSP-Rebel
01-22-2018, 09:24 PM
955638105637343232

Danke
01-22-2018, 09:30 PM
How about this Zippy.

If they don’t release the memo in the next two months, I will never post on this site again.

If they do release the memo in the next two months, you will never post on this site again.

Deal?


Which Zippy are you addressing?

goldenequity
01-22-2018, 09:45 PM
955638105637343232

http://i469.photobucket.com/albums/rr55/goldenequity/q.jpg

Swordsmyth
01-23-2018, 12:21 AM
Congressional investigators learned from a new batch of text messages between anti-Trump FBI investigators that a "secret society of folks" within the Department of Justice and the FBI may have come together in the "immediate aftermath" of the 2016 election to undermine President Trump, according to Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) who has reviewed the texts.

The new texts were included in a 384-page DOJ document release to Congressional investigators last Friday - during which Congress was notified in the cover letter that that five months of text messages from December 14, 2016 to May 17, 2017 have gone missing (If only the NSA had copies).

Ratcliffe was joined by Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) to discuss the latest developments with Fox News host Martha McCallum, when Ratcliffe said:

What we learned today in the thousands of text messages that weve reviewed that perhaps they may not have done that (checked their bias at the door). There's certainly a factual basis to question whether or not they acted on that bias. We know about this insurance policy that was referenced in trying to prevent Donald Trump from becoming president.

We learned today from information that in the immediate aftermath of his election that there may have been a secret society of folks within the Department of Justice and the FBI to include Page and Strzok to be working against him.

Watch:

.@RepRatcliffe (https://twitter.com/RepRatcliffe?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) on 5-month gap discovered in new FBI texts: "For former prosecutors like @TGowdySC (https://twitter.com/TGowdySC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) & myself...it makes it harder & harder for us to explain away one strange coincidence after another." https://t.co/jTCsiBqaVi pic.twitter.com/yPKVEJoG91 (https://t.co/yPKVEJoG91)
Fox News (@FoxNews) January 23, 2018 (https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/955597493592645632?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) Rep. Gowdy deflected a question over a second special counsel, but mentioned "a text about not keeping texts," and "more manifest bias against President Trump all the way through the election into the transition," and finally Gowdy said he saw a text that "Director Comey was going to update the President of the United States about an investigation" which would have been Obama - and may, Gowdy speculates, have been about the Trump team.

.@TGowdySC (https://twitter.com/TGowdySC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) on 50,000+ new @FBI (https://twitter.com/FBI?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) texts, possible 2nd special counsel appointed to investigate Mueller probe: "We saw more manifest bias against @POTUS (https://twitter.com/POTUS?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) all the way through the election into the transition." https://t.co/jTCsiBqaVi pic.twitter.com/CuyZKexf2s (https://t.co/CuyZKexf2s)
Fox News (@FoxNews) January 23, 2018 (https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/955595942270562305?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
Gowdy on FBI text messages: "Today we saw a text about not keeping texts." https://t.co/beCXGpALF6
Sean Davis (@seanmdav) January 23, 2018 (https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/955614410164367360?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) Regarding the "secret society," Gowdy said "You have this insurance policy in Spring 2016, and then the day after the election, what they really didn't want to have happen, there is a text exchange between these two FBI agents, these supposed to be fact-centric FBI agents saying, 'Perhaps this is the first meeting of the secret society.' So I'm going to want to know what secret society you are talking about, because you're supposed to be investigating objectively the person who just won the electoral college. So yeah -- I'm going to want to know."

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-22/fbi-agents-discussed-secret-society-within-doj-and-fbi-working-undermine-trump

Mach
01-23-2018, 03:36 AM
Hmmmm.


In the meantime, some Republican senators are curious about the memo’s contents.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., made an effort to gain access to the memo, but was rejected, his spokesman, Sergio Gor, confirmed to the Washington Examiner on Saturday.

2:06 "the releaser is immune from criminal and civil liability"

2:50 Rand Paul




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKRZXxtEJO8

Schifference
01-23-2018, 05:20 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6Lg-4hLaEk

goldenequity
01-23-2018, 05:35 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6Lg-4hLaEk

FBI Agents Spoke Of ‘Pressure’ To Wrap Up Clinton Probe As Trump Surged To GOP Nomination
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/21/fbi-agents-felt-pressure-wrap-up-clinton-email-probe-trump/?utm_source=site-share


955454387958304768


========

regarding Gowdey's last comment to her question.. 'Will Congress attempt to subpoena the phone carriers to retrieve missing text mssgs?"
Gowdey's answer was "Congress needs to use 'some law enforcement agency..." (implying they can no longer 'trust' the FBI with such a request)
I immediately thought of the US Marshalls. Do it.

AZJoe
01-23-2018, 10:16 AM
Rand Paul Petition (http://randpac.com/fisa-memo):

Last week, just after Congress passed its phony FISA reform bill – that really gave MORE power to our spying government – a bombshell dropped. … there were massive abuses of the FISA program. … and there is vital evidence of this currently in the House Intelligence Committee.

You, me and all of the American people deserve to find out what’s in these memos detailing the abuses by the FBI, Department of Justice and others, exposing countless Americans to warrantless searches and other violations. …

Congress needs to hear from YOU today. Please join the RELEASE THE MEMO movement today, and let Congress know they can’t keep secret what your government has been doing to innocent Americans.
Add Your Name (https://t.e2ma.net/click/8kuyab/wj1pzy/4dumiu)

They’re so worried about what’s in these documents they won’t even let ME — a sitting US Senator with clearance — see them. …

We know they “unmasked” Americans citizens. We know they listened in to political campaigns. We know they’re now claiming they’re “Missing” all sorts of text messages and documents showing their bias and outrageous actions. …
Let’s force them to RELEASE THE MEMO ..
Add Your Name (https://t.e2ma.net/click/8kuyab/wj1pzy/k6umiu)


ACLJ Petition (https://aclj.org/government-corruption/release-the-document-its-time-to-release-the-shocking-memo-on-fisa-abuses-and-expose-the-deep-state):

the deep state has been willing to violate federal law. … Now a new bombshell memo is sending shockwaves through Capitol Hill … a four-page memo in the House Intelligence Committee details unthinkable FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) abuses …
Nearly every Member of Congress who has seen this report has been remarkably shocked. … The American people must see this document. We deserve the truth. … call the Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121, ask for your Member of Congress, and urge them to release the document today.

goldenequity
01-23-2018, 01:19 PM
I haven't found the 99 page document yet by FISA Judge Rudy Contreras...
not sure if this accompanied his recusal from the Flynn case? I want to read it.
Please post if you find it.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyiMm0q7L7A

BACKGROUND (https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/12/08/the-big-ugly-why-u-s-district-court-judge-rudolph-contreras-recusal-from-mike-flynn-case-is-a-big-deal/comment-page-1/)



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPBMCgy7I6A

goldenequity
01-23-2018, 01:29 PM
George gets a call....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXW7gy6vp7s

955784088257953793

Swordsmyth
01-23-2018, 01:38 PM
George gets a call....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXW7gy6vp7s

955784088257953793


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Nuzp4QxAuM

TER
01-23-2018, 01:47 PM
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/b4ab929b1e1813b34197517c5ccff4aaf84d8c58720059c8b0 ceddcc70f0ec0d.jpg

Valli6
01-23-2018, 01:50 PM
Okay...
Alex Jones says William Binney contacted him, and this already-published (?) 99-page document - is the document the 4 page memo is based on. Apparently, the president has just declassified this TODAY and it's been published on the Director of National Intelligence Web site.

2016 Cert FISC Memo Opin Order Apr 2017 (4)
https://www.scribd.com/document/349261099/2016-Cert-FISC-Memo-Opin-Order-Apr-2017-4#download

Interview with William Binney discussing what they're talking about in the document. 01/23/18

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZaldynOKmc

FSP-Rebel
01-23-2018, 02:49 PM
955891765105561600

Anti Federalist
01-23-2018, 02:59 PM
The memo:

https://www.scribd.com/document/369818480/2016-Cert-FISC-Memo-Opin-Order-Apr-2017#download&from_embed

goldenequity
01-23-2018, 05:08 PM
Q always seems a step ahead...

http://i469.photobucket.com/albums/rr55/goldenequity/q.jpg




FBI Official: FBI Agents Threatened Physical Harm to President Trump In Missing FBI Texts & Other “Frightening” Communications
https://truepundit.com/fbi-official-fbi-agents-threatened-physical-harm-president-trump-missing-fbi-texts-frightening-communications/

“This is much larger than just texts between two FBI agents.”


A high-ranking FBI official confirms a number of the missing 50,000 FBI text messages — as well as other text and email messages among FBI brass — reportedly discussed initiating physical harm to President Donald Trump.

The FBI official urged the U.S. Department of Homeland Security — which oversees the U.S. Secret Service — to launch an investigation of the Justice Department, the FBI and all text messages missing and otherwise that threatened the President.

“This is dangerous territory and all FBI text messages and personal phones should be examined,” the official said. “It would reveal some frightening conversations.”

Did FBI brass discuss the assassination of President Donald Trump? If not, what was the nature of the threats against the president from inside the alleged premiere law enforcement agency in the United States?

“(Director) Wray wants a lid on this,” the FBI official said. “Many know there was talk of harming Trump politically but there is a group here (in D.C. HQ) that understands it goes deeper. We need a special counsel or Homeland Security. Somebody has to clean this up outside of DOJ. It is unacceptable.

“This is much larger than just texts between two FBI agents.”

The FBI official called on President Trump to do what is necessary to weed out corruption in the FBI.

“Text messages just don’t disappear,” the FBI official said. “Not here. Someone outside DOJ has to look at all emails and texts. These (FBI bosses) are bad people. You’ve only scratched the surface.”

The high-ranking FBI official called on lawmakers and the Inspector General to focus on the text and email messages of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. The official referred to McCabe’s official and personal correspondences “an anti-Trump treasure trove.”

As reported in March 2017 by True Pundit, McCabe openly threatened President Trump and then-National Security Adviser Gen. Mike Flynn, saying first we “Fuck Flynn and then we Fuck Trump” to several high-ranking FBI bosses who cheered his comment.

From that True Pundit Exclusive:

McCabe, the second highest ranking FBI official, emphatically declared at the invite-only gathering with raised voice: “Fuck Flynn and then we Fuck Trump,” according to direct sources. Many of his top lieutenants applauded and cheered such rhetoric. A scattered few did not.

This was one of several such meetings held in seclusion among key FBI leaders since Trump was elected president, FBI sources confirm. At the congregation where McCabe went off the political rails and vowed to destroy Flynn and Trump, there were as many as 16 top FBI officials, inside intelligence sources said. No lower-level agents or support personnel were present.

If you are among the millions of Americans who have pondered in recent months whether the Obama-era “Deep State” intelligence apparatus and FBI are working for or against Trump, this is the first definitive proof that the country’s once-premiere law enforcement agency has gone rogue.

The non-elected hierarchy that steer the FBI have declared war on President Trump and his White House inner circle. Make no mistake.

Flynn has since been indicted and plead guilty to a charge of lying to the FBI from an investigation supervised by McCabe after a FBI interview conducted by Peter Strzok, one of the agents busted sending anti-Trump texts. And Trump remains under investigation by U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller, a figure linked to several conflicts of interest in the case including prior deals with McCabe.

As reported yesterday in True Pundit, members of the FBI and Justice Department’s top brass at their Washington D.C.headquarters and other field offices are now using burner phones to stay under the radar of federal investigators and lawmakers, according to FBI insiders.

The shocking revelations come on the heels of news that the FBI deleted thousands of text messages between anti-Trump FBI agents before investigators could review their content.

While that is disturbing on one level, FBI and DOJ hierarchy employing the telecom habits of drug cartel bosses reaches a new low for the once-heralded federal law enforcement agency and the DOJ. And breaks federal laws as well.

The FBI “failed to preserve” five months worth of text messages exchanged between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, the two FBI employees who made pro-Clinton and anti-Trump comments while working on the Clinton email and the Russia collusion investigations.

And now more text messages are missing from more FBI agents, according to the Justice Department.

That means 50,000 text messages.

Fifty.

Thousand.

Per The Hill yesterday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Monday announced the Justice Department will investigate missing text messages sent between two FBI agents critical of President Trump, joining the chorus of Republican lawmakers who are eager to recover the exchange.

GOP officials have seized on the messages as evidence of FBI bias against Trump in the probes into Russian election meddling and Hillary Clinton‘s use of a private email server as secretary of State.

“We will leave no stone unturned to confirm with certainty why these text messages are not now available to be produced and will use every technology available to determine whether the missing messages are recoverable from another source,” Sessions said in a statement.

goldenequity
01-23-2018, 05:13 PM
The memo:

https://www.scribd.com/document/369818480/2016-Cert-FISC-Memo-Opin-Order-Apr-2017#download&from_embed



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E50m2I8UKgg

George reviewed/commented on the Contreras document... yesterday.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3gkL0Mi7Yg

955922693613871104

goldenequity
01-24-2018, 06:04 AM
Good review and chain of some events... and a little more info on the hospitalized researcher. :cool:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kcsmmzz_WNg

goldenequity
01-24-2018, 12:06 PM
Uranium continued...
from http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?518365-Fraud-Upon-the-FISA-Court-Confirmed&p=6578031&viewfull=1#post6578031

(remember: Who's biggest US 'customer' for Uranium?)



Navy Intel Looks at Uranium as Strategic Reserve


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-os2ca6980E






Aimen Mir
Obama appointee Aimen Mir: Treasury Deputy Assistant
approved Gulftainer, approved CFIUS, approve Uranium One
Aimen Nabi Mir, Terror-tied former two-time president of the youth wing of the Islamic Society of North America

Obama Appointed Terror-Tied ISNA Official To Approve Russian Uranium Sale and UAE Port Deal
https://pamelageller.com/2017/10/isna-uranium-sale-uae-port-deal.html/




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlF22Uhc1PQ

goldenequity
01-24-2018, 07:48 PM
To those who might get 'lost' in the details of 'drilling down' on the different 'parts'....
Here is a much broader attempt at describing some history/complexities in the use of Uranium as cover...
and a better understanding of why Uranium One was launched to try & put 'cookies back in the cookie jar'.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeLo_oUAZl4


What's 'Uranium' doing in a thread about the FISA fraud?
He does a pretty good job of explaining that. :)

goldenequity
01-25-2018, 11:50 AM
The Whole Enchilada
(if you're now 'uranium savy' with what's been already posted... you'll have no trouble understanding this one.)


George explains the entire Uranium 'working theory' for Charles Ortel.
(no TELLING how many white hats (and black hats)... and Senate staff members are taking notes. :D)


Megatons to MegaBucks


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7en8x9uWmyQ

goldenequity
01-25-2018, 04:37 PM
Lithium and Poppies (Welcome to Afghanistan)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UoWyhJKdR0

goldenequity
01-25-2018, 07:02 PM
not 'what' but why. :)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUZSWaWW4AEra0P.jpg:large

Revenge must be sweet for Sharyl Attkisson...
herself being a victim of an FBI orchestrated reprisal operation.
She's still in court suing the bastards.

timosman
01-25-2018, 09:09 PM
955891765105561600


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6EEBkbA5vs

AZJoe
01-26-2018, 09:35 PM
Daniel McAdams on CrossTalk


https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=275&v=bKpx_YGL95c

goldenequity
01-27-2018, 05:31 AM
Going UP?
Enriching yellow cake to LEU takes a LOT of 'time' (spinning) and raw electric power (to run centerfuges)
if you're going to try and 'replace the cookies in the cookie jar'... aka Uranium conspirators transporting/converting Western States ore deposits, etc.

Going Down?
Megatons to Megawatts
Downblending HEU (20,000 Russian warheads) to LEU (for US power plants) takes the 'gas diffusion' process.. long, arduous and 'outsourced'/limited #plants shut down in US.

What if there were 'another way'?

Meet Silex (Separation of isotopes by laser excitation)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUh-MFrWAAAdeqg.jpg




The uranium players were VERY interested and are invested.

George has exposed it as yet another lead and added to the litany of ratline breadcrumbs to be followed.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNkC3Mbb_e8




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsC1vKCOzuI




The 'Shawn Hannitys' of the world will always be 'useful'
in expending the 'concerned National attention span'
AWAY
from the core.
George calls it 'running a school play' or 'creating a parallel construction'.
It's meant to 'distract' and expend your energy on bait and insignificance/minor players/issues thrown under the bus.
'Red Herrings'.
Most of the time
it works.

a coyote will chew off it's own leg to escape.
ask Oyarde.

Swordsmyth
01-27-2018, 01:45 PM
Going UP?
Enriching yellow cake to LEU takes a LOT of 'time' (spinning) and raw electric power (to run centerfuges)
if you're going to try and 'replace the cookies in the cookie jar'... aka Uranium conspirators transporting/converting Western States ore deposits, etc.

Going Down?
Megatons to Megawatts
Downblending HEU (20,000 Russian warheads) to LEU (for US power plants) takes the 'gas diffusion' process.. long, arduous and 'outsourced'/limited #plants shut down in US.

What if there were 'another way'?

Meet Silex (Separation of isotopes by laser excitation)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUh-MFrWAAAdeqg.jpg




The uranium players were VERY interested and are invested.

George has exposed it as yet another lead and added to the litany of ratline breadcrumbs to be followed.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNkC3Mbb_e8




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsC1vKCOzuI




The 'Shawn Hannitys' of the world will always be 'useful'
in expending the 'concerned National attention span'
AWAY
from the core.
George calls it 'running a school play' or 'creating a parallel construction'.
It's meant to 'distract' and expend your energy on bait and insignificance/minor players/issues thrown under the bus.
'Red Herrings'.
Most of the time
it works.

a coyote will chew off it's own leg to escape.
ask Oyarde.
oyarde chewed off his own leg?:eek:

enhanced_deficit
01-27-2018, 01:51 PM
Is this same material that is supposedly in the explosive memo that is not being released to public?

If so, as noted elsewhere this could be potentially very good news for Trump and respected WH advisor Jared Kushner as this could negate the very basis of witchhunt "Russia gate" scandal.


Quote:
If the claims being made about this memo are factual, that could undermine the very basis for Mueller investigation ?

IF that turned out to be the case, then all the secondary gates/scandals linked to/stemmed from original "Russia gate" (such as Israel-Flynn gate (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?517312-Breaking-Flynn-says-Trump-directed-him-to-make-contact-with-Russians&), Bannon claimed Kushner money laundering gate (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?518162-The-Kushner-s***-is-greasy-Bannon-predicts-Mueller-will-roll-up-president-s-son-in-law&), latest Peggy Peterson-Michael Cohen (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?518567-Never-Trumpers-doing-excessive-Stormy-Daniels-porn-searches&p=6576479&viewfull=1#post6576479) gate etc) would also become moot?

This would be huge news if confirmed.


With additional memogate reports that have come out, is it time for Mr.Mueller to move on to other things and drop the "Russia gate" pursuit?

Swordsmyth
01-27-2018, 02:51 PM
Clinton, Podesta And Others In Senate Crosshairs Over Dossier; Given Two Weeks To Respond


GOP Congressional investigators have written six letters to individuals or entities involved or thought to be involved in the funding, creation or distribution of the salacious and unverified "Trump-Russia dossier" believed to have been inappropriately used by the FBI, DOJ and Obama Administration in an effort to undermine Donald Trump as both a candidate and President of the United States.
Senators Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Lindsey Graham (R-SCS) wrote six Judiciary Committee letters requesting information from: John Podesta, Donna Brazille, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Robbie Mook, the DNC, and Hillary For America Chief Strategist Joel Benenson.
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/wrapgang_1.jpg

(https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/wrapgang_1.jpg)The Senate Judiciary Committee letters read in part:
In October 2017, the Washington Post reported that Hillary for America and the Democratic National Committee had funded, via Fusion GPS, Christopher Steele's creation of a series of memos relying largely on Russian government sources to make allegations against Donald Trump and his associates. A letter from the law firm Perkins Coie acknowledged that, " [t]o assist in its representation of the DNC and Hillary for America, Perkins Coie engaged Fusion GPS in April of2016" and that "the engagement concluded prior to the November 2016 Presidential election
the Committee has been investigating the FBI' s relationship with Christopher Steele during this time his work was funded by Hillary for America and the DNC. The scope of our review includes the extent to which the FBI may have relied on information relayed by Mr. Steele in seeking judicial authorization for surveillance of individuals associated with Mr. Trump. It also includes whether any applications that may have been made for permission for such surveillance fully and accurately disclosed:
(1) the source of Fusion GPS's and Mr. Steele's funding;
(2) the degree to which his claims were or were not verified;
(3) the motivations of Mr. Steele, his clients, and his sources; and
( 4) representations about their contacts with the press.

The letter then goes on to list twelve questions - the last being a request for all communications between a list of 40 individuals or entities - including Christopher Steele, Bruce Ohr, Peter Strzok, Andrew McCabe, Glenn Simpson and former CIA Director John Brennan.
The six recipients of letters have two weeks to comply with the following requests (note; "Hillary for America" is replaced by "the DNC" depending on who the letter is addressed to):
1. Prior to the Washington Post 's article in October of 2017, were you anyone else at Hillary for America aware of Mr. Steele's efforts on behalf of the Clinton campaign to compile and distribute allegations about Mr. Trump and the Russian government? If so, when and how did you first learn of his activities on the campaign's behalf? Please provide all related documents.
2. Did you or anyone else at Hillary for America receive copies of any of the memoranda comprising Mr. Steele's dossier prior to its publication by Buzzfeed in January of 2017? If so, how and when? Please provide all related documents.
3. Regardless of whether you or your associates received copies of the actual memoranda, did you or anyone else at Hillary for America otherwise receive information contained in the dossier prior to Buzzfeed publishing the dossier in January of 2017? If so, how and when? Please provide all related documents.
4. Did you or anyone else at Hillary for America receive other memoranda written or forwarded by Mr. Steele regarding Mr. Trump and his associates that were not published as part of the Buzzfeed dossier? If so, how and when? Please provide all related documents.
5. Did you or anyone else at Hillary for America distribute outside of the organization any o f the dossier memoranda, information contained therein, or other information obtained by Mr. Steele? If so, please list who distributed the information, what was distributed, and to whom it was distributed. Please provide all related documents.
6. Did you or anyone else at Hillary for America communicate with any government officials - whether in the executive, legislative or judicial branches - regarding the dossier memoranda, information contained therein, or other information obtained by Mr. Steele? If so, please list the parties involved in the communication, the content of the communication, and the date and means of the communication. Please provide all related documents. References such as "anyone at Hillary for America" include all of Hillary for America's officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, advisors, volunteers, and, of course, Secretary Clinton herself. Mr. Podesta January 25, 2018
7. Did you or anyone else at Hillary for America instruct, request, suggest, or imply that any individuals should pass along information to Mr. Steele or his intermediaries? Please provide all related documents.
8. Did you or anyone else at Hillary for America communicate with members of the press regarding the dossier memoranda, information contained therein, or other information obtained by Mr. Steele? If so, please list the parties involved in the communication, the content of the communication, and the date and means of the communication. Please provide all related documents.
9. Did you or anyone else at Hillary for America inform Secretary Clinton of Mr. Steele's efforts, whether by name or not, or of the allegations he was spreading? If so, who and when? Please provide all related documents.
10. Were you or anyone else at Hillary for America aware of Mr. Steele's contacts with the FBI or other government agencies prior to the 2016 election? If so, who? When and how did you or they become aware? Please provide all related documents.
11. Did you or anyone else at Hillary for America encourage, whether directly or through intermediaries, Mr. Steele to initiate or continue contacts with the FBI or other government agencies? If so, who and when? Please provide all related documents.
12. For the period from March 2016 through January 2017, please provide all communications to, from, copying, or relating to: Fusion GPS; Bean LLC; Glenn Simpson; Mary Jacoby; Peter Fritsch; Tom Catan; Jason Felch; Neil King; David Michaels; Taylor Sears; Patrick Corcoran; Laura Sego; Jay Bagwell; Erica Castro; Nellie Ohr; Rinat Akhmetshin; Ed Lieberman; Edward Baumgartner; Orbis Business Intelligence Limited; Orbis Business International Limited; Walsingham Training Limited; Walsingham Partners Limited; Christopher Steele; Christopher Burrows; Sir Andrew Wood, Paul Hauser; 4 Oleg Deripaska; Cody Shearer; Sidney Blumenthal; Jon Winer; 5 Kathleen Kavalec; Victoria Nuland; Daniel Jones; 6 Bruce Ohr; Peter Strzok; Andrew McCabe; James Baker; 7 Sally Yates; Loretta Lynch; John Brennan.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-27/clinton-podesta-and-others-senate-crosshairs-over-dossier-given-two-weeks-respond




(https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-27/clinton-podesta-and-others-senate-crosshairs-over-dossier-given-two-weeks-respondAs)



As part of their ongoing oversight efforts to ensure that the FBI’s law enforcement activities are free of improper political influence, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) yesterday sent six letters seeking information and documents regarding Christopher Steele’s work on behalf of the Democratic National Committee and Hillary for America. The letters seek information and documents relating to those political organizations’ knowledge of and involvement in Mr. Steele’s work and his reported interactions with the FBI while he was working on behalf of these political organizations. The letters were sent to:


The Democratic National Committee (DNC) (https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/grassley-graham-to-democratic-national-committee_-steele-dossier)
Hillary for America (HFA) (https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/grassley-graham-to-hillary-for-america_-steele-dossier)
Former DNC Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/grassley-graham-to-rep-wasserman-schultz_-steele-dossier)
Former DNC Chair Donna Brazile (https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/grassley-graham-to-brazile_-steele-dossier)
HFA Chair John Podesta (https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/grassley-graham-to-podesta_-steele-dossier)
HFA Chief Strategist Joel Benenson (https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/grassley-graham-to-benenson_-steele-dossier)




https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-graham-send-batch-letters-related-potential-political-influence-fbi




(https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/wrapgang_1.jpg)

goldenequity
01-29-2018, 05:22 PM
as we breathlessly await the 'memo' on the 'horrific crime' of 'politicization' (oh the humanity! :rolleyes: )

let's get back to some REAL shiit... shall we?

