PDA

View Full Version : Hannity just ate Hucks lunch...




WillInMiami
12-10-2007, 08:25 PM
LOL - I loved it. Huck probably thought he was going to be in freindly territory. But, he's apparently too ignorant to see that Hannity is sucking Rudy's $#!@. Hannity and the chick fill-in for Colmes just pounced on Huck on commutations and position on immigration. I honestly thought that Hannity was going to call him a liberal bitch that Rudy should just smack in the face.

It was pretty funny to hear Huck make a mob reference that was clearly aimed at Rudy too!

This is GREAT! The "front-runners" and thier attack machines (ie. Fox) are openly attacking each other with VALID points!

WillInMiami
12-10-2007, 08:27 PM
ROTFLMAO! Now Hannity is talking to Dick Morris and STILL attacking the Huckster!

curtisag
12-10-2007, 08:28 PM
Oh damn, I wanna see that on youtube. I hope someone captured it. It's great fun to see all the neo-cons slap each other around.

ItsTime
12-10-2007, 08:28 PM
split the vote = Ron Paul winner

justinc.1089
12-10-2007, 08:29 PM
Ha thats funny, and what else would Huckabee expect since he is now being propped up by the media? He probably still doesn't understand what happened not being promoted by part of the media lol.

XelR8r
12-10-2007, 08:30 PM
Yeah, but he should mention that Morris is a paid Huck shill. Notice how he, and Huck both keep repeating that "there is no way a Gov. w/ 16 executions is going to be seen as soft on crime."

JosephTheLibertarian
12-10-2007, 08:31 PM
maybe it's good we're not high in those neocon polls :)

ItsTime
12-10-2007, 08:31 PM
Does the person the rapist killed after Huck let them out count as an execution?


Yeah, but he should mention that Morris is a paid Huck shill. Notice how he, and Huck both keep repeating that "there is no way a Gov. w/ 16 executions is going to be seen as soft on crime."

bobmurph
12-10-2007, 08:32 PM
Does the person the rapist killed after Huck let them out as an execution?

Ouch.

JAM824A
12-10-2007, 08:39 PM
Youtube? Purty please...

WillInMiami
12-10-2007, 08:40 PM
Youtube? Purty please...

I didn't record it but it'll be on again at 12:00 am EST.

Ron LOL
12-10-2007, 08:42 PM
Although it was in reference to Fred Thompson rather than the Huckster, we must recall the wise words of Ron Paul: "he'll dilute their support to my benefit." :)

ItsTime
12-10-2007, 08:44 PM
and people called me a Huck shill :D


Ouch.

WillInMiami
12-10-2007, 08:48 PM
Now Newt is on and Hannity and the chick are STILL attacking Huck. This has become the bash Huck hour. They keep comparing him to Dukakis.

Newt was just saying something mildly positive about Huck and ended it by saying " I don't want to defend him but...".

ROTFLMAO!

OptionsTrader
12-10-2007, 08:53 PM
The rub is that laymen watching Fox News aren't sophisticated enough to decipher the 1% occassional accurate reporting from the other 99% of spindoctoring propaganda.

Question_Authority
12-10-2007, 08:55 PM
Does the person the rapist killed after Huck let them out count as an execution?


Ooooooooooooo!!!! Ouch! Nasty! below the belt!

(and I LOVE it!)

philistineau
12-10-2007, 08:57 PM
Anyone able to you tube it? :D

Dan D.
12-10-2007, 08:58 PM
Newt attacking Huck actually gives me more respect for Huckabee. Newt is everything wrong with the conservative movement; he's giving free advice to the Clinton campaign for chrissakes.

quickmike
12-10-2007, 09:02 PM
Hannity just ate Hucks lunch...


So THATS how Huck lost all that weight.

I knew there was more to the story.

maxmerkel
12-10-2007, 09:02 PM
So THATS how Huck lost all that weight.

I knew there was more to the story.

