PDA

View Full Version : Robert Mueller’s Role in Clinton Scheme to Sell 20 Percent of US Uranium to Russia




Swordsmyth
07-28-2017, 03:37 PM
On May 17, the day Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller as Special Counsel charged with investigating possible “Russian collusion” with President Trump’s campaign, Julian Assange at WikiLeaks tweeted (https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/864994472492453888/photo/1) a WikiLeaks released State Department cable documenting that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered Mueller to deliver a sample of stolen Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) to Russia in 2009.Assange’s email signaled an investigation is needed into Mueller and his complex involvement with Russia and Uranium One, the company Bill Clinton promoted with Canadian entrepreneur Frank Giustra while Hillary Clinton served as Obama secretary of state in a criminal saga that ended up with Secretary Clinton voting to give the Russian State Atomic Nuclear Energy Agency, Rosatom, control of approximately 20 percent of all uranium holdings in the United States.
Mueller’s involvement in the Clintons’ drive to profit from selling 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Vladimir Putin’s Russian government should properly make him the target of a Department of Justice grand jury convened to examine the Clintons’ involvement with Uranium One, thereby disqualifying him from serving as Special Counsel appointed to examine the “no evidence” Democratic meme that the Trump campaign “colluded” with Russia to steal the election from Hillary Clinton.

More at: https://www.infowars.com/robert-muellers-role-in-clinton-scheme-to-sell-20-percent-of-us-uranium-to-russia/

We need a Special Prosecutor for THIS.

AZJoe
01-30-2018, 04:23 AM
864994472492453888

TheCount
01-30-2018, 04:47 AM
The secretary of state is in charge of the FBI?

timosman
01-30-2018, 04:49 AM
The secretary of state is in charge of the FBI?

They sometimes did cooperate.

TheCount
01-30-2018, 04:51 AM
They sometimes did cooperate.It says ordered.

AZJoe
01-30-2018, 05:03 AM
The secretary of state is in charge of the FBI?

And that is a good point. In 2009 then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton directed then FBI director Robert Muller to personally deliver the sample of Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) to Russia. That is particularly odd that the FBI director would personally make the transfer on behalf of Hillary. The FBI is not under the supervision of the State Department, Which makes Clinton and Mueller's collaboration and Mueller's involvement all the more incriminating and suspect.

Not long after Mueller's successful delivery of the sample of the product, Hillary was able to conclude her Uranium One deal to the delight of the multi-million "donors" to the Clinton Foundation that were at the center of the deal.

timosman
01-30-2018, 05:04 AM
It says ordered.

Snopes says it's a mixture - https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-robert-mueller-uranium/


There was nothing nefarious in the transfer of the ten-gram sample, which was done at the request of Russian law enforcement and with the consent of the government of Georgia, whose agents had participated in its confiscation.

https://www.snopes.com/content/themes/snopes/dist/images/det-mixture.gif

TheCount
01-30-2018, 06:12 AM
And that is a good point. In 2009 then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton directed then FBI director Robert Muller to personally deliver the sample of Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) to Russia. That is particularly odd that the FBI director would personally make the transfer on behalf of Hillary. The FBI is not under the supervision of the State Department, Which makes Clinton and Mueller's collaboration and Mueller's involvement all the more incriminating and suspect.

Not long after Mueller's successful delivery of the sample of the product, Hillary was able to conclude her Uranium One deal to the delight of the multi-million "donors" to the Clinton Foundation that were at the center of the deal.

What does Russian uranium confiscated in Georgia have to do with Uranium One?

timosman
01-30-2018, 06:19 AM
What does Russian uranium confiscated in Georgia have to do with Uranium One?

That's a very good question, unfortunately the answer is - we will never know. Knowing why FBI was involved in handling international affairs might however be quite an eye opener. :cool:

AZJoe
01-30-2018, 07:18 AM
What does Russian uranium confiscated in Georgia have to do with Uranium One?

Instead of constantly relying on other people to explain everything to you, try to figure this one out on your own. Do a little research on your own for once. Think about motives and consequences.