Uranium One, Andrew You Stole For Hillary


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nc2LNw4oQkM

Following the thread?
By now you 'get it'...
Stealing Western resources to 'backfill' what they already STOLE and marketed/sold Worldwide from our Nation's Uranium stockpiles.
and using 'radioactive' transport to run drugs and weapons internationally. The sex and human/organ trafficking are xtra 'percs'.

McCabe is 'stepping down'. That's nice. :mad:

All the 'obedient' thugs, mindless drones, useful 'idiots', judges, politicians below the TOP conspirators
(if they're even US citizens at ALL and not 'imported' and held hostage by 'greased' Visa programs)
know virtually 'nothing' / and are compartmentalized...
but are themselves compromised by either greed or 'entrapment' ops to gain their 'compliance'...
and the rest.... 'think' they're working for 'National Security'.
Decades long in 'construction'.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qL5W0M0NAc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7D0RlRCsQk

goldenequity
01-30-2018, 07:38 PM
another attempt to simplify the complexity...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BD1q9zY2FU0



Trump's State of Union Announcement:
Throw a Trillion at Uranium One Conspirators?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_J1qK8LcqM

Remember: Molly Macauley murder (http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/crime/bs-md-ci-homicide-20160709-story.html)

Elaine Chao, Transportation Secretary; husband, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/04/Elaine_Chao_official_portrait.jpg/220px-Elaine_Chao_official_portrait.jpg

goldenequity
01-31-2018, 05:04 PM
George is fuming :mad:... he 'uncovers'
CONCERAS (an 8A subsidized outsourced Business Front for offshored FBI/Dyncorp operations)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJwQDkOJpKU


Drilling Down on Conceras


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CHksIsLyt0


Responding to Conceras Concerns


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HspcPT9GbA


How to Build a 40,000 strong offshored Org with 8A 'set-aside' small business loans and 'gateway' Visas....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enwLucQHiyU

goldenequity
01-31-2018, 06:52 PM
Today's Wrap Up and a Nunes 'Memo' Update


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1liVPgA50tI

goldenequity
02-01-2018, 06:14 AM
If you haven't figured it out (by now)...
George's 'little chats' are NOT falling on 'deaf ears' inside the 'agencies'.
As he 'simplifies' and sarcastically 'mocks' and disassembles the ratline engineering..
He (absolutely) doesn't care whether the 'effect' is:
the 'black hats' freaking out and 'disassembling/shredding/shutting down'
or
the 'white hats' following his leads kicking in office doors with badges and warrants
or
the Treasury following 'targets' to freeze 'dark fortunes'.
He
Doesn't
Care. :)


Uranium Continued





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5odhLvxJI68





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztSBtqxvxWE
(this vid is only 14:10 not 28... George: you forgot to turn off yur camera :) )

goldenequity
02-02-2018, 11:25 AM
Drilling down on the Uranium One 'use' of 8a 'set aside' biz creations for radioactive dumping...

Uranium One's Darker Side - Fracking, Leaching





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTwzndK3Nlw






https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPSHOZzwk5w

goldenequity
02-03-2018, 10:52 PM
Understanding What (not who) Carter Page Was

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/carter-page-3.jpg?w=213&h=283

According to a Wall Street Journal report, Carter Page was on the radar of the FBI since 2013
“when Russian spies made an attempt to recruit him.” (Uh-huh.)
However, for some undetermined reason the FBI waited until October 21st, 2016,
to apply for Title I surveillance authority through the FISA court.

The FIRST FISA to begin penetrating the Trump campaign was a Title I.
Title I is COMPLETELY different than Title VII (702 etc.)
Title I is application to the FISA court that identifies Carter Page (American Citizen) as a 'Foreign Agent'... a 'spy'.
Why is that significant?

cuz EVERYBODY and ANYONE he then 'touches' becomes a LEGAL TARGET for surveillance under a Title I warrant. (not so w/ Title 7-702 warrant often called the 'Foreign Intelligence 'loophole' allowing 'ancillary' surveillance on 1 NAMED citizen, them ONLY/ALONE.)

They THEN (after setting up Carter Page w/ this FIRST Title I FISA application)
could 'LEGALLY' go after everyone/anyone including the Trump campaign, that Carter had ANY 'contact' with.
Carter Page became a surveillance 'leper' and they set him up and used him for exactly that purpose. (insert McCabe here.)
He Carter (of course) had no idea.



================



THE 'N' WORD


I confess. I've been holding back... but (sigh)
I can't continue to post George's videos now without a comment.

You have to understand a precept: 'George Doesn't Care.'
Everything will come easier after that. :)

He's yer basic gumshoe detective. He's going to follow the 'dots'
no matter where it takes him.
Keep in mind also that to George.. he's 'thinking' out loud. All the time.
Everything is 'working theory', puzzle pieces that are either left in place or discarded or set aside. It's how he rolls.

If you want to continue to follow.... we're going to 'Krazee Town'. Buckle up.





So.. my attempt at an 'intro'...

We've all been watching the absolute evil that's befallen this Country.... for years.
Shocked... then numb. Shocked... then numb.
But..
It has now 'turned' some kind of 'corner' in a 'cosmic lens' sort of way.
Most of us have 'felt it'... some sort of 'line' has now been crossed...
One of the noticeable results has been that those of us long time 'woke folks'
all feel somewhat relieved/justified that 'we're NOT krazee'...
It's real... all the things we 'suspected' are becoming mainstream.

Well...

What if in fact we are following a 'template' of sorts? Something not really 'new'?
What if this 'thing' we are unraveling has historic 'ROOTS' and is not just evolving 'happenstance'?
What if there are not just ideological roots and 'similarities' from history..
but could also have actual physical roots?
Think of 'chain migration' from the pit of hell.
Think virus.

Are you familiar with Operation PaperClip (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip)?

Maybe it would be a good time to watch The Boys from Brazil again.
The Boys From Brazil 1978 (Laurence Olivier - Gregory Peck)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvG_ORNxrO8







Here's George...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r3nbJhesls



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHqvpWDR9kg



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXEZjkxwtPc

The 'Fat Leonard' Scandal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjUg0JnjyW0








https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dif7Wx9GaxE

goldenequity
02-04-2018, 06:09 PM
Understanding What (not who) Carter Page Was

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/carter-page-3.jpg?w=213&h=283

According to a Wall Street Journal report, Carter Page was on the radar of the FBI since 2013
“when Russian spies made an attempt to recruit him.” (Uh-huh.)
However, for some undetermined reason the FBI waited until October 21st, 2016,
to apply for Title I surveillance authority through the FISA court.

The FIRST FISA to begin penetrating the Trump campaign was a Title I.
Title I is COMPLETELY different than Title VII (702 etc.)
Title I is application to the FISA court that identifies Carter Page (American Citizen) as a 'Foreign Agent'... a 'spy'.
Why is that significant?

cuz EVERYBODY and ANYONE he then 'touches' becomes a LEGAL TARGET for surveillance under a Title I warrant. (not so w/ Title 7-702 warrant often called the 'Foreign Intelligence 'loophole' allowing 'ancillary' surveillance on 1 NAMED citizen, them ONLY/ALONE.)

They THEN (after setting up Carter Page w/ this FIRST Title I FISA application)
could 'LEGALLY' go after everyone/anyone including the Trump campaign, that Carter had ANY 'contact' with.
Carter Page became a surveillance 'leper' and they set him up and used him for exactly that purpose. (insert McCabe here.)
He Carter (of course) had no idea.


Sundance is catching up to us Good!!!

Exceptional Work by Sharyl Attkisson – Did FBI Violate Woods Procedures?…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/02/04/exceptional-work-by-sharyl-attkisson-did-fbi-violate-woods-procedures/#more-145461

next thing you know..
it will be coming out of Hannity... or an Infowars 'exclusive'.
George
doesn't
care.
:)

timosman
02-05-2018, 04:00 AM
Gowdy says it ain't so, showing his true colors:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_ylNzY7Ixc

goldenequity
02-05-2018, 06:22 AM
Thanks 4 posting this Timo.
It's clear Gowdy has sold out by defending the 'institution' (no matter what)
This interview is laughable (though I enjoyed the end)

In the first MINUTE it's an OBVIOUS lie.
He's establishing the narrative that out of 30,000 men and women
with their daily 'hands' on that much POWER
only 5 FIVE!.... no.. make that 2 TWO! are corrupted????
USA! USA! USA! :rolleyes:

He is coating the 'system' with so much 'butter'
... like we're all supposed to IGNORE that fact
that the BREAD really DOES have MOLD on it.
I consider him a very sincere but very CONFUSED individual.

I could go into a whole discourse on Judgement vs Mercy...
it's EXACTLY where and what is 'troubling' Trey Gowdy.

Sooner or Later we will get to what lies 'beneath' the dossier.
The operation was ALREADY in play LONG before Christopher Steele/Simpson/Fusion GPS.
It was (as we know) not the FBI (alone).

remember: It wasn't MONEY, the DNC nor McCain that 'launched' what became the 'dossier'.
They were 'customers'.... they BOUGHT it; they didn't COMMISSION it.
THAT lie continues to be regurgitated by ALL media (including FOX).
It's being used as 'cover' for what lies beneath.

It was Brennan, US/CIA and UK/GCHQ/G4S
who were ALREADY busy doing clandestine surveillance on American soil trying to get 'dirt'
and organize the entrapment/sting.
Papadapolous was THEIR man.

We KNOW they each REGULARLY hand off TERABYTES
of bulk, domestic Vault 7/Snowden type 'data collection'
to each other (to skirt each others 'domestic' spying laws)
to then be taken apart and analyzed 'offshore', condensed/assembled
and then 'onshored' as useable 'reports'.

Look Ma... NO FISA!

McCabe is Brennan's protege.. he's been an inside man for the CIA throughout his career.
He's corrupt as HELL covered in blood and dirt.
We lay Lavoy Finicum's body at your feet Andy. :mad:

I can't WAIT till we get past the 'political weaponization' angle...
The continual focus on 'HOW' and 'WHAT' they did...
and never touching on the 'WHY' (Uranium/Greed/ratlines/Clinton Foundation etc.)
We'll get there.

Jan2017
02-05-2018, 07:15 AM
It is significant - if true - that the very first FISA warrant application was rejected
without some DNC/Clinton manufactured false affidavit to push it through as insurance for the election outcome,
done by an FBI director !


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKvocipcOHU
from about 0:23 mark on ...

"dangerous precedent that's been established by the FBI.
James Comey and the FBI attempted to get a FISA warrant in the summer of 2016. They were not successful.
They then moved in October by adding to their request the Steele dossier. Then they get a FISA warrant.
Then it was renewed a day before the inauguration and then renewed subsequently again."

Comey tweets about "weasels and liars" on Friday . . .

https://s26.postimg.org/qb506pz61/i_know_you_are_pee_wee_herman.gif (https://postimages.org/)

goldenequity
02-05-2018, 08:07 AM
It is significant - if true - that the very first FISA warrant application was rejected
without some DNC/Clinton manufactured false affidavit to push it through as insurance for the election outcome,
done by an FBI director !


Yes it is. AND via Alexandra Chalupa (http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/251897/obama-steele-dossier-russiagate) incident we know it was PURPOSELY 'dropped' into Obama's lap
(who then no longer could claim 'clean hands'/no 'knowledge') to gain/manufacture further 'credibility'
to FURTHER 'pressure' the FISA court on it's re-submission.

seapilot
02-05-2018, 10:49 AM
Thanks 4 posting this Timo.
It's clear Gowdy has sold out by defending the 'institution' (no matter what)
This interview is laughable (though I enjoyed the end)

In the first MINUTE it's an OBVIOUS lie.
He's establishing the narrative that out of 30,000 men and women
with their daily 'hands' on that much POWER
only 5 FIVE!.... no.. make that 2 TWO! are corrupted????
USA! USA! USA! :rolleyes:

He is coating the 'system' with so much 'butter'
... like we're all supposed to IGNORE that fact
that the BREAD really DOES have MOLD on it.
I consider him a very sincere but very CONFUSED individual.

I could go into a whole discourse on Judgement vs Mercy...
it's EXACTLY where and what is 'troubling' Trey Gowdy.

Sooner or Later we will get to what lies 'beneath' the dossier.
The operation was ALREADY in play LONG before Christopher Steele/Simpson/Fusion GPS.
It was (as we know) not the FBI (alone).


Interesting that Gowdy is not seeking reelection. Maybe he is smart enough to understand its time to jump off a sinking ship.

dannno
02-05-2018, 11:08 AM
Interesting that Gowdy is not seeking reelection. Maybe he is smart enough to understand its time to jump off a sinking ship.

He is self-draining.

Madison320
02-05-2018, 11:17 AM
Things are about to get real bad for Democrats.

I will be increasing my bet that Republicans hold the house in 2018.

If interest rates keep rising and the Dow keeps sinking we're going to get QE4 and $10 a gallon gas. Nobody will remember this memo.

goldenequity
02-05-2018, 12:35 PM
It's like he's reading our thread.. hahaha

I can't think of a better emphasis on just what's been said on this very page.
The 'collusion' coverup and ABUSE by the intelligence agencies and law enforcement/justice.

Here you can watch in one setting
both
Director Mueller (FBI) and Director Clapper (DNI)
playing cat and mouse with oversight questioning.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-HQxjxp5bs

(The first part of the video concerns George's 4 lawsuits that he's doing in his 'spare' time. hahaha
I don't discuss them on this thread... yet. Let's see if he can get standing first.
Interestingly... It's going to be Judge Contreras that hears the lawsuit(s).
Ring any bells???)

Brian4Liberty
02-05-2018, 12:41 PM
Interesting that Gowdy is not seeking reelection. Maybe he is smart enough to understand its time to jump off a sinking ship.

He is looking for his next job, and he wants to make it perfectly clear that he stands with the establishment and the system.

Cleaner44
02-05-2018, 12:43 PM
If interest rates keep rising and the Dow keeps sinking we're going to get QE4 and $10 a gallon gas. Nobody will remember this memo.

True. By the same token if more people are getting raises and doing well financially, nobody will care about anything that Democrats whine about.

Schifference
02-05-2018, 01:02 PM
He is looking for his next job, and he wants to make it perfectly clear that he stands with the establishment and the system.

I would think his time and publicity gained from his time in Congress will bolster his private sector demand.

seapilot
02-05-2018, 04:30 PM
He is looking for his next job, and he wants to make it perfectly clear that he stands with the establishment and the system.

Here is something interesting to note about Gowdy leaving. He is THE ONLY PERSON that was allowed on the Republican side to see the FISA warrants in question that were written in the memo. He understands the implications.

He also said that this would not harm the Mueller investigation. Why would he say that? My guess is he does not want to be the one that gets blamed for lighting the fuse.

Jan2017
02-05-2018, 05:00 PM
He is THE ONLY PERSON that was allowed on the Republican side to see the FISA warrants in question
that were written in the memo. He understands the implications.

He also said that this would not harm the Mueller investigation. Why would he say that?
My guess is he does not want to be the one that gets blamed for lighting the fuse.

Fuse lit . . . about to clear the tower.

https://s26.postimg.org/livnefg89/clearing_tower.jpg (https://postimages.org/)

goldenequity
02-06-2018, 07:35 AM
George (imo) has not yet read the article outing/proving Carter Page as an FBI operative in 2013 (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?519128-Ready-4-This-Carter-Page-(2013)-was-WORKING-for-the-FBI-(hahaha-they-R-Now-SO-!ed!))....

and yet
he posts a completely on TARGET vid this morning discussing EXACTLY that. Amazing. amazing.
behold:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSD5Vlnou9U

goldenequity
02-06-2018, 08:01 AM
Senior Executive Service (SES) (just say Stazi... it's easier.)



more great info for the white hats.....
as George performs a 'spinal tap' on a 10,000 strong centerpiece of the 'swamp'.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLXphx5Sd0E


Senior Executive Service (SES)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senior_Executive_Service_%28United_States%29

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/SES_Emblem.svg/220px-SES_Emblem.svg.pnghttps://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fd/Flag_of_the_United_States_Senior_Executive_Service .svg/220px-Flag_of_the_United_States_Senior_Executive_Service .svg.png



You might have to replay this several times in order to fathom exactly the magnitude of what he is describing here.

This is a program of 'political appointees' simply INSERTED at the TOP of gov't orgs in cities across the country.
(actually the world.. the 2nd logo above is the Foreign Service SES)

Exactly like the Executive branch/State Department's appointee pay-to-play 'ambassadors' system....
except
this is a DOMESTIC 'internal' chain of command of political appointees....
owing 'allegiance' to their 'benefactors'... but on government payroll w/ $200,000 salaries.
Hillary 'grew' the program from 1,000 to 10,000.

So think 'ambassadors'. Centralized. Immediately 'in charge' of 'local' operations. 10,000 'cells'.

The question then is: Ambassadors for WHOM/WHAT?


Like Geo says: This was/is a very, very BAD idea. :cool:

Schifference
02-06-2018, 09:42 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHcoJ77-vdE

goldenequity
02-17-2018, 11:20 AM
"You're not serious... not possible!!"




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVOesZWB1xU

Swordsmyth
02-19-2018, 05:03 PM
On Friday, Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order in United States v. Flynn that, while widely unnoticed, reveals something fascinating: A motion by Michael Flynn to withdraw his guilty plea based on government misconduct is likely in the works.
Just a week ago, and thus before Sullivan quietly directed Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team to provide Flynn’s attorneys “any exculpatory evidence,” Washington Examiner columnist Byron York detailed (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-comey-told-congress-fbi-agents-didnt-think-michael-flynn-lied/article/2648896) the oddities of Flynn’s case. The next day, former assistant U.S. attorney and National Review contributing editor Andrew McCarthy connected more (https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/02/michael-flynn-guilty-plea-questions-raised-about-fbi-robert-mueller-investigation/) of the questionable dots. York added even more details (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-an-unusual-turn-in-the-michael-flynn-case/article/2649272) a couple of days later. Together these articles provide the backdrop necessary to understand the significance of Sullivan’s order on Friday.


Why Bombshells Are Likely Ahead With a protective order in place, Flynn’s attorneys should start receiving the required disclosures from the special counsel’s office. There is reason to believe these will include some bombshells.
First, we know from the recently released GOP House Intelligence Committee memo and the Grassley-Graham criminal referral of Christopher Steele, the FBI and DOJ withheld significant (and material, in my view (http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/05/we-dont-need-democrats-memo-to-know-the-fbi-and-doj-need-house-cleaning/)) information in seeking a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to conduct surveillance on Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page. There is cause (https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/02/michael-flynn-guilty-plea-questions-raised-about-fbi-robert-mueller-investigation/) to believe the FISA court was connected to the criminal charge filed against Flynn because Contreras, who recused less than a week after accepting Flynn’s guilty plea, “is one of just three FISA court judges who sits in the District of Columbia, where it is likely the Trump-Russia FISA warrants were sought.”
Was other evidence withheld, either from the FISA court or from Flynn’s attorneys in negotiating a plea? Again, there is reason to believe so, given the players involved and the facts already uncovered.
Remember, the special counsel charged Flynn with lying to FBI agents on January 24. While the charge did not identify the FBI agents involved, we know that Peter Strzok conducted the January interview that eventually led to the criminal case against Flynn. Strzok formed a part of Mueller’s team until he was removed following the discovery of hostile text messages concerning Trump, including a planned “insurance policy” should Trump win the White House.
Obama political holdover Sally Yates’ involvement in the case raises additional concerns. While Strzok and Mueller initially indicated they believed Flynn had been truthful, Yates, while serving as acting attorney general, had directed Strzok to interview Flynn and had pushed for charges against Flynn under the Logan Act. Another member of Mueller’s team, Andrew Weissmann, is likewise suspect given his praise (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/prosecutor-from-robert-muellers-team-praised-sally-yates-for-not-defending-trump-travel-ban/article/2642647) for Yates’ refusal to defend Trump’s travel ban. Weissmann remains a part of the special counsel’s team, notwithstanding calls (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/prosecutor-from-robert-muellers-team-praised-sally-yates-for-not-defending-trump-travel-ban/article/2642647) for his ouster.
Mueller must now provide Flynn all exculpatory evidence: Significantly, if the information is favorable to Flynn but the special counsel’s office believes it is immaterial, government attorneys must nonetheless provide the evidence to Sullivan to allow him to make the call. In other words, Mueller’s team cannot unilaterally decide what evidence matters, as the Department of Justice did in applying to the FISA court for a surveillance warrant on Page while withholding the key fact that Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee paid for information crucial to the application.
This Whole Thing Could Bring further Abuse to Light No one knows yet what the evidence will show. However, there are enough shady characters involved to believe there will be something of significance. Then what?
Sidney Powell, a former federal prosecutor and author of “Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice,” writes (http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/16/general-flynn-should-withdraw-his-guilty-plea-his-new-judge-is-a-government-misconduct-expert/) that Flynn should withdraw his guilty plea and suggests that Sullivan, as “the country’s premier jurist experienced in the abuses of our Department of Justice, . . . is the best person to confront the egregious government misconduct that has led to and been perpetrated by the Mueller-Weissmann ‘investigation’ and to right the injustices that have arisen from it.”
Friday’s order suggests Sullivan is ready to do just that. That order consisted of an updated standing order detailing the government’s obligations under Brady. On the surface, Friday’s order seems inconsequential, but in comparing the December 12, 2017, version to the February 16, 2018, version, one substantive change stood out.
It was subtle, but significant given the posture of this case: The revised version added one sentence specifying that the government’s obligation to produce evidence material either to the defendant’s guilt or punishment “includes producing, during plea negotiations, any exculpatory evidence in the government’s possession.”

More at: http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/19/michael-flynns-plea-reversal-uncover-federal-corruption/

goldenequity
02-19-2018, 07:05 PM
Swordsmyth
If the DoJ suddenly 'drops' the Flynn case... it is BECAUSE they want to hide the 'exculpatory' documents/disclosures.
This is very, very, very common...
indeed, another very common tactic is to purposefully 'taint' proceedings so a case is then declared a mistrial by the judge.
They do this to hide their own 'set-ups' and illegal 'stings' when things aren't going 'slam-dunk' in court. Think Bundy.
I will watch for it.

