PDA

View Full Version : FBI Uncovered Russian Bribery Plot Before Obama Approved Uranium One Deal




Swordsmyth
10-17-2017, 03:12 PM
As the mainstream media continues to obsess over $100,000 worth Facebook ads allegedly purchased by Russian spies in 2016 seeking to throw the presidential election, we're almost certain they'll ignore the much larger Russian bombshell dropped today in the form of newly released FBI documents that reveal for the very first time that the Obama administration was well aware of illegal bribery, extortion and money laundering schemes being conducted by the Russians to get a foothold in the atomic energy business in the U.S. before approving a deal that handed them 20% of America's uranium reserves...and resulted in a windfall of donations to the Clinton Foundation.
As we pointed out last summer when Peter Schweizer first released his feature documentary Clinton Cash (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-25/clinton-cash-debut-just-time-fan-flames-tension-dnc), the Uranium One deal, as approved by the Obama Administration, netted the Clintons and their Clinton Foundation millions of dollars in donations and 'speaking fees' from Uranium One shareholders and other Russian entities.



Russian Purchase of US Uranium Assets in Return for $145mm in Contributions to the Clinton Foundation - Bill and Hillary Clinton assisted a Canadian financier, Frank Giustra, and his company, Uranium One, in the acquisition of uranium mining concessions in Kazakhstan and the United States. Subsequently, the Russian government sought to purchase Uranium One but required approval from the Obama administration given the strategic importance of the uranium assets. In the run-up to the approval of the deal by the State Department, nine shareholders of Uranium One just happened to make $145mm in donations to the Clinton Foundation. Moreover, the New Yorker (http://www.newyorker.com/news/amy-davidson/five-questions-about-the-clintons-and-a-uranium-company) confirmed that Bill Clinton received $500,000 in speaking fees from a Russian investment bank, with ties to the Kremlin, around the same time. Needless to say, the State Department approved the deal giving Russia ownership of 20% of U.S. uranium assets
Now, thanks to newly released affidavits from a case that landed one of the Russian co-conspirators, Vadim Mikerin, in jail, we learn that not only was the Obama administration aware the Russians' illegal acts in the U.S. but it may have also been fully aware that "Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow." Per The Hill (http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355749-fbi-uncovered-russian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration):



Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews.

Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents show.

They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user230519/imageroot/2017/10/17/2017.10.17%20-%20Clinton%20Cash_0.JPG
Of course, when Schweizer's book first made Uranium One a political hot topic in 2015, both the Obama administration and the Clintons defended their actions and insisted there was no evidence that any Russians or donors engaged in wrongdoing and there was no national security reason for anyone to oppose the deal. That said, we now know that the FBI was aware of wrongdoing going back to at least April 2009 even though the deal wasn't approved until October 2010.

More at: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-17/fbi-uncovered-russian-nuclear-bribery-plot-obama-approved-uranium-one-deal-netting-c

The One
10-17-2017, 05:15 PM
Bump...This isn't getting near enough attention here or in the MSM.

Brian4Liberty
10-17-2017, 05:36 PM
Bump...This isn't getting near enough attention here or in the MSM.

Isn't the MSM burying this one? Is it on CNN?

nikcers
10-17-2017, 05:43 PM
We won't get any attention on this because it doesn't fit any narrative that people have subscribed to. The people that think there was no Russian collusion will always think that Russian collusion is fake news, and the people who think that there was Russian collusion have the right idea just backwards. This is what I have been trying to argue for months on here and people have been neg repping me.

Swordsmyth
10-17-2017, 05:49 PM
We won't get any attention on this because it doesn't fit any narrative that people have subscribed to. The people that think there was no Russian collusion will always think that Russian collusion is fake news, and the people who think that there was Russian collusion have the right idea just backwards. This is what I have been trying to argue for months on here and people have been neg repping me.

LOL

You have been claiming that Russia intervened for Trump.

nikcers
10-17-2017, 05:55 PM
LOL

You have been claiming that Russia intervened for Trump.

LOL you think that the two parties don't represent the same thing.

