Swordsmyth
08-24-2017, 09:13 PM
An angry Julian Assange slammed efforts to officially classify his whistleblowing organization as a "non-state hostile intelligence service", decrying it as an attempt to put the "Pompeo Doctrine" into law. In its annual "intelligence authorization", the Senate Intelligence Committee proposed to effectively declare WikiLeaks a terrorist media organization.
“It is the sense of Congress that WikiLeaks and the senior leadership of WikiLeaks resemble a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors and should be treated as such a service by the United States,” the bill states. Published on Friday, the Senate committee passed the bill late last month on a 14-1 vote, with only Democrat Ron Wyden of Oregon voting against the measure, citing “legal, constitutional and policy implications” that the WikiLeaks provision may entail.
.@RonWyden (https://twitter.com/RonWyden) announces he voted against Intel Authorization Act due to concerns that language targeting @WikiLeaks (https://twitter.com/wikileaks) could chill journalism pic.twitter.com/Ey3zBSTupt (https://t.co/Ey3zBSTupt)
— Dustin Volz (@dnvolz) August 22, 2017 (https://twitter.com/dnvolz/status/900095869185396736)
In response, Assange tweeted a statement slamming the “absurd” decision to brand a media organizations in such a way.
“It is equivalent to suggesting that the CIA is a media organization. Publishers publish what they obtain. Intelligence agencies do not.”
More at: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-24/senate-declares-war-assange
My statement responding to the U.S. Senate Intel Committee's attempt to place the "Pompeo doctrine" into law.
More: https://t.co/ZmZenqzh7k pic.twitter.com/Kra0T7jSID (https://t.co/Kra0T7jSID)
— Julian Assange ???? (@JulianAssange) August 23, 2017 (https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/900449135605817344)
Realizing the gravity of the situation of becoming a persona non grata to the US government (and CIA), Assange then siad that “it is an interesting thought experiment to consider where other media outlets lay on this spectrum. It is clear that if the 'Pompeo doctrine' applies to WikiLeaks then it applies equally if not more so to other serious outlets."
“It is the sense of Congress that WikiLeaks and the senior leadership of WikiLeaks resemble a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors and should be treated as such a service by the United States,” the bill states. Published on Friday, the Senate committee passed the bill late last month on a 14-1 vote, with only Democrat Ron Wyden of Oregon voting against the measure, citing “legal, constitutional and policy implications” that the WikiLeaks provision may entail.
.@RonWyden (https://twitter.com/RonWyden) announces he voted against Intel Authorization Act due to concerns that language targeting @WikiLeaks (https://twitter.com/wikileaks) could chill journalism pic.twitter.com/Ey3zBSTupt (https://t.co/Ey3zBSTupt)
— Dustin Volz (@dnvolz) August 22, 2017 (https://twitter.com/dnvolz/status/900095869185396736)
In response, Assange tweeted a statement slamming the “absurd” decision to brand a media organizations in such a way.
“It is equivalent to suggesting that the CIA is a media organization. Publishers publish what they obtain. Intelligence agencies do not.”
More at: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-24/senate-declares-war-assange
My statement responding to the U.S. Senate Intel Committee's attempt to place the "Pompeo doctrine" into law.
More: https://t.co/ZmZenqzh7k pic.twitter.com/Kra0T7jSID (https://t.co/Kra0T7jSID)
— Julian Assange ???? (@JulianAssange) August 23, 2017 (https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/900449135605817344)
Realizing the gravity of the situation of becoming a persona non grata to the US government (and CIA), Assange then siad that “it is an interesting thought experiment to consider where other media outlets lay on this spectrum. It is clear that if the 'Pompeo doctrine' applies to WikiLeaks then it applies equally if not more so to other serious outlets."