Swordsmyth
02-19-2018, 11:07 PM
@Swordsmyth (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?u=65299)
If the DoJ suddenly 'drops' the Flynn case... it is BECAUSE they want to hide the 'exculpatory' documents/disclosures.
This is very, very, very common...
indeed, another very common tactic is to purposefully 'taint' proceedings so a case is then declared a mistrial by the judge.
They do this to hide their own 'set-ups' and illegal 'stings' when things aren't going 'slam-dunk' in court. Think Bundy.
I will watch for it.

They have an infinite number of tricks for every occasion.:(

Swordsmyth
02-22-2018, 08:18 PM
McCain associate invokes Fifth Amendment on Trump dossier sources: reporthttp://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/375205-mccain-associate-invokes-fifth-amendment-on-trump-dossier

timosman
02-22-2018, 08:20 PM
They have an infinite number of tricks for every occasion.:(

The tricks aren't that good. We just let them get away with murder.:cool:

acptulsa
02-22-2018, 08:28 PM
McCain associate invokes Fifth Amendment on Trump dossier sources: reporthttp://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/375205-mccain-associate-invokes-fifth-amendment-on-trump-dossier


Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) had wanted to speak with Kramer about his visit to London in November 2016, during which he met with the author of the dossier, former British spy Christopher Steele. According to court filings, he met with Steele at McCain's request, to view “the pre-election memoranda on a confidential basis."
Kramer then traveled back to the U.S. and gave copies of the memos to McCain, who then turned the documents over to the FBI.

The committee interviewed Kramer last month prior to issuing a subpoena for him.

The dossier was created by opposition research firm Fusion GPS and funded by Hillary Clinton's campaign.

So, the crime was meeting with a British spy? Stealing a copy of something funded by the Clinton campaign? Showing it to McCain?

What is the crime that allows him to hide behind the Fifth?

Swordsmyth
02-22-2018, 08:34 PM
So, the crime was meeting with a British spy? Stealing a copy of something funded by the Clinton campaign? Showing it to McCain?

What is the crime that allows him to hide behind the Fifth?

Treason?

acptulsa
02-22-2018, 08:41 PM
Treason?

So, if meeting with the spy and looking at the report is treason, what is hiring the spy and commissioning the report?

No, I doubt that's it. It sounds good. I'd like to see Hilldawg trade her pantsuist for an orange jumpsuit. But it's probably more like industrial espionage.

Swordsmyth
02-23-2018, 02:19 AM
Suspiciously, Barack Obama’s Intelligence Community Assessment matches the main allegations leveled by the Clinton-paid dossier on Trump, which wormed its way into intelligence channels (https://nypost.com/2017/04/18/fbi-used-trump-dossier-to-justify-monitoring-of-ex-aide-report/), in addition to the FBI, Justice Department and State Department, during the 2016 campaign.
In fact, the shady dossier makes exactly the same claim — that Putin personally “ordered” the cyberattacks on the Clinton campaign and leaked embarrassing e-mails to “bolster Trump,” as part of “an aggressive Trump support operation.” Like Obama’s ICA, Clinton’s dossier provides no concrete evidence to back up the claim.
After learning Obama Justice and FBI officials relied heavily on unsubstantiated rumors in the dossier to wiretap a Trump adviser during the election, congressional leaders now suspect the dossier also informed Obama intelligence officials who compiled the ICA.
The report was released Jan. 6, 2017 — the same day intelligence officials attached a written summary of the dossier to a highly classified Russia briefing they gave Obama about the dossier, and the day after Obama held a secret White House meeting to discuss the dossier with his national-security adviser and FBI director.
Staff investigators for GOP Rep. Devin Nunes’ intelligence committee, for one, are now going over “every word” of the ICA — including classified footnotes — to see if any of the analysis was pre-cooked based on the dossier. On Tuesday, Nunes sent letters to Obama intel officials responsible for the report. He demanded former top spook John Brennan and intel czar James Clapper provide answers about how they used the dossier in intel reports and when they learned the Clinton camp paid for it.

More at: https://nypost.com/2018/02/22/yet-another-way-obamas-spies-apparently-exploited-the-trump-dossier/

goldenequity
02-28-2018, 02:25 PM
Buried in this thread is much material about the Uranium crime ring... answering the question of WHY all the FISA/Election gate.

So..
picking up from here (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?518365-Fraud-Upon-the-FISA-Court-Confirmed&p=6579016&viewfull=1#post6579016)

we now find another loose thread in the Uranium tapestry:




AQ Khan / Abdul Qadeer Khan Father of Pakistan Nukes since 1971

http://worldmeets.us/images/AQ.Khan.lecture_pic.png

A. Q. Khan, is a Pakistani former nuclear physicist and a metallurgical engineer,
founded the uranium enrichment program for Pakistan's atomic bomb project.
Khan founded and established the Kahuta Research Laboratories in 1976,
serving as both its senior scientist and Director-General until he retired in 2001.

Lots of Background (https://duckduckgo.com/?t=palemoon&q=AQ+Khan&ia=web)



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhocjFL-_Pk

BBC China: (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_China) In October 2003 the ship was diverted to Italy while carrying gas centrifuges for uranium enrichment to Libya.

Libyan Nuke Program Was CIA-MI6 Sting Op (https://gosint.wordpress.com/2017/11/16/libyan-nuke-program-was-cia-mi6-sting-op/)
“Then, in early October 2003, the U.S., the U.K., Germany, and Italy interdicted the ‘BBC China,’ a German ship destined for Libya that the Americans had been tracking for nearly a year.

A U.S. intelligence official informed the Libyans that the five 40-foot containers marked used machine parts that were offloaded from the ship contained thousands of centrifuge parts to enrich uranium, manufactured in Malaysia by the A.Q. Khan network,”



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BK7iWRF1Qhc

►http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/16/world/asia/16chron-khan.html
►http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/12/world/a-tale-of-nuclear-proliferation-how-pakistani-built-his-network.html

Swordsmyth
03-02-2018, 12:04 AM
The FBI may have violated criminal statutes, as well as its own strict internal procedures, by using unverified information during the 2016 election to obtain a surveillance warrant on onetime Trump campaign aide Carter Page, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee charged Thursday in a letter obtained by Fox News.
House Intelligence Committee (HPSCI) Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., wrote in his letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions that “in this instance, it’s clear that basic operating guidance was violated.”
Nunes cited the Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide (DIOG), which was created by the bureau and approved by the Justice Department, to say he believed the FBI violated procedures requiring verified and documented evidence in applications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
An Oct. 2011 version of the operations guide states that the “accuracy of information contained within FISA applications is of utmost importance... Only documented and verified information may be used to support FBI applications to the court.”
The guidance also states that information in a FISA application must be “thoroughly vetted and confirmed.”
Nunes to Sessions: FBI may have violated criminal statutes in Carter Page FISA application (https://www.scribd.com/document/372746970/Nunes-to-Sessions-FBI-may-have-violated-criminal-statutes-in-Carter-Page-FISA-application#from_embed)

Nunes listed five criminal statutes that were possibly violated, including conspiracy, obstruction of justice, contempt of court. It also cites statutes that make it a crime to willfully deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution and another preventing unauthorized electronic surveillance.
In the letter, Nunes asks Sessions whether these protocols requiring verified information have changed, and if not, what steps the DOJ or FBI taken to hold officials behind the Page application accountable.
The letter is carbon copied to FBI Director Christopher Wray and DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz.

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/01/nunes-fbi-may-have-violated-criminal-statutes-in-fisa-application-to-spy-on-trump-adviser-carter-page.html

goldenequity
03-02-2018, 11:11 AM
another part of the crime ring...
Scaramucci and Bannon both played the role of 'brokers', overseeing the Wall Street 'investments'
for Naval Intelligence connected players looking to 'parley' their profits from the transport & logistics of the ops...
either by 'looking the other way' or by active participation in 'tracking' using the tools at their disposal.




DARK WEAPONS (smuggling ops/contractors like Skybridge, Chemring and Purple Shovels)

http://www.purpleshovel.com/
https://skybridgetactical.com/
http://www.chemring.co.uk/

March 1, 2017
Scaramucci Says He Fears John Kelly Will Thwart SkyBridge Sale
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-01/scaramucci-tears-into-bad-dude-trump-chief-of-staff-kelly


Accuses Kelly of blocking him from meeting with Trump

Scaramucci says he now fears Kelly will thwart his bid to sell his stake in SkyBridge Capital to China’s HNA Group Co.
The sale has been stuck at CIFIUS Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., which reviews foreign acquisitions of domestic businesses for security risks.

Scaramucci claims Kelly has been blocking his access to the president.
He said he was prevented from attending a gathering Trump went to with business executives at the World Economic Forum in Davos.
He also said he was blocked after having been invited to a meeting at the White House with a top Trump aide.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7lOXkYHZWM

Swordsmyth
03-09-2018, 02:39 PM
In a Daily Caller op-ed calling the Russian meddling narrative a "false public manipulation (http://dailycaller.com/2018/03/08/the-ever-changing-russia-narrative-in-american-politics-is-cynically-false-public-manipulation/)," Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska claims that Daniel Jones - a former FBI investigator, Feinstein staffer and now a Fusion GPS operative (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-20/leaked-texts-suggest-former-feinstein-staffer-part-ongoing-scramble-verify-dossier) - told the Russian Oligarch's lawyer in March, 2017 that Fusion GPS was funded by "a group of Silicon Valley billionaires and George Soros."

Of note, Deripaska's lawyer, D.C. lobbyist Adam Waldman, recommended Jones to investigate and verify the claims from the Fusion GPS anti-Trump dossier assembled by former UK spy Christopher Steele. Waldman was also an intermediary between Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) and Steele in trying to arrange a meeting - which suggests that Waldman, Jones, Steele and Fusion GPS are all connected.
Deripaska describes the ongoing "Russia narrative" as nothing more than a scandal manufactured by the deep state. "Wagging the dog costs money," writes Deripaska. "So, who is the “funding mechanism” of this “shadowy government?”" Why, none other than billionaire financier George Soros, according to Daniel Jones - as relayed to Congressional investigators by Deripaska's attorney Adam Waldman:

[O]n March 16, 2017, Daniel Jones — himself a team member of Fusion GPS, self-described former FBI agent and, as we now know from the media, an ex-Feinstein staffer — met with my lawyer, Adam Waldman, and described Fusion as a “shadow media organization helping the government,” funded by a “group of Silicon Valley billionaires and George Soros.” My lawyer testified these facts to the Senate Intelligence Committee on Nov. 3. Mr. Soros is, not coincidentally, also the funder of two “ethics watchdog” NGOs (Democracy 21 and CREW) attacking Rep. Nunes’ committee memo. -Oleg Deripaska
Jones currently runs the Penn Quarter Group, a "research and investigative advisory" firm whose website was registered in April of 2016, days before Steele delivered his first in a series of Trump-Russia memos. Jones began tweeting out articles suggesting illicit ties between the Trump campaign and Russia as early as 2017.
As The Federalist's Sean Davis reported (http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/20/is-a-former-feinstein-staffer-running-fusion-gpss-post-election-russia-dossier-operation/) last month, Congressional documents and leaked texts between Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) and Deripaska's attorney Adam Waldman reveal that Jones is "intimately involved with ongoing efforts to retroactively validate" the Steele / Fusion GPS memos.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-09/russian-billionaire-claims-fusion-gps-funded-soros

Swordsmyth
03-15-2018, 05:49 PM
In a letter sent Thursday to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, Graham and Grassley, along with Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), wrote that “a special counsel is needed to work with the inspector general to independently gather the facts and make prosecutorial decisions, if any are merited.”
Graham said that he believes the Clinton email probe was "shoddily done," with conflicts of interest and political bias that may have given Clinton a pass.
"The FBI and the Department of Justice were corrupt, in my view, when it came to handling the email investigation of Clinton," Graham said, adding that they also "abused" the FISA warrant application process.
The senators on Thursday also released a February letter from Grassley and Graham to the Justice Department’s inspector general asking that he work with a second special counsel to investigate the DOJ and FBI’s request for a FISA warrant against a Trump campaign adviser.

More at: http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/03/15/sen-graham-fbi-doj-were-corrupt-clinton-email-probe-abused-fisa-process

Swordsmyth
03-17-2018, 04:32 PM
Christopher Steele, was ordered by an English court Friday to appear for a videotaped deposition in London to be used as trial testimony in ongoing civil litigation against Buzzfeed for publishing the unverified dossier. Evan Fray-Witzer, a Boston-based attorney representing Russian tech tycoon Aleksej Gubarev, told Fox News, “We’re thrilled that the English Court has ordered Mr. Steele to sit for his deposition. It was always amazing to us that he could talk as freely as he has to reporters around the world about the dossier, yet refuse to sit for a deposition about the same topics.”

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/16/christopher-steele-must-appear-for-dossier-deposition-in-british-court.html

goldenequity
03-17-2018, 11:56 PM
Senior Executive Service (SES) (just say Stazi... it's easier.)



more great info for the white hats.....
as George performs a 'spinal tap' on a 10,000 strong centerpiece of the 'swamp'.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLXphx5Sd0E


Senior Executive Service (SES)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senior_Executive_Service_%28United_States%29

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/SES_Emblem.svg/220px-SES_Emblem.svg.pnghttps://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fd/Flag_of_the_United_States_Senior_Executive_Service .svg/220px-Flag_of_the_United_States_Senior_Executive_Service .svg.png



You might have to replay this several times in order to fathom exactly the magnitude of what he is describing here.

This is a program of 'political appointees' simply INSERTED at the TOP of gov't orgs in cities across the country.
(actually the world.. the 2nd logo above is the Foreign Service SES)

Exactly like the Executive branch/State Department's appointee pay-to-play 'ambassadors' system....
except
this is a DOMESTIC 'internal' chain of command of political appointees....
owing 'allegiance' to their 'benefactors'... but on government payroll w/ $200,000 salaries.
Hillary 'grew' the program from 1,000 to 10,000.

So think 'ambassadors'. Centralized. Immediately 'in charge' of 'local' operations. 10,000 'cells'.

The question then is: Ambassadors for WHOM/WHAT?


Like Geo says: This was/is a very, very BAD idea. :cool:

Well... this is annoying... not even ONE shout out to George (who 'broke' this story.)
Typical.
I've seen it time and again. (sigh)

Never the less... A good dialog between 'a' Thomas Paine (True Pundit?) and Michael McKibben that describes SES.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlRIxkVTyeA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlRIxkVTyeA
(comments worth reading)

timosman
03-18-2018, 04:50 AM
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Mendenhall


To mount someone from behind while they are in the fetal position on the ground. After the deed is complete, you roll them over and see the humiliation in their eyes. This is best accomplished in front of a large audience.

This sounds ridiculous. I would expect at most you would be asked to perform a bj. :rolleyes:

goldenequity
03-18-2018, 02:24 PM
Prequel – Reminder of The ‘Big Picture’ in Summary…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/03/18/prequel-reminder-of-the-big-picture-in-summary/#more-147085

(if you've got the patience... Sundance does a good job of connecting the timing and linkages, work-arounds by the scheme team..
the 'who' and 'how'... from Nellie Ohr to Samantha Power.... he outlines the connections.... what caused what and why.)

goldenequity
03-18-2018, 03:30 PM
Well... this is annoying... not even ONE shout out to George (who 'broke' this story.)
Typical.
I've seen it time and again. (sigh)


George is going to get fameized. Good! :) (at 6'8" he should have no trouble becoming a media GIANT)

Day 149.1. Peter Duke - Biographer of the Alt-Right
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_V2_PyyvmM

Day 149.2. Senate Outdoes House With Steele Questions?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_U76Y5QnjsQ

Day 149.3 Meet Peter Duke - Culture Wars Through a Camera Lens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNggxrLnIzk

Day 149.6. Peter Duke Zoolander Shoot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x96_OPARzCw

goldenequity
03-18-2018, 03:47 PM
500 Day Summary Complete Through March 2018


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWfiIVivob8

PURE GOLD

goldenequity
03-18-2018, 04:22 PM
SES 'Exposed' is now going viral :) (deserves its own thread)

975404359503831041

975404567717347328

975404985235202048

975405273258037250


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlRIxkVTyeA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2usmlq7oFE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFFnT9JaG2g





Remember: Hillary 'grew' the program from 1,000 to 10,000 'members'



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTW4HP0L88U



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8UeSs-K_QA

goldenequity
03-18-2018, 09:11 PM
Good Interview w/ Nunes


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fx-gS4B0Av8

goldenequity
03-19-2018, 11:47 AM
Sleuthing Tools


The headline below will take you to Americans for Innovation
that has developed a research tool that you can use
to identify Senior Executive Services members.

The amazing research team at Americans for Innovation created this research tool for you to find SES employees in the Plum Book.
In order to compile this report, they had to search widely on the internet for the bits and pieces of the report
that had been scattered in digital space so that you couldn’t find it.

Make sure to bookmark this tool and share it with everyone.
The SES network, indexed, all in one place.

It also contains a Crimeline with its own search feature.
A mind-blowing 17 years- worth of research that the ‘white hats’ have done
so that internet research sleuths have access to thousands of documents
that can be used as indictable evidence for thousands of D. C. criminals.

Research Tools for Digital Truth Sleuths
https://patriots4truth.org/2018/03/17/research-tools-for-digital-truth-sleuths/

How to identify members of Deep State’s Senior Executive Service
http://themillenniumreport.com/2018/03/how-to-identify-members-of-deep-states-senior-executive-service/
Bookmark this page to save these research tools.

United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions (Plum Book)
https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/plum-book?path=/gpo/United%20States%20Government%20Policy%20and%20Supp orting%20Positions%20%28Plum%20Book%29/2016

==========


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxx9YQs7KqQ

timosman
03-19-2018, 12:31 PM
What's Rand's role in all of this? https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-PLUMBOOK-2016/html/GPO-PLUMBOOK-2016.htm


SES statement to Congress on Dec. 01, 2016, Appendix 2, last paragraph, PDF p. 228 218, “Appointments to SES Positions”:

“By law, the appointment or removal” of SES positions “shall not be subject, directly or indirectly to review or approval by an officer or entity within the Executive Office of the President.” (Is this not sedition?)

Note: This SES statement was endorsed by the following Senators. Did they know what they were endorsing? Somebody needs to give at least Sen. Rand Paul a heads up.

Senators who endorsed SES rule that SES cannot be fired by the President:

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS:
RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin, Chairman
JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona
ROB PORTMAN, Ohio
RAND PAUL, Kentucky
JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma
MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming
KELLY AYOTTE, New Hampshire
JONI ERNST, Iowa
BEN SASSE, Nebraska
THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware
CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri
JON TESTER, Montana
TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin
HEIDI HEITKAMP, North Dakota
CORY A. BOOKER, New Jersey
GARY C. PETERS, Michigan
CHRISTOPHER R. HIXON, Staff Director
GABRIELLE D’ADAMO SINGER, Chief Counsel
GABRIELLE A. BATKIN, Minority Staff Director
JOHN P. KILVINGTON, Minority Deputy Staff Director
MARY BETH SCHULTZ, Minority Chief Counsel
LAURA W. KILBRIDE, Chief Clerk

Let's get this straight. A Senate Committee that oversees the Department of Homeland Security—an agency of the Executive Branch, is telling the American People that the hiring and firing function of the SES—also an agency within the Executive Branch, is not subject to the Executive Branch in its hiring and firing of personnel? Are you kidding me? Is this not the very definiton of sedition. This is proof of a shadow government in the Congressional record.

Swordsmyth
03-19-2018, 12:54 PM
Sleuthing Tools


The headline below will take you to Americans for Innovation
that has developed a research tool that you can use
to identify Senior Executive Services members.

The amazing research team at Americans for Innovation created this research tool for you to find SES employees in the Plum Book.
In order to compile this report, they had to search widely on the internet for the bits and pieces of the report
that had been scattered in digital space so that you couldn’t find it.

Make sure to bookmark this tool and share it with everyone.
The SES network, indexed, all in one place.

It also contains a Crimeline with its own search feature.
A mind-blowing 17 years- worth of research that the ‘white hats’ have done
so that internet research sleuths have access to thousands of documents
that can be used as indictable evidence for thousands of D. C. criminals.

Research Tools for Digital Truth Sleuths
https://patriots4truth.org/2018/03/17/research-tools-for-digital-truth-sleuths/

How to identify members of Deep State’s Senior Executive Service
http://themillenniumreport.com/2018/03/how-to-identify-members-of-deep-states-senior-executive-service/
Bookmark this page to save these research tools.

United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions (Plum Book)
https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/plum-book?path=/gpo/United%20States%20Government%20Policy%20and%20Supp orting%20Positions%20%28Plum%20Book%29/2016

==========


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxx9YQs7KqQ

You must spread some reputation around.......

goldenequity
03-19-2018, 04:43 PM
Andy and Oleg Oligarchs On the Mnuchin BBQ


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLWHzTvm0pQ


A Veritable Candy Store of the McCabe & Deripaska compromise 'targets'

Oligarchs (The US State Department defined oligarchs as individuals with an estimated net worth of $1 billion or more.)

1. Aleksandr Abramov
2. Roman Abramovich
3. Aras Agalarov
4. Farkhad Akhmedov
5. Vagit Alekperov
6. Igor Altushkin
7. Aleksey Ananyev
8. Dmitry Ananyev
9. Vasiliy Anisimov
10. Roman Avdeyev
11. Petr Aven
12. Yelena Baturina
13. Aleksey Bogachev
14. Vladimir Bogdanov
15. Leonid Boguslavskiy
16. Audrey Bokarev
17. Oleg Boyko
18. Nikolay Buynov
19. Oleg Deripaska
20. Aleksandr Dzhaparidze
21. Leonid Fedun
22. Gleb Fetisov
23. Mikhail Fridman
24. Aleksandr Frolov
25. Filaret Galchev
26. Sergey Galitskiy
27. Valentin Gapontsev
28. Sergey Gordeyev
29. Andrey Guryev
30. Yuriy Gushchin
31. Mikhail Gutseriyev
32. Sait-Salam Gutseriyev
33. Zarakb Iliyev
34. Dmitriy Kamenshchik
35. Vyacheslav Kantor
36. Sanwel Karapetyan
37. Yevgeniy Kasperskiy
38. Sergey Katsiyev
39. Suleyman Kerimov
40. Igor Kesayev
41. Danil Khachatmov
42. German Khan
43. Viktor Kharitonin
44. Aleksandr Klyachin
45. Petr Kondrashev
46. Andrey Kosogov
47. Yuriy Kovalchuk
48. Andrey Kozitsyn
49. Aleksey Kuzmichev
50. Lev Kvetnoy
51. Vladimir Lisin
52. Anatoliy Lomakin
53. Ziyavudin Magornedov
54. Igor Makarov
55. Iskander Makhmudov
56. Aleksandr Mamut
57. Andrey Melnichenko
58. Leonid Mikhelson
59. Yuriy Milner
60. Boris Mints
61. Andrey Molchanov
62. Aleksey Mordashov
63. Vadim Moshkovich
64. Aleksandr Nesis
65. God Nisanov
66. Aleksandr Ponomarenko
67. Sergcy Popov
68. Vladimir Potanin
69. Mikhail Prokhorov
70. Dmitriy Pumpyanskiy
71. Megdet Rakhimkulov
72. Andrey Rappoport
73. Viktor Rashnikov
74. Arkadiy Rotenberg
75. Boris Rotenberg
76. Dmitriy Rybolovlev
77. Ayrat Shaymiyev
78. Radik Shaymiyev
79. Kirill Shamalov
80. Yuriy Sheller
81. Albert Shigabutdinov
82. Mikhail Shishkhanov
83. Leonid Simanovskiy
84. Audrey Skoch
85. Aleksandr Skorobogatko
86. Rustem Sulteyev
87. Aleksandr Svetakov
88. Gennadiy Timchenko
89. Oleg Tinkov
90. Roman Trotsenko
91. Alisher Usmanov
92. Viktor Vekselberg
93. Arkadiy Volozh
94. Vadim Yakunin
95. Vladimir Yevtushenkov
96. Gavril Yushvayev

The full 'Putin list' of Russian oligarchs and political figures released by the US Treasury
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/30/politics/full-us-list-of-russian-oligarchs-with-putin-ties-intl/index.html



Day 151.3. Stop Opiod Crisis - Start With Oleg and Andy


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylcFSyUgs6I

goldenequity
03-19-2018, 05:27 PM
What's Rand's role in all of this? https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-PLUMBOOK-2016/html/GPO-PLUMBOOK-2016.htm

None really. Just voted on something barely understood by most.