Raginfridus
10-17-2017, 06:25 PM
We won't get any attention on this because it doesn't fit any narrative that people have subscribed to. The people that think there was no Russian collusion will always think that Russian collusion is fake news, and the people who think that there was Russian collusion have the right idea just backwards. This is what I have been trying to argue for months on here and people have been neg repping me.In what universe is allegedly paying facebook trolls the equivalent of bribing the state department?


https://i.imgflip.com/1nzla4.jpg

nikcers
10-17-2017, 07:27 PM
In what universe is allegedly paying facebook trolls the equivalent of bribing the state department?
Intent does not always preclude impact. I don't mind debating this if you want to really debate this, but this is precisely what I was talking about. This was never about partisan politics because if it was about partisan politics then Trump wouldn't of became a Republican when he was a democrat all of those years.

Rand Paul said that Clinton would lose against anyone that she ran against because she was a criminal because of the book that was coming out detailing the sale of Uranium to the Russians. He said this prior to announcing he was running, that was the prediction the RAND PAUL made.

This is what people are ignoring, there was so much controlled opposition running that even people on the same team were fighting with eachother. Its not like the democrats didn't know that Clinton was polling really badly against GENERIC REPUBLICAN. The establishment knew who they were polling bad with and did everything they could to stop a bipartisan anti war coalition, they did everything they could to stop a Rand Paul.

Jamesiv1
10-17-2017, 07:29 PM
I predicted this back in September 2016.

nikcers
10-17-2017, 07:37 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ry3NHkINjTg

Raginfridus
10-17-2017, 08:36 PM
Intent does not always preclude impact. I don't mind debating this if you want to really debate this, but this is precisely what I was talking about. This was never about partisan politics because if it was about partisan politics then Trump wouldn't of became a Republican when he was a democrat all of those years.What is there to debate? Russian trolls didn't help elect Trump, that accusation's dead in the water. If any foreign nation subverts our elections its NatSoc Israel and nobody seems to give a shit. Its as if Red Scare and Yellow Peril were fabrications...

AZJoe
10-17-2017, 08:51 PM
Nine shareholders in Uranium One just happened to provide more than $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation (http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10/fbi-informant-working-russian-nuclear-bribery-scheme-threatened-obama-administration/) in the run-up to State Department approval.

The Clintons took the cash from Uranium One officials before the deal was approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department. The Clintons hid the donations which is a clear violation of the Memorandum of Understanding Hillary Clinton signed with the Obama administration wherein she promised and agreed to publicly disclose all donations during her tenure as Secreatary of State. …

Sara Carter of Circa News (https://www.circa.com/story/2017/10/17/national-security/the-fbi-uncovered-russian-nuclear-kickback-scheme-months-before-the-obama-administration-passed-uranium-one-deal-with-moscow) interviewed Victoria Toensing, a lawyer for the FBI informant.
The FBI informant was actually threatened by the Obama administration for speaking out about the corruption he witnessed while he was providing information. Toensing said her client “is not only afraid of the Russian people, but he is afraid of the US government because of the threats the Obama administration made against him.”

nikcers
10-17-2017, 08:57 PM
What is there to debate? Russian trolls didn't help elect Trump, that accusation's dead in the water. If any foreign nation subverts our elections its NatSoc Israel and nobody seems to give a $#@!. Its as if Red Scare and Yellow Peril were fabrications...
I disagree, the establishment ignores threats to make them go away. Trump got the most free air time from the fake news, he got the most attention for the primaries.

The military industrial complex that is coaching Nikki Hailey ran 6 figure ads against Rand Paul not Donald Trump for siding with Obama on the Iran agreement, Trump said in 2011 that he would run 3rd party if Ron Paul was the republican nominee because Ron Paul doesn't even think in terms of Israel because he is not against diplomacy with Iran.

Why would anyone do this? The money, we fund both opposition groups and destabilize countries in the middle east because it makes a shit ton of money, and Trump makes money off of it. The argument that I made, and that you guys continue to take out of context is not that Russian trolls colluded to make Trump win. Its that Russia did intervene in the US election, and the result was Trump won.

Non government forces and government forces allowed it to happen and it was most likely orchestrated and engineered by the US deep state in order to unify Americans against Russia because before the 2016 election Ron Paul's argument was winning, and we didn't support war with Russia..

There is nothing that happens, especially on the Internet in Russia that Putin doesn't know about and allow, its not that Putin did it himself, but he did let it happen. If the US government allowed some terrorist organization like the democrat party to instigate a war with Russia by orchestrating a false flag attack the best option is to let them do it. When America is punching themselves in the face you let them do it, its working for Iran.

