Why is Obama's mother listed in thepeerage? Obama is also listed there. Is he a peer?

[Swordsmyth]

http://www.thepeerage.com/p69249.htm#i692482

[Peace Piper]

That's a pretty damn good question. Thanks for posting.

[r3volution 3.0]

I find her in no other listing.

If she's a Lord I'm the Queen of England.

Bullocks

[Swordsmyth]

I find her in no other listing.

If she's a Lord I'm the Queen of England.

Bullocks

Then why are they listed there?

[r3volution 3.0]

Then why are they listed there?

In some random website?

Because somebody (some ugly lower case democrat) thinks this makes a better case against Obama.

The Lords should sue for slander, for being putatively associated with that thing.

[Swordsmyth]

In some random website?

Because somebody (some ugly lower case democrat) thinks this makes a better case against Obama.

The Lords should sue for slander, for being putatively associated with that thing.

Some guy in New Zealand? What's his motive?

[r3volution 3.0]

Some guy in New Zealand?

Huh?

[Swordsmyth]

Huh?




http://www.thepeerage.com/darryl.jpg







Compiler:
Darryl Lundy
Wellington, New Zealand


http://www.thepeerage.com/


What is a New Zealander's motive to:
make a better case against Obama.?

[r3volution 3.0]

Swordsmyth

Show me a website from the British government, showing that this negresss is a Lord; others, it's a joke.

[TheTexan]

Is Obama's mother also listed on Bumble ?

[Swordsmyth]

@Swordsmyth (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?u=65299)

Show me a website from the British government, showing that this negresss is a Lord; others, it's a joke.
His mother is white.

[r3volution 3.0]

His mother is white.

How interesting.

So's mine.

And yet, believe it or not, I'm not a peer of England.

Show me an official document demonstrating that that character is a Lord.

[Swordsmyth]

How interesting.

So's mine.

And yet, believe it or not, I'm not a peer of England.

Show me an official document demonstrating that that character is a Lord.

The Brits have maintained a "shadow" Peerage for a LONG time, sometimes one of them will come back into the "White world" and are recognized and treated as peers.
I expect you to dismiss this, so I won't reply if you do.

[r3volution 3.0]

The Brits have maintained a "shadow" Peerage for a LONG time, sometimes one of them will come back into the "White world" and are recognized and treated as peers.
I expect you to dismiss this, so I won't reply if you do.

Ah, I see.

Make believe.

I like this standard of evidence...

Thus...

I'm the King of England (obviously).

Therefore, as the King of England, the making and unmaking of Peers is my pleasure.

And so I hereby unmake...something something Obama....whatever her name is.

The end.

[r3volution 3.0]

In case any lurkers are wondering WTF is going on here, let me explain,

Some people get paranoid about the British royal family (or, evidently, the House of Lords), or the Jesuits, or various other groups.

Now, the actual results of our present system, in which every politician is democratically elected is so heinous that...

...people are inclined to try to find an excuse of some kind - well gee whiz, it can't be democracy, must be the Jesuits' conspiracy, etc.

Nope. Actually, it's just democracy (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAg1r6zw7Bg).

;)

[Swordsmyth]

In case any lurkers are wondering WTF is going on here, let me explain,

Some people get paranoid about the British royal family (or, evidently, the House of Lords), or the Jesuits, or various other groups.

Now, the actual results of our present system, in which every politician is democratically elected is so heinous that...

...people are inclined to try to find an excuse of some kind - well gee whiz, it can't be democracy, must be the Jesuits' conspiracy, etc.

Nope. Actually, it's just democracy (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAg1r6zw7Bg).

;)
America has been under the influence of the shadow Nobility from the beginning, Ben Franklin was a cloaked British noble see:
https://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/fc/deacononfranklin.html
And http://mileswmathis.com/ben.pdf

More in other papers at: http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html

[oyarde]

I cannot imagine anyone cares about united kingdom peerage .