The SES 'program' started benignly in 1976 or so.
The criminal ring grew it into a monster. (surprise!)
The whole concept of simply 'inserting' appointees 'at the top' and bypassing the 'natural' vetting
that occurs during the 'climb' of experience/hiring/firing of personnel within departments is a TERRIBLE idea.

It should be completely abolished. It is literally made-to-fit for entrenching pay-to-play.

It should be completely investigated to sort the wheat from the criminal syndicate.
Start w/ the meta data.
Programs like Palantir can easily handle an analysis like this... piece of cake.
showing a 'weighted' chain of interconnections between members... emails, finances, bank transactions, appointments, assets etc. etc.

Easy to 'do'.... all the FBI needs is 'permission'/instruction.
see the problem?

timosman
03-19-2018, 06:48 PM
None really. Just voted on something barely understood by most.

The SES 'program' started benignly in 1976 or so.
The criminal ring grew it into a monster. (surprise!)
The whole concept of simply 'inserting' appointees 'at the top' and bypassing the 'natural' vetting
that occurs during the 'climb' of experience/hiring/firing of personnel within departments is a TERRIBLE idea.

It should be completely abolished. It is literally made-to-fit for entrenching pay-to-play.

It should be completely investigated to sort the wheat from the criminal syndicate.
Start w/ the meta data.
Programs like Palantir can easily handle an analysis like this... piece of cake.
showing a 'weighted' chain of interconnections between members... emails, finances, bank transactions, appointments, assets etc. etc.

Easy to 'do'.... all the FBI needs is 'permission'/instruction.
see the problem?

So how do you search for SES people? Appendix2 says


Currently, there are 9936 SES positions allocated by OPM to agencies.

goldenequity
03-19-2018, 07:32 PM
So how do you search for SES people? Appendix2 says

You have 2 options in the SES data base...
either Google Search feature
or
Download the PDFs by year and use 'Control F' to search out a name in each year/batch.

Google and I parted ways about 6 months ago & that includes Chrome & Adobe Flash so I don't/won't use ANY Google products.
I haven't decided yet to dwnload the PDFs but that is the way I would go.
If you look at the Plum Book you can get a feel for how intricate the payscales and massive the database is.

timosman
03-19-2018, 08:42 PM
You have 2 options in the SES data base...
either Google Search feature
or
Download the PDFs by year and use 'Control F' to search out a name in each year/batch.

Google and I parted ways about 6 months ago & that includes Chrome & Adobe Flash so I don't/won't use ANY Google products.
I haven't decided yet to dwnload the PDFs but that is the way I would go.
If you look at the Plum Book you can get a feel for how intricate the payscales and massive the database is.


OMG, sounds really spooky. :eek:

All you have to do is look at the html version of the Plum Book - https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-PLUMBOOK-2016/html/GPO-PLUMBOOK-2016.htm

Some names are listed multiple times but none of them is SES(I think):


2 Allan M Holt
2 Atul Keshap
2 Cynthia H Akuetteh
2 Edith Ramirez
2 Jacob J Lew
2 James Costos
2 James P Zumwalt
2 Jane D Hartley
2 John Holdren
2 John R Phillips
2 Linda Thomas-Greenfield
2 Mark Gilbert
2 Nathaniel David Norris
2 Patrick F Kennedy
2 Steven Croley
2 Tom A Bernstein
2 Vacant Vacant
2 Victoria Kennedy
2 Wendy Spencer
3 Catherine Ebert-Gray
5 Judith B Cefkin
7 Linda Swartz Taglialatela

The Plum Book states there are 9936 SES positions but only 4503 are listed and only 833 are listed by name. There are 873 Vacant, 2791 Career Incumbent and one is listed simply as Esq - Senior Counsel for Criminal Enforcement in Chicago. :cool:


AJ Pearlman
Aaron G Hughes
Aaron J Snow
Aaron Matthew Bishop
Abigail Ross Hopper
Abraham M Denmark
Acacia Tyler Bamberg Salatti
Adaeze Akamigbo
Adam Hodge
Adam M Neufeld
Adri D Jayaratne
Adrienne N Schweer
Alan D Bersin
Alan Davidson
Alastair Fitzpayne
Albert Ke-Li Shen
Alejandra Ybelisse Castillo
Alejandro Ricardo Rodriguez
Alex Wagner
Alexander M Laskaris
Alexandra Elizabeth Teitz
Alexandra R Isern
Alexis Taylor
Alfred Jerome Fletcher II
Ali A Zaidi
Ali John Shoraka
Alice C Hill
Alicia O'Brien
Alison J Markovitz
Alletta Belin
Allison Beth Orris
Allyson K Anderson
Amanda Bennett
Amanda Cohen Leiter
Amanda Renae Simpson
Amias Moore Gerety
Amit Bose
Amy B Demagistris
Amy Bennett McIntosh
Amy Ellen Friedlander
Amy Pope
Amy Solomon
Andre J Gudger
Andrea J Palm
Andreas George Schneider
Andrew Bryan Bindman MD
Andrew C Right
Andrew Cary Littman
Andrew LaMont Eanes
Andrew Mcdonald Exum
Andrew Miller Slavitt
Andrew O Rich
Andrew S McMahon
Andrew Stanner
Andrew Velasquez III
Andy Liu
Angela Marie Simpson
Angela Marie Tagtow
Angela Nichole Botticella
Anjan Mukherjee
Ann Cameron Mills
Ann Dunkin
Ann Marie Bledsoe Downes
Ann Marie Mehlum
Ann P Kalayil
Anne A Witkowsky
Anne Harkavy
Anne L Shimabukuro
Anne Morris Reid
Anthony Hernandez
Anthony S Kram
Anthony Salvatore
Antonia Whalen
Antonio R Riley
Antonio Weiss
Antwaun D Griffin
Arati Prabhakar
Arthur A Mabbett
Arthur Gonzalez
Arthur Plews
Arun Venkataraman
Ashlee N Johnson
Aubrey G Butts
Audrey Rowe
Austin Baidas
Austin John Durrer
Aviva Ronit Aron Dine
Barbara A Ward
Beatrice Hanson
Beatrice M Disman
Benjamin E Milakofsky
Benjamin E Webb
Benjamin Locke Wakana
Benjamin Mizer
Beth A Freeman
Beth McGarry
Beth Susan Brinkmann
Beverly A Oyama
Bianca Michele Oden
Blair C Anderson
Blair C Reinarman
Blake J Androff
Blanca Estela Enriquez
Bobbie Gregg
Boyd Vindell Washington
Bradley Dean Keister
Bradley M Pfaff
Brandon Clark Willis
Brandon L Fureigh
Brenda Mallory
Bret Creech Birdsong
Brett J Feddersen
Brett J Prather
Brette Steele
Brian Boynton
Brian Michael Salerno
Brian Ronholm
Brian Weiss
Bridgett Elaine Taylor
Brodi J Kotila
Bryan G Polisuk
Bryna L Helfer
C D Brown
Caitlin A Durkovich
Camron S Gorguinpour
Carlin R Woog
Carlos F Uriarte
Carol Ann DiBattiste
Carol Pier
Caroline Ciraolo
Caroline Holland
Carolyn Flowers
Carolyn Pokorny
Catherine M Dale
Cathy Ventrell-Monsees
Caya B Lewis
Charles Jay Homer
Charles Jeffrey Appel
Charlotte A Hayes
Christen Linke Young
Christian Andrew Weideman
Christina Iskandar
Christine Blackburn
Christine June Harada
Christine S Abizaid
Christopher Casey
Christopher E Davis
Christopher J King
Christopher Lee James
Christopher P Maier
Ciaran Mary Clayton
Clarence T Bishop
Clifton Gregory Kellogg
Coby Christopher Dolan
Connie N LaRossa
Corey Then
Courtney M Chapin
Cristin Dorgelo
Crystal Lynne Brown
Cynthia G Pierre
Daleep Singh
Daniel B Prieto III
Daniel E Katz
Daniel L Zeitlin
Daniel M Turbitt
Daniel P Feehan
Daniella Ballou-Aares
Danielle Conley
Daryl B Witherspoon
David Bitkower
David F Conrad
David H Thorne
David J Friedman
David J Tubman Jr
David L Howard
David L Myers
David Lipsetz
David M Klaus
David R Pearl
David S Kim
David S Roberts
David S Weaver
David Shahoulian
David Simpson
David W Mohler
Dawn Christianne O'Connell
Deborah A Roth
Deborah L Feinstein
Debra Dumontier
Demetra Nightingale
Denise A Vanison
Denise E Ryan
Denise L Pease
Dennis James McLerran
Devin Labella O'Connor
Diana C Banks
Diana Erbsen
Dionne E Thompson
Dominic Cussatt
Dominique McCoy
Donald C Stanton
Donna J Batch
Douglas John O'Brien
Douglas K Walker
Douglas Lee Loverro
Douglas Steiger
Earl C Wyatt
Earl Lenell Gay
Eben W Burnham-Snyder
Edward L Golding
Edward Mcmichael Dean
Edward T Allard III
Edwards L Jennings Jr
Eileen Sobeck
Elaine M Bunn
Elanor Starmer
Elisa M T Basnight
Elissa B Slotkin
Elizabeth A Zimmerman
Elizabeth Anne Field
Elizabeth Anne Klein
Elizabeth Harrison Hadley
Elizabeth L George
Elizabeth R Dalton
Elizabeth Rodke Washburn
Ellen L Dichner
Ellen Lucy Hughes-Cromwick
Ellen Partridge
Elliot Williams
Elvis Cordova
Emily Alyssa Barson
Emily McMahon
Emma Vadehra
Eric A Pierce
Eric B Rosenbach
Eric Losick
Eric M Seleznow
Eric N Hysen
Eric R Biel
Erica De Vos
Erik J Woodhouse
Erika Brown Lee
Erin Donar
Erin Elizabeth Andrew
Erin Hayes
Erin M Logan
Ernest Robinson
Errol R Schwartz
Esther Eleojo Krofah
Ethan Gregory Shenkman
Ethan Jared Corson
Eugenia Lynn Chaffin
Evagren O Caldera
Eve Lynne Hill
Fatima Annalie Cuevas
Francis Kelley
Francisca A Gonzalez
Francisco Carrillo
Frank Cristaudo
Frank G Lowenstein
Frank Joseph Benenati
Frederick W Pfaeffle Esq
Gary Simpson
Genger Charles
Geoffrey Scott Roth
George D Duchak
George E Northcroft
George Selim
Gerald D Cohen
Gia Lee
Gilberto De Jesus
Glen Roy Sears
Glenn K Davidson
Gordon L Trowbridge
Greg Arlen Diephouse
Gregory Charles Simon
Gregory J Touhill
Gregory M Kausner
Gwendolyn R Keyes Fleming
H Curtis Spalding
Haley Lynn Vandyck
Hannah Mary Stott-Bumsted
Harriet H Tregoning
Heather Childs
Heather J Fong
Heather Mcteer Toney
Helen A Lowman
Herbert M Strauss
Holly E Canevari
Holly June Wong
Holly M Leicht
Howard Gadlin
Ian H Gershengorn
Ian Jay Kalin
Ilona Rene Cohen
Iram A Ali
Irene M Qualters
Isabella Casillas Guzman
J Mark Iwry
James A Ozment
James Albino
James C Onusko
James Cadogan
James Cox
James D Rodriguez
James Gareth Clark
James J Donlon
James J Reed
James J Townsend Jr
James L Swartout
James L Dwyer
James M Eisenmann
James Matthew Hock
James R Lyons
James R Murphy
James Tedarll Minor
James Z Wartski
Jane Cw Vincent
Jane Kyung Hwa Dokko
Janet A Nuzum
Janet Garvin McCabe
Janice L Glick
Janine Benner
Jannie Versi
Jarel Lapan Hill
Jarrett Nathaniel Blanc
Jarris L Taylor Jr
Jason Anthony Weller
Jason K Levine
Jason Levitis
Jason Michael Young
Jason O Klumb
Javier Guzman
Jeannie Layson Shiffer
Jed D D'Ercole
Jeff M Marootian
Jeffrey Eschmeyer
Jeffrey Jonathan Teitz
Jeffrey P Angers
Jennifer A Haverkamp
Jennifer Abruzzo
Jennifer Bell-Elllwanger
Jennifer L Ho
Jennifer L Mustain
Jennifer Lynne Pilat
Jennifer M Cannistra
Jennifer M Stewart
Jennifer M Yezak
Jennifer N Parker
Jennifer P Tidwell
Jennifer Punsalan Wood
Jennifer Romero Monaco
Jennifer Stout
Jennifer Yeager Kaplan
Jenny T Rosenberg
Jeremy Beck Sharp
Jeremy Martin
Jerome Hatfield
Jerome Timothy Gronniger
Jessamyn Sarmiento
Jessica A Milano
Jetta L Wong
Jill E Steinberg
Jimmy Cosby
Jimmy Kolker
Joann K Chase
Joanne C Hoff
Jocelyn Samuels
Jodie M Misiak
Jody Allen Cummings
Joel C Beauvais
Johan E Uvin
John Colwell
John Derek Ratliff
John E Gilliland
John Edward Bies
John F Kotek
John H Sturc
John Hobart Hale
John J Burnham
John J MacWilliams III
John Jioni Palmer
John Joseph O'Brien
John Karl Dipaolo
John Leland Sligh Simpkins
John Mateja
John Michael Harney
John Michael Schmidt
John T Tschida Jr
John W Drake
John Watson Blair
Jonathan Arthur Dale Herczeg
Jonathan E Meyer
Jonathan Foster Olin
Jonathan Jay Cordone
Jonathan Joseph Finer
Jonathan L Lee
Jonathan Rockwell Foley
Jonathan S Lachman
Jordan Barab
Jose Mayorga
Joseph Brodil South
Joseph M Bryan
Joseph Matthew Goffman
Josh Drobnyk
Joshua Berman
Joshua C Batkin
Joshua David Jacobs
Joshua Frederick Anderson Peck
Joshua Jackson Cohen
Joshua Teitelbaum
Joyce Hunter
Joyce Philip
Juan Arteaga
Judith E Heumann
Judith Enck
Judith Greenwald
Judith Kenny
Judith Lazar
Judith Nadine Gracia MD
Judy L Chesser
Julia E Hudson
Julia McKinney
Julie E Aaronson
Julie Huffman Herr
Juliet Christina Johnson
Juliet K Choi
Julius Horwich
Justin Cole
Justin R Johnson
Justin Reid Ehrenwerth
Justin Ross Meservie
Justin S Antonipillai
Kali Bracey
Karen Anne Scott
Karen DeSalvo
Karen Hyun
Karen Neuman
Karen Sue Guice
Karen Wayland
Karl Kadon
Karl Remon Thompson
Karla Ann Thieman
Kate Heinzelman
Katherine Mooney Carroll
Katherine P Kelly
Kathryn Martin
Kathryn T Wilson
Katy A Kale
Kayla M Williams
Kedric L Payne
Keia D Cole
Keith A Marzullo
Kelly Craighead Mullen
Kelly E Magsamen
Kenneth D Murphy
Kenneth P Martin
Kevin A Monroe
Kevin J Counihan
Kevin J Landy
Kevin Knobloch
Kevin M Kramer
Kevin Michael Coggins
Kim Hunter Reed
Kimberly A O'Connor
Kimberly Cochrane Field
Kiran A Ahuja
Kiran Raj
Kris E Durmer
Kristen Joan Sarri
Kshemendra N Paul
L S Statler
Lafe E Solomon
Lamont G Kapec
Lanon Baccam
Laura A Fortman
Laura E Vaught
Laura Elizabeth Stuber
Laura H Hogshead
Laura Hussain
Laura J Hildner
Laura Kate Ginns
Laura McClintock
Laura Smith Morton
Laura Taylor-Kale
Lauren Kristina Kidwell
Lauren Leonard
Laurie F Richardson
Lawrence Mitchell
Lawrence Scott Roberts
Leandra English
Lee Koehler Fink
Lee Lynn Zia
Leon Fresco
Leonard J Howie III
Leonard P Joseph
Leonardo Martinez-Diaz
Leslie Ann Weelock
Leslie Jones
Leslie M Proll
Lesly W McNitt
Libia S Gil
Lillian Elizabeth Salerno
Linda Diane Elam
Linda Kay Smith
Linda Lance
Lisa A Austin
Lisa Danzig
Lisa Foster
Lisa J Pino
Lisa Jones
Lisa Lorelei Pena
Lloyd G Thrall
Lois J Schiffer
Lorraine V Faeth
Louis De Baca
Louisa Terrell
Lourdes M Castro Ramirez
Lowry A Crook
Lucas E Guttentag
Lucia Clara Savage
Luis Antonio Jimenez
Luke J McCormack
Luseni J Pieh
Lydia J Muniz
Lynn M Ross
Lynn Marie Fischer Fox
Madhura Chivate Valverde
Mallory Stewart
Mandy Krauthamer Cohen
Mara E Karlin
Marc Matthew Groman
Margaret Buford
Margaret F Plympton
Margaret H Mack
Margaret Harrell
Mari C Aponte
Maria De Lourdes Gonzalez
Maria L Boyce
Maria M Odom
Maria Teresa Nino
Mariacamille Calimlim Touton
Marie Gabrielle Alexia Latortue
Marina Stone Martin
Marion M McFadden
Marissa Padilla
Mark A Munson Sr
Mark Adrian McCall
Mark Cohen
Mark E McArdle
Mark Edward Walsh
Mark Francis Brzezinski
Mark Howard Greenberg
Mark J Hague
Mark Jacobson
Mark K Dowd
Mark R Lewis
Mark Walsh
Marrianne McMullen
Marsha L Catron
Mary E Giovagnoli
Mary Elizabeth McBride
Mary Katherine Wakefield
Mary Smith
Mathew S Nosanchuk
Matthew A Lehrich
Matthew A Vogel
Matthew Axelrod
Matthew Colangelo
Matthew Michael Herrick
Matthew R Fritz
Matthew R Jeppson
Matthew S Collier
Matthew Scott Erskine
Matthew Varilek
Maura Sullivan
Maureen A Shauket
Mauro Albert Morales
Max Minzner
Maynard A Holliday
Meena Seshamani
Megan Beyer
Megan Elizabeth O'Reilly
Megan Uzzell
Meghan M Conklin
Melanie Kenderdine
Melanie Newman
Melinda Cep
Melissa L Flagg
Melissa Schroder Koide
Melvin F Williams
Meredith Ashley Jones
Meredith Olafson
Micah Ragland II
Michael A Coen Jr
Michael A Grant
Michael Allen Dickerson
Michael Arthur Zubrensky
Michael D Deich
Michael D Farber
Michael French
Michael G Williams
Michael J Bean
Michael J Hayes
Michael J Rodriguez
Michael J Yeager
Michael John Griffin
Michael John Stella
Michael Joseph Amato
Michael M Johnson
Michael R Carpenter
Michele Sumilas
Michelle Aronowitz
Michelle Dominguez
Minh-Hai Tran-Lam
Miriam Barnett Vogel
Molly J Moran
Nadya Chinoy Dabby
Neilesh Shelat
Nichole M Distefano Beier
Nicolas Theodore Maduros
Nicole Buffa
Nikol Nabors-Glass
Nitin Natarajan
Noble Wray
Ona Hahs
Paige Herwig
Parrish A Staples
Patricia Hines Adkins
Patricia J Lawrence
Patricia Shiu
Patrick Allen Harr
Patrick C Grant
Patrick J Pontius Jr
Patrick O Patterson
Patrick Pinschmidt
Paul A Hemmersbaugh
Paul A Mussenden
Paul J Sturm
Paul M Rosen
Paula A Gant
Pedro G Ribeiro
Peter C Cook
Peter D Winkler
Peter J Carlton
Peter Martin Loge
Phaedra S Chrousos
Philip A McNamara
Philip J LaVelle
Philip Karsting
Philip R Park
Philippa Scarlett
Phyllis A Schneck
Priya Jayachandran
Priya Radhakrishna Aiyar
Pronita Gupta
Rachel Elizabeth Schumacher
Rachel L Jacobson
Rafael C Diaz
Raj D Nayak
Ramsey Laursoo Kropf
Randall James Devalk
Raphael Prober
Raymond D Cook
Rebecca Bill Chavez
Regina Marie Labelle
Renata B Hesse
Renee Stone
Renwick L Payne
Rhonda M Carter
Richard G Kidd IV
Richard L McKinney
Rick M Garcia
Rishi Ram Sahgal
Robert B Stack
Robert C Zarnetske III
Robert D Macke
Robert G Bell
Robert James Carey
Robert John Clark
Robert Kim
Robert Klopp
Robert M Phillips III
Robert P Silvers
Robert S Taylor
Robert Schiff
Robin E Jacobsohn
Robin J Lerner
Rodney James Stowers
Ron Curry
Ronald Davis
Ronald J Clark
Ronald T Keohane
Ronnie Carleton
Rosetta Lue
Roy F Phillips
Russell Flenoyd Smith
Russell Shilling
Ruth M Milkman
Ruthanne Louise Buck
Ryan P McDermott
Samir Jain
Samuel Hamilton Rikkers
Samuel Hirsch
Samuel T Walsh
Sandra Salstrom
Sandra Veronica Richardson
Sara Aviel
Sara Francis Eckhouse
Sara Maclay Singleton
Sara Manzano-Diaz
Sarah C Neimeyer
Sarah Devins Greenberger
Sarah E Morgenthau
Sarah Levine
Sarah M Fox
Scott Nathan
Sean Cavanaugh
Sean W O'Brien
Seema Nanda
Serena J Hoy
Seth M Galanter
Seth M Stodder
Shannon Elisabeth Roche
Shannon Gilson
Shannon Laverne Rudisill
Shannon Lee Smith
Shannon Spillane Buckingham
Shantanu Kumar Agrawal MD
Shari Wilson
Sharon Elaine Parrott
Sharon I Block
Sharon Leigh Morris
Sharon Werner
Shaun L McGrath
Shawn G Skelly
Shawn Garvin
Sheldon I Friedman
Shirlethia Franklin
Siddharth Mohandas
Simon G Limage
Siva Kumar Chandran
Sonia Pfaffenroth
Sonya Bernstein
Sophia Edwards
Stacey H Mitchell
Stacy Lynn Rodgers
Stefanie Langsam
Stephanie J Jones
Steven E Harris
Steven I Cooper
Steven Jeffrey Hild
Subhasri Ramanathan
Sue Ellen Swenson
Sung-Hee Suh
Susan B Damour
Susan B Keith
Susan M Elliott
Susan P Lagana
Susannah Rogers Fox
Susanne M Lafratta-Decker
Suzanne E Emmerling
Suzanne Palmieri
Sylvia L Hernandez
T F Scott Darling III
Tamara Lynn Fucile
Tameka Montgomery
Tammye Hildamar Trevino
Tara Dawson McGuinness
Tarak N Shah
Terence Szuplat
Teresa A Gonsalves
Teresa Rose Christopher
Teresa W Gerton
Theodore Edward Lecompte
Therese Moretto Jorgensen
Thomas Amadeus Kalil
Thomas B Allin
Thomas Burke
Thomas D Sullivan
Thomas E Cochran
Thomas E Hawley
Thomas E Zoeller
Thomas Echikson
Thomas F Atkin
Thomas L Hungerford
Thomas M Iseman
Thomas P Ehrhard
Thomas P Oppel
Thomas R Frieden
Thomas Richard Hill Jr
Thomas Russell Coderre
Thomas S P Perriello
Thomas W Ross Jr
Timothy Gannon
Timothy Mark Reif
Timothy Rodger McClees
Todd Coker
Tommy Beaudreau
Tonya T Robinson
Torre J Jessup
Tracy R Terrill
Tressa S Guenov
Trevor N Reuschel
Troy H Cribb
Troy McKenzie
Troy S Thomas
Ur M Jaddou
Valente Dolcini
Valerie G Piper
Valerie N Miller
Vanita Gupta
Vernita F Dore
Vicki Anne Turetsky
Victoria A Wachino
Victoria K Holt
Vikrum David Aiyer
Vinai Thummalapally
Virginia Chavez Romano
Virginia P Reno
Walter A Looney
Wendin D Smith
William Bentley
William Bradford Jupp Iii
William G P Monahan
William Jenkins
William K Sutey
William M Roberts
William T Kane
William Tatum (Tate) Heuer
William Woodward
Yeshimebet Abebe
Zachary M Mears

Jan2017
03-19-2018, 09:05 PM
Day 151.3. Stop Opiod Crisis - Start With Oleg and Andy


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylcFSyUgs6I

Bruce Ohr family household, yep . . .. . . and don't forget Comey Chief of Staff (aka HR Haldeman) Jimmy "the Snake" Rybicki . . .