Danke
10-17-2017, 09:32 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyoiSuC7QkY

Raginfridus
10-17-2017, 09:48 PM
I disagree, the establishment ignores threats to make them go away. Trump got the most free air time from the fake news, he got the most attention for the primaries.

The military industrial complex that is coaching Nikki Hailey ran 6 figure ads against Rand Paul not Donald Trump for siding with Obama on the Iran agreement, Trump said in 2011 that he would run 3rd party if Ron Paul was the republican nominee because Ron Paul doesn't even think in terms of Israel because he is not against diplomacy with Iran.And this tells you Russia, and not, you know, Israel, are our enemy? :rolleyes:

https://destroyzionism.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/rand-paul.jpg

Question: Is Rand praying at the Berlin Wall or the Wailing Wall?


Why would anyone do this? The money, we fund both opposition groups and destabilize countries in the middle east because it makes a $#@! ton of money, and Trump makes money off of it. The argument that I made, and that you guys continue to take out of context is not that Russian trolls colluded to make Trump win. Its that Russia did intervene in the US election, and the result was Trump won.

Non government forces and government forces allowed it to happen and it was most likely orchestrated and engineered by the US deep state in order to unify Americans against Russia because before the 2016 election Ron Paul's argument was winning, and we didn't support war with Russia..

There is nothing that happens, especially on the Internet in Russia that Putin doesn't know about and allow, its not that Putin did it himself, but he did let it happen. If the US government allowed some terrorist organization like the democrat party to instigate a war with Russia by orchestrating a false flag attack the best option is to let them do it. When America is punching themselves in the face you let them do it, its working for Iran.You must have tied your brain in knots to think this up... correlation isn't causation, nor does your theory cast much suspicion on Russia but on Israel. Israel gain from a distracted Europe and a war-weird America, with Neocons at the helm coaching politicians and the MSM into Russophobia. Iran loses; I'm not even sure what you're referencing in that last sentence... what's working for Iran?

nikcers
10-17-2017, 09:55 PM
You must have tied your brain in knots to think this up... correlation isn't causation, nor does your theory cast much suspicion on Russia but on Israel. Israel gain from a distracted Europe and a war-weird America, with Neocons at the helm coaching politicians and the MSM into Russophobia. Iran loses, I'm not even sure what you're referencing in that last sentence... what's working for Iran?
Not really does Putin gain from this, politically but geopolitically. Russia has become more powerful, and more feared by allowing this to happen. By allowing it to happen I am talking about how Russia's economy works, no one makes money in Russia without their oligarchs making money and allowing it to happen.

It takes two to tango- as far as Israel goes naturally they are not an enemy, but they are a huge threat to our national security because they perpetuate the deep states boondoggles by using the race card and calling people racist because they don't do your bidding.

The deep state is the enemy, Iranians win every time they sit back and let us punch ourselves in the face, which is why they are even winning control over the middle east, we fund opposition groups and then have them fight each other because the MIC makes more money that way, the Iranians sit back watch us punch ourselves in the face and win.

Champ
10-17-2017, 09:59 PM
Much like so many other cases in recent years, people that did a minimal amount of research into this ages ago found out the same conclusions that are being published today. The MSM garbage news is notoriously slow at giving people the scoop, when they actually decide to do so, and that is a part of why they are dying and people are naturally tuning into other sources that are proving to be far superior platforms for quicker information retrieval.

It's no surprise this is hardly being covered by most MSM sources. They didn't when news and rumors of this first broke more than a year ago, so there is no incentive to cover it now as doubling and tripling down on every poor decision is the norm.

nikcers
10-17-2017, 10:28 PM
And this tells you Russia, and not, you know, Israel, are our enemy? :rolleyes:
methinks that this was self defense but the best geopolitical option Russia had, not only was the Obama administration supporting opposition groups in countries bordering Russia they were funding opposition groups for regime change and surrounding Russia with troops.

Trump hasn't changed any of that really by expanding NATO, sanctions against Russia... That doesn't change the fact that the Russia scare did sway the election, the underlying message that won was that Clinton can't win because if Clinton wins we go to war with Russia.

Not only did we still escalate war with Russia but people are buying the narrative that Trump is different because Clinton was against him. That's like saying Obama was different because Mccain and Clinton was against him. That's like saying Obama was different because he funded ISIS to fight Assad instead of sending US troops to fight Assad.

