PDA

View Full Version : Army preps for urban warfare




tod evans
02-08-2017, 02:04 PM
Quotes referenced at link....


From Drudge;

Army Preps for Urban Warfare in MegaCities: “Mass Migration, Disaster and Inner-City Turmoil”

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/army-preps-for-urban-warfare-in-megacities-mass-migration-disaster-and-inner-city-turmoil_02072017

There will be war in the streets of America. Things have been engineered that way.

The scenarios are many, the issues are complex. The current anger from the left, who are violently protesting against President Trump, is just one aspect of it.

But the Pentagon and the U.S. national security structure is increasingly looking towards the shifting demographics around the globe – people have moved from rural areas, and shifted into cities. Where ever conflict stirs, there will be a need for military and SWAT response to the call. Entire cities will be locked down; door to door sweeps will often have violent ends.

Baghdad could be brought home to the streets of America, and the military already knows it.

The powers that be are deeply concerned about the unfolding situations with migrants, illegal immigrants, potential terrorists, political factions, violent protests, arson and riots.

Increasingly, they are training for and expecting a homegrown conflict that will call for them to restore order in a major cities – and even hunt down suspects block to block, like in the Boston Marathon bombing incident, while making some significant infringement of our civil liberties.

During the past several years, there have been reports about unannounced urban warfare drills in major U.S. cities, sometimes in coordination with major events; there have also been military training scenarios that have maintained a consistent theme of civil unrest, economic breakdown and widespread riots.

As Intellihub reported:

For years the alternative media has warned about the US military possibly being used against the American people in a time of economic collapse or any sort of martial law scenario.

Drills such as Vigilant Guard 2010 have brought widespread attention to the fact that portions of our own military are training to take on crowds of American citizens demanding food and Constitutional rights in a time of crisis.

Now, a new release by the website Public Intelligence, once again confirms that as recently as February and March of 2012, US troops at Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington were conducting training scenarios for a civil disturbance domestic quick reaction force.

A series of photos of the drills shows US troops with crowd control riot shields on the opposite side of actors portraying what can only be described as American citizens.

What do the elite know that we don’t?

Now, a major military scholar is calling for the creation of “megacities combat units” – a proposal that is a major and drastic departure from warfare of the past, which has been designed away from cities. Now, military and paramilitary units, as well as local law enforcement, much engage the population itself – with all the unpredictability afforded by a real life, complex situation filled with combatants, non-combatants and friendlies behind any and all doors, etc.

With a heightened focus on terrorism and reigning in undocumented immigrants, there will be a tendency, if we are not careful, for a heightened militarized and police state atmosphere to arise – both at home, and in everyplace that they take the fight.

Major John Spencer, a former Ranger Instructor and scholar at West Point’s Modern War Institute called for an armed unit ready for megacities deployment in an op-ed:

Every year, more and more of the world’s population moves into cities. The number of megacities is growing exponentially. Both of these global patterns and their inevitable consequences for military operations are well documented. Yet we still do not have units that are even remotely prepared to operate in megacities. If we want to find success on the urban battlefields the US Army will inevitably find itself fighting on in the future, that needs to change.

Throughout history, military forces either sought to avoid or simply had no need to engage in urban combat. Most military doctrine, and the strategic theory it is built upon, encourages land forces to bypass, lay siege to, or—if required—isolate and slowly clear cities from the outside in. The great armies of the world have historically fought for cities rather than in cities, a distinction with a significant difference. In cases where military forces had no choice but to operate within cities, the environment, almost without exception, proved very costly in both military and civilian casualties. Today, many armies have accepted that global population growth and urbanization trends will increasingly force military operations into crowded cities, and military forces must therefore be capable of conducting the full range of operations in large, dense urban areas.

Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley recently remarked that the Army “has been designed, manned, trained and equipped for the last 241 years to operate primarily in rural areas.” But that is about to change. Milley continued:

[…]

The conclusions of the SSG research are clear: megacities are unavoidable, they are potentially the most challenging environment the Army has ever faced, and the Army is unprepared to operate in them.