HAHA :D

Dan D.
12-10-2007, 09:03 PM
Huck's gained not a little bit of it back on the campaign trail, at least 25 lbs.

Mr. White
12-10-2007, 09:07 PM
Does the person the rapist killed after Huck let them out count as an execution?

Damn son. Made me flinch.

ronpaulyourmom
12-10-2007, 09:09 PM
Newt attacking Huck actually gives me more respect for Huckabee. Newt is everything wrong with the conservative movement; he's giving free advice to the Clinton campaign for chrissakes.

Dan, I'm glad he is, because if Obama wins he takes the presidency.

quickmike
12-10-2007, 09:10 PM
Honestly, if Ron werent running for president, I would rather have romney or the ghoul than the Huckabeast.

Thats not saying much either.

BeFranklin
12-10-2007, 09:14 PM
Being peaceful and meek works :)

Maverick
12-10-2007, 09:23 PM
No youtubes yet? pweese? :(

RevolutionSD
12-10-2007, 09:36 PM
Honestly, if Ron werent running for president, I would rather have romney or the ghoul than the Huckabeast.

Thats not saying much either.

I'd rather have a whole lot of candidates before the 3 of them. Or how about nobody for president?

ne1buthilary
12-10-2007, 09:41 PM
Anderson Cooper just got done tearing him up too. Now that I have to look at him all the time Huck's lazy eye is really starting to bug me.

Mister Grieves
12-10-2007, 09:43 PM
Now that I have to look at him all the time Huck's lazy eye is really starting to bug me.

It can see into your soul.

paulitics
12-10-2007, 09:46 PM
Does anyone else think that these are the most ruthless attacks on a political candidate since Howard Dean, and for a Repub, you have to go back to Buchanan?

I don't care much for this guy, but I think his appplication for the CFR got rejected.

AlexMerced
12-10-2007, 09:47 PM
that rolling stone article was pretty harsh

quickmike
12-10-2007, 09:52 PM
This is a MustTube.

Jodi
12-10-2007, 10:01 PM
I don't care much for this guy, but I think his appplication for the CFR got rejected.

LOL Thats rich!!!!

Mr. Coolidge
12-10-2007, 10:02 PM
Did I miss something big? Did something happen that made the media turn on him all of a sudden? I mean, we've been pushing for people to take notice of these things (taxes, immigration, etc.) for a while...

InRonWeTrust
12-10-2007, 10:11 PM
Hannity has been hinting for like several days now that he was going to bitchslap Huck,

hahha

WillInMiami
12-10-2007, 10:13 PM
Did I miss something big? Did something happen that made the media turn on him all of a sudden? I mean, we've been pushing for people to take notice of these things (taxes, immigration, etc.) for a while...

Yea something happened - Huck's breaking out in the polls and kicking the "annointed" one's ass. Now the meadia pit-bulls have been released to bite his ass.

It's all good. They keep slinging mud at each other and laughing at our guy. The last laugh will be on them...

maxmerkel
12-10-2007, 10:14 PM
don't be fooles, they just want to prevent huckster from reaching frontrunner position too early and want to squander all ammo now. in the next two month there will be nothing left to attack huckster. :(

WillInMiami
12-10-2007, 10:17 PM
don't be fooles, they just want to prevent huckster from reaching frontrunner position too early and want to squander all ammo now. in the next two month there will be nothing left to attack huckster. :(

Wrong. There's plenty of ammo to use against Huck. This is just the start of an avalanche of mud. The neocon segment of the MSM do not want him to be the nominee - they want Rudy. They'll attack anyone that gets in the way.

On a related note, the liberal segment of the MSM is holding back all the mud on Rudy because they want him to be the nominee. They know there's enough dirt on Rudy to build Mt. Everest and they want to use it to sink him in the general election.

chon
12-10-2007, 10:19 PM
if your not ferretani sean wont like you lol

maxmerkel
12-10-2007, 10:20 PM
Wrong. There's plenty of ammo to use against Huck. This is just the start of an avalanche of mud. The neocon segment of the MSM do not want him to be the nominee - they want Rudy. They'll attack anyone that gets in the way.


i think it pretty irrelevant to them wether huckabee, rudy or romney becomes the nominee.