Raginfridus
10-17-2017, 10:55 PM
Not really does Putin gain from this, politically but geopolitically. Russia has become more powerful, and more feared by allowing this to happen. By allowing it to happen I am talking about how Russia's economy works, no one makes money in Russia without their oligarchs making money and allowing it to happen.

It takes two to tango- as far as Israel goes naturally they are not an enemy, but they are a huge threat to our national security because they perpetuate the deep states boondoggles by using the race card and calling people racist because they don't do your bidding.

The deep state is the enemy, Iranians win every time they sit back and let us punch ourselves in the face, which is why they are even winning control over the middle east, we fund opposition groups and then have them fight each other because the MIC makes more money that way, the Iranians sit back watch us punch ourselves in the face and win.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOOcGF72bdA

http://asheepnomore.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/uss-liberty_remember_w-texblk_lg.png

nikcers
10-17-2017, 11:40 PM
I find it hard to believe that USA requires permission and approval from the highest levels of government to sell Uranium, but Russia had no idea what was going on.. I find it hard to believe that the people who control their government the Oligarchs were unaware, and allowed that much money to change hands without sticking their own hands out.

Maybe I just have no idea how the Russian government works and buying yellow cake and making a lot of money and giving a lot of money to the Clinton foundation, is something that the Russian government would not be aware of, nor would they have to get permission from their government. They are just bastions of free markets with no government monopolies... right?

Swordsmyth
10-18-2017, 03:10 PM
Senate Launches Probe Into Russian Nuclear Bribery Case That Netted Clintons Millionshttp://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-18/senate-judiciary-launches-probe-russian-nuclear-bribery-case-netted-clintons-million

The One
10-18-2017, 07:28 PM
Bump

Danke
10-18-2017, 07:52 PM
Bump



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeC_zLku2J4

Danke
10-18-2017, 08:10 PM
Robert Mueller Accused Of Providing Cover For Clinton While FBI Director (http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/robert-mueller-accused-providing-cover-clinton-fbi-director?utm_source=FBLC&utm_medium=FB&utm_campaign=LC)
October 18, 2017 By Robert Gehl (http://thefederalistpapers.org/author/rgehl)


Robert Mueller, who is now in charge of the Justice Department’s Russia investigation, is accused of hiding evidence showing Russian officials engaged in a bribery scheme with Hillary Clinton’s charity while Mueller was FBI director.


As far back as 2009, FBI officials had gathered “substantial evidence” that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, The Hill reports (http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/fbi-uncovered-bribery-plot-russian-govt-uranium-one).


Included in the bribery scheme is the routing of millions of dollars designed to benefit the Clinton Foundation during the time Hillary was Secretary of State.



"Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents show.

Rather than bring immediate charges for the scheme though, the FBI and Justice Department decided to continue “investigating” the issue for four more years – leaving the American public and Congress in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil during a period when the Obama administration made two major decisions benefiting Putin’s commercial nuclear ambitions."


The first decision occurred in October 2010, when the State Department and government agencies on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States unanimously approved the partial sale of Canadian mining company Uranium One to the Russian nuclear giant Rosatom, giving Moscow control of more than 20 percent of America’s uranium supply.


On the campaign trail, the decision was used by President Donald Trump against Hillary, who denied any involvement in the committee review. But The Hill reports that Clinton and then-Attorney General Eric Holder were on the Committee on Foreign Investment when the deal was approved.


In 2011, the administration gave approval for Rosatom’s Tenex subsidiary to sell commercial uranium to U.S. nuclear power plants in a partnership with the United States Enrichment Corp. Before then, Tenex had been limited to selling U.S. nuclear power plants reprocessed uranium recovered from dismantled Soviet nuclear weapons under the 1990s “Megatons to Megawatts” peace program.


“The Russians were compromising American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all of which raised legitimate national security concerns. And none of that evidence got aired before the Obama administration made those decisions,” a person who worked on the case told The Hill, who spoke anonymously for fear of retribution from either U.S. or Russian officials.



"Former Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), who chaired the House Intelligence Committee during the time the FBI probe was being conducted, told The Hill that he was never told of anything regarding “Russian nuclear corruption,” though many of his fellow lawmakers were concerned about the deal, which was also approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

“Not providing information on a corruption scheme before the Russian uranium deal was approved by U.S. regulators and engage appropriate congressional committees has served to undermine U.S. national security interests by the very people charged with protecting them,” Rogers said. “The Russian efforts to manipulate our American political enterprise is breathtaking.”

