Companies That Might Build Trump’s Wall Threatened by California Politicians

[Swordsmyth]

Fletcher’s bill would dictate that the state’s two large pension systems — the California Public Employee Retirement System and the California State Teachers Retirement System — liquidate in companies that help build the wall. The total investment of the two retirement funds is $312 billion and $202 billion, respectively.

More at: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/25670-companies-that-might-build-trump-s-wall-threatened-by-california-politicians

[dannno]

I don't know that putting up a fight against Trump has ever served anybody very well.

California will get what it deserves.

[oyarde]

Fletcher’s bill would dictate that the state’s two large pension systems — the California Public Employee Retirement System and the California State Teachers Retirement System — liquidate in companies that help build the wall. The total investment of the two retirement funds is $312 billion and $202 billion, respectively.

More at: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/25670-companies-that-might-build-trump-s-wall-threatened-by-california-politicians

I wonder if there really is 515 billion .

[Schifference]

Maybe Trump should have Mexican prisoners build the wall.

[specsaregood]

Fletcher’s bill would dictate that the state’s two large pension systems — the California Public Employee Retirement System and the California State Teachers Retirement System — liquidate in companies that help build the wall. The total investment of the two retirement funds is $312 billion and $202 billion, respectively.

More at: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/25670-companies-that-might-build-trump-s-wall-threatened-by-california-politicians

seems fiscally irresponsible to not invest in companies sucking off the big federal teat. you don't go broke investing in those types. I mean, if these folks had a history of being against big govt spending and grift I could understand their position; but I doubt that is the case.

[timosman]

seems fiscally irresponsible to not invest in companies sucking off the big federal teat. you don't go broke investing in those types. I mean, if these folks had a history of being against big govt spending and grift I could understand their position; but I doubt that is the case.

on the other hand investing in companies who are part of the MIC is ok.

[tod evans]

seems fiscally irresponsible to not invest in companies sucking off the big federal teat. you don't go broke investing in those types. I mean, if these folks had a history of being against big govt spending and grift I could understand their position; but I doubt that is the case.

What better batch of ticks to suck their host dry?

[TheCount]

on the other hand investing in companies who are part of the MIC is ok.

Border control is part of the MIC.