On a related note, the liberal segment of the MSM is holding back all the mud on Rudy because they want him to be the nominee. They know there's enough dirt on Rudy to build Mt. Everest and they want to use it to sink him in the general election.that is certainly true.

dircha
12-10-2007, 10:21 PM
don't be fooles, they just want to prevent huckster from reaching frontrunner position too early and want to squander all ammo now. in the next two month there will be nothing left to attack huckster. :(

Don't overestimate "them"!

Hannity isn't attacking Huckabee now because he secretly wants Huckabee to win in some weird conspiracy laden alternate universe. :) No!

Hannity is attacking Huckabee because he supports Giuliani.

Sometimes things really are just as simple as they look!

WillInMiami
12-10-2007, 10:21 PM
[QUOTE=maxmerkel;572734]i think it pretty irrelevant to them wether huckabee, rudy or romney becomes the nominee.

How do you explain the rapid-fire attacks (from the neocon media) on Huckabee all of the sudden if this is true?

BillyBeer
12-10-2007, 10:22 PM
Hannity is Rudys gunga din, y'all gotta understand that. He is constantly making excuses for Rudy and trying to pass him off as Conservative. He likes to note how Rudy shut down the porn theatres in Times Squara. This is pretty irrelevant since a President has no control over local zoning laws.

maxmerkel
12-10-2007, 10:24 PM
How do you explain the rapid-fire attacks (from the neocon media) on Huckabee all of the sudden if this is true?

as i said, to contain him for now, shoot all ammo, and let him rise over the top in the last month.

Mister Grieves
12-10-2007, 10:27 PM
Hannity is Rudys gunga din, y'all gotta understand that.

Limbaugh has the same m.o. in regards to Rudy.

Andrew-Austin
12-10-2007, 10:27 PM
Its amazing how the mainstream media filters candidates. In and out, up and down.

Well, I guess their not really on the same page in their efforts.

drednot
12-10-2007, 10:28 PM
Rudy forced Fox Cable into NYC in the early days when Time Warner tried to shut them out.

That's all you need to know.

maxmerkel
12-10-2007, 10:29 PM
Its amazing how the mainstream media filters candidates. In and out, up and down.

yep, somehow all the candidates besides ron paul must know they don't stand any chance if they are not the chosen one, simply because they got way too much dirt on them to survice any media scrutiny.

why do they bother to run in the first place ?

paulitics
12-10-2007, 10:31 PM
Don't overestimate "them"!

Hannity isn't attacking Huckabee now because he secretly wants Huckabee to win in some weird conspiracy laden alternate universe. :) No!

Hannity is attacking Huckabee because he supports Giuliani.

Sometimes things really are just as simple as they look!

I agree with this. Its the same strategy they always use. Ignore the candidate until he becomes a threat, than treat him like he eats babies in broad daylight.

You know its a hit job when they use racism, homophobia, and Jerry Springer tactics, instead of debating issues.
The power brokers have, in unison, decided that Huckabee will not fulfill their agenda. They got the memo on the same day, to throw Huckster under the bus.

This will be interesting to see how stoic his army is. My bet is that with the barrage of attacks it ay take the wind out of their sails.

I don't much care for Huck, but I feel empathy for their supporters.

Hurricane Bruiser
12-10-2007, 10:31 PM
Hannity is Rudys gunga din, y'all gotta understand that. He is constantly making excuses for Rudy and trying to pass him off as Conservative. He likes to note how Rudy shut down the porn theatres in Times Squara. This is pretty irrelevant since a President has no control over local zoning laws.