Swordsmyth
10-18-2017, 08:43 PM
Rosenstein to Investigate Himself?
Rosenstein was on the CFIUS committee that approved the sale despite knowing that, as The Hill reported (http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355957-senate-judiciary-opens-probe-into-obama-era-russian-nuclear-bribery), “Russian nuclear officials were engaged in a racketeering scheme involving bribes, kickbacks and money laundering,” that also ensnared the Clinton Foundation.
After the Senate Judiciary Committee announced its intention to launch a full scale investigation, Senator Charles Grassley asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions today if Rosenstein, as Deputy Attorney General, would be allowed to investigate himself.


“I don’t think it would be proper for him to supervise a review of his own conduct, do you?” asked Grassley.
“It would be his decision,” responded Sessions.
Sessions’ bizarre comments prompted some to ask if the Attorney General had been compromised.
“Attorney General Jeff Sessions is compromised. He has to be,” wrote Jim Hoft (http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10/ag-sessions-folds-says-rosenstein-can-investigate-uranium-one-criminal-investigation-video/).
“Deep State has something on him and the Attorney General is acting irrationally.”

More at: https://www.infowars.com/russian-bribery-cover-up-rosenstein-to-investigate-himself/

Swordsmyth
10-18-2017, 08:47 PM
FBI Informant Blocked From Telling Congress About Russia Nuclear Case
An American businessman who worked for years undercover as an FBI confidential witness was blocked by the Obama Justice Department from telling Congress about conversations and transactions he witnessed related to the Russian nuclear industry’s efforts to win favor with Bill and Hillary Clinton and influence Obama administration decisions, his lawyer tells The Hill.
Attorney Victoria Toensing, a former Reagan Justice Department official and former chief counsel of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Tuesday she is working with members of Congress to see if they can get the Trump Justice Department or the FBI to free her client to talk to lawmakers.
“All of the information about this corruption has not come out,” she said in an interview Tuesday.

More at: http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355937-fbi-informant-blocked-from-telling-congress-about-russia-nuclear

Working Poor
10-18-2017, 09:53 PM
*yawnhttp://www.petmd.com/sites/default/files/why-do-dogs-yawn.jpg

Champ
10-19-2017, 05:04 PM
This may end up bringing us back full circle to Clinton Foundation activities soon.

More on Clinton Foundation links: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10/wall-street-whistleblower-explains-clinton-foundation-purposely-hid-russian-uranium-one-payments/

Champ
10-19-2017, 05:14 PM
There are so many concurrent scandals happening at the moment, one is bound to break through the Mueller/Rosenstein/Comey/McCabe deep state coverup blanket.

People have become so disillusioned to the corruption and abuse of power and the subsequent lack of consequence for the corruption that that in itself is becoming a major story. Faith in government institutions (especially FBI and DoJ) continues to erode rapidly. This is a good thing.

Swordsmyth
10-20-2017, 02:27 PM
Emails Reveal Bill Clinton Met With Vladimir Putin Just Before Uranium One Dealhttp://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-20/emails-reveal-bill-clinton-sought-meetings-key-russian-nuclear-officials-just-uraniu

parocks
10-20-2017, 08:17 PM
Senate Launches Probe Into Russian Nuclear Bribery Case That Netted Clintons Millionshttp://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-18/senate-judiciary-launches-probe-russian-nuclear-bribery-case-netted-clintons-million

This and the crimes of Hillary Clinton should be what politics is about for the next 3 years.

Does everyone hear agree with most things that Trump is doing? No. Many support much or most. Some little or none.

But who is going to complain about seeing Hillary publically humiliated and her supporters absolutely shamed. Nail this down. All the things that Hillary has done dwarf anything else. There's so much shtshow garbage that I guess the media feels that is a non stop barrage of whatever sht, will distract from Hillary.

It's night, dark hard to see, if a geyser of sht is flowing onto the windshield so fast that the windshield wipers can't keep up, you definitely won't notice Hillary in a communist, satanist, lesbian ritual eating a baby.

Swordsmyth
10-20-2017, 08:21 PM
This and the crimes of Hillary Clinton should be what politics is about for the next 3 years.