[r3volution 3.0]

America has been under the influence of the shadow Nobility from the beginning, Ben Franklin was a cloaked British noble see:
https://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/fc/deacononfranklin.html
And http://mileswmathis.com/ben.pdf

More in other papers at: http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-m3sK0-HoKg4/VXBdijYvUbI/AAAAAAAAPRY/E7OoTRWY9BA/s1600/bien.gif

Most of the time I'd just drop off some snark like that and leave it.

...but I think Sworthsmyth is far too intelligent to believe silly "conspiracy theory" type material.

Am I wrong?

[r3volution 3.0]

I cannot imagine anyone cares about united kingdom peerage .

An injun would say that

[Swordsmyth]

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-m3sK0-HoKg4/VXBdijYvUbI/AAAAAAAAPRY/E7OoTRWY9BA/s1600/bien.gif

Most of the time I'd just drop off some snark like that and leave it.

...but I think Sworthsmyth is far too intelligent to believe silly "conspiracy theory" type material.

Am I wrong?
I'm too intelligent to not believe it.
Do you seriously believe that conspiracies and spycraft were only invented in the modern era?

[r3volution 3.0]

I'm too intelligent to not believe it.
Do you seriously believe that conspiracies and spycraft were only invented in the modern era?

Do you seriously believe that conspiracies and spycraft are required to explain why people like free shit?

[Swordsmyth]

Do you seriously believe that conspiracies and spycraft are required to explain why people like free $#@!?
Conspiracies and spycraft manipulate and exacerbate human frailties for advantage.

[r3volution 3.0]

Conspiracies and spycraft manipulate and exacerbate human frailties for advantage.

Reality is - really- a lot simpler than you suspect.

...neither good nor bad, just the situation.

[Swordsmyth]

Reality is - really- a lot simpler than you suspect.

...neither good nor bad, just the situation.

A line from a Franklin essay, "Observations of My Reading History in Library" is more self-revelatory, in view of what we have learned, than he could have intended:
"The great affairs of the world, wars, revolutions, etc.," he wrote, were conducted by those who, while maintaining the public interest, "acted from selfish interests, whatever they may pretend."

It would be a strange world indeed if the rich and powerful did not use their riches and power to secure and improve their positions, better perhaps but strange.
You believe conspiracies that arise from the (supposedly) poor classes who have the least ability to put them into effect, then why not the rich and powerful who have the means to succeed?

[r3volution 3.0]

Franklin enjoyed Parisian whores and so, in his honor, the Earl of Rochester,

Naked she lay, clasped in my longing arms,

I filled with love, and she all over charms;

Both equally inspired with eager fire,

Melting through kindness, flaming in desire.

With arms, legs, lips close clinging to embrace,

She clips me to her breast, and sucks me to her face.

Her nimble tongue, love’s lesser lightning, played

Within my mouth, and to my thoughts conveyed

Swift orders that I should prepare to throw

The all-dissolving thunderbolt below.

My fluttering soul, sprung with the pointed kiss,

Hangs hovering o’er her balmy brinks of bliss.

But whilst her busy hand would guide that part

Which should convey my soul up to her heart,

In liquid raptures I dissolve all o’er,

Melt into sperm, and spend at every pore.

A touch from any part of her had done ’t:

Her hand, her foot, her very look's a cunt.

Smiling, she chides in a kind murmuring noise,

And from her body wipes the clammy joys,

When, with a thousand kisses wandering o’er

My panting bosom, “Is there then no more?”

She cries. “All this to love and rapture’s due;

Must we not pay a debt to pleasure too?”

But I, the most forlorn, lost man alive,

To show my wished obedience vainly strive:

I sigh, alas! and kiss, but cannot swive.

Eager desires confound my first intent,

Succeeding shame does more success prevent,

And rage at last confirms me impotent.

Ev’n her fair hand, which might bid heat return

To frozen age, and make cold hermits burn,

Applied to my dear cinder, warms no more

Than fire to ashes could past flames restore.