[…]

One ongoing military study of megacities is the NATO Urbanization Project. […] In the project’s most recent experiment, the NATO team conducted a wargame to determine the capabilities needed to achieve the goals of three likely missions in 2035: response to mass migration, natural disaster, and inner-city turmoil. Within these missions, the wargame specified that a brigade conduct three operations in a megacity—joint forcible entry, major combat, and subsequent stability operations—without unacceptable levels of military or civilian casualties.

[…]

Of course, urban warfare is not exclusively a future phenomenon. Much has been learned from urban battles in recent history: the Siege of Sarajevo (1992–95); the Battle of Mogadishu (1993); Russian operations in Grozny (1994–95 and 1999–2000); US operations in Baghdad (2003) and Fallujah (2004); Lebanese operations in Nahr al-Bared, Lebanon (2007); and the Second Battle of Donetsk (2014–15). But the broad lessons of these cases have yet to truly inform Army training for urban combat, which for most units consists mainly of tactical training (e.g., room clearing drills with four-man teams). The Army would be much better served by the creation of an entire unit dedicated to preparing to operate in dense urban environments, particularly megacities.

Any way you slice it, the military and the national security infrastructure are watching for cracks in the system.

People are at their wits end, and many are on the edge of poverty – and for many, it just won’t take much more to set them loose, and let riots erupt. Whether the system wants those to spread, or wants to suppress and contain them, they know they are coming.

Population pressures, and clashing groups within growing city centers are creating more problems, and compounding old ones.

If the economic stability of a given region were to give way, nearly every megacity would spiral out of control and descend into absolute madness – whether or this continent or any other.

via Nicholas West:

The following Pentagon video was featured by The Intercept and portrays the chilling atmosphere presented by sheer numbers and those who would enter such environments in the pursuit of order.
Drills such as “Unified Quest” run yearly by the U.S. Army took a sharper turn in 2014 toward addressing the problem of combat in megacities – defined as cities with more than 10 million people, of which there already are nearly 25 and projected to total near 40 by the year 2025. The Pentagon’s own solicitation early last year called “Thunderstorm Spiral” was a request for “help from technological innovators to take on the future of warfare.” This appeared to indicate that in addition to boots on the ground, an additional pervasive centralized intelligence apparatus would be needed to properly plan for troop movements through such dense but vast environments that also would be made up of networks underground.



Rather than trying to guess what specific crisis may spill over into violence, or bring things to a stand still in traffic or electronic commerce, just consider the piling pressure that is growing in the techno hubs and swelling urban population centers.

New York, Boston, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston and dozens of enormous cities around the world are all completely vulnerable. Depending upon the political situation, unrest, violence or whatever else could spread across the entire Eastern half of the U.S., and the entire country could face collapse as it has never before known it. It is only a question of timing and circumstance.

Preppers should take all this into account. Modern life may make a connection to the city unavoidable prior to the collapse, but being insufficiently away from major urban centers is definitely a liability in times of crisis. Even outlying neighbors can be subject to looting, natural disaster, grid shutdown, riots, and many other situations. Make arrangements to shelter away from the city, and make sure you can get there safely and quickly when something goes down.

Do not rely on the services or goods of these cities, and get out while you still can. There are some very major crises brewing right now. They are preparing; you should, too.

Zippyjuan
02-08-2017, 06:12 PM
Been hearing this for at least 20 years now.

Slave Mentality
02-08-2017, 06:29 PM
Been hearing this for at least 20 years now.

Since you are so good with charts and graphs:

Compare SWAT raids from '97-'17.

How many MRAPS did Bugtustle, AR have in '97 vs. '17?

Compare the number of check-points (any type) from '97-'17.

What percentage of the population is dependent on government for basic necessities '97 vs. '17?

What percentage of the population is imprisoned '97 vs. '17?

It's called creeping tyranny for a reason.

Origanalist
02-09-2017, 12:14 AM
Since you are so good with charts and graphs:

Compare SWAT raids from '97-'17.

How many MRAPS did Bugtustle, AR have in '97 vs. '17?

Compare the number of check-points (any type) from '97-'17.

What percentage of the population is dependent on government for basic necessities '97 vs. '17?

What percentage of the population is imprisoned '97 vs. '17?

It's called creeping tyranny for a reason.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re72di5phM0

shakey1
02-09-2017, 09:17 AM
Isn't that what they were training for during Jade Helm?