Well the sad thing is that too many of these candidates would like to control such things as president IMO.

honkywill
12-10-2007, 10:31 PM
The more the feeding frenzy continues I realize what has been said about Huckabee peaking too early.

If Ron can get a good surge just before the primaries then it's all over for the establishment.

RlxdN10sity
12-10-2007, 10:40 PM
If Ron can get a good surge just before the primaries then it's all over for the establishment.

Isn't that what the 16th is about?

My .02, Hannity does not neccessarily want Ghouliani, his bosses want him and Hannity would like to keep his job. In the general, Clinton would smear the Ghoul and thats what the establishment wants, another Clinton front person in the Oval Office.

frasu
12-10-2007, 10:42 PM
impressive... such a long thread and no youtube :D

BillyBeer
12-10-2007, 10:43 PM
Isn't that what the 16th is about?

My .02, Hannity does not neccessarily want Ghouliani, his bosses want him and Hannity would like to keep his job. In the general, Clinton would smear the Ghoul and thats what the establishment wants, another Clinton front person in the Oval Office.

Hannity is an idiot who believes what hes told. How in the hell can a Conservative rail on and on about how we need the Patriot Act?

-LibertyLover-
12-10-2007, 10:44 PM
impressive... such a long thread and no youtube :D

I agree! lol

bulloncoins
12-10-2007, 10:44 PM
Yes. I love to see the Top Tier starting to cannibalize themselves......

Today was not the day to be a Huckabilly........

:D

quickmike
12-10-2007, 10:45 PM
I don't much care for Huck, but I feel empathy for their supporters.


I dont feel it. These mindless robots would support him even if he ate the still beating heart out of a 4 month old babies chest on national TV and find a way to justify it in their feeble little minds. I have NO respect for someone that backs someone just because they made their mind up and nothing will change it no matter what facts come out on him.

If Ron Paul were to be found out to have done even HALF of the stuff Huckabee has done, I would drop my support for him in 1 second flat. Know why? Because I have something called a concience, and it wouldnt allow me to support someone that I believed in and later found out to be something different than what I thought he was.

Its like they decided on him and nothing that comes out, even if its 100% factual, will change their minds. People like that REALLY piss me off no matter who they support. I mean, if you cant be 100% genuine as to why you support something, then you might as well just throw a dart at a list of candidates and just take your chances.

I have no respect or empathy for mindless robots that support something based solely on a "feeling".

AlexMerced
12-10-2007, 10:45 PM
Sadly Mccain and Thompson are stil playing it quiet

honkywill
12-10-2007, 10:48 PM
I dont feel it. These mindless robots would support him even if he ate the still beating heart out of a 4 month old babies chest on national TV.

Reminds me of a bit by David Cross.

Arek
12-10-2007, 10:49 PM
Well RP wants to peak a week or two before the primaries so, look for RP to have good showings in the early primaries and victories on the 5th of February.

I saw the Huck attacks coming.

fireworks_god
12-10-2007, 10:50 PM
It sounds like the GOP candidates will cannibalize themselves as Ron Paul eats up more and more support. :D

quickmike
12-10-2007, 10:54 PM
It sounds like the GOP candidates will cannibalize themselves as Ron Paul eats up more and more support. :D

Yeah, I think thats what the Iowa coordinator was getting at when he said that Ron was gaining steadily but slowly and its a good strong foundation hes climbing on. People dont just support Ron Paul on a whim. They know the facts and his 30+ year track record of consistency. Thats not just something you can buy.

nullzero
12-10-2007, 11:04 PM
Here is a youtube added today from the MSNBC Countdown show... Looking bad for Huckabee media is starting to trash him hard!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAC-kDJFNdU

Chomsky
12-10-2007, 11:09 PM
Here is part of it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxYGk4msiFA

weagle
12-10-2007, 11:09 PM
Ha! just watched the first segment of the Hannity show. This is a hit job on Huckabee. I'm glad I stayed up for this.