Fidelity
Bravery
Integrity

Swordsmyth
03-19-2018, 10:53 PM
Bruce Ohr family household, yep . . .. . . and don't forget Comey Chief of Staff (aka HR Haldeman) Jimmy "the Snake" Rybicki . . .


Fidelity
Bravery
Integrity

Falsehood
Brutality
Intrigue

goldenequity
03-20-2018, 08:02 PM
►You Won't Find Me in the SES PlumBook - I Work at NAVAIR

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbpnvjk4rZY


►Drilling Down On SES Is the Only Way To Win

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pG-gEWGFhCA


►More Drill Down on SES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYLWI8sB3Rs

goldenequity
03-22-2018, 01:24 AM
SES First Vid / George

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgQpY9F2a2I


Kristine Marcy Founder of SES Surrenders to Field McConnell (Abel Danger)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9lEtLZm3bE

current More...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B21BK7OMcsM


Abel Danger says goodbye to YouTube Censorship

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkVHQZ5qWTU


3-19-2018 Agent Marcy (of Abel Danger) on K2D4 in Wisconsin

https://vimeo.com/261255103


https://vimeo.com/user82128977 channel

goldenequity
03-22-2018, 12:45 PM
OPIR (Overhead Persistent Infrared Radar)

"Originally developed for missile detection and 'battle field awareness'...
the infrared 'system' evolved to provide near-real-time data products for a myriad of end users.
It now far exceeds the 'original intent' of its mission and highlights the extraordinary application of new geo-spatial systems."


Basically, if you're targeting Oil orUranium mining prospects...
You either 'wait' for 'seismic events' to occur naturally then analyze the location for 'telltale' uranium linked 'gasses' to emit
or
if your an 'insider' (think SES)
you can coordinate and 'create' a seismic event via a pre-planned 'weapons testing'.
You know the time. You know and 'target' the place.



Overhead Persistent Infrared Radar - Wishing You Well


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ktQE0T_a8k


Is Susan Rothschild On NOAA Staff?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tccmVecvgqk




Finally Admitting Rothschilds Do Uranium


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g35f_fa0cnc


David, Susanne, Elliot Rothschild - GTE, Logistics?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1yfpb0IWuo


UK: Muhammed Tahir Awan - Space Eyes?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcOIhDpB7ms


RATLINE OVERVIEW

Uranium's First Family - Rothschild?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwTJXPw1NFk

goldenequity
03-22-2018, 02:07 PM
Drugs/Oil for Weapons



MBZ, iDen-Motorola, Raymond Edwin Mabus (Hillary's Sec. of the Navy)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSJxWOtlTN8


Drug For Weapons UAE Hates Above Board Trump

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j39JDhkKlBE


Interesting that both Corsi/Alex Jones seem to be 'ducking' SES revelation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do_fTP9sL0U


MBS (aboveboard weapons purchase) vs MBZ (covert oil-drugs for Weapons)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYsf6hz2EQs





Kompromat


kompromat, short for "compromising material", is damaging information about a politician or other public figure
used to create negative publicity, for blackmail, or for ensuring loyalty.
Kompromat may be acquired from various security services, or outrightly forged, and then publicized by use of a public relations official.







Bannon Sets Up Kushner With Child Molester and MBZ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xp8GWZphJXI


Thanks Bannon.. nice move.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIFLGP4EKLA


KOMPROMAT Everywhere You Look

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DIpS47iFBQ

goldenequity
03-22-2018, 02:14 PM
SES First Vid / George

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgQpY9F2a2I


Kristine Marcy Founder of SES Surrenders to Field McConnell (Abel Danger)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9lEtLZm3bE

current More...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B21BK7OMcsM


Abel Danger says goodbye to YouTube Censorship

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkVHQZ5qWTU


3-19-2018 Agent Marcy (of Abel Danger) on K2D4 in Wisconsin

https://vimeo.com/261255103


https://vimeo.com/user82128977 channel






Jason Chats with Field McConnel 'Abel Danger'.... What's Next for SES + just about any/every thing you could think of


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYtWE59WllU


►other links

Vimeo https://vimeo.com/user82128977
BitChute https://www.bitchute.com/channel/abel-danger/
Livestream https://livestream.com/accounts/1990801
Steemit https://steemit.com/@abeldangerlive
Discord Chat Invite https://discord.gg/HYHeGwB
MailChimp Newsletter https://mailchi.mp/fa6918b7f5b5/abel-danger
GAB https://gab.ai/Telford_Russian
Twitter https://twitter.com/Telford_Russian


========

here's the abel danger chat room on Discord
https://discordapp.com/channels/421843540079804438/421844214423486465



David Hawkins (the other 'half' of Abel Danger)

Kristine Marcy and The Weaponization of American Bureaucracy

https://www.twitch.tv/videos/241666894

goldenequity
03-22-2018, 04:22 PM
SES Update (from the guy who developed the Plum Book database)

The 'DOJ SS 500'


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSvSqvFwfUk

(don't miss this one)



More
https://aim4truth.org/2018/03/22/doj-ses-500-discovered-the-paymasters-of-the-deep-state/

goldenequity
03-22-2018, 11:21 PM
977020202633302016

this is #1 of 21 tweets

goldenequity
03-24-2018, 08:32 PM
3-22-2018 Field McConnell Gives Updates from England
Abel Danger

https://vimeo.com/261388237





3-22-2018 David Hawkins Gives Inputs on Recent News - SES & Novichok
Abel Danger

https://vimeo.com/261396793




Just to be clear: Field McConnell is the 'Granddaddy' of exposing the SES (and SERCO)... at least 3-4 years ago.
carry on.

goldenequity
03-24-2018, 08:42 PM
This kind of stuff always happens... ok w/ me. We all benefit from 'civil' discourse. :)

Debate Challenge Accepted From AIM (aka American Intelligence Media/Thomas Paine (Doug?) )


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTcGzDUf7WI




2 'basic' issues of disagreement are: (imo)
1. How to disarm the SES
2. Whether the SES should be completely de-capitated vs partial take down (are there 'innocents'-'good guys'.)

==========




Update:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wS1IxtAI7hM
►@52:00 Doug backs off his attack on George..

goldenequity
03-25-2018, 09:23 AM
Praetorian Guard (SES)


8 Things You May Not Know About the Praetorian Guard
https://www.history.com/news/history-lists/8-things-you-may-not-know-about-the-praetorian-guard




George...

Drilling Down On the Fake Lawyers in the SES Core

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLxRgls5Ess



Blackberry Backbone Cracked? Now Crack Back Of Sat Hacks?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vjLaUMCQqM



I Wore Rollerskates in Congress For The DoD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axx1sBvKz2U



Rosenstein's Big Announcement at 10 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQIZcdSpbM0



I'm a DOD SES And You're Not - Smelly Walmarter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpFS3Vbf_-4

goldenequity
03-25-2018, 05:56 PM
Whistleblower Sunday




Whistleblower Sunday - Reinstating Robyn Gritz

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwLVHUlw8OE



Battle of Fort Washington

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ILp_mVSmN8


'Don't Give Up the Ship'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3c_4wDuDLk

Swordsmyth
03-26-2018, 07:34 PM
After he escaped from Al Qaeda in Syria, American photojournalist Matt Schrier investigated his own kidnapping and uncovered what he describes as a pattern of "betrayal" by FBI agents handling his case. Schrier is now asking hard questions of former FBI Director Robert Mueller, who now leads the special counsel Russia probe, and former FBI Director James Comey who was fired by President Trump in May 2017.
"Not every FBI agent is bad. Some are very good people," Schrier told Fox News. "But the ones that are bad need to be weeded out. And the ones who let them be bad, and who turn their head, need to be exposed."
In an exclusive cable interview that first aired Monday on "The Story" with Martha MacCallum (http://www.foxnews.com/shows/the-story.html), Schrier went in depth, sharing emails, financial records and formal letters of complaint, which backed up allegations that after he was taken hostage in 2012, the FBI monitored his accounts as Al Qaeda terrorists used his money to buy at least a dozen computers and tablets.
While he was tortured and held by al Nusra, the brutal Al Qaeda franchise in Syria, Schrier claimed the FBI put intelligence gathering ahead of his personal security, hoping to track the computers and tablets to learn more about Al Qaeda recruits and future plots. After his harrowing escape, Schrier started demanding answers from the FBI, which at the time of his kidnapping was led by Mueller.


Since his return to the U.S. in mid-2013, Schrier shared documents with Fox News and expalined, "I faxed-- I emailed them, probably between my mother and my father and me, between 50 and 100 complaints."
Comey took over from Mueller in September 2013, and Schrier said the stonewalling continued. "I was emailing him questions. I was forwarding him all these emails. I was demanding answers from him," Schrier said. "And I never got anything back."
Schrier said he has been unable to obtain credit cards or open new bank accounts because Al Qaeda stole his identify and passwords. Unable to get a lease for an apartment, Schrier said his FBI case manager suggested he temporarily live in a New York City homeless shelter.
"I just got clean clothes without bed bugs. I don't want to go through a situation where I have to deal with lice and bed bugs again. Like, no thank you."

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/26/american-who-escaped-al-qaeda-captivity-says-fbi-under-mueller-and-comey-betrayed-him.html

Swordsmyth
03-28-2018, 02:36 PM
Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz announced Wednesday he will review potential Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) abuses by both the Justice Department and the FBI, following requests from Congress and Attorney General Jeff Sessions.


The Office of the Inspector General released a statement Wednesday outlining the start of the review.
“The OIG will initiate a review that will examine the Justice Department’s and the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s compliance with legal requirements, and with applicable DOJ and FBI policies and procedures, in applications filed with the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) relating to a certain U.S. person,” the statement obtained by Fox News read. “As part of this examination, the OIG also will review information that was known to the DOJ and the FBI at the time the applications were filed from or about an alleged FBI confidential source.”
http://a57.foxnews.com/media2.foxnews.com/BrightCove/694940094001/2018/03/16/300/169/694940094001_5752887947001_5752887502001-vs.jpg?ve=1&tl=1 Video (http://video.foxnews.com/v/5752887502001/sexton-doj-has-been-trying-to-hide-information-about-fisa)
Sexton: DOJ has been trying to hide information about FISA (http://video.foxnews.com/v/5752887502001/sexton-doj-has-been-trying-to-hide-information-about-fisa)

The OIG statement added that Horowitz also would “review the DOJ’s and FBI’s relationship and communications with the alleged source as they relate to the FISC applications.”
The statement continued, “If circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise during the course of the review.”

More at: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/28/doj-inspector-general-investigates-alleged-fisa-abuses-by-doj-fbi.html

Swordsmyth
03-28-2018, 08:36 PM
Newly uncovered text messages between FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page suggest a possible coordination between high-ranking officials at the Obama White House, CIA, FBI, Justice Department and former Senate Democratic leadership in the early stages of the investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to GOP congressional investigators on Wednesday.
The investigators say the information provided to Fox News “strongly” suggests coordination between former President Barack Obama’s Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, then-Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, and CIA Director John Brennan — which they say would “contradict” the Obama administration’s public stance about its hand in the process.

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/28/documents-suggest-possible-coordination-between-cia-fbi-obama-wh-and-dem-officials-early-in-trump-russia-probe-investigators.html

Swordsmyth
03-29-2018, 12:33 AM
A great article: https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/03/russia-collusion-real-story-hillary-clinton-dnc-fbi-media/

pcosmar
03-29-2018, 01:11 AM
opps,, wrong thread.

Swordsmyth
04-04-2018, 11:03 PM
House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Devin Nunes (http://thehill.com/people/devin-nunes) (R-Calif.) is demanding the original FBI document that outlines the bureau's reasoning for opening a counterintelligence investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign's alleged connections to Russia.
His deadline for the DOJ and FBI to provide the unredacted document is April 11. In a letter sent Wednesday to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein (http://thehill.com/people/rod-rosenstein) and FBI Director Christopher Wray, Nunes threatened to take legal action if the agencies do not comply, noting that the committee issued subpoenas in August (http://thehill.com/homenews/house/349337-house-intel-subpoenas-fbi-doj-over-trump-dossier) that "remain in force."
According to Nunes, the previous response to his request was a "heavily redacted version" of the document, which Nunes called "unsatisfactory."



Nunes also requested unrestricted access to four Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) applications the DOJ used to obtain a warrant to spy on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Paige.

More at: http://thehill.com/homenews/house/381716-nunes-demands-original-document-that-prompted-russia-investigation

Jan2017
04-04-2018, 11:07 PM
McCabe and Rybicki need jail - excuse me, correction . . . i mean serious prison time . . .

Sessions HAS to have frozen their passports already.

Jamesiv1
04-04-2018, 11:16 PM
A great article: https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/03/russia-collusion-real-story-hillary-clinton-dnc-fbi-media/
That article is fake news.

Swordsmyth
04-04-2018, 11:18 PM
That article is fake news.

It isn't perfect but it is useful.

Jamesiv1
04-04-2018, 11:22 PM
It isn't perfect but it is useful.
I'm just being ornery. Messing w ya

Swordsmyth
04-04-2018, 11:26 PM
I'm just being ornery. Messing w ya
;)

Swordsmyth
04-06-2018, 08:44 PM
The Department of Justice (DOJ) on Friday agreed to allow additional access by the House Intelligence Committee to view four surveillance applications, calling it an "extraordinary accommodation."
The DOJ said in a letter to the committee that it will allow all members of both the House and Senate Intelligence committees private access to view the classified documents at the Justice Department, emphasizing "unique facts and circumstances."

More at: http://thehill.com/homenews/house/382056-doj-offers-extraordinary-accommodation-allowing-intel-committee-access-to-fisa




The Justice Department failed to meet an initial deadline to give the House Judiciary Committee 1.2 million documents related to the charging decisions in the Hillary Clinton email investigation, possible abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility's recommendation to fire former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.
A Republican Judiciary Committee aide told Fox News late Thursday that the Justice Department had "not yet" complied with the March 22 subpoena issued by committee chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va. The aide added that the committee was "working with officials at DOJ to take immediate steps to comply with the subpoena and produce documents to the Committee."
A Justice Department official confirmed to Fox News that the department was "in ongoing communication with Chairman Goodlatte."

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/05/justice-department-misses-deadline-to-hand-over-fbi-documents-on-fisa-clinton-foundation.html

Swordsmyth
04-06-2018, 11:03 PM
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/2f3a6d0bb445bbd8a11bd4c59c7de08bfcb6dd18152769f0bf 8a65e43de42b96.jpeg

Swordsmyth
04-07-2018, 05:40 PM
As criticism mounts for its delay in turning over documents detailing FBI investigations surrounding the 2016 presidential election to separate House and Senate Committees, the Department of Justice has invited committee members to review the files at its headquarters.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen E. Boyd sent a letter late Friday to House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes inviting congressman and senators to privately view the documents.
“The Department considers this an extraordinary accommodation based on unique facts and circumstances,” Mr. Boyd wrote. “We are also extending this review opportunity o members of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the Department will be in contact to arrange appropriate review sessions in the near future.”

More at: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/6/justice-department-invites-senators-clinton/

goldenequity
04-07-2018, 08:37 PM
As criticism mounts for its delay in turning over documents detailing FBI investigations surrounding the 2016 presidential election to separate House and Senate Committees, the Department of Justice has invited committee members to review the files at its headquarters.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen E. Boyd sent a letter late Friday to House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes inviting congressman and senators to privately view the documents.
“The Department considers this an extraordinary accommodation based on unique facts and circumstances,” Mr. Boyd wrote. “We are also extending this review opportunity o members of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the Department will be in contact to arrange appropriate review sessions in the near future.”

More at: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/6/justice-department-invites-senators-clinton/

screw him. :mad: give us the 1.3M emails/texts/docs to STUDY AND DISSECT. You have stalled CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT for more than a year.
You
are
in
con
tempt!

timosman
04-07-2018, 08:53 PM
screw him. :mad: give us the 1.3M emails/texts/docs to STUDY AND DISSECT. You have stalled CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT for more than a year.
You
are
in
con
tempt!

If you can stall it for so long it does not seem like an oversight. Even if it says CONGRESSIONAL. :(

Oh, wait ....


o·ver·sight, noun
1. an unintentional failure to notice or do something.
"he said his failure to pay for the tickets was an oversight"
synonyms: mistake, error, omission, lapse, slip, blunder; More

2. the action of overseeing something.
"effective oversight of the financial reporting process"

Maybe it needs to be clarified for the members of congress?:confused:

goldenequity
04-08-2018, 04:40 PM
House Considers Impeaching Rosenstein for Delaying and Not Providing Documents Requested by Oversight Committees


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiW4PT_sqGc

Swordsmyth
04-09-2018, 06:06 PM
//

Swordsmyth
04-10-2018, 07:38 PM
NewsAlertHQ‏ @NewsAlertHQ (https://twitter.com/NewsAlertHQ)









Fox News airs a graphic of people who are "waiting to be raided" 1) Hillary #Clinton (https://twitter.com/hashtag/Clinton?src=hash) 2) Bill #Clinton (https://twitter.com/hashtag/Clinton?src=hash) 3) James #Comey........ (https://twitter.com/hashtag/Comey?src=hash)



Pic at: https://twitter.com/NewsAlertHQ/status/983880881482928128

goldenequity
04-10-2018, 11:51 PM
Devin Nunes Delivers 24 Hour Ultimatum: Wray and Rosenstein Deliver EC Origination Documents or Impeachment Vote


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKrdUsTw0xc

Nunes says either FBI Director Chris Wray and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein give him the “electronic communication” (EC) documents
(initiated the counterintelligence operation against candidate Trump in July 2016)
or congress will hold an impeachment vote.

Swordsmyth
04-11-2018, 05:14 PM
https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/984145872241020929

Swordsmyth
04-11-2018, 05:18 PM
Senator Rand Paul‏Verified account @RandPaul (https://twitter.com/RandPaul)









BREAKING: FBI admits that @realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump) haters still have Top Secret security clearances which allows them to access sensitive private information!

https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/984136953502330881

Swordsmyth
04-11-2018, 06:02 PM
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/40b0d2ca28b15cc9d4da8193706c88ee5c24275d3ec901eb63 4dc15f0bfd4d5f.png

Swordsmyth
04-14-2018, 06:03 PM
Chairman Nunes said in a statement via House Intel website (https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=878):

“After numerous unfulfilled requests for an Electronic Communication (EC) related to the opening of the FBI’s Russia counterintelligence probe, Chairman Trey Gowdy and I met this afternoon with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. During the meeting, we were finally given access to a version of the EC that contained the information necessary to advance the Committee’s ongoing investigation of the Department of Justice and FBI. Although the subpoenas issued by this Committee in August 2017 remain in effect, I’d like to thank Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein for his cooperation today.”


The 2-page document known as the “Electronic Communication” is what launched the investigation into the Trump-Russia collusion probe.
Nunes told Sara Carter (https://saraacarter.com/deadline-for-docs-nunes-threatens-to-impeach-rosenstein-and-wray/) the “Electronic Communication” is a central piece of information necessary to their ongoing investigation into the FBI and related matters.

More at: http://thegatewaypundit.com/2018/04/chairman-nunes-releases-statement-after-being-given-access-to-electronic-communication-document-from-doj/?mtcid=cf&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=thegatewaypundit.com&utm_term=68731&utm_content=2219018

goldenequity
04-18-2018, 10:13 PM
Just preceeding the 'Criminal Referral' to the Justice Department on Comey, Hillary, McCabe et al... by 11 congressmen making today's headline...

was this article by True Pundit the day before...
CONFIRMING
what we knew months ago.
We know MORE than this (much more)... but hey
it's a start:

The primary confirmation?
It was ALL being done/started as a US/UK op LONG before FBI/Fusion GPS/DNC
Brennan Brennan Brennan. :)

Read it for yourself.

April 17, 2018
FEDS DROP BOMBSHELL: Comey & Lynch Colluded with Clinton Campaign to Entrap, Wiretap Trump; Illegal Scheme Involved Entire U.S. Intel Community
https://truepundit.com/feds-drop-bombshell-comey-illegal-scheme-involved-entire-u-s-intel-community/






https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crSTWGV3XV4

Swordsmyth
04-19-2018, 12:16 AM
Interesting document:

https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/oig-reports/FinalEvaluation_SESReassignments_Public.pdf

Swordsmyth
04-19-2018, 07:05 PM
After months of resisting, the Justice Department has provided Congress with copies of several memos written by former FBI Director James Comey.The move comes as House Republicans have escalated criticism of the department, threatening to subpoena the documents and questioning officials. In a letter sent to three Republican House committee chairmen Thursday evening, Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd wrote that the department is sending a classified version of the memos and an unclassified version. The department released Boyd's letter publicly but did not release the memos.

More at: https://www.yahoo.com/news/justice-department-agrees-send-comey-memos-congress-201859195--politics.html

Swordsmyth
04-19-2018, 07:47 PM
Supposed Comey Memos have Leaked Online:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4442900-Ex-FBI-Director-James-Comey-s-memos.html

Related:


Apr 19 2018 20:11:51 (EST)
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ
ID: eb1842
1107913 (https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1107792.html#1107913)
NEW

>>1107523
Memos are FAKE.
Guided by LL/+3 CLAS.
Think SC.
All written same time.
Q

Swordsmyth
04-19-2018, 07:58 PM
House lawmakers are zeroing in on a meeting that German chancellor Angela Merkel held with President Obama at a key moment as one of the FISA warrants against Trump was set to expire. Lawmakers are aware of the role of foreign governments in collaborating with U.S. intelligence agencies in the Trump investigation as recently as 2017. Germany provided information beginning in 2015 to aide British spies and the Obama administration in compiling the Christopher Steele “dossier.”
Obama had been called out by the Drudge Report for visiting foreign leaders in Europe in the spring of 2017 right before President Trump visited those leaders in Europe. It turns out that one of those Obama meetings is now under scrutiny on Capitol Hill.
Deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein gave a redacted document to Rep. Devin Nunes, showing two major redactions about the creation of the Trump “Dossier” and the launch of FISA warrants and Robert Mueller’s investigation during the 2016 campaign. The redactions were: “the name of a country and the name of a foreign agent who supplied information.”


Now we know: the country is Germany and the foreign agent was either Angela Merkel or someone who worked for Angela Merkel in foreign intelligence.
The redacted sections will be referencing one of the European countries and agents that share SIGINT (signal intelligence) to US Intelligence,” says Chuck Marler, a longtime agent of the FBI Special Surveillance Group under Robert Mueller, who is an official whistleblower in this case. (https://bigleaguepolitics.com/exclusive-fbi-whistleblower-mueller-lied-senate-intelligence-committee/)
SIGINT countries were involved in sharing information that helped the Christopher Steele dossier to come together. The Guardian reported in an amazingly under-covered article: (https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia) “Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said. The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said.”
So Germany helped build the dossier. When does Merkel re-emerge in this picture?
“Fast forward to April/May 2017, roughly the same time the fourth and final FISA warrant was running out (because the Carter Page story was determined false). Rosenstein and McCabe were in desperate need of renewed help from intelligence to keep the Russian Collusion narrative alive,” Marler reports.
“Well they weren’t going to get help from the CIA because Pompeo was now CIA Director and wouldn’t help with a faux collusion narrative. In comes Obama to the rescue. He meets with Merkel in private (the US no longer monitored her communications because of the previous mishap) to beg for some more Sigint information to keep the collusion narrative alive. Conveniently he meets her hours prior to Trump’s meeting and his stay in her heavily monitored territory.”

