PDA

View Full Version : US military rewrites Hollywood blockbusters to save reputation, research reveals




goldenequity
07-05-2017, 02:57 PM
US military rewrites Hollywood blockbusters to save reputation, research reveals (http://rinf.com/alt-news/newswire/us-military-rewrites-hollywood-blockbusters-to-save-reputation-research-reveals/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+RinfAlternativeNewsMediaDaily BreakingNews+%28RINF+Alternative+News+Media%3A+Dai ly+Breaking+News%29)

While the US government’s influence in Hollywood is no secret, new documents reveal the staggering extent of CIA and Pentagon influence across hundreds of movies and TV shows.

Researchers Tom Secker and Matthew Alford secured 4,000 new pages of Pentagon and CIA documents using Freedom of Information requests, which show how US intelligence has been behind the scenes on more than 800 movies and 1000 TV shows.

The breadth of the collaboration is explained in Secker and Alford’s book, National Security Cinema: The Shocking New Evidence of Government Control in Hollywood, which raises questions about the levels of propaganda to which Hollywood exposes its audiences.

US intelligence and defense influence ranges from script rewrites to loaning equipment, censoring, and even stopping production of movies.

While it may not be surprising to learn the CIA was involved in its portrayal in Argo or Zero Dark Thirty, the Pentagon’s influence in Hulk, Transformers, Avatar and even Meet the Parents will surprise many.

As for television, Cupcake Wars, Oprah and America’s Got Talent may not seem like apt targets for propaganda, but all have allegedly been influenced by either the Department of Defense or the CIA, according to Secker and Alford.

The authors released the Department of Defense’s Hollywood database of collaborations, along with the book to show how far the assistance goes. While many of the film entries are benign, the database provides an insight into the influence waged, as well as the DOD’s amusing summaries of plots.

The document shows a pattern of the military essentially making access to equipment and film locations depending on how it’s portrayed in the script.

Any producer or writer who asks for access to the military for research has to have their scripts vetted.
If they fail to make changes as requested, they won’t get the cooperation they need.
Producers sign Production Assistance Agreements which commit them to using Pentagon-approved versions of the script, Secker and Arnold explain.

Any reference to military suicides appear to be a no-go for the Pentagon, the authors point out, perhaps not surprising given the high rates of veteran suicides. Coming Home was refused assistance from the Marines as it contained “reference to leathernecks in Vietnam cutting ears off dead Viet Cong, portraying an officer suffering a breakdown from his war experiences and committing suicide,” the DOD notes.

The military doesn’t like mentioning losses. Even the Vietnam War, a well-established defeat by the US, is a touchy subject.

The 2003 Hulk movie saw “radical” changes made by the Marine Corps, including the code name of an operation to capture the Hulk being changed from ‘Ranch Hand’ because that was the real name for US destruction of Vietnamese land with pesticides and poison.

References to “guinea pigs dying from radiation” was also omitted because it referred to real covert experiments on humans, the authors explain in a Medium post.

The Navy refused to cooperate with Top Gun 2 in the ’90s after the Navy and Marine Corp scandal known as Tailhook (which saw aviation officers accused of sexually assaulting people at a Vegas symposium), led to an internal report that blamed Top Gun for contributing to a regressive military culture, the book explains.

Assistance was approved for the original Top Gun, however, as “it clearly portrayed the navy in a very positive light,” the DOD said, adding that it “completed rehabilitation of the military’s image, which had been savaged by the Vietnam War.”

Meet the Parents saw CIA censorship in the scene where Ben Stiller’s character discovers his father-in-law’s secret room. An initial script originally saw Stiller discover torture manuals.

True Lies was described as “highly fictional but positive depiction of Marines,” and military assistance was granted, while Independance Day saw “no cooperation due to implausible portrayal of military and story centered on aliens attacking from space and annemic [sic] us. military response.”

Forest Gump requested support for training scenes, but, the DOD notes, the early script had a “nihilistic view of military of Vietnam experience,” so they said “no thanks.”

For Air Force One, the DOD notes, “air force provided full cooperation for film in which russian terrorists kidnap air force one and hold the president hdstage [sic].”

Jurassic Park 3 had its script rewritten to get rid the “bad military force” featured.

“Script rewritten at our suggestion to eliminate all military references, since no positive military portrayal seemed feasible,” the DOD writes.

Die Hard 2’s request for assistance was rejected as it “met none of the departments criteria for approval, such as historical authenticity, accuracy of feasibility, benefits to understanding of the military, recruiting value, etc,” the DOD said.

An Officer and a Gentleman was declined because filmmakers wouldn’t change scenes showing a “damaging portrayal of navy single parent lifestyle, negative portrayal of women living around an air station, and a fight between officer candidate and drill instructor.”

Firestarter
07-06-2017, 09:16 AM
Since the 1910s there is a strong affiliation between Hollywood and the Pentagon. The CIA has paid Hollywood to tell the story on how the wonderful US government saves the world: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?505809-Braindead-by-the-movies


Ever since WW II (and even before) the main objective of the film industry is propaganda. The Hollywood blockbuster movies are not only brainwashing the USA, but even the rest of the world.
The CIA has been paying Hollywood to tell the story of how the good American government makes war for peace: 1) Oscar winner “Argo” is a manipulated story about the Iran hostage crisis (in reality the Reagan-Bush team paid Iran to NOT release the hostages); 2) “Zero Dark Thirty” tells how torturing “unlawful combatants” led to catching Osama Bin Laden; 3) the CIA “advised” Tom Clancy for “The Hunt for Red October”, “Patriot Games” and “The Sum of All Fears” : http://www.globalresearch.ca/screen-propaganda-hollywood-and-the-cia/5324589
Since the 1910s there is a strong affiliation between Hollywood and the Pentagon. The Pentagon has given “advice” and provided material and personnel for lots of movies; Phil Strub of the Pentagon alone was involved with over 50 movies: http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/7/29/hollywood-and-thepentagonarelationshipofmutualexploitation.html
The following 11 movies (since 2001) are all US propaganda (many with the help of CIA and/or Pentagon) – Pearl Harbor, The Sum of all fears, United 93, The hurt locker, Iron man, Skyfall, Zero dark thirty, Argo, Captain Philips, The interview, American sniper: http://screechingkettle.blogspot.nl/2015/01/11-hollywoodpentagon-propaganda-films_26.html
The US government pays lots of money to the film industry to spread propaganda. In 2010 alone $1.5 billion in state funding was donated to filmmakers: https://pando.com/2014/02/20/hollywood-handouts-how-subsidies-to-the-entertainment-industry-are-fleecing-taxpayers/
Filthy slime Michael Moore got $840,000 for his movie "Capitalism: A Love Story" from the Michigan Film Office, while as part of the Film Office Advisory Council he advised to give him this money: https://www.mackinac.org/12025
In my opinion the most horrible propaganda movies aren’t even American, but the James Bond series.