JoeySweets
12-10-2007, 11:17 PM
watching it just now,

Huckabee is SOFT

he's getting Hammered

bbachtung
12-10-2007, 11:19 PM
Huck is starting to lose it; he's gonna have one of those days when he goes all whacko on the media (thin-skinned Huck is about to come out).

Danny
12-10-2007, 11:23 PM
You know, we complain a lot about how the MSM ignores us, but maybe we should be thankful. Something tells me that when they're finally forced to set their sights on us, all we're going to get is a barrage of hit jobs exactly like Huckabee is seeing now...

paulitics
12-10-2007, 11:24 PM
Huck Norris is not looking good defending himself. Its too complex for the couch potatos at home. I think he looks neutered here.

quickmike
12-10-2007, 11:25 PM
You know, we complain a lot about how the MSM ignores us, but maybe we should be thankful. Something tells me that when they're finally forced to set their sights on us, all we're going to get is a barrage of hit jobs exactly like Huckabee is seeing now...

Ron doesnt have the dirt on him though.

What are they going to accuse him of? Taking a dump?

BillyBeer
12-10-2007, 11:25 PM
You know, we complain a lot about how the MSM ignores us, but maybe we should be thankful. Something tells me that when they're finally forced to set their sights on us, all we're going to get is a barrage of hit jobs exactly like Huckabee is seeing now...

The only thing they have on Ron Paul is that ghost written racist letter from the early 90s. Its not like hes a Governor with a steady paper trail of fuckups.

BillyBeer
12-10-2007, 11:26 PM
Ron doesnt have the dirt on him though.

What are they going to accuse him of? Taking a shit?

They have that letter that Ron didnt even write...they will trot that out...we will see if it sticks.

quickmike
12-10-2007, 11:27 PM
Huck is starting to lose it; he's gonna have one of those days when he goes all whacko on the media (thin-skinned Huck is about to come out).

Just keep your dogs on a chain and dont let them anywhere near the Huckster.




New Huckster motto - "Hes gonna snap....... Im tellin ya"

RlxdN10sity
12-10-2007, 11:28 PM
I just watched it, and I gotta say I didn't think it was that bad. Matter of fact that lady twice said "your the front-runner now" as if she was crowning him. Don't get me wrong, I wanted it to be bad, and I watched it based on what people who saw it earlier said about it, because I wanted to see him get slammed, but I was dissapointed. Maybe my expectations of Hannity eating someones lunch were too high before I watched it.

mathamagician
12-10-2007, 11:33 PM
Strange because Huck is helping Rudy so much right now. Huck and Romney in a struggle to the death is Rudy's best shot at winning right now.

westmich4paul
12-10-2007, 11:35 PM
I can almost feel chuck norris flexing in anger while watching this. I wonder if afterwards he went on a supersecret training assigment in the Octagon to get ready to openup a can of whoop on Hannity!

Hey Huckster, you can't believe these guys would attack you with dirty mud? These are the same neo-cons you have been embracing and shmoozing with for monthes. What? It is only ok when they do it to Ron?

Guess what Huckleberry, They will eat your young and laugh in your face afterwards. I hope you enjoy the fleas you got while sleeping with these dogs!

Danny
12-10-2007, 11:37 PM
Ron doesnt have the dirt on him though.

What are they going to accuse him of? Taking a dump?

I'm not sure the truth really matters to these guys. They'll call him a racist. They'll call him crazy. They'll talk about how he wants to end social security and medicare. How he wants to legalize all drugs.

You're right, Huckabee is a horrible candidate and I'm thrilled to see him get taken down like this. I just think it's happening because -- and I'm no conspiracy theorist -- he's not one of their "anointed" guys. I'm sure there is plenty of dirt on Romney and the Ghoul, but I've never seen them hit relentlessly like this. I fear we're next if we start surging.

