PDA

View Full Version : Montana Governor: Individuals can not be trusted on open carry




seapilot
02-23-2017, 08:43 PM
Montana I thought was a bastion for Firearm Freedom? Governor knows best. Sarc


Montana Governor Bullock Vetoes Constitutional Carry…Again
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/02/dean-weingarten/montana-governor-bullock-vetoes-constitutional-carry-2/

Dean Weingarten
February 23, 2017

Governor Steve Bullock (D) of Montana has vetoed constitutional carry again. The bill, HB 262 was struck down on Thursday afternoon. In an nbcmontana.com article, Governor Bullock stated that individuals can’t be trusted to decide whether or not to carry firearms.

Bullock noted in his veto letter that he had rejected two bills identical to Harris’ measure in past sessions. The governor says the idea of allowing individuals to decide for themselves whether they are eligible to carry concealed weapons is absurd.

An override attempt of the veto is unlikely. The bill passed with strong margins, about 60% of the votes in each house, but it did not get the two thirds necessary for an override.

©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Gun Watch

openfire
02-23-2017, 09:00 PM
Governor Steve Bullock (D) of Montana

CPUd
02-23-2017, 09:05 PM
If Matt Collins were there, dude would have signed that bill.

TheTexan
02-23-2017, 09:32 PM
If Matt Collins were there, dude would have signed that bill.

If Matt Collins were there, they would have voted hard enough to get 67%

oyarde
02-23-2017, 09:46 PM
Actually , Montana really does need Collins .

TheTexan
02-23-2017, 11:02 PM
The governor says the idea of allowing individuals to decide for themselves whether they are eligible to carry concealed weapons is absurd.

Without licenses, it would be chaos... blood in the streets.

Please, for the sake of our children, practice gun safety, and carry a license with your weapon at all times.

muh_roads
02-23-2017, 11:33 PM
You can thank the CIA for this. From false flags to instigating hatred within the Muslim communities. People are paranoid as fuck on both sides.

Keith and stuff
02-24-2017, 12:31 AM
Montana I thought was a bastion for Firearm Freedom?

That is New Hampshire where we just passed the best Constitutional Carry law in the nation. We have an optional license that is good in half of the states. We don't have any age requirement at all. We don't have a duty to inform the police. We don't have a residency requirement. No other state even comes close!

Athan
02-24-2017, 08:42 AM
This is bad.

Keith and stuff
02-24-2017, 06:19 PM
Bullock vetoed one measure Thursday by Republican Rep. Randy Brodehl of Kalispell that would have allowed anyone to carry a firearm in a post office.

Does MT law specifically prohibit the carrying in a federal Post Office? Why would it do that?

phill4paul
02-24-2017, 06:43 PM
Does MT law specifically prohibit the carrying in a federal Post Office? Why would it do that?

Federal Government property laws. The states are the Unions bitches.

TommyJeff
02-24-2017, 07:20 PM
Thankfully this governor is around. How would people in MT know when to eat without Steve

XNavyNuke
02-25-2017, 10:02 AM
Montana - Summer getaway and Chateau de Versailles for the west coast elite. Bullock thinks he's some kind of big political mover and shaker when he's really a mere estate caretaker for the monied masters.

XNN

Anti Federalist
02-25-2017, 11:14 PM
NH>MT

The Northbreather
02-25-2017, 11:49 PM
That is New Hampshire where we just passed the best Constitutional Carry law in the nation. We have an optional license that is good in half of the states. We don't have any age requirement at all. We don't have a duty to inform the police. We don't have a residency requirement. No other state even comes close!

Missouri's seem pretty damn good....;)

Keith and stuff
02-26-2017, 07:33 PM
Missouri's seem pretty damn good....;)

MO is better than average and just got better. No state has perfect firearm laws, unfortunately. With MO there is a long list of prohibited places. The new law reduces the age requirement from 21 to 19. However, there is no justifiable argument for a 19 year old age requirement. I disagree with states that make it 18, but lawmakers in those states might just be confused. It is my opinion that lawmakers in MO made it 19 specifically to violate the Constitution. http://www.lakeexpo.com/news/lake_news/what-you-need-to-know-about-missouri-s-new-concealed/article_649c4c18-d113-11e6-9fd7-a7d22708d618.html

fr33
02-26-2017, 09:14 PM
Opposing legalized open carry is like closing your eyes and putting your fingers in your ears. The guns are still there whether you see them or not.

One person will say, "Why do you want to conceal that? What are you trying to hide? You must be up to something bad."
Another will say, "Carrying a gun openly will trigger shootouts at high noon. Keep it concealed."

Gun laws in America are retarded and I don't mean that in the way Europeans usually say it. In the US, a short barreled rifle is more restricted than a pistol of the same model of firearm. In Canada, a pistol is more restricted than a short barreled rifle of the same model of firearm. The existence, or lack thereof, of a butt-stock doesn't make it any more dangerous.

Brian4Liberty
02-26-2017, 09:52 PM
"Individuals can not be trusted ________________________."

Fill in the blank. To the Mommy-Staters, everything can go in that blank.

timosman
02-26-2017, 09:58 PM
"Individuals can not be trusted ________________________."

Fill in the blank. To the Mommy-Staters, everything can go in that blank.

We all should be treated like the toddlers we are, unable to wipe our own ass without the government help.