PDA

View Full Version : Federal Enforcement and the Congressional Cannabis Caucus




CaseyJones
03-03-2017, 10:46 AM
http://www.thestranger.com/slog/2017/03/02/24955548/federal-enforcement-and-the-congressional-cannabis-caucus


Melissa McCarthy Spicer said there could be a federal crackdown on recreational marijuana! Is this true?

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer says many peculiar things. Regarding marijuana, he recently said, “I do believe that you’ll see greater enforcement.” He also distinguished between recreational and medical marijuana before making a bullshit comparison with opioid addiction.

We’ll have to wait and see what this means, exactly, but a shift in the executive branch’s marijuana policy creates many complex issues. The most important one? Federal legislators could and should loosen marijuana laws soon.

One week before Spicey’s statements, Oregon’s Earl Blumenauer and Colorado’s Jared Polis (both Democrats), with California’s Dana Rohrabacher and Alaska’s Don Young (both Republicans), officially launched the bipartisan Congressional Cannabis Caucus.

A caucus, or “congressional member organization,” refers to an organized group of lawmakers who pursue common legislative objectives and register the organization with the Committee on House Administration. Caucus members may assign staff (including shared employees) to carry out the caucus’ objectives.

The Congressional Cannabis Caucus intends to bridge the gap between the federal laws prohibiting cannabis and the growing number of states legalizing cannabis. As a bipartisan working group, the caucus presents a platform for lawmakers to cooperate across the aisle on the political work of swinging votes and upending failed prohibitionist policies. Immediate goals include but aren’t limited to: allowing normal bank accounts for cannabis businesses (ending the current cash insanity), reforming IRC 280E (which currently forces cannabis businesses to pay whopping taxes to the IRS), and supporting states’ rights to allow cannabis.

The caucus co-chairs represent diverse states that have all legalized “recreational” cannabis. Blumenauer (D-OR) has been a vocal supporter of cannabis law reform throughout his political career. Polis (D-CO) says he has never used cannabis but he supports sensible drug policy, states’ rights, and his home state’s booming cannabis industry. Rohrabacher (R-CA) has spoken publicly about using medical cannabis to successfully deal with his own arthritis pain. He was the architect of a provision in the federal budget (expiring soon) that prevented the US Department of Justice from interfering with state-level medical marijuana. And Young (R-AK) is a stalwart defender of states’ rights who doesn’t think the federal government should care whether or not people use cannabis, although he says he hasn’t used it himself. Staff from representative Blumenauer’s office confirmed that a good handful of other lawmakers have also committed to joining the cannabis caucus as inaugural members.

The symbolic significance of this should not be understated. As more legislators join, bipartisan support for federal marijuana law reform becomes increasingly visible and therefore likely. After Spicer’s hint that federal enforcement is probable, the need for legislative action is more urgent.

While Washington, DC, might presently resemble an episode of Black Mirror, cannabis reform could be an easy, bipartisan political win following the momentum of the 2016 election: Twenty-eight states have legal medical cannabis. Eight allow “recreational” use. A sizeable majority of Americans support legalizing some form of marijuana. Early figures suggest that legal marijuana sales amounted to $6.5 billion last year. Some estimate that could grow to $25 billion by 2020. Stay tuned.

dannno
03-03-2017, 11:10 AM
Blumenauer (D-OR)

http://media.oregonlive.com/politics_impact/photo/earlblumenauerjpg-25d60650a2edd184.jpg


Polis (D-CO)




http://images.politico.com/global/click/091130_polis2_ap_522_regular.jpg


Rohrabacher (R-CA)

http://www.trbimg.com/img-53233ee6/turbine/la-pn-dana-rohrabacher-ukraine-putin-20140314


Young (R-AK)

http://media.salon.com/2014/10/AP101027073416-620x412.jpg

CaseyJones
03-03-2017, 11:13 AM
Heroes

dannno
03-03-2017, 01:02 PM
Heroes

Ironically two of them are "anti-gay". I told one of my gay friends who uses cannabis medicinally about what great work Rohrabacher was doing to help get medical cannabis companies more fair treatment in the marketplace (being able to use banks, being able to expense expenses from revenue to calculate taxes, etc) and he just came back about how he didn't like him because he didn't support gay marriage..

The other guy Don Young explained his opposition to gay marriage by comparing homosexuality to having sex with bulls.

I disagree with their views, although I'm not sure how they hurt homosexuals..

But I guess the bigger question is, why aren't there more people on the left in office who support gay marriage trying to help out on the cannabis front?

parocks
03-04-2017, 04:39 AM
Ironically two of them are "anti-gay". I told one of my gay friends who uses cannabis medicinally about what great work Rohrabacher was doing to help get medical cannabis companies more fair treatment in the marketplace (being able to use banks, being able to expense expenses from revenue to calculate taxes, etc) and he just came back about how he didn't like him because he didn't support gay marriage..

The other guy Don Young explained his opposition to gay marriage by comparing homosexuality to having sex with bulls.

I disagree with their views, although I'm not sure how they hurt homosexuals..

But I guess the bigger question is, why aren't there more people on the left in office who support gay marriage trying to help out on the cannabis front?


In Maine, there are referendums on issues like gay marriage and marijuana legalization. A while back, maybe 5 years ago there was a November election where there was a gay issue and a marijuana issue on the ballot at the same time. If I recall correctly, the marijuana issue won handily and the gay issue won narrowly.

I went over town by town, trying to find areas that were more the most pro marijuana / anti gay, and the most pro gay / anti marijuana.

The most pro gay / anti marijuana was Bar Harbor. Bar Harbor is a fairly famous place, filled with mansions. The rich are pro gay, anti marijuana. The "elites" are pro gay, anti marijuana, and I think that if you look at Team Bilderberg, the Suckoligopoly, the Deep State, the Satanic Pedophiles, Big Pharma, The Bankers, Monsanto, the MSM, whatever name you might have for "the bad guys" and the various factions of bad guys we have around these days, you'll see that the pro marijuana groups are grassroots groups supported by a majority of the people and the gay groups aren't supported by the people but by the bad guys, who are pushing the people to support their agenda. It could be said, to some degree, that "Democrats" on the street might often support marijuana and gay, but the people who are pushing each of those things are entirely different.