Does everyone hear agree with most things that Trump is doing? No. Many support much or most. Some little or none.

But who is going to complain about seeing Hillary publically humiliated and her supporters absolutely shamed. Nail this down. All the things that Hillary has done dwarf anything else. There's so much shtshow garbage that I guess the media feels that is a non stop barrage of whatever sht, will distract from Hillary.

It's night, dark hard to see, if a geyser of sht is flowing onto the windshield so fast that the windshield wipers can't keep up, you definitely won't notice Hillary in a communist, satanist, lesbian ritual eating a baby.

Rand Paul 2020: I will actually LOCK HER UP

nikcers
10-20-2017, 08:25 PM
This and the crimes of Hillary Clinton should be what politics is about for the next 3 years.

Does everyone hear agree with most things that Trump is doing? No. Many support much or most. Some little or none.

But who is going to complain about seeing Hillary publically humiliated and her supporters absolutely shamed. Nail this down. All the things that Hillary has done dwarf anything else. There's so much shtshow garbage that I guess the media feels that is a non stop barrage of whatever sht, will distract from Hillary.

It's night, dark hard to see, if a geyser of sht is flowing onto the windshield so fast that the windshield wipers can't keep up, you definitely won't notice Hillary in a communist, satanist, lesbian ritual eating a baby.

No, this should not be what politics is about for the next 3 years, it should be the same thing we have been doing. Going against interventionist foreign policy, getting the government out of our business, fighting for more people in the senate to help Rand get rid of Obamacare. We can't stop Clinton from doing shit she already did, but we can sure as hell stop world war 3 if we don't shit ourselves over fake partisan witchhunts that won't go nowhere. If we are just going to spend the next 3 years talking about how shitty Obama Clinton is then we are part of the problem.

Swordsmyth
10-20-2017, 08:28 PM
No, this should not be what politics is about for the next 3 years, it should be the same thing we have been doing. Going against interventionist foreign policy, getting the government out of our business, fighting for more people in the senate to help Rand get rid of Obamacare. We can't stop Clinton from doing $#@! she already did, but we can sure as hell stop world war 3 if we don't $#@! ourselves over fake partisan witchhunts that won't go nowhere. If we are just going to spend the next 3 years talking about how $#@!ty Obama Clinton is then we are part of the problem.

But it might be PART of a primary campaign against Dump.

Champ
10-20-2017, 09:20 PM
This and the crimes of Hillary Clinton should be what politics is about for the next 3 years.

Does everyone hear agree with most things that Trump is doing? No. Many support much or most. Some little or none.

But who is going to complain about seeing Hillary publically humiliated and her supporters absolutely shamed. Nail this down. All the things that Hillary has done dwarf anything else. There's so much shtshow garbage that I guess the media feels that is a non stop barrage of whatever sht, will distract from Hillary.

It's night, dark hard to see, if a geyser of sht is flowing onto the windshield so fast that the windshield wipers can't keep up, you definitely won't notice Hillary in a communist, satanist, lesbian ritual eating a baby.

Agreed on most points. They shouldn't be stopping at Hillary, there is an entire cabal of networks in DC (Awan group is just the start) setup for the primary purpose of extracting money and emboldening not only themselves, but other countries and other groups of tactical interest(ISIS). The network extends from there into the media and entertainment industry. Like a rat's nest. The list of people involved is too long to list at this point, so making this about one person (Hillary) is doing a whole lot in order to achieve very little.

This is what politics are going to be about in the years to come, not because they should be, but because the people let it get to this point and we have no choice. Even if key political elites never go down, the way investigations are handled from a growing group of citizen investigators and the way alternative media has been stepping up to shine a light on what is going on has forever changed the way these career criminals are going to carry on with their business. And I'm sure it's not a change in behavior they are taking kindly to.

enhanced_deficit
10-24-2017, 10:42 AM
House Republicans launch new probes into Obama-era Uranium One deal, FBI handling of Clinton case (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/24/house-republicans-launch-new-probes-into-obama-era-uranium-one-deal-fbi-handling-clinton-case.html)Fox News 10m ago

AZJoe
10-24-2017, 11:55 AM
THE FBI’S FORGOTTEN CRIMINAL RECORD (https://www.fff.org/explore-freedom/article/fbis-forgotten-criminal-record/)

The FBI has a long record of both deceit and incompetence. Five years ago, Americans learned that the FBI was teaching its agents that “the FBI has the ability to bend or suspend the law to impinge on the freedom of others.” This has practically been the Bureau’s motif since its creation in 1908.

