Could Clinton "cabal" be guilty of sedition against USA ?

[Jan2017]

Taking a lead from a comment in a youtube of Senator Warner's recent blowing more smoke up everyone's arse . . .

Conduct and organization (like the "insurance" planning for an American presidential election ?)
would seem to be acts of sedition against the United States.

As for Hillary herself going outside the government security requirements as Secretary of State and, then,
actively transferring classified documents - some 'Top Secret' - using her rogue methodology of electronic communication.


-----

Sedition differs from treason in that it does not involve overt acts of open violence or assistance to an enemy.
U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Sedition Act of 1940, by interpreting the purpose of the act
to apply to a political creed that has a tendency to produce imminent lawless action.

[Jan2017]

Is Washington the Most Corrupt Government in History? (https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/12/paul-craig-roberts/is-washington-the-most-corrupt-government-in-history/)


How corrupt does Mueller have to be to agree to lead a fake investigation designed to overthrow the democratic election of
the President of the United States? Why doesn’t Trump have Mueller and Comey arrested for sedition and conspiring to
overthrow the president of the United States?

The fake scandal is Trump’s Russiagate. The real scandal is Hillary Clinton’s uranium sale (http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/10/25/hillary-clinton-and-real-russian-collusion.html) to Russia.
No evidence for the former exists. Voluminous evidence for Hillary’s scandal lies in plain view.

Why are the clearly false charges against Trump being investigated and the clearly true charges against Hillary not being investigated?
The answer is that Hillary with her hostility toward Russia and her denunciation of Russian President Putin as the “New Hitler” is
not a threat to the budget and power of the US military/security complex, while Trump’s aim of normalizing relations with Russia
would deprive the military/security complex of the “enemy” it requires to justify its massive budget and power.

Why hasn’t President Trump ordered the Justice Department to investigate Hillary?
Is the answer that Trump is afraid the military/security complex will assassinate him?

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/12/paul-craig-roberts/is-washington-the-most-corrupt-government-in-history/

[asurfaholic]

I think pretty clearly trump is part of the establishment and while he tweets like a mad man, he actually has no intention of showing teeth (if he even has any) because he also knows that he is being protected in the sense that the fake scandal is only a show put on by the establishment for media points.

[goldenequity]

Although still 'on the books' as a 'punishable offense'... sedition/seditious conspiracy
has a rare prosecutorial instance and has a history of appeal/reversal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedition

the Hatch Act is likewise toothless.

[Jan2017]

Although still 'on the books' as a 'punishable offense'... sedition/seditious conspiracy
has a rare prosecutorial instance and has a history of appeal/reversal.

At least one instance since 1995 or 1996 . . . guy died just this year after sentenced to life in solitary confinement.

2016 Election is in the unique category as well.
Just putting a charge like sedition / treason in the discussion directs how history should really look at this.

What a core of the Obama administration was really up to was worse than Watergate . . . more than Nixon did imho.
and it must be prevented from occurring - in some way - since Hillary losing the election gives us the chance to even get this all looked at.

Or maybe it is time Rand introduces a New Sedition Act for 2018 or something . . . with cybersecurity and FISA discussion part of it.

[Superfluous Man]

How corrupt does Mueller have to be to agree to lead a fake investigation designed to overthrow the democratic election of
the President of the United States?

I don't know.

Are you assuming that democratic elections make presidents legitimate?

[DamianTV]

"Could be"? How about beyond an absolute shadow of a doubt!

[timosman]

"Could be"? How about beyond an absolute shadow of a doubt!

We are talking about Hillary here so it all depends on what your definition of the word "is" is. The Trump's collusion with Russia on the other hand ....

[DamianTV]

We are talking about Hillary here so it all depends on what your definition of the word "is" is. The Trump's collusion with Russia on the other hand ....

Well, her definition of Legal and Moral at least appear to be polar opposites. She wants it to be Legal, therefore as Immoral as one could possibly get. Trump isnt any better.