Trembling, confused, despairing, limber, dry,

A wishing, weak, unmoving lump I lie.

This dart of love, whose piercing point, oft tried,

With virgin blood ten thousand maids has dyed,

Which nature still directed with such art

That it through every cunt reached every heart—

Stiffly resolved, ’twould carelessly invade

Woman or man, nor ought its fury stayed:

Where’er it pierced, a cunt it found or made—

Now languid lies in this unhappy hour,

Shrunk up and sapless like a withered flower.

Thou treacherous, base deserter of my flame,

False to my passion, fatal to my fame,

Through what mistaken magic dost thou prove

So true to lewdness, so untrue to love?

What oyster-cinder-beggar-common whore

Didst thou e’er fail in all thy life before?

When vice, disease, and scandal lead the way,

With what officious haste doest thou obey!

Like a rude, roaring hector in the streets

Who scuffles, cuffs, and justles all he meets,

But if his king or country claim his aid,

The rakehell villain shrinks and hides his head;

Ev’n so thy brutal valor is displayed,

Breaks every stew, does each small whore invade,

But when great Love the onset does command,

Base recreant to thy prince, thou dar’st not stand.

Worst part of me, and henceforth hated most,

Through all the town a common fucking post,

On whom each whore relieves her tingling cunt

As hogs on gates do rub themselves and grunt,

Mayst thou to ravenous chancres be a prey,

Or in consuming weepings waste away;

May strangury and stone thy days attend;

May’st thou never piss, who didst refuse to spend

When all my joys did on false thee depend.

And may ten thousand abler pricks agree

To do the wronged Corinna right for thee.

[Swordsmyth]

Franklin enjoyed Parisian whores and so, in his honor, the Earl of Rochester
Trying to get this post removed by the Mods?
This forum is supposed to be family friendly.

[r3volution 3.0]

Trying to get this post removed by the Mods?
This forum is supposed to be family friendly.

If you can't tolerate the mores of the 17th-18th century, perhaps you ought to join the Quakers and roll about on the floor.

[Swordsmyth]

-Rep comment


07-30-2017 10:57 PM
r3volution 3.0 (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?58077-r3volution-3-0)

Thread: Why is Obama's mother listed in thepeerage? Obama is also listed there. Is he a peer? (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?513485-Why-is-Obama-s-mother-listed-in-thepeerage-Obama-is-also-listed-there-Is-he-a-peer&p=6505051#post6505051)
don't pretend that people sit in the Lords

r3volution 3.0 I refuse to submit to your "blasphemy" policing.
The lords are not Holy and I will theorize about their historical and present clandestine operations all I want.

[r3volution 3.0]

Well, first @Swordsmyth (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?u=65299) need to figure out how to do nesting quotes, as opposed to this mess he does now.

He can ask me, if he likes.

That aside, he can say anything he likes about the Lords, fine, but then I advise him to inquire into the behavior of the commons.

I advise him in particular to consider the "people's budget" of 1909, which the Lords opposed, and which the English republic killed.

[Swordsmyth]

Well, first @Swordsmyth (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?u=65299) need to figure out how to do nesting quotes, as opposed to this mess he does now.

He can ask me, if he likes.

That aside, he can say anything he likes about the Lords, fine, but then I advise him to inquire into the behavior of the commons.

I advise him in particular to consider the "people's budget" of 1909, which the Lords opposed, and which the English republic killed.
The common man is often used as a pawn by one faction or another when they fight, they rarely benefit from it, the winning faction usually ends up stealing more of of their money or freedom after using them against the losing faction.

[r3volution 3.0]

To clarify, the thing which the English republic killed (yes, republic, the monarchy ended January 30, 1649), was opposition to the "people's budget," It was a gigantic welfare bill, the origin of the welfare state in Britain. The Lords vetoed it. The commons bullied the Lords, and the King, into forcing the Lords to accept it - threatening ultimately to create new Lords to outvote the existing. So there's your fucking democracy.

Choke on it.