Who was Hillary catering to and trying to please with the Mueller's secret trip to return the US confiscated uranium in a secret plane side meeting on the tarmac?
Why was she giving up the purported smoking gun evidence in a smuggling and bribery case involving Russian uranium companies that the FBI itself was investigating?
Isn't it just convenient that this covert suppression of the criminal investigation into the Russian uranium companies and cover up of crimes and the giving up of the evidence conveniently opens up the door to subsequent approval for her Uranium One deals?
Why did Mueller not oppose and Rosenstein approve the Uranium One deal?
Why did she entrust this secret mission solely to Robert Mueller to hand deliver personally in a covert meeting on a runway tarmac?
Why was Hillary tracking Uranium One Kazakhstan dealings prior to this secret exchange as revealed by Wikileaks cables here (https://search.wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/08ASTANA2232_a.html), here (https://search.wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09ASTANA209_a.html), and here (https://search.wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09ASTANA855_a.html)?
Whose favor did she gain by returning the sample? Who is she indulging?
Do the timings of these events seem just coincidentally extremely convenient for Hillary's Uranium One agenda?

Use your brain power. I've given you some remedial clues to start. Go ahead. Give it try for once. See if you can answer your own question.

TheCount
01-30-2018, 08:51 AM
Instead of constantly relying on other people to explain everything to you, try to figure this one out on your own. Do a little research on your own for once. Think about motives and consequences.

Who was Hillary catering to and trying to please with the Mueller's secret trip to return the US confiscated uranium in a secret plane side meeting on the tarmac?
Why was she giving up the purported smoking gun evidence in a smuggling and bribery case involving Russian uranium companies that the FBI itself was investigating?
Isn't it just convenient that this covert suppression of the criminal investigation into the Russian uranium companies and cover up of crimes and the giving up of the evidence conveniently opens up the door to subsequent approval for her Uranium One deals?
Why did Mueller not oppose and Rosenstein approve the Uranium One deal?
Why did she entrust this secret mission solely to Robert Mueller to hand deliver personally in a covert meeting on a runway tarmac?
Why was Hillary tracking Uranium One Kazakhstan dealings prior to this secret exchange as revealed by Wikileaks cables here (https://search.wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/08ASTANA2232_a.html), here (https://search.wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09ASTANA209_a.html), and here (https://search.wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09ASTANA855_a.html)?
Whose favor did she gain by returning the sample? Who is she indulging?
Do the timings of these events seem just coincidentally extremely convenient for Hillary's Uranium One agenda?

Use your brain power. I've given you some remedial clues to start. Go ahead. Give it try for once. See if you can answer your own question.

Are you under some kind of impression that Hillary was in charge of the government in 2009? This may come as a shock to you, but she lost the election.

The State department is neither in charge of uranium samples nor the FBI.

AZJoe
01-30-2018, 09:13 AM
Are you under some kind of impression that Hillary was in charge of the government in 2009? This may come as a shock to you, but she lost the election.
The State department is neither in charge of uranium samples nor the FBI.

And yet we know from Wikileaks documents that Hillary as Secretary of State directed then FBI director Robert Muller to personally deliver the sample of Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) to Russia, and that Mueller did so. So rather than find that peculiar or odd, Count simply wishes it not to be, therefore Count simply denies reality altogether.

https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fcf.mp-cdn.net%2Ff4%2F64%2Fd13f19cd7cd444b0d62a3eaf030a-is-willful-ignorance-acceptable.jpg&f=1

I must spread some reputation around before giving it to Count again.

AZJoe
01-30-2018, 09:21 AM
Are you under some kind of impression that Hillary was in charge of the government in 2009? This may come as a shock to you, but she lost the election.
The State department is neither in charge of uranium samples nor the FBI.

Terrible effort by Count. Ignores all evidence. Fails to address any questions. Doesn't even try to answer is own question. Count's grade is F-.
Try again.

The Count simply willfully ignores reality. The Count's questions are akin to looking at a giant flood in your living room and a hole in the roof and saying the flood cannot be there because the roof is not supposed to leak. It is akin to saying. Trump cannot have any troops occupying part of Syria and is not building a 30,000 man proxy army in Syria despite him admitting and evidence t the contrary, because he is not supposed to. It is willful denial of reality despite all reality to the contrary.

We know from the Wikileaks leaks that in 2009 then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton directed then FBI director Robert Muller to personally deliver the sample of Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) to Russia. The Count saying that is not supposed to happen does not change the very real fact that it did. Simply denying reality is not any argument, it is delusional mindless stupidity.

Yes the state department does not run the entire government or is in charge of the FBI evidence, or run the FBI. That makes the actions by the collaborators all the more odd. Denying reality serves no benefits and answer no questions. The fact that things are not supposed to work that way merely makes Mueller's collaboration and Mueller's involvement all the more incriminating and suspect.

TheCount
01-30-2018, 09:25 AM
And yet we know from Wikileaks documents that Hillary as Secretary of State directed then FBI director Robert Muller to personally deliver the sample of Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) to Russia, and that Mueller did so.
Did you read the cable or just the Infowars article?