Midnight77
12-10-2007, 11:47 PM
Good. I am glad they are doing this. Put the seed of doubt in the voters that are the biggest threat to us. The Hardcore Christian Right.

paulitics
12-10-2007, 11:47 PM
I'm not sure the truth really matters to these guys. They'll call him a racist. They'll call him crazy. They'll talk about how he wants to end social security and medicare. How he wants to legalize all drugs.

You're right, Huckabee is a horrible candidate and I'm thrilled to see him get taken down like this. I just think it's happening because -- and I'm no conspiracy theorist -- he's not one of their "anointed" guys. I'm sure there is plenty of dirt on Romney and the Ghoul, but I've never seen them hit relentlessly like this. I fear we're next if we start surging.

Its no conspiracy to think that, the evidence is plain as day. There is no way that the media would run hit piece after hit piece on Giuliani. His father was a mob boss, he dresses up in drag, he commits treason by selling out Texas to Nafta. His financial contributions are highly suspect. He is a fascist.

This is how they determine the election. Huck Norris is not a CFR member. And as much as I hate his sanctimonious posturing, he would at least be conservative on a few important issues, like the 2nd amendment.

reduen
12-10-2007, 11:52 PM
Its no conspiracy to think that, the evidence is plain as day. There is no way that the media would run hit piece after hit piece on Giuliani. His father was a mob boss, he dresses up in drag, he commits treason by selling out Texas to Nafta. His financial contributions are highly suspect. He is a fascist.

This is how they determine the election. Huck Norris is not a CFR member. And as much as I hate his sanctimonious posturing, he would at least be conservative on a few important issues, like the 2nd amendment.


"Huck Norris is not a CFR member" - I am not sure that you are right about this topic. I believe that he might be.. I saw some info here recently that seems to suggest that he is a member.

bpassmore
12-11-2007, 12:01 AM
"Huck Norris is not a CFR member" - I am not sure that you are right about this topic. I believe that he might be.. I saw some info here recently that seems to suggest that he is a member.


Huck is not a member; He once spoke at a CFR policy conference, and his good friend Rick Warren is a member, but Huckabee is not.....

Maverick
12-11-2007, 12:02 AM
"Huck Norris is not a CFR member" - I am not sure that you are right about this topic. I believe that he might be.. I saw some info here recently that seems to suggest that he is a member.

Yeah, he joined in late October. I don't know where the link is though....I'll bet someone here can find it however :)

paulitics
12-11-2007, 12:11 AM
"Huck Norris is not a CFR member" - I am not sure that you are right about this topic. I believe that he might be.. I saw some info here recently that seems to suggest that he is a member.


http://www.cfr.org/publication/14335/mike_huckabees_speech_on_foreign_policy.html


He presented himself before the CFR, though this does not make him a member. I think they were taking applications, and he failed. Here are a few highlights. Tell me what you think. This does not seem to jibe well with the CFR agenda.

"The Administration has quite properly said that it will not take the military option for Iran off the table. Neither would I. But if we don’t put other options on the table, eventually the military option becomes the only viable one. Right now we are proceeding down only one track with Iran – armed confrontation. Nothing would make Osama bin Laden happier – he would welcome war between the United States and Iran, his two biggest enemies. I try to avoid doing anything that brightens bin Laden’s day."

"The wisdom of Sun-tzu from almost 2,500 years ago is relevant today: keep your friends close and your enemies closer. We haven’t had diplomatic relations with Iran in almost thirty years, my whole adult life. A lot of good it’s done us! Putting this in human terms, all of us know that when we stop talking to a parent or a sibling or a friend, it’s impossible to accomplish anything, impossible to resolve differences and move the relationship forward. The same is true for countries. "


“Our experience in Iraq provides a valuable lesson for Iran. We have since learned that when we overthrew Saddam, we invaded an “imaginary country” because our information was so out of date. We relied on exiles who had long since fled the country, who exaggerated the condition of Iraq’s infrastructure, the strength of its middle class, and the secular nature of its society. If we had had diplomatic relations with Iraq and an ambassador in Baghdad, we obviously would have had better information. So before we put boots on the ground in the future, we’d better have some wing tips there first"

ape
12-11-2007, 01:15 AM
Interviews like this are bad for huck, makes him gain weight.