More at: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/exclusive-house-lawmakers-investigating-angela-merkels-meeting-obama-trump-probe/

Swordsmyth
04-20-2018, 03:45 PM
In response to the Comey memos, Congressional Committee chairs Devin Nunes (R-CA), Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) and Trey Gowdy (R-SC) fired off a scathing rebuke (https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=879), in which they made it abundantly clear that the Mueller investigation is a farce based on yet another example of the FBI using a flimsy document to launch a politically motivated investigation.
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/nunes-goodlatte-gowdy-comey-009-01-800x416_0.jpg
"These memos are significant for both what is in them and what is not," begins the joint statement, which goes on to completely dress down the FBI and James Comey:


Former Director Comey's memos show the President made clear he wanted allegations of collusion, coordination, and conspiracy between his campaign and Russia fully investigated.



The memos also made clear the ‘cloud’ President Trump wanted lifted was not the Russian interference in the 2016 election cloud, rather it was the salacious, unsubstantiated allegations related to personal conduct leveled in the dossier.



The memos also show former Director Comey never wrote that he felt obstructed or threatened. "he never once mentioned the most relevant fact of all, which was whether he felt obstructed in his investigation."



The memos also make certain what has become increasingly clear of late: former Director Comey has at least two different standards in his interactions with others. He chose not to memorialize conversations with President Obama, Attorney General Lynch, Secretary Clinton, Andrew McCabe or others, but he immediately began to memorialize conversations with President Trump. It is significant former Director Comey made no effort to memorialize conversations with former Attorney General Lynch despite concerns apparently significant enough to warrant his unprecedented appropriation of the charging decision away from her and the Department of Justice in July of 2016.
These memos also lay bare the notion that former Director Comey is not motivated by animus. He was willing to work for someone he deemed morally unsuited for office, capable of lying, requiring of personal loyalty, worthy of impeachment, and sharing the traits of a mob boss. Former Director Comey was willing to overlook all of the aforementioned characteristics in order to keep his job. In his eyes, the real crime was his own firing.



The memos show Comey was blind to biases within the FBI and had terrible judgment with respect to his deputy Andrew McCabe. On multiple occasions he, in his own words, defended the character of McCabe after President Trump questioned McCabe.



Finally, former Director Comey leaked at least one of these memos for the stated purpose of spurring the appointment of Special Counsel, yet he took no steps to spur the appointment of Special Counsel when he had significant concerns about the objectivity of the Department of Justice under Attorney General Loretta Lynch.



"As we have consistently said, rather than making a criminal case for obstruction or interference with an ongoing investigation, these memos would be Defense Exhibit A should such a charge be made."

In response to the memo's release, President Trump exclaimed over Twitter:
"James Comey Memos just out and show clearly that there was NO COLLUSION and NO OBSTRUCTION." adding "Also, he leaked classified information. WOW! Will the Witch Hunt continue?"

James Comey Memos just out and show clearly that there was NO COLLUSION and NO OBSTRUCTION. Also, he leaked classified information. WOW! Will the Witch Hunt continue?
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 20, 2018 (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/987173366401585155?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) Then again, given that the Special Counsel has gone from investigating whether or not the Trump campaign colluded with Russia - to raiding Trump's lawyer over documents related to paying off a porn star, perhaps Mueller's probe is getting a bit long in the tooth...

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-20/nunes-gowdy-and-goodlatte-go-nuclear-after-comey-memos-released

Swordsmyth
04-20-2018, 03:49 PM
The Department of Justice (DOJ) inspector general is now conducting an investigation into classification issues concerning the "Comey memos" leaked to the New York Times by former FBI Director James Comey.
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/comey%20richman.jpg
Sources tell the Wall St. Journal that at least two of the memos which Comey leaked to his "good friend," Columbia Law Professor Daniel Richman, contained information that officials now consider classified - prompting the review by the Office of the Inspector General, headed by Michael Horowitz.

Of those two memos, Mr. Comey himself redacted elements of one that he knew to be classified to protect secrets before he handed the documents over to his friend. He determined at the time that another memo contained no classified information, but after he left the Federal Bureau of Investigation, bureau officials upgraded it to “confidential,” the lowest level of classification. -WSJ (http://archive.is/ZeZQI)
Comey told Congressional investigators that he considered the memos to be personal rather than government documents. The memos - leaked through Richman, were a major catalyst in Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's decision to appoint former FBI Director Robert Mueller as special counsel to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 US election.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-20/comey-memos-probed-doj-classified-info-leaks

Swordsmyth
04-20-2018, 07:09 PM
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/c63eda89bdd91e6196c1d51d598b98bd96835a1155d06cbdf6 06f132290356ea.jpg

Swordsmyth
04-23-2018, 09:24 PM
The Republican chairmen of the House Judiciary Committee and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee announced Monday that the Justice Department has agreed to provide them with documents related to the FBI's investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server.

The deal was struck after Reps. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., and Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., met this month with the U.S. attorney, John Lausch, who has been selected to respond to Republican demands for documents.

"We look forward to reviewing the information to better understand the decisions made by the Department of Justice in 2016 and 2017," Goodlatte and Gowdy said in a joint statement. "Congress has a constitutional responsibility to preserve the integrity of our justice system by ensuring transparency and accountability of actions taken."

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/23/goodlatte-gowdy-say-struck-deal-with-doj-for-hillary-clinton-probe-documents.html

goldenequity
04-24-2018, 03:42 AM
The Republican chairmen of the House Judiciary Committee and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee announced Monday that the Justice Department has agreed to provide them with documents related to the FBI's investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server.

The deal was struck after Reps. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., and Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., met this month with the U.S. attorney, John Lausch, who has been selected to respond to Republican demands for documents.

"We look forward to reviewing the information to better understand the decisions made by the Department of Justice in 2016 and 2017," Goodlatte and Gowdy said in a joint statement. "Congress has a constitutional responsibility to preserve the integrity of our justice system by ensuring transparency and accountability of actions taken."

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/23/goodlatte-gowdy-say-struck-deal-with-doj-for-hillary-clinton-probe-documents.html

complete bullshiit. This isn't 'compliance' and isn't transparency and accountability.
2 pairs of eyeballs and 1.2 million documents is window dressing and no substitute for scrutiny and forensic examination.
Unelected 'Team Mueller' gets unlimited time, unlimited money and unlimited scope.
'Team America' gets this nonsense. It's crap.

Swordsmyth
04-24-2018, 04:44 PM
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/1603c3b285ecadbe475ae6620755e22ffdbfed4aba8a34a642 da974348412383.jpg

Swordsmyth
04-24-2018, 08:37 PM
Columbia Professor Comey Leaked Classified Memos To Claims He was Secret Undercover Squirrel for FBI
The Columbia law professor James Comey used as a go-between last year to leak the contents of sensitive memos to the media confirmed to Fox News on Tuesday that he previously worked as a “special government employee” (SGE) for Comey’s FBI on an unpaid basis.
The professor, Daniel Richman, confirmed the special status in response to an inquiry from Fox News, while referring other questions, including on the scope of his work, to the FBI.
“I did indeed have SGE status with the Bureau (for no pay),” Richman wrote in an email.
Richman emerged last year as the former FBI director’s contact for leaking memos documenting his private discussions with President Trump – memos that are now the subject of an inspector general review over the presence of classified material. Sources familiar with Richman’s status at the FBI told Fox News that he was assigned to “special projects” by Comey, and had a security clearance as well as badge access to the building. Richman’s status was the subject of a Memorandum of Understanding.
Lawmakers are only beginning to raise questions about Richman’s status. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo,” said the information about Richman and his special FBI status first emerged during closed-door testimony by Comey’s former chief of staff James Rybicki before the House oversight and judiciary committees.
“[D]uring that deposition, it was brought out that Daniel Richman, the guy who information was leaked through to The New York Times, had this special status called special government employee status, where he could sort of come and go in the FBI,” Jordan said. He said he could not speak to the significance, but “it seems kind of interesting that the guy who Comey leaks to is a good friend, who had this sort of unfettered access into the FBI.”
Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., also raised questions about the status.

These two stooges think this helps Comey? Nope. Now Comey's pal is on the hook too. He had better protection as a professor who didn't know the Memos were classified. Now he is co-conspirator. Morons. https://t.co/klCJfigOqC
— Thomas Paine (@Thomas1774Paine) April 25, 2018 (https://twitter.com/Thomas1774Paine/status/988960002110042112?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
READ MORE (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/24/comeys-memo-leak-contact-had-special-government-employee-status-at-fbi.html)

https://truepundit.com/columbia-professor-comey-leaked-classified-memos-to-claims-he-was-secret-undercover-squirrel-for-fbi/



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1iteT0UwHg

Swordsmyth
04-25-2018, 06:32 PM
The revelation that former CIA Director John Brennan made a secret trip to Moscow in March 2016, meeting with the Russian Federal Security Service (today’s version of the Soviet KGB), has heightened speculation that Brennan may have been a key figure behind the Trump-Russian collusion story.

The American Thinker, in a story on Brennan's’s secret trip to Russia, believes that it is a real possibility that “John Brennan himself colluded with the Russians to help Hillary win to guarantee his continued tenure as CIA director,” noting that the dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele “was used by Brennan and others as a pretext for a Trump investigation bonanza.”

More at: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/28833-brennan-s-secret-trip-to-moscow-did-he-originate-russian-collusion-story

goldenequity
04-25-2018, 07:07 PM
The revelation that former CIA Director John Brennan made a secret trip to Moscow in March 2016, meeting with the Russian Federal Security Service (today’s version of the Soviet KGB), has heightened speculation that Brennan may have been a key figure behind the Trump-Russian collusion story.

The American Thinker, in a story on Brennan's’s secret trip to Russia, believes that it is a real possibility that “John Brennan himself colluded with the Russians to help Hillary win to guarantee his continued tenure as CIA director,” noting that the dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele “was used by Brennan and others as a pretext for a Trump investigation bonanza.”

More at: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/28833-brennan-s-secret-trip-to-moscow-did-he-originate-russian-collusion-story

This is just more fuel to add onto Brennan's ALREADY documented collusion with Ex-GCHQ Chief Robert Hannigan
to initiate what BECAME the 'dossier'.
Here's an up to date litany:

April 9, 2018 by Jeff Carlson, CFA
John Brennan’s Role in the FBI’s Trump-Russia Investigation
https://www.themarketswork.com/2018/04/09/john-brennans-role-in-the-fbis-trump-russia-investigation/

It's the same crime ring that spans the globe, in every major country and in every agency you can think of... Russia included.

TER
04-25-2018, 07:42 PM
This timeline will be in history books.

Swordsmyth
04-27-2018, 03:09 PM
Buried within a newly declassified congressional report on Russian meddling (https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/20180322/108023/HRPT-115-1.pdf) in the 2016 U.S. elections is a shocking revelation: former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper not only leaked information about the infamous Steele dossier and high-level government briefings about it to CNN, he also may have lied to Congress about the matter.

In one of the findings within the 253-page report, the House intelligence committee wrote that Clapper leaked details of a dossier briefing given to then-President-elect Donald Trump to CNN’s Jake Tapper, lied to Congress about the leak, and was rewarded with a CNN contract a few months later.


“Clapper flatly denied ‘discussing[ing] the dossier [compiled by Steele] or any other intelligence related to Russia hacking of the 2016 election with journalists,'” the committee found.
When asked directly whether he had ever discussed the dossier with any journalists, Clapper replied that he had not, according to a transcript of the proceedings:

MR. ROONEY: Did you discuss the dossier or any other intelligence related to Russia hacking of the 2016 election with journalists?

MR. CLAPPER: No.
The former DNI later changed his story after he was confronted specifically about his communications with Jake Tapper of CNN.
“Clapper subsequently acknowledged discussing the ‘dossier with CNN journalist Jake Tapper,’ and admitted that he might have spoken with other journalists about the same topic,” the report continued. “Clapper’s discussion with Tapper took place in early January 2017, around the time IC leaders briefed President Obama and President-elect Trump, on ‘the Christopher Steele information,’ a two-page summary of which was ‘enclosed in’ the highly-classified version of the ICA,” or intelligence community assessment.
The briefing of Trump by U.S. intelligence chiefs was held on January 6. CNN published its story on the briefing (https://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/donald-trump-intelligence-report-russia/index.html), based on anonymous leaks from “two national security officials,” on January 10. BuzzFeed published the full dossier (https://www.buzzfeed.com/kenbensinger/these-reports-allege-trump-has-deep-ties-to-russia?utm_term=.jtZkNK4nZd#.mnX6ya7Yj0), which was jointly funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (https://www.axios.com/clinton-campaign-dnc-backed-research-for-trump-russia-dossier-1513306427-8feadb36-a1be-41e8-8f29-1e654d1c7112.html), minutes after the CNN story was published.

The revelation that Clapper was responsible for leaking details of both the dossier and briefings to two presidents on the matter is significant, because former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) director James Comey wrote in one of four memos that he leaked (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4442900-Ex-FBI-Director-James-Comey-s-memos.html) that the briefing of Trump on salacious and unverified allegations from the dossier was necessary because “CNN had them and were looking for a news hook.”
The congressional report on Russian interference noted that it was this very briefing of Trump that multiple media organizations used as an excuse to publish the unverified dossier.

More at: http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/27/house-intel-report-james-clapper-lied-dossier-leaks-cnn/

Swordsmyth
04-27-2018, 05:42 PM
The Justice department has finally produced (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-24/missing-strzok-page-texts-russia-insurance-policy-period-be-released-momentarily) 49 pages comprising around 300 previously "missing (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-24/missing-strzok-page-texts-russia-insurance-policy-period-be-released-momentarily)" text messages sent between two anti-Trump FBI employees in charge of investigating him. The messages, sent between FBI special agent Peter Strzok and FBI counsel Lisa Page, who were also having an extramarital affair together, span the period between December 16, 2016 and May 23, 2017.
As the Daily Caller (http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/27/read-the-strozk-page-texts-in-full/) reports, many of the messages are in shorthand and out of context. Congressional investigators will be sifting through them and piecing them together with previously released text messages to see if there is further evidence of political bias from two people acting in roles which required the utmost impartiality.

Interestingly, one of the text messages refers to opening "a case we've been waiting on" and doing it "now while Andy is acting."

New texts between Strzok and Page show their dismay at the firing of Comey & in the immediate aftermath of his firing on May 9, 2017, Strzok texted: "We need to open the case we've been waiting on now while Andy is acting." What case was he referring to? https://t.co/2R7EU92LIv pic.twitter.com/1tHiYKrgSi (https://t.co/1tHiYKrgSi)
— Nick Short ���� (@PoliticalShort) April 27, 2018 (https://twitter.com/PoliticalShort/status/989753395723386881?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) Another text shows Strzok's concern over former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and FBI employee Sally Yates all playing into the "there should be an unmasking request/record" for incidental collection incorrect narrative."

#breaking (https://twitter.com/hashtag/breaking?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) Strozk and Page texts confirm ‘incidental collection’ was an INCORRECT NARRATIVE. pic.twitter.com/ig1qXEpgAk (https://t.co/ig1qXEpgAk)
— steviewires (@steviedeadlocks) April 27, 2018 (https://twitter.com/steviedeadlocks/status/989880215802400768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) Independent investigator George Webb (Sweigert), who is notably suing Andrew McCabe, Hillary Clinton, Fusion GPS, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner, the Awan family and John Podesta - notes that there are only two texts per day in today's release, vs. 12 texts per day in prior releases - implying that the DOJ is withholding texts.

Metadata on Strzok-Page email doesn’t add up. Twelve texts a day down to two a day during the coup? pic.twitter.com/JUZw0RSIxJ (https://t.co/JUZw0RSIxJ)
— TruthLeaks (@GeorgWebb) April 27, 2018 (https://twitter.com/GeorgWebb/status/989896240849719303?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-27/here-are-missing-strzok-page-texts-doj-finally-handed-over-congress

timosman
04-27-2018, 11:35 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dycp2x_hWbA

Swordsmyth
04-28-2018, 01:53 PM
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has pushed back the estimated completion date of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents pertaining to its communications with the security firm that examined the Democratic National Committee’s hacked servers to October.
The Washington Free Beacon submitted the FOIA request in July 2017 with the FBI seeking all communication between the bureau and CrowdStrike, Inc., the California-based cyber security firm that examined the DNC’s servers following the infiltration that led to the release of John Podesta’s emails. The FBI said in December the documents should be available by March.
The FBI, which was never granted access to the DNC’s servers for inspection, instead relied on the third-party firm that was brought in by the DNC for information regarding the compromised network who concluded that Russia was behind the hack.

More at: http://freebeacon.com/issues/fbi-delays-release-communications-firm-examined-dnc-servers/

TheCount
04-28-2018, 04:57 PM
This timeline will be in history books.
Should Trump's presidential library include the pee tape?

timosman
04-28-2018, 06:58 PM
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has pushed back the estimated completion date of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents pertaining to its communications with the security firm that examined the Democratic National Committee’s hacked servers to October.
The Washington Free Beacon submitted the FOIA request in July 2017 with the FBI seeking all communication between the bureau and CrowdStrike, Inc., the California-based cyber security firm that examined the DNC’s servers following the infiltration that led to the release of John Podesta’s emails. The FBI said in December the documents should be available by March.
The FBI, which was never granted access to the DNC’s servers for inspection, instead relied on the third-party firm that was brought in by the DNC for information regarding the compromised network who concluded that Russia was behind the hack.

More at: http://freebeacon.com/issues/fbi-delays-release-communications-firm-examined-dnc-servers/


Am I the only one to whom FBI looks like a bunch of incompetent schmucks unable to prosecute anybody? How do they ever get anything done?:cool:

unknown
04-29-2018, 02:01 PM
Doesnt FISA rubber stamp damn near everything regardless?

Swordsmyth
04-30-2018, 08:17 PM
Conservative House allies of President Donald Trump (http://www.chicagotribune.com/topic/politics-government/donald-trump-PEBSL000163-topic.html) have drafted articles of impeachment against Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who oversees the ongoing special counsel probe, setting up a possible GOP (http://www.chicagotribune.com/topic/politics-government/republican-party-ORGOV0000004-topic.html) showdown over the federal investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The document, which was obtained by The Washington Post, underscores the growing chasm between congressional Republican leaders, who have maintained for months that Special Counsel Robert Mueller (http://www.chicagotribune.com/topic/crime-law-justice/robert-s.-mueller-iii-PEPLT0008908-topic.html) should be allowed to proceed, and rank-and-file GOP lawmakers who have repeatedly battled the Justice Department (http://www.chicagotribune.com/topic/crime-law-justice/u.s.-department-of-justice-ORGOV0000160-topic.html) during the past year.
The draft articles, which one of its authors called a "last resort," would be unlikely to garner significant support in Congress (http://www.chicagotribune.com/topic/politics-government/government/u.s.-congress-ORGOV0000131-topic.html). But it could serve as a provocative political weapon for conservatives in their standoff with Mueller and the Justice Department.
Members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus (http://www.chicagotribune.com/topic/politics-government/freedom-caucus-ORGPOL00005-topic.html) - led by Rep. Mark Meadow, R-N.C., a Trump confidant - finalized the draft in recent days. It came after weeks of disputes with Rosenstein over the Justice Department's response to congressional requests for documents about the decisions and behavior of federal law-enforcement officials working on the Russia investigation and other federal probes, including the investigation into 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton (http://www.chicagotribune.com/topic/politics-government/government/hillary-clinton-PEPLT007433-topic.html)'s email server.
Meadows acknowledged the draft in an interview Monday, calling the one-page document "a last resort option, if the Department of Justice fails to respond" for his requests for more information.
"My frustrations about their inability to respond to simple requests could warrant further action," Meadows said, adding that many of his colleagues are nearing a breaking point with Rosenstein.

More at: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-rosenstein-impeachment-20180430-story.html

Swordsmyth
05-01-2018, 06:31 PM
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein pushed back against his House Republican critics on Tuesday, warning that the Justice Department is "not going to be extorted" amid threats that he could be impeached."There have been people who have been making threats privately and publicly against me for quite some time, and I think they should understand by now the Department of Justice is not going to be extorted," Rosenstein said at an event at the Newseum in Washington.

More at: https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/01/politics/rod-rosenstein-rule-of-law/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+rss%252Fcnn_allpolitics+(RS S%253A+CNN+-+Politics)

Swordsmyth
05-01-2018, 07:24 PM
The special counsel's office wants two more months before it looks toward sentencing former national security adviser Michael Flynn (http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/31/politics/robert-mueller-michael-flynn/index.html), who has pleaded guilty to lying to investigators and is cooperating in the Russia probe."Due to the status of the special counsel's investigation, the parties do not believe that this matter is ready to be scheduled for a sentencing hearing at this time," Robert Mueller's prosecutors and Flynn's lawyers told the DC federal court on Tuesday.
Flynn pleaded guilty five months ago. Prosecutors have previously delayed scheduling his sentencing.

More at: https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/01/politics/michael-flynn-sentencing/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+rss%252Fcnn_allpolitics+(RS S%253A+CNN+-+Politics)

Swordsmyth
05-04-2018, 01:00 PM
A judge sharply questioned whether Special Counsel Robert Mueller overstepped his authority by charging Paul Manafort with crimes unrelated to Russian election interference while also suggesting that the onetime Trump campaign chairman was indicted to coerce his cooperation against the president.
U.S. District Judge T. S. Ellis III expressed deep skepticism Friday about whether Mueller went too far in signing a bank- and tax-fraud indictment against Manafort. Ellis questioned how Mueller could prosecute financial crimes dating back a decade without charging Manafort for his election activities.
“I don’t see how this indictment has anything to do with anything the special prosecutor is authorized to investigate,” Ellis said at a hearing on a motion by Manafort to dismiss the case. The hearing ended without a ruling, and Ellis didn’t say when he would decide the matter in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia.
The judge’s unusually provocative remarks and questions don’t necessarily indicate how he will rule, but they put Mueller’s team on the defensive. The special counsel’s office was given two weeks to deliver an unredacted version of a Justice Department memo authorizing Mueller’s work.
A dismissal would be a blow to Mueller as he faces political attacks by President Donald Trump, congressional Republicans and conservative media. Still, Manafort faces an indictment in Washington on charges that he laundered millions of dollars and failed to register as a foreign agent of Ukraine.


Ellis said it appeared that prosecutors were using the indictment of Manafort to pressure him to cooperate against Trump. Manafort, 69, has pleaded not guilty and disputes Mueller’s assertion that he violated U.S. laws when he worked for a decade as a political consultant for pro-Russian groups in Ukraine.
“You don’t really care about Mr. Manafort’s bank fraud,” Ellis told four prosecutors working for Mueller. “You really care about what information he might give you about Mr. Trump and what might lead to his impeachment or prosecution.”
Manafort attorney Kevin Downing argued that Mueller overstepped his May 2017 appointment order, which directed him to pursue links between Russia and the Trump campaign, as well as “any matter that arose or may arise directly” from the investigation. He said that Mueller improperly took over existing Justice Department investigations into Manafort without adequately explaining what connection it had to the Russia probe.

At the hearing, Justice Department attorney Michael Dreeben argued that Mueller acted properly and always consulted with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who is overseeing the investigation, about the steps he was taking. He pointed to an Aug. 2 memo that said Manafort may have “committed a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials” to interfere in the election, and that he illegally handled payments he got from the pro-Russian Ukrainian government.