The bureau was small potatoes until Woodrow Wilson dragged the United States into World War I. In one fell swoop, the number of dangerous Americans increased by perhaps twentyfold. The Espionage Act of 1917 made it easy to jail anyone who criticized the war or the government. In September 1918, the bureau … seized more than 50,000 suspected draft dodgers off the streets and out of the restaurants of New York, Newark, and Jersey City. … the vast majority of young men who had been arrested turned out to be innocent.

In January 1920, … the “Palmer Raids” … Nearly 10,000 suspected Reds and radicals were seized. … Attorney General Mitchell Palmer sought to use the massive roundups to propel his presidential candidacy. The operation took a drubbing, however, after an insolent judge demanded that the Justice Department provide evidence for why people had been arrested. Federal judge George Anderson complained that the government had created a “spy system” that “destroys trust and confidence and propagates hate. …”

After … the Palmer raids, … The bureau targeted “senators whom the Attorney General saw as threats to America … breaking into their offices and homes, intercepting their mail, and tapping their telephones,” … The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee was illegally targeted because the bureau feared he might support diplomatic recognition of Soviet Russia. …

The FBI tapped the home telephone of a Supreme Court clerk, and at least one Supreme Court Justice feared the FBI had bugged the conference room where justices privately discussed cases. In 1945, President Harry Truman wrote in his diary, “We want no Gestapo or Secret Police. FBI is tending in that direction…. This must stop.” …

The bureau’s power soared after Congress passed the Internal Security Act of 1950 … Hoover compiled a list of more than 20,000 “potentially or actually dangerous” Americans who could be seized and locked away at the president’s command. Hoover specified that “the hearing procedure [for detentions] will not be bound by the rules of evidence.” “Congress secretly financed the creation of six of these [detention] camps in the 1950s,” ...

From 1956 through 1971, the FBI’s COINTELPRO program conducted thousands of covert operations to incite street warfare between violent groups, to get people fired, to portray innocent people as government informants, and to cripple or destroy left-wing, black, communist, white racist, and anti-war organizations. FBI agents also busied themselves forging “poison pen” letters to wreck activists’ marriages. The FBI set up a Ghetto Informant Program … that had 7,402 informants …

it even worked to expose and discredit … “Young Men’s Christian Association and Boy Scouts,” as a 1976 Senate report noted. … and harass protesters partly because of its “belief that dissident speech and association should be prevented …” … COINTELPRO was exposed only after a handful of activists burglarized an FBI office in a Philadelphia suburb, seized FBI files, and leaked the damning documents to the media. …

April 19, 1993 … its agents used 54-ton tanks to smash into the Branch Davidians’ sprawling, ramshackle home near Waco, Texas. The tanks intentionally collapsed 25 percent of the building on top of the huddled residents. … the FBI pumped the building full of CS gas (banned for use on enemy soldiers by a chemical-weapons treaty), a fire ignited that left 80 children, women, and men dead. … FBI agents had stopped firetrucks … Six years after the assault, news leaked that the FBI had fired incendiary tear-gas cartridges into the Davidians’ home prior to the fire’s erupting. … the FBI brazenly lied about what it did at Waco …

The FBI has long relied on entrapment … The FBI Academy taught agents that subjects of FBI investigations “have forfeited their right to the truth.” …

In the Liberty City 7 case in Florida, FBI [provocateurs] planted the notion of blowing up government buildings. …a federal judge concluded that the government “came up with the crime, provided the means, and removed all relevant obstacles” in order to make a “terrorist” out of a man “whose buffoonery is positively Shakespearean in scope.” …

The FBI bankrolled a right-wing New Jersey blogger and radio host for five years prior to his 2009 arrest for threatening federal judges. … how many bloggers, talk-show hosts, or activists the FBI is currently financing. …

parocks
10-24-2017, 06:27 PM
No, this should not be what politics is about for the next 3 years, it should be the same thing we have been doing. Going against interventionist foreign policy, getting the government out of our business, fighting for more people in the senate to help Rand get rid of Obamacare. We can't stop Clinton from doing $#@! she already did, but we can sure as hell stop world war 3 if we don't $#@! ourselves over fake partisan witchhunts that won't go nowhere. If we are just going to spend the next 3 years talking about how $#@!ty Obama Clinton is then we are part of the problem.

