Andrew-Austin
12-10-2007, 06:05 PM
I hope I am on the same frequency as most other Ron Paul supporters when I say, the Tea Party must be a mere sign post of what is to come!
We can safely assume within a ball park estimate that the Tea Party will be a success. However, it is not the success of this one event that matters, but the continued growth of the movement. Not so much the growth of the campaign's wallet, but the number of hearts and souls behind it.
The stakes are big. Far bigger then a normal election, and we're not exactly playing on fair grounds. Which is why Ron Paul must not be the omega and alpha of this movement. We have some considerable disadvantages, but we also have advantages the are only beginning to be explored that are sure to have depth.
Thoughts? What cometh after the 16th?
We can safely assume within a ball park estimate that the Tea Party will be a success. However, it is not the success of this one event that matters, but the continued growth of the movement. Not so much the growth of the campaign's wallet, but the number of hearts and souls behind it.
The stakes are big. Far bigger then a normal election, and we're not exactly playing on fair grounds. Which is why Ron Paul must not be the omega and alpha of this movement. We have some considerable disadvantages, but we also have advantages the are only beginning to be explored that are sure to have depth.
Thoughts? What cometh after the 16th?