Most of the three-page memo is blacked out, and Dreeben said it wasn’t necessary to share the rest of it because it didn’t relate to Manafort. But Ellis ordered that prosecutors give him the full memo within two weeks, saying he’ll determine whether the explanation of why Manafort was under investigation is adequate.
Mueller’s office took over an investigation of Manafort that had been conducted by prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia, where Ellis sits. The judge appeared impatient with Dreeben, who has argued more than 100 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. Ellis repeatedly interrupted Dreeben as he pressed for an explanation of Mueller’s authority.
“It covers bank fraud in 2005 and 2007?” Ellis said. “Tell me how. How does that have to do with links or coordination with Russia and Trump?”
Dreeben said the investigations were “folded together with our overall examination of Mr. Manafort’s conduct,” and he was indicted based on information developed by Mueller as they followed the trail of money that left Ukraine.
“This indictment didn’t arise from your investigation,” Ellis said. “It arose from the pre-existing investigation.”

More at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-04/manafort-judge-questions-if-mueller-overstepped-his-authority

Swordsmyth
05-04-2018, 01:05 PM
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes is blasting the FBI and Department of Justice for “excessive and sloppy redactions” amid efforts to unseal a redacted section having to do with the FBI’s interview of former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
“The excessive and sloppy redactions applied to the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia report deny the American people the opportunity to know and understand the report’s full findings and conclusions,” Nunes told Fox News.
A key section of the report concludes FBI agents “did not detect any deception during Flynn’s interview” despite his eventual guilty plea in the special counsel’s Russia probe for making false statements.
A source familiar with the House Intelligence report told Fox News that heavily redacted sections on pages 53 and 54 back up the report’s conclusion about Flynn, and the source challenged former FBI Director James Comey’s public statements on the issue.
In his interview last week on Fox News’ “Special Report,” Comey denied that he ever told lawmakers his FBI agents didn’t believe Flynn intentionally lied.
“No, I saw that in the media,” Comey said. “Someone misunderstood something I said. I didn’t believe that and didn’t say that.”
The House Intelligence Committee report, which was disputed by Democrats and released over their objections, provides virtually no public information to back up its conclusion about Flynn’s interactions with the agents – as most of the section explaining that finding is redacted.


“The deliberate withholding of this vital information from the public is inexplicable and intolerable,” Nunes said. “Protecting executive branch officials and agencies from embarrassment is not a valid reason to hide information and will not be accepted by Congress.”
Speaking to Fox News’ Tucker Carlson after the report’s release, Nunes said it was impossible for Comey to know what investigators found because so many sections were blacked out.
“Mr. Comey probably never read our report, likely because the Department of Justice and FBI redacted so much of it, that if you go online and try to read our report, you’ll see that much of it you can’t even read,” Nunes said. “So he doesn’t know what we have.”

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/02/intel-committee-chairman-blasts-sloppy-redactions-in-russia-report-amid-flynn-mystery.html

Swordsmyth
05-04-2018, 01:06 PM
Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s widely anticipated testimony next week before the House Oversight Committee has been postponed, as the Justice Department IG has pursued new leads in his review of the Hillary Clinton email investigation, according to a congressional letter and sources familiar with the matter.
“It is of the utmost importance that your review be as fulsome, complete and unimpeded as possible,” Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., the chairman of the committee, wrote in a recent letter to Horowitz obtained by Fox News.
Horowitz was scheduled to appear before the committee on May 8. But Gowdy told Horowitz he wants to reschedule his testimony “as close to the day the report is finalized as is practicable.”
Gowdy said the decision to postpone is based on “the representations” in an April 23 letter from Horowitz.


The developments suggest Horowitz is still working to complete his review of the FBI and DOJ's handling of the Clinton case. Sources familiar with the review have told Fox News that Horowitz has continued to pursue new leads and witnesses in recent weeks.
During a speech Friday, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said he expects Horowitz’s review will be finalized soon.
“Within the next few weeks, I anticipate that our inspector general will complete a comprehensive, fair and nonpartisan report that answers many questions about how the Department of Justice handled a high-profile investigation during the last presidential campaign,” Rosenstein said. “We will learn from it, and our Department will do better in the future.”

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/04/doj-inspector-generals-testimony-postponed-amid-new-leads-in-clinton-case-review.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Interna l+-+Politics+-+Text%29

Swordsmyth
05-05-2018, 01:49 AM
Two FBI officials who have faced scrutiny in recent months resigned from the bureau on Friday, sources familiar with their departures have confirmed to CNN.Lisa Page, who served as an FBI lawyer and close adviser to former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, voluntarily resigned Friday, a source close to Page told CNN.
Page came under increasing attack after her text messages with FBI special agent Peter Strzok (https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/26/politics/missing-strzok-page-text-messages/index.html) criticizing President Donald Trump came to light last winter. She briefly served on special counsel Robert Mueller's team last summer before returning to her duties at the FBI.
The text messages between Strzok and her became fodder for the President and Republican lawmakers who leveled accusations (https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/21/politics/second-strzok-text-production/index.html) that some members of the FBI working on the Russia probe are biased against Trump.
James A. Baker, the former general counsel for the FBI and one of former FBI Director James Comey's closest advisers, also resigned Friday, according to a source familiar with Baker's departure. A second source familiar with Baker's thinking said his departure was unrelated to Page's resignation and that hers came as a surprise to him.

More at: https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/04/politics/fbi-officials-lisa-page-james-baker-resign/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+rss%252Fcnn_topstories+(RSS %253A+CNN+-+Top+Stories)

Swordsmyth
05-05-2018, 01:50 AM
Two FBI officials who have faced scrutiny in recent months resigned from the bureau on Friday, sources familiar with their departures have confirmed to CNN.Lisa Page, who served as an FBI lawyer and close adviser to former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, voluntarily resigned Friday, a source close to Page told CNN.
Page came under increasing attack after her text messages with FBI special agent Peter Strzok (https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/26/politics/missing-strzok-page-text-messages/index.html) criticizing President Donald Trump came to light last winter. She briefly served on special counsel Robert Mueller's team last summer before returning to her duties at the FBI.
The text messages between Strzok and her became fodder for the President and Republican lawmakers who leveled accusations (https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/21/politics/second-strzok-text-production/index.html) that some members of the FBI working on the Russia probe are biased against Trump.
James A. Baker, the former general counsel for the FBI and one of former FBI Director James Comey's closest advisers, also resigned Friday, according to a source familiar with Baker's departure. A second source familiar with Baker's thinking said his departure was unrelated to Page's resignation and that hers came as a surprise to him.

More at: https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/04/politics/fbi-officials-lisa-page-james-baker-resign/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+rss%252Fcnn_topstories+(RSS %253A+CNN+-+Top+Stories)

May 4 2018 20:47:29 (EST)
Q !2jsTvXXmXs
64

(https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#64) Justice_1.jpg
(https://qanon.pub/data/images/89e8be3f0b37a19c27ec58fde566cdc31c26c8b9c4b72f49f7 34656f354cdea4.jpg)
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/data/images/89e8be3f0b37a19c27ec58fde566cdc31c26c8b9c4b72f49f7 34656f354cdea4.jpg
Apr 27 2018 22:40:01 (EST)
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ
ID: 5086f0
1218147

(https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1217600.html#1218147) Focus only on the FBI [for now].
Jim Rybicki, chief of staff and senior counselor - FIRED.
James Baker, general counsel - FIRED.
Andrew McCabe, deputy director - FIRED.
James Comey, director - FIRED.
Bill Priestap, Head of Counterintelligence and Strzok’s boss - Cooperating witness [power removed].
Peter Strzok, Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence - cooperating witness [power removed].
Lisa Page, attorney with the FBI's Office of the General Counsel - cooperating witness [power removed].
Conspiracy?
Think about the above.
Only the above.
Get the picture?
Q



[Updated]
James Baker - FIRED [reported today - resigned [false]] / removed Jan/FIRED 4.21
Lisa Page - FIRED [reported today - resigned [false]]
Testimony received.
Tracking_y.
[Added]
Mike Kortan, FBI Assistant Director for Public Affairs - FIRED [cooperating under 'resigned' title]
Josh Campbell, Special Assistant to James Comey - FIRED
[DOJ]
David Laufman, Chief of the Justice Department’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section [NAT SEC - HRC email invest] - FIRED/FORCE
John Carlin, Assistant Attorney General – Head of DOJ’s National Security Division - FIRED/FORCE
Sally Yates, Deputy Attorney General & Acting Attorney General - FIRED
Mary McCord, Acting Assistant Attorney General – Acting Head of DOJ’s National Security Division - FIRED/FORCE
Bruce Ohr, Associate Deputy Attorney General – Demoted 2x - cooperating witness [power removed]
Rachel Brand, Associate Attorney General – No. 3 official behind Deputy AG Rosenstein - FIRED/FORCE
Cross against House/Senate resignations/final term announcements + CEO departures.
CONSPIRACY?
FAKE NEWS?
THE SWAMP IS BEING DRAINED.
TRUST THE PLAN.
JUSTICE.
Q

Swordsmyth
05-05-2018, 01:57 AM
Lawyers for the company accused of funding Russia’s election interference trolls are demanding that special counsel Robert Mueller turn over reams of information, including the identities of informants, details of any electronic surveillance, and a list of “each and every instance” since 1945 in which the U.S. “engaged in operations to interfere with elections and political processes in any foreign country.”

More at: https://www.thedailybeast.com/russian-troll-farm-goes-after-muellers-files?yptr=yahoo

Swordsmyth
05-05-2018, 02:00 AM
Special counsel Robert Mueller's office appears to be in an early stalemate in its efforts to bring a criminal case against Russians allegedly involved in Moscow's efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election. Although one Russian company indicted by Mueller in February, Concord Management and Consulting, has US attorneys and a court hearing scheduled, the special counsel's team hasn't been able to reach the company or its co-defendants.
The Russian government's top legal office wouldn't accept paperwork from US law enforcement in the case, and the company has already hit back at Mueller by demanding more evidence and information.
The tit-for-tat was revealed in a court filing Friday when Mueller's prosecutors asked to reschedule a hearing about the criminal case against 13 Russians and associated companies, who allegedly influenced the election using social media. The hearing was set for May 9.
The situation shows how difficult it will be for Mueller to bring Russians to justice for allegedly interfering in the 2016 election.
The prosecutors said in Friday's filing that they don't know whether one of the companies indicted alongside the Russians was served with a summons in the case.
Mueller's team has tried to reach the Russians, first with the summons delivered to the office of the prosecutor general of Russia on March 20. They have also tried to reach the Russians through the power of international treaties. The Russian law enforcement office declined to accept the summonses, US prosecutors said.
"To the government's knowledge, no further steps have been taken within Russia to effectuate service," prosecutors told the judge in DC federal court on Friday.

More at: https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/04/politics/mueller-russia-case-indictments/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+rss%252Fcnn_allpolitics+(RS S%253A+CNN+-+Politics)

Swordsmyth
05-06-2018, 09:48 PM
The FBI is refusing to pursue work-related text messages and emails sent on the personal devices of Peter Strzok and Lisa Page - the FBI "lovebirds" discovered to harbor extreme political bias for Hillary Clinton and against Donald Trump while actively involved in cases against each candidate during the 2016 US election. Clinton was of course exonerated by the FBI despite overwhelming evidence of criminal conduct, while Trump's entire presidency has been tainted by the spectre of unproven Russian collusion.
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/grassleymad_0.jpg
Over 50,000 text messages between Strzok and Page were discovered by the Department of Justice's internal watchdog, the Office of Inspector General (OIG), leading to their removal from special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation - which has since devolved into trying to embarrass the President over allegedly paying a porn star not to discuss consensual sex. Of note, Page tendered her resignation (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-05/fbi-chaos-comey-caught-lie-over-flynn-investigation-anti-trump-lovebird-lisa-page) on Friday.
In a Wednesday letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee, FBI Director Christopher Wray said that the FBI was not "obligated" to collect all communications between employees, and would not be pursuing communications Strzok and Page sent to each other on their personal devices.
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/strzok_0.jpg
In response, Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) went nuclear - reminding Wray in a Friday letter (https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-05-04%20CEG%20to%20FBI%20(Strzok%20Page%20Records).pd f) cc'd to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) that "Although, as your letter notes, the FBI is not "obligated" to collect all communications between employees, it is obligated to collect and preserve federal records."
Grassley goes on to note that previously released text messages between Strzok and Page "show substantial reason to believe government work was performed on non-government systems during the course of a high-profile investigation," and that those communications could prove vital to the Committee's investigation.

The work-related communications on nongovernment systems could shed more light on how the FBI handled the Clinton investigation and would constitute federal records that the FBI would be obligated to retrieve and preserve under the Federal Records Act. -Sen. Grassley to FBI Director Wray
The letter then provides several examples in which Strzok and Page explicitly referred to exchanging work-related information over their personal devices.
"For example, in two text messages Strzok said to Page:"

Gmailed you two drafts of what I’m thinking of sending Bill, would appreciate your thoughts. Second (more recent) is updated so you can skip the first.
...
Yep. Sent something to your gmail, work-related. Think I’m going to pull here and send to Kortan….
"In another text message, Strzok and Page appear to use the encrypted iMessage application on their personal Apple devices to discuss work-related material:"

Strzok: Want to imsg it to me, or want to do it in person?
Page: It’s not that sensitive.
Strzok: Ok. You can imsg just for convenience of typing, too, if you want
...
Strzok: And I have no good, awful, sh*tty terrible (work) news. I can’t say it here, and you can’t share with Andy (yet). I’m upset.
Page: Can you share it on imsg?
Strzok: Yes just sent[.]8
Grassley then excoriates the FBI - comparing Strzok and Page's use of personal devices for work purposes to Hillary Clinton's mishandling of classified information on her personal server - which Strzok and Page were investigating.
"Under 18 U.S.C. § 2071, it is illegal to willfully and unlawfully conceal, remove, or destroy a federal record. Secretary Clinton alienated thousands of federal records when she used a nongovernment server and email for official work, many of which were deleted rather than returned to the State Department when the Department requested them. Ironically, as FBI employees tasked with investigating Clinton’s similar conduct, Strzok and Page appear to have used nongovernment systems for official work as well. This Committee has yet to receive a satisfactory explanation as to why the FBI apparently let Secretary Clinton off the hook for multiple § 2071 violations. It is disturbing that even at this late date, and with all the litigation surrounding Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server for official business, the FBI seems similarly uninterested in even attempting to retrieve federal records of its own employees that appear to have been alienated as well."
Grassley then asks three questions of Wray, noting that he expects the response to be unclassified:


Why has the FBI not requested from Ms. Page or Mr. Strzok any official work-related material from their personal devices and email accounts?
Why has the FBI not conducted searches of non-FBI-issued communications devices or non-FBI email accounts associated with Mr. Strzok or Ms. Page for official work-related material?
The FBI’s May 3, 2018, response letter also failed to answer questions 1-5, 8, and 11. Please provide answers and the requested documentation by the deadline.





More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-06/fbi-refuses-pursue-personal-strzok-page-texts-grassley-goes-nuclear

Swordsmyth
05-06-2018, 09:54 PM
Lawyers for the company accused of funding Russia’s election interference trolls are demanding that special counsel Robert Mueller turn over reams of information, including the identities of informants, details of any electronic surveillance, and a list of “each and every instance” since 1945 in which the U.S. “engaged in operations to interfere with elections and political processes in any foreign country.”

More at: https://www.thedailybeast.com/russian-troll-farm-goes-after-muellers-files?yptr=yahoo

Politico's Gerstein notes that by defending against the charges, “Concord could force prosecutors to turn over discovery about how the case was assembled as well as evidence that might undermine the prosecution’s theories.”
In a mad scramble to put the brakes on the case, Mueller's team tried to say that Concord never formally accepted the court summons related to the case, wrapping themselves in a "cloud of confusion" as Powerline puts it. “Until the Court has an opportunity to determine if Concord was properly served, it would be inadvisable to conduct an initial appearance and arraignment at which important rights will be communicated and a plea entertained.”
The Russians hit back against Mueller's attempt to delay - filing a response (http://redirect.viglink.com/?format=go&jsonp=vglnk_152565547918812&key=abd7fb656f4225b209f52eeeaddc9f25&libId=jgvjq6t90101xr40000DA1ccofad5ya41d&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.powerlineblog.com%2Farchives% 2F2018%2F05%2Fmueller-would-prefer-not-to.php%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dsw%26 utm_campaign%3Dsw&v=1&out=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Ff%2F%3Fid%3D0 0000163-3131-d4e8-a5ff-b7732a9e0000&title=Mueller%20would%20prefer%20not%20to%20%5BWit h%20Comment%20by%20John%5D%20%7C%20Power%20Line&txt=here) on Friday to let the court know that “[Concord] voluntarily appeared through counsel as provided for in [the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure], and further intends to enter a plea of not guilty. [Concord] has not sought a limited appearance nor has it moved to quash the summons. As such, the briefing sought by the Special Counsel’s motion is pettifoggery.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/petifogger_0.JPG
And the Judge agreed...

A federal judge has rejected special counsel Robert Mueller’s request to delay the first court hearing in a criminal case charging three Russian companies and 13 Russian citizens with using social media and other means to foment strife among Americans in advance of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
In a brief order Saturday evening, U.S. District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich offered no explanation for her decision to deny a request prosecutors made Friday to put off the scheduled Wednesday arraignment for Concord Management and Consulting, one of the three firms charged in the case. -Politico (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/04/mueller-russia-interference-election-case-delay-570627)
In other words, Mueller was just denied the opportunity to kick the can down the road, and will likely be forced to produce the requested evidence or withdraw the indictment, potentially jeopardizing the PR aspect of the entire "Trump collusion" probe.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-06/mueller-investigation-jeopardy-witch-hunt-accusations-play-out-court

Swordsmyth
05-06-2018, 11:11 PM
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes said Sunday he will be pushing to hold Attorney General Jeff Sessions in contempt this week for not complying with a subpoena.

.@DevinNunes (https://twitter.com/DevinNunes?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw): We have to move quickly to hold AG Jeff Sessions in contempt, and that’s what I’m going to press for this week pic.twitter.com/QsPdcrVSwq (https://t.co/QsPdcrVSwq)
— FOX & friends (@foxandfriends) May 6, 2018 (https://twitter.com/foxandfriends/status/993132022838083585?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
The California Republican said his committee sent a letter requesting classified information regarding its probe into FISA abuses and counterintelligence investigations, including the targeting of Americans like former Trump campaign official Carter Page, but it was ignored.
After attempting to subpoena the classified information last week, Mr. Nunes discovered the Justice Department will not comply.
“We have to move quickly to hold the Attorney General of the United States in contempt and that’s what I want to press for this week,” Mr. Nunes told Fox News on Sunday.

More at: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/may/6/devin-nunes-push-hold-jeff-sessions-contempt/

Swordsmyth
05-09-2018, 02:18 PM
FBI and national intelligence officials warned the White House last week that information requested by House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes could put a top-secret intelligence source at risk, The Washington Post reported on Tuesday. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/risk-to-intelligence-source-who-aided-russia-investigation-at-center-of-latest-showdown-between-nunes-and-justice-dept/2018/05/08/d6fb66f8-5223-11e8-abd8-265bd07a9859_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.c3ed0f2d9847)The Post, citing multiple individuals familiar with the interaction and the role of the intelligence source, reported that top White House officials, with President Donald Trump's approval, opted to support a decision to withhold the information and were persuaded that handing over Department of Justice documents "could risk lives by potentially exposing the source." The newspaper reported that the person is a US citizen who has been a source of intelligence to both the CIA and the FBI.
According to the report, "information developed by the intelligence source" has been turned over to special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, though it is not known whether Trump was aware of that fact.

More at: https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/09/politics/russia-investigation-robert-mueller-nunes-justice-department/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+rss%252Fcnn_latest+(RSS%253 A+CNN+-+Most+Recent)

Swordsmyth
05-09-2018, 07:54 PM
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes and fellow GOP committee member Trey Gowdy have been invited to the Justice Department for a classified briefing Thursday about the latest document request related to the Russia investigation, according to a source with knowledge of the matter.Talks between the Justice Department and Nunes have been intensifying over the last day as the two sides try to cut a deal and avoid a standoff that could lead to House Republicans ultimately pursuing contempt charges against Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
The White House, which has thus far sided with the Justice Department over Nunes, has also been involved in the talks, multiple sources say. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and another top Justice Department official were seen leaving the White House on Tuesday evening.
Nunes and Rosenstein also discussed the matter over the phone Tuesday evening, according to sources briefed on the matter.

More at: https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/09/politics/devin-nunes-classified-briefing-justice-department/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+rss%252Fcnn_latest+(RSS%253 A+CNN+-+Most+Recent)

Swordsmyth
05-10-2018, 07:08 PM
A government watchdog group released new emails (http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/JW-v-DOJ-Comey-testimony-records-00220-8.pdf) on Thursday that revealed former FBI Director James Comey seemingly coordinated his testimony last year before the Senate Intelligence Committee with special counsel Robert Mueller.
Top-level FBI officials advised Comey to "consult" with Mueller before testifying in front of any congressional committees regarding the Trump administration firing him as FBI Director and alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election. Journalist Sara Carter (https://saraacarter.com/former-fbi-director-comey-consulted-with-mueller-on-russia-testimony/) notes:

It is the first time evidence reveals there was coordination between the Special Counsel and Comey in the long drawn out controversial Mueller investigation.

Shortly after Comey was fired, his then Chief of Staff James Rybicki sent an email to FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, FBI Deputy Director David L. Bowdich, former FBI General Counsel James A. Baker, and others that said:

Please see a DRAFT response to Director Comey (below). I will hold pending further direction….
Director:
In response to your emails below we have consulted with executive management here, including the General Counsel, and recommend the following:


That your counsel convey any acceptance or declinations to invitations to testify directly to the Committees.
That your counsel consult with Special Counsel Mueller to determine the timing of any such testimony and,
The Office of General Counsel stands ready to discuss with you in consultation with the Department of Justice and the Special Counsel, institutional privileges or prerogatives that may be presented by any such testimony.

Judicial Watch reported that sources have indicated that Comey's "opening statement and subsequent testimony were coordinated with Mueller."
Comey revealed at the hearing that he intentionally leaked his memos that allegedly documented his interactions with Trump, which contained classified information so that a special counsel would be appointed.

