PDA

View Full Version : House Leadership’s Health Bill Is Not What Republicans Promised




Brian4Liberty
03-20-2017, 10:18 PM
House Leadership’s Health Bill Is Not What Republicans Promised. We Can Do Better. (http://dailysignal.com/2017/03/15/house-leaderships-health-bill-is-not-what-republicans-promised-we-can-do-better/)
By Rep. Jeff Duncan / @RepJeffDuncan / March 15, 2017 /


President Ronald Reagan once said, “We should carry a banner of no pale pastels—but one of bold colors, which make it unmistakably clear where we stand on the issues.”

The 2010 mid-term elections were historic. Running opposite of President Barack Obama’s agenda—primarily the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare—the Republican efforts resulted in 63 seats changing hands, the highest loss of a party in a House mid-term election since 1938 and the largest House swing from one party to the other since 1948.

Americans were angry with the Democrats’ efforts on health care reform, feeling hoodwinked by a 1,400-page bill crafted in such a fashion that members of Congress were urged to “pass [it] so we can find out what is in it,” as then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is remembered for saying.
...
In order to send an Obamacare repeal bill to the president’s desk with only a 54-46 Senate majority, congressional Republicans had to use a budgetary tactic known as budget reconciliation, which requires only a simple majority of votes in the Senate (51) in order to pass. (This is the same method Democrats had to use to pass the bulk of Obamacare in 2010.)

The Restoring Americans’ Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act of 2015 (H.R. 3762) was the reconciliation legislation for fiscal year 2016, and the vehicle used to repeal Obamacare. Predictably, Obama vetoed the bill on Jan. 8, 2016.

During the presidential election cycle in 2016, Republicans were once again given the nod by the nation by retaining the majority in the House of Representatives, keeping a 52-48 majority in the Senate, and winning the White House with the election of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States.

Obamacare was once again in the crosshairs of the Republican majority.

The New Plan

Now, House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell hope to use the budget reconciliation tactic to once again overcome the Democrats’ ability to filibuster general legislation in the Senate.

On the evening of March 6, House leadership rolled out the American Health Care Act, a reconciliation bill aimed at making changes to Obamacare. Many have dubbed the bill “Obamacare Lite” since it does not repeal the Affordable Care Act, but instead nibbles around the edges in an attempt to make Obamacare less harmful.
...
First and foremost, the American Health Care Act does not repeal Obamacare.

The bill does repeal some facets of Obamacare, and there are some things to like about the bill. These include:


Defunding of Planned Parenthood, something Republicans should have already been able to do.
Repeal of the individual mandate, which requires everyone to purchase health insurance or pay a gradually increasing fine.
Repeal of the employer mandate, which subsequently changes the definition of full-time employment.
Repeal of the medical device tax and other taxes on health insurance premiums and pharmaceuticals, while increasing the expense threshold for medical expense deductions.
Ending the Medicaid expansion after three years.
Repeal of the government subsidy for health insurance premiums.


These are good things that were all included in the 2015 budget reconciliation bill, which passed both houses of Congress.

The American Health Care Act also repeals the individual mandate that requires everyone to have health insurance or pay a gradually increasing tax. But the House GOP plan replaces the individual mandate with its own penalty—a 30 percent penalty to the insurer if there is a lapse in coverage.

In essence, this is requiring people to have health insurance or risk paying more when they do obtain it. The penalty will just be retained by the insurance companies instead of being collected by the government in the Obamacare tax.
...
I ran for Congress on repealing Obamacare. Not nibbling around the edges. Not exchanging one mandate for another.

I ran to unwind government, limit the size and scope of government, and unleash the things that make America great. One of the most powerful institutions that has built this country is the free market. Capitalism.

Government has no business being in health care or the health insurance business. We have allowed safety net programs like Medicaid and Medicare to become big bureaucratic nightmares that restrict choice, dictate terms, and mandate coverage—enforced with a carrot-and-stick mentality and funded by the tax dollars of hardworking Americans.

Medicaid and Medicare are no longer safety net programs. They have become the health insurance for many Americans.

These programs entangle the federal government (with its money), the states (who run Medicaid programs), and hospitals and doctors who must comply with bureaucratic mandates, which are often crafted by people with little to no understanding of the doctor-patient relationship, medical diagnoses, or treatments.

Betraying Our Voters

Is this the set of policies the American people expected when Trump ran in 2016 on the repeal of Obamacare? How do you think they will react when these are the only parts of repeal that pass because some members of Congress cannot sell free markets and less government back in their districts?

I believe they will feel betrayed. That is why the bill that House Leadership has introduced, in its current form, is not one that I can support.
...
More: http://dailysignal.com/2017/03/15/house-leaderships-health-bill-is-not-what-republicans-promised-we-can-do-better/

CaptUSA
03-21-2017, 11:46 AM
Good on him for sticking his neck out. I have a feeling the GOP will break out the ax. But at least they'll have a few more targets.

timosman
03-21-2017, 11:56 AM
Will you be able to buy insurance across the state lines? :confused:

Jan2017
03-22-2017, 07:27 AM
"the House GOP plan replaces the individual mandate with its own penalty—a 30 percent penalty to the insurer if there is a lapse in coverage."

So it is not a "tax" this time - exactly what enabled the squeaky 5-4 Supreme Court decision that Obamacare was constitutional.

Occam's Banana
03-22-2017, 08:02 AM
House Leadership’s Health Bill Is Not What Republicans Promised

In other late-breaking news, water is wet and fire is hot ...