Is that what Trump is doing? The Liberty thing is our thing, we like it, but who else is all about that? Trump can make the GOP happy and others happy by talking about what a crook Hillary is for 3 years, and then finally putting her in jail.

nikcers
10-24-2017, 06:33 PM
Is that what Trump is doing? The Liberty thing is our thing, we like it, but who else is all about that? Trump can make the GOP happy and others happy by talking about what a crook Hillary is for 3 years, and then finally putting her in jail.

Trump is just a politician just like anyone else, if there was enough demand for policy change he would have to do it. Just like he did the health care executive order. He only did something pro liberty because it was politically expedient for him to do so, Rand Paul cornered him by campaigning on every news program for that policy and telling the country that it was "trumps" bright idea.

parocks
10-24-2017, 06:45 PM
Agreed on most points. They shouldn't be stopping at Hillary, there is an entire cabal of networks in DC (Awan group is just the start) setup for the primary purpose of extracting money and emboldening not only themselves, but other countries and other groups of tactical interest(ISIS). The network extends from there into the media and entertainment industry. Like a rat's nest. The list of people involved is too long to list at this point, so making this about one person (Hillary) is doing a whole lot in order to achieve very little.

This is what politics are going to be about in the years to come, not because they should be, but because the people let it get to this point and we have no choice. Even if key political elites never go down, the way investigations are handled from a growing group of citizen investigators and the way alternative media has been stepping up to shine a light on what is going on has forever changed the way these career criminals are going to carry on with their business. And I'm sure it's not a change in behavior they are taking kindly to.

Oh, I'm not saying stop at Hillary. I can say that it could be made about Hillary, and that success or failure could be based on whether or not Hillary is jailed.

But sure, Podesta too, absolutely, same with Soros. Trump hasn't even really realized that he can fire people.

Wasn't that his thing "you're fired" on that tv show which prepared him to be President?

We read these things, some D is indicted, but his D brother works for the Fed Gov, still.

You can write a bunch of last names of the most awful folks and just cross reference that list of last names with Fed Gov employees, and fire them all.



The difference between Obama and Trump is that Obama had a full list of people of people he wanted to hire so that they could all fck with americans in a sinister way. Thousands of people plotting together, big money, big bribery, etc.

Trump has like 5 people total. And 2 slots keep getting new people put in. Half of the sinister Obama / Hillary types are still operating as if it was the Obama administration.

I thought that the government was going to be ripped to shreds, drain the swamp and all that.

nikcers
10-24-2017, 08:46 PM
The difference between Obama and Trump is that...
You keep using that word, I don't think you know what it means. The key difference between Obama and Trump is Obama people thought that there was going to be change in Washington, that he would fight political corruption with Trump people think.. I don't think any real people think Trump is going to fight political corruption, just fake people who keep repeating the same Obama talking points on the internet. The thing is Trump is not going to fight against political corruption because he is been fighting for political corruption his whole life.

Swordsmyth
11-18-2017, 05:34 PM
FBI Informant Has Video Of Russian Agents With Briefcases Of Bribe Money In Clinton-Uranium Scandalhttp://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-18/fbi-informant-has-video-russian-agents-briefcases-bribe-money-clinton-uranium-scanda

Swordsmyth
11-20-2017, 07:02 PM
Secret Informant in Fear for His Life After Jeff Sessions’ DOJ Leaks His Name One Week Before Testifying Against Clinton Crime Familyhttp://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/11/jeff-sessions-doj-leaks-name-of-informant-in-clinton-uranium-one-bribery-case-hes-now-in-fear-for-his-life/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=thegatewaypundit.com&utm_term=68731&utm_content=2154432

Raginfridus
11-20-2017, 07:07 PM
Secret Informant in Fear for His Life After Jeff Sessions’ DOJ Leaks His Name One Week Before Testifying Against Clinton Crime Family

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/11/jeff-sessions-doj-leaks-name-of-informant-in-clinton-uranium-one-bribery-case-hes-now-in-fear-for-his-life/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=thegatewaypundit.com&utm_term=68731&utm_content=2154432

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9q4SZJPthwo