"I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter," Comey said (https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/19/politics/comey-russia-investigation-trump/index.html) during his testimony. "Didn't do it myself for a variety of reasons. I asked him to because I thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel. I asked a close friend to do it."
Weighing in on the newly released emails, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton slammed Comey for his actions.
"These documents show that James Comey, who was fired by the president, nevertheless had easy, friendly access to the FBI as he prepped his infamous anti-Trump testimony to the Senate," Fitton said. "This collusion led to Comey’s attacking President Trump and misusing FBI records as part of a vendetta against the president."

https://www.dailywire.com/news/30491/bombshell-comey-coordinated-his-russia-testimony-ryan-saavedra?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=dailywire.com&utm_term=68731&utm_content=1

Swordsmyth
05-10-2018, 08:47 PM
On Tuesday, the Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/risk-to-intelligence-source-who-aided-russia-investigation-at-center-of-latest-showdown-between-nunes-and-justice-dept/2018/05/08/d6fb66f8-5223-11e8-abd8-265bd07a9859_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.5335aeb2a7a9) reported that Nunes was denied access to the information on the grounds that it "could risk lives by potentially exposing the source, a U.S. citizen who has provided intelligence to the CIA and FBI."
After the White House caved to Rosenstein and Nunes was barred from seeing the documents, it also emerged that this same intelligence had already been shared with Special Counsel Robert Mueller as part of his investigation into alleged Russian involvement in the 2016 US election.
On Wednesday afternoon, however, news emerged that Nunes and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) would receive a classified Thursday briefing (http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/386998-nunes-gowdy-to-get-classified-briefing-on-mueller-documents) at the DOJ on the documents. This is, to put it lightly, incredibly significant.
Why? Because it appears that the FBI may have had a mole embedded in the Trump campaign.
In a bombshell op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, Kimberly Strassel shares a few key insights about recent developments. Perhaps we should start with the ending and let you take it from there. Needless to say Strassel's claims, if true, would have wide ranging implications for the CIA, FBI, DOJ and former Obama administration officials.
Strassel concludes:

"I believe I know the name of the informant, but my intelligence sources did not provide it to me and refuse to confirm it. It would therefore be irresponsible to publish it."
Authored by Kimberley Strassel, op-ed via The Wall Street Journal, (https://www.wsj.com/articles/about-that-fbi-source-1525992611)
About That FBI ‘Source’
Did the bureau engage in outright spying against the 2016 Trump campaign?
The Department of Justice lost its latest battle with Congress Thursday when it allowed House Intelligence Committee members to view classified documents about a top-secret intelligence source that was part of the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign. Even without official confirmation of that source’s name, the news so far holds some stunning implications.
Among them is that the Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation outright hid critical information from a congressional investigation. In a Thursday press conference, Speaker Paul Ryan bluntly noted that Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes’s request for details on this secret source was “wholly appropriate,” “completely within the scope” of the committee’s long-running FBI investigation, and “something that probably should have been answered a while ago.” Translation: The department knew full well it should have turned this material over to congressional investigators last year, but instead deliberately concealed it.
House investigators nonetheless sniffed out a name, and Mr. Nunes in recent weeks issued a letter and a subpoena demanding more details. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s response was to double down—accusing the House of “extortion” and delivering a speech in which he claimed that “declining to open the FBI’s files to review” is a constitutional “duty.” Justice asked the White House to back its stonewall. And it even began spinning that daddy of all superspook arguments—that revealing any detail about this particular asset could result in “loss of human lives.”
This is desperation, and it strongly suggests that whatever is in these files is going to prove very uncomfortable to the FBI.
The bureau already has some explaining to do. Thanks to the Washington Post’s unnamed law-enforcement leakers, we know Mr. Nunes’s request deals with a “top secret intelligence source” of the FBI and CIA, who is a U.S. citizen and who was involved in the Russia collusion probe. When government agencies refer to sources, they mean people who appear to be average citizens but use their profession or contacts to spy for the agency. Ergo, we might take this to mean that the FBI secretly had a person on the payroll who used his or her non-FBI credentials to interact in some capacity with the Trump campaign.
This would amount to spying, and it is hugely disconcerting. It would also be a major escalation from the electronic surveillance we already knew about, which was bad enough. Obama political appointees rampantly “unmasked” Trump campaign officials to monitor their conversations, while the FBI played dirty with its surveillance warrant against Carter Page, failing to tell the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that its supporting information came from the Hillary Clinton campaign. Now we find it may have also been rolling out human intelligence, John Le Carré style, to infiltrate the Trump campaign.
Which would lead to another big question for the FBI: When? The bureau has been doggedly sticking with its story that a tip in July 2016 about the drunken ramblings of George Papadopoulos launched its counterintelligence probe. Still, the players in this affair—the FBI, former Director Jim Comey, the Steele dossier authors—have been suspiciously vague on the key moments leading up to that launch date. When precisely was the Steele dossier delivered to the FBI? When precisely did the Papadopoulos information come in?
And to the point, when precisely was this human source operating? Because if it was prior to that infamous Papadopoulos tip, then the FBI isn’t being straight. It would mean the bureau was spying on the Trump campaign prior to that moment. And that in turn would mean that the FBI had been spurred to act on the basis of something other than a junior campaign aide’s loose lips.
We also know that among the Justice Department’s stated reasons for not complying with the Nunes subpoena was its worry that to do so might damage international relationships. This suggests the “source” may be overseas, have ties to foreign intelligence, or both. That’s notable, given the highly suspicious role foreigners have played in this escapade. It was an Australian diplomat who reported the Papadopoulos conversation. Dossier author Christopher Steele is British, used to work for MI6, and retains ties to that spy agency as well as to a network of former spooks. It was a former British diplomat who tipped off Sen. John McCain to the dossier. How this “top secret” source fits into this puzzle could matter deeply.
I believe I know the name of the informant, but my intelligence sources did not provide it to me and refuse to confirm it. It would therefore be irresponsible to publish it. But what is clear is that we’ve barely scratched the surface of the FBI’s 2016 behavior, and the country will never get the straight story until President Trump moves to declassify everything possible. It’s time to rip off the Band-Aid.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-10/wsj-fbi-hid-mole-trump-campaign

Swordsmyth
05-11-2018, 06:53 PM
Paul Sperry made another titillating tweet Friday morning, in which he writes:
"DEVELOPING: A major new front is opening in the political espionage scandal. In summer 2016, Brennan with his FBI liaison Strzok, along with help from Kerry @ State, were trying to set Russian espionage traps for minor players in the Trump campaign through cultivated intel assets"
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/kerry%20strzok%20brennan_0.jpg

DEVELOPING: A major new front is opening in the political espionage scandal. In summer 2016, Brennan with his FBI liaison Strzok, along with help from Kerry @ State, were trying to set Russian espionage traps for minor players in the Trump campaign through cultivated intel assets
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) May 11, 2018 (https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/994981427044372480?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) As we reported in March (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-07/john-kerry-state-dept-crosshairs-house-intel-committee-enters-phase-two), Nunes and the House Intelligence Committee was investigating the Obama State Department under John Kerry for its involvement in the dissemination of the unverified "Steele Dossier," along with a second anti-Trump dossier written by Clinton confidant Cody Shearer. Nunes referred to this as "Phase 2" of his committee's probe into Russian influence in the 2016 US election.
Nunes is also investigating whether former CIA director John Brennan perjured himself during Congressional testimony about the Steele Dossier. As Paul Sperry wrote in February:

In his May 2017 testimony before the intelligence panel, Brennan emphatically denied the dossier factored into the intelligence community’s publicly released conclusion last year that Russia meddled in the 2016 election “to help Trump’s chances of victory.”
Brennan also swore that he did not know who commissioned the anti-Trump research document (excerpt here), even though senior national security and counterintelligence officials at the Justice Department and FBI knew the previous year that the dossier was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign. -RealClear Investigations (https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/02/11/former_cia_director_john_brennan_investigated_for_ perjury.html)
So, if Sperry's tweet is correct, the Obama State department, CIA, and FBI conspired to set "Russian espionage traps" for minor players in the Trump campaign, and the FBI had a mole within the Trump campaign, that giant sucking sound you might hear is nothing short of the US Intelligence community starting to implode.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-11/brennan-strzok-and-kerry-allegedly-set-espionage-traps-trump-team-hunt-fbi-mole

Swordsmyth
05-12-2018, 05:13 PM
The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee wrote Friday to the FBI and Department of Justice, pushing the agencies for answers about the interview of former national security adviser Michael Flynn, citing an “apparently contradiction” between what former FBI Director James Comey said to the committee, and what he has said since.

Grassley’s letter requests transcripts of intercepted calls, any FBI summaries, the FBI agents notes of their interview with Flynn by May 25. It also requests an interview with one of the agents who conducted the interview with Flynn.
Grassley says that due to the guilty plea, “the Committee’s oversight interest in the underlying documents requested more than a year ago now outweighs any legitimate executive branch interest in withholding it.”

“So too does the Committee’s interest in learning the FBI agents’ actual assessments of their interview of Lt. Gen. Flynn, particularly given the apparent contradiction between what then-Directory Comey told us in March 2017 and what he now claims,” he says.

More at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/12/grassley-pushes-doj-for-answers-on-flynn-interview-cites-apparent-contradiction-by-comey.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Interna l+-+Politics+-+Text%29

Swordsmyth
05-13-2018, 01:47 PM
Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa is getting to the bottom of things, and some think he's laying out a path to exonerate former National Security Advisor Mike Flynn - who pleaded guilty of lying to the FBI over his contacts with former Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak.
It has been suggested that the FBI set Flynn up, and his admission of guilt could have been to avoid sure financial ruin trying to fight the Special Counsel. Others say Flynn was protecting his son, Michael Flynn Jr., who served as his father's aide for his consulting company, Flynn Intel Group.
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/chuck-grassley-feature.jpg
In a very direct Friday letter to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray, Grassley gets straight to the point - going after former FBI Director Comey's blatant contradiction between what he told two Congressional committees - which was that the FBI agents who interviewed Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn "saw nothing that led them to believe [he] was lying." - and what Comey told Fox News host Bret Baier - the complete opposite of his Congressional testimony.
Grassley's letter reads:

Director Comey specifically told us during that briefing that the FBI agents who interviewed Lt. General Michael Flynn, “saw nothing that led them to believe [he was] lying.” Our own Committee staff’s notes indicate that Mr. Comey said the “agents saw no change in his demeanor or tone that would say he was being untruthful.” Contrary to his public statements during his current book tour denying any memory of those comments, then-Director Comey led us to believe during that briefing that the agents who interviewed Flynn did not believe he intentionally lied about his conversation with the Ambassador and that the Justice Department was unlikely to prosecute him for false statements made in that interview.
Now compare to what Comey said on Fox while promoting his book, A Higher Loyalty:

Baier: Did you tell lawmakers that FBI agents didn't believe former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn was lying intentionally to investigators?
Comey: No. And I saw that in the media. I don't know what - maybe someone misunderstood something I said. I didn't believe that, and didn't say that.
Grassley's Friday letter also notes that "The Department has withheld the Flynn-related documents since our initial bipartisan request last year," referring to the FBI's materials from the Flynn interview.
Then comes the bottom line:

"the Committee’s oversight interest in the underlying documents requested more than a year ago now outweighs any legitimate executive branch interest in withholding it. So too does the Committee’s interest in learning the FBI agents’ actual assessments of their interview of Lt. Gen. Flynn, particularly given the apparent contradiction between what then-Directory [sic] Comey told us in March 2017 and what he now claims."
In other words, the DOJ is out of excuses - and in light of the Comey contradictions - including the fact that he gave Congress the impression Flynn wasn't going to be prosecuted, it's clear that the DOJ has been hiding key facts that would significantly weaken the Flynn case.
Grassley then demands the following no later than May 25, 2018:

1. "The information requested in our February 15, 2017 letter, including the transcripts of the reportedly intercepted calls and any FBI reports summarizing them; and"
2. The FBI agents’ 302s memorializing their interview of Flynn and 1A supporting docs, including the agents’ notes.
Then it gets really interesting
Grassley demands a transcribed interview with Special Agent Joe Pientka - who he reveals to be the second FBI agent that interviewed Flynn. Prior to Friday, it was only known that (Trump-hating) Special Agent Peter Strzok was in the Flynn interview, while Pientka's name was kept nonpublic.
Pientka can now testify to whether or not McCabe had him alter his 302 form, which would send things nuclear. Given the DOJ's stonewalling to this point, it will be interesting to see how they respond to Grassley's new demands. Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein has likened Congressional efforts to pry information from the agency "extortion."
Clues to piece things together
Speaking to the suggestion that the 302 forms were altered is an analysis by Sundance of Conservative Tree House (https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/05/11/senator-chuck-grassley-drops-atomic-sledgehammer-on-fbi-requests-fbi-reports-and-testimony-from-special-agent-joe-pientk/), who says "it's likely Chairman Grassley outed the name [Pientka's] for a reason." (h/t American Thinker (https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/05/senator_grassley_appears_to_be_preparing_to_bust_t he_frameup_of_general_flynn.html))

Regarding the "widely held belief" (https://twitter.com/Nick_Falco/status/989951075317788674) that Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the FBI agents (Strzok and Pientka) to shape their FBI reports of the interview (FD-302's) to assist a "Flynn lied" narrative…. evidence of that is within the most recent text messages (https://www.scribd.com/document/377540616/PS-LP-Text-Messages-Dec-2016-May-2017#from_embed) between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok:
♦January 23, 2017, the day before the Flynn interview, Lisa Page says: "I can feel my heart beating harder, I'm so stressed about all the ways THIS has the potential to go fully off the rails." Weird!
♦Strzok replies: "I know. I just talked with John, we're getting together as soon as I get in to finish that write up for Andy (MCCABE) this morning." Strzok agrees with Page about being stressed that "THIS" could go off the rails…(Strzok's meeting w Flynn the next day)
♦Why would Page & Strzok be stressed about "THIS" potentially going off the rails if everything was by the book?
BECAUSE IT WASN'T!
It was a conspiracy to entrap Gen Mike Flynn. All Strzok needed was an excuse to speak w Flynn. Everything in the 302 was likely fabricated.
♦February 14th, 2017, there is another note about the FBI reports filed from the interview.
Peter Strzok asks Lisa Page if FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe is OK with his report: "Also, is Andy good with F-302?"
Lisa Page replies: "Launch on F 302".
And he reminds us that previously, on September 10, 2016, Strzok texted about withholding 302s that he called "VERY inflammatory"
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/2018-05-13.jpg
"is Andy good with F-302?" Strzok asks page, weeks after they're stressing out about something going "off the rails." While not conclusive evidence that the 302's were altered, at least points to some sort of crisis management within the agency in relation to recent events.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-13/grassley-demands-sit-down-mystery-fbi-agent-discuss-flynn-302-forms

Swordsmyth
05-14-2018, 01:44 PM
But there’s one episode even Mueller’s former law enforcement comrades — and independent ethicists — acknowledge raises legitimate legal issues and a possible conflict of interest in his overseeing the Russia election probe.

In 2009, when Mueller ran the FBI, the bureau asked Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska (https://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/14/world/middleeast/a-disappearing-american-spy-and-the-cia.html) to spend millions of his own dollars funding an FBI-supervised operation to rescue a retired FBI agent, Robert Levinson, captured in Iran while working for the CIA in 2007.
Yes, that’s the same Deripaska who has surfaced in Mueller’s current investigation and who was recently sanctioned by the Trump administration.

The Levinson mission is confirmed by more than a dozen participants inside and outside the FBI, including Deripaska, his lawyer, the Levinson family and a retired agent who supervised the case. Mueller was kept apprised of the operation, officials told me.
Some aspects of Deripaska’s help were chronicled in a 2016 book by reporter Barry Maier (https://www.amazon.com/Missing-Man-American-Vanished-Iran-ebook/dp/B016IBBP3A), but sources provide extensive new information about his role.

They said FBI agents courted Deripaska in 2009 in a series of secret hotel meetings in Paris, Vienna, Budapest and Washington. Agents persuaded the aluminum industry magnate to underwrite the mission. The Russian billionaire insisted the operation neither involve nor harm his homeland.

“We knew he was paying for his team helping us, and that probably ran into the millions,” a U.S. official involved in the operation confirmed.

One agent who helped court Deripaska was Andrew McCabe (http://thehill.com/people/andrew-mccabe), the recently fired FBI deputy director (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/16/us/politics/andrew-mccabe-fbi-fired.html) who played a seminal role starting the Trump-Russia case, multiple sources confirm.

Deripaska’s lawyer says the Russian ultimately spent $25 million assembling a private search and rescue team that worked with Iranian contacts under the FBI’s watchful eye. Photos and videos indicating Levinson was alive were uncovered.

Then in fall 2010, the operation secured an offer to free Levinson. The deal was scuttled, however, when the State Department become uncomfortable with Iran’s terms, according to Deripaska’s lawyer and the Levinson family.

FBI officials confirmed State hampered their efforts.

“We tried to turn over every stone we could to rescue Bob, but every time we started to get close, the State Department seemed to always get in the way,” said Robyn Gritz, the retired agent who supervised the Levinson case in 2009, when Deripaska first cooperated, but who left for another position in 2010 before the Iranian offer arrived. “I kept Director Mueller and Deputy Director Pistole informed of the various efforts and operations, and they offered to intervene with State, if necessary.”

FBI officials ended the operation in 2011, concerned that Deripaska’s Iranian contacts couldn’t deliver with all the U.S. infighting. Levinson was never found; his whereabouts remain a mystery, 11 years after he disappeared.

“Deripaska’s efforts came very close to success,” said David McGee, a former federal prosecutor who represents Levinson’s family. “We were told at one point that the terms of Levinson’s release had been agreed to by Iran and the U.S. and included a statement by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (http://thehill.com/people/hillary-clinton) pointing a finger away from Iran. At the last minute Secretary Clinton decided not to make the agreed-on statement.”

The State Department declined comment, and a spokesman for Clinton did not offer comment. Mueller’s spokesman, Peter Carr, declined to answer questions. As did McCabe.

The FBI had three reasons for choosing Deripaska for a mission worthy of a spy novel. First, his aluminum empire had business in Iran. Second, the FBI wanted a foreigner to fund the operation because spending money in Iran might violate U.S. sanctions and other laws. Third, agents knew Deripaska had been banished since 2006 from the United States by State over reports he had ties to organized crime and other nefarious activities. He denies the allegations, and nothing was ever proven in court.

The FBI rewarded Deripaska for his help. In Fall 2009, according to U.S. entry records, Deripaska visited Washington on a rare law enforcement parole visa. And since 2011 he has been granted entry at least eight times on a diplomatic passport, even though he doesn’t work for the Russian Foreign Ministry.

Former FBI officials confirm they arranged the access.

Deripaska said in a statement through Adam Waldman, his American lawyer, that FBI agents told him State’s reasons for blocking his U.S. visa were “merely a pretext.”

“The FBI said they had undertaken a careful background check, and if there was any validity to the State Department smears, they would not have reached out to me for assistance,” the Russian said.

Then, over the past two years, evidence emerged tying him to former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort (http://thehill.com/people/paul-manafort), the first defendant charged by Mueller’s Russia probe with money laundering and illegal lobbying.

Deripaska once hired Manafort as a political adviser and invested money with him in a business venture that went bad. Deripaska sued Manafort, alleging he stole money.

Mueller’s indictment of Manafort makes no mention of Deripaska, even though prosecutors have evidence that Manafort contemplated inviting his old Russian client (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-manafort/trump-campaign-manager-manafort-offered-to-brief-russian-billionaire-during-2016-race-washington-post-idUSKCN1BV33D?il=0) for a 2016 Trump campaign briefing. Deripaska said he never got the invite and investigators have found no evidence it occurred. There’s no public evidence Deripaska had anything to do with election meddling.

The U.S. government in April imposed sanctions on Deripaska (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-russia-sanctions-deripaska/sanctions-on-russian-tycoon-deripaska-will-create-global-ripples-idUSKCN1HD2Q3), one of several prominent Russians targeted to punish Vladimir Putin — using the same sort of allegations that State used from 2006 to 2009. Yet, between those two episodes, Deripaska seemed good enough for the FBI to ask him to fund that multimillion-dollar rescue mission and to allow him into the country eight times.

I was alerted to Deripaska’s past FBI relationship by U.S. officials who wondered whether the Russian’s conspicuous absence from Mueller’s indictments might be related to his FBI work.

They aren’t the only ones.

Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz told me he believes Mueller has a conflict of interest because his FBI previously accepted financial help from a Russian that is, at the very least, a witness in the current probe.

“The real question becomes whether it was proper to leave him (Deripaska) out of the Manafort indictment, and whether that omission was to avoid the kind of transparency that is really required by the law,” Dershowitz said.

Melanie Sloan, a former Clinton Justice Department lawyer and longtime ethics watchdog, told me a “far more significant issue” is whether the earlier FBI operation was even legal: “It’s possible the bureau’s arrangement with Mr. Deripaska violated the Antideficiency Act, which prohibits the government from accepting voluntary services.”

George Washington University constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley agreed: “If the operation with Deripaska contravened federal law, this figure could be viewed as a potential embarrassment for Mueller. The question is whether he could implicate Mueller in an impropriety.”

More at: http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/387625-mueller-may-have-a-conflict-and-it-leads-directly-to-a-russian-oligarch

Swordsmyth
05-14-2018, 03:43 PM
This week, one of the Russian companies accused by Special Counsel Robert Mueller of funding a conspiracy to meddle in the 2016 U.S. presidential election was revealed in court to not have existed during the time period alleged by Mueller's team of prosecutors, according to a lawyer representing the defendant.
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/robert_mueller.jpg
U.S. Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey asked Eric Dubelier, one of two lawyers representing the accused Russian company, Concord Management and Consulting LLC, if he was representing a third company listed in Mueller's indictment (https://www.justice.gov/file/1035477/download).

"What about Concord Catering?" Harvey asked (https://www.docdroid.net/ytSx83s/usa-v-concord-5-9-18-18-032.pdf#page=4) Dubelier.
"The government makes an allegation that there's some association. I don't mean for you to – do you represent them, or not, today? And are we arraigning them as well?"
"We're not," Dubelier responded.
"And the reason for that, Your Honor, is I think we're dealing with a situation of the government having indicted the proverbial ham sandwich."
"That company didn't exist as a legal entity during the time period alleged by the government," Dubelier continued.
"If at some later time they show me that it did exist, we would probably represent them. But for purposes of today, no, we do not."
The term "indict a ham sandwich" is believed to have originated from a 1985 report in the New York Daily News (http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/chief-judge-wanted-abolish-grand-juries-article-1.2025208) when New York Chief Judge Sol Wachtler told the news publication that government prosecutors have so much influence over grand juries that they could get them to "indict a ham sandwich."

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-14/mueller-indicted-russian-company-didnt-even-exist-court-transcripts-say

timosman
05-14-2018, 03:50 PM
At least we know the system works - a ham sandwich can be indicted. Actual perpetrators - not so much.

Swordsmyth
05-14-2018, 03:56 PM
The Wall Street Journal continues to counter (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-10/wsj-fbi-hid-mole-trump-campaign)the liberal mainstream media's anti-Trump-ness (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-07/wsj-exposes-mystery-michael-flynns-guilty-plea) with today's op-ed from Steven Calabresi, who served as a special assistant to Attorney General Edwin Meese (1985-87) and a law clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia (1987-88). Calabresi proclaims that Mueller's investigation has crossed the legal line, explaining that it's unconstitutional under 'Morrison vs Olson' - the decision, not the dissent...
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/Donkey-Dog-600-LI_0.jpg
Via The Wall Street Journal, (https://www.wsj.com/articles/muellers-investigation-crosses-the-legal-line-1526233750)
Judge T.S. Ellis has expressed skepticism about the scope of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. “What we don’t want in this country is... anyone with unfettered power,” Judge Ellis, who is to preside over the trial of former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, told prosecutor Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben May 4. “So it’s unlikely you’re going to persuade me that the special prosecutor has unlimited powers.”
Judge Ellis is right to be skeptical. Mr. Mueller’s investigation has crossed a constitutional line, for reasons the U.S. Supreme Court made clear in the 1988 case Morrison v. Olson. That case is best known for Justice Antonin Scalia’s powerful lone dissent arguing that the post-Watergate independent counsel statute was unconstitutional. But Chief Justice William Rehnquist’s opinion for the court, while upholding the statute, set forth limits that the Mueller investigation has exceeded.
At issue is the Constitution’s Appointments Clause, which provides that “principal officers” must be appointed by the president with the Senate’s consent. Rehnquist wrote that independent counsel Alexia Morrison qualified as an “inferior officer,” not subject to the appointment process, because her office was “limited in jurisdiction” to “certain federal officials suspected of certain serious federal crimes.”
Mr. Mueller, in contrast, is investigating a large number of people and has already charged defendants with many different kinds of crimes, including - as in Mr. Manafort’s case - ones unrelated to any collaboration between the Trump campaign and Russia. That’s too much power for an inferior officer to have. Only a principal officer, such as a U.S. attorney, can behave the way Mr. Mueller is behaving. Mr. Mueller is much more powerful today than any of the 96 U.S. attorneys. He is behaving like a principal officer.
Rehnquist’s majority opinion has never been overturned. In Edmund v. U.S. and in Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Oversight Board, the justices said that an officer cannot be inferior unless he has a boss - as Mr. Mueller does in Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who appointed him. But that’s not a sufficient condition. As a principal officer, Mr. Rosenstein could legally have brought all the indictments Mr. Mueller has. But he may not delegate that authority to Mr. Mueller, any more than President Trump could delegate his veto power to Mr. Rosenstein.
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/mueller-fishing-tina-toon.jpg
The Framers struggled long and hard over the Appointments Clause. For better or worse, they arrived at the process of presidential nomination with senatorial consent. The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel should confirm the analysis set forth above in a legal opinion to guide Mr. Rosenstein in the exercise of his duties. Judge Ellis should dismiss the indictment against Mr. Manafort on Appointments Clause grounds. All other defendants Mr. Mueller charges, and witnesses he subpoenas, should challenge the constitutionality of his actions on Appointments Clause grounds.



https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-14/its-unconstitutional-muellers-investigation-crosses-legal-line