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/G-2k2YjQ44c/maxresdefault.jpg

jllundqu
02-09-2017, 10:28 AM
Oh lord. Here we go.

jllundqu
02-09-2017, 10:31 AM
Let us ask a primary question:

Given the state of this divided nation and its obvious fragility, even a small disruption in electricity (GRID), water, food, etc. would lead to massive disruptions.

Would it not be prudent for a statist apparatus to plan for such an eventuality?

Now before anyone gets their panties in a twist, I do not endorse such actions and would resist with lethal force any attempt by the military to suppress my natural human rights...

pcosmar
02-09-2017, 10:38 AM
Would it not be prudent for a statist apparatus to plan for such an eventuality?


It would be expected of any authoritarian, for both control and exploitation. It is already a presidential Executive Order.


and it should not be so in a free society.

I have long advised folk to get out of large cities.

pcosmar
02-09-2017, 10:45 AM
Note to Militia

you know who you are. you know you duty is to defend.

AVOID conflict in urban areas. Draw them away.

Don't set up to fight urban warfare,, and don't get drawn into it.. it gets innocents killed. and gives them a PR edge.

Draw them away to places of your own choosing.

Don't get caught defending ground,,, Don't die for dirt.

Defend People. That is the Duty.

seapilot
02-09-2017, 12:21 PM
Lots of propaganda heating up turning the dial up to 11. Left is now convinced(thanks to the MSM) the right is Hitler/Facists and end justifies the means for violence. They have turned into full blown communists supporting anti free speech (hate speech) anti self-defense(gun control) and wanting more state rights to become more socialist.

The right are being told by their propagandists the left does not just disagree with them but outright hate them and want to destroy them. They are witnessing them become more violent and unhinged to get their way. Now the right is calling for more state power to deal with the left, when 6 months ago they all believed the state power would be used against them. I do not think anyone would be surprised to see the army involved in massive riot control. In fact many will cheer it on. The country has never been this out of wack politically in my lifetime.

timosman
02-09-2017, 12:24 PM
It would be expected of any authoritarian, for both control and exploitation. It is already a presidential Executive Order.


and it should not be so in a free society.

I have long advised folk to get out of large cities.

Not everybody is excited about living under a bridge. :cool:

pcosmar
02-09-2017, 12:50 PM
Not everybody is excited about living under a bridge. :cool:

Though I have on occasion,, I would not recommend bridges for dwelling.

as a place of choosing perhaps,,

Athan
02-09-2017, 03:23 PM
In regards to the Trump presidency and the insurgency of populists, I am frankly surprised and taken aback how much his election has been enough of an anomaly against the scheming of the cretins of the CFR that it is hard to know whether we will be dealing with unrest or the shelving of it till after Trump is out of office. I expected this much kick back only had Ron Paul had gotten in office as well with him trying to offset it with peaceful and intelligent rhetoric the general public would not have generally followed because the media would have played on emotions and sound bites.

The media knows that passion and not intelligence sways the masses, but Trump does better than any candidate to shit on their plans with his character. I usually hate getting into time tables of predictions for market corrections, but back in 2011-12 people asked me what I thought of a collapse or civil unrest as mentioned above. I gave it likely after 2016 due to the BRICS nation finalizing their trade agreements last year and dollar deleveraging like with what is going on with Iran. Then Trump happened instead of Hillary and likely civil war/WW3 with Russia. I am glad I was obviously wrong because I knew service members that were so upset with Hillary they did say they would do more than protest.

But now it requires a complete set of new analysis with Trump, economic restructuring with the tariff threats, political opponents trying to prevent him from possibly arresting them for serious treason level crimes among other, the deep state fissure between agencies, NGO's, CF appointees, mainstream media discredited, populist nationalism sweeping the globe with the refugee crisis, and a whole host of things.

I think such an event of urban conflict would likely be put off because the globalists are seeing their plans starting to completely crumble from the US to euRape.

Think about it, they are losing the gun debate, people are wanting now the NFA repealed and legalization of silencers.
A wall is likely to be constructed soon, while the drug war is crumbling with states legalizing weed.
An attempt on Trump's life will likely be met with violence, and the nation will likely be thrown into civil war.
La Pen is