reduen
12-11-2007, 03:30 AM
I think that the fact that his speech is now listed in thier essential documents section on their site says something. (at least enough for me to be extremely cautious)

Truly, I have not found hard evidence that he is a member yet. I thought I had but I can not seem to find it now..:confused:



http://www.cfr.org/publication/14335/mike_huckabees_speech_on_foreign_policy.html


He presented himself before the CFR, though this does not make him a member. I think they were taking applications, and he failed. Here are a few highlights. Tell me what you think. This does not seem to jibe well with the CFR agenda.

"The Administration has quite properly said that it will not take the military option for Iran off the table. Neither would I. But if we don’t put other options on the table, eventually the military option becomes the only viable one. Right now we are proceeding down only one track with Iran – armed confrontation. Nothing would make Osama bin Laden happier – he would welcome war between the United States and Iran, his two biggest enemies. I try to avoid doing anything that brightens bin Laden’s day."

"The wisdom of Sun-tzu from almost 2,500 years ago is relevant today: keep your friends close and your enemies closer. We haven’t had diplomatic relations with Iran in almost thirty years, my whole adult life. A lot of good it’s done us! Putting this in human terms, all of us know that when we stop talking to a parent or a sibling or a friend, it’s impossible to accomplish anything, impossible to resolve differences and move the relationship forward. The same is true for countries. "


“Our experience in Iraq provides a valuable lesson for Iran. We have since learned that when we overthrew Saddam, we invaded an “imaginary country” because our information was so out of date. We relied on exiles who had long since fled the country, who exaggerated the condition of Iraq’s infrastructure, the strength of its middle class, and the secular nature of its society. If we had had diplomatic relations with Iraq and an ambassador in Baghdad, we obviously would have had better information. So before we put boots on the ground in the future, we’d better have some wing tips there first"

xao
12-11-2007, 04:35 AM
Schmuckabee's policies are sure in line with the CFR.


Huckabee aid plan for illegal aliens draws 'venom, anger'
www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2005/01/17/News/315406.html
LITTLE ROCK - Gov. Mike Huckabee's proposal last week to provide college scholarships and loans to illegal immigrants has sparked some emotional talk

Huckabee is pro illegals and pro taxes.
OWNED!

www.TaxHikeMike.org

more devastating evidence against Huckabee.
He is a big-government tax-and-spender.

Huckabee says he wants to RAISE TAXES.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pLOC4krZI4




huckabee's CFR link

Here is one paragraph from Huckabee's speech to the CFR on Sept. 28, 2007. He wants to continue the War on Terror and spend OUR money rebuilding a foreign country we ruined with OUR foreign aid money going back for how many years:

quote:
“We have to stop using our active duty forces for nation building and rely on other government agencies for building schools, hospitals, roads, sewage treatment, water filtration, electricity, legal and banking systems. The State Department should be in charge and coordinate with the relevant departments of Energy, Housing, Education, Treasury, Justice, and Transportation."



This should outrage every American! What Constitutional authority do they have spending OUR tax money on ANY foreign country?

This is why Ron Paul's non-interventionism is so badly needed.

WHO GETS THE CONTRACTS FOR ALL THESE PROJECTS??? C'mon, figure it out, who, who, who? Of course, the multi-national corporations who are represented by the membership of the Council on Foreign Relations. This is the military-industrial complex in its' glory. Declare pre-emptive war, destroy their infrastructure which was probably crap to begin with, then make the US taxpayers pay for building it all again. Of course Iraq has plenty of oil, so maybe they can get paid in oil. In either case, the whole thing stinks. If business wants to build things overseas, don't make American taxpayers and soldiers pay the price.

Here is the link:
http://www.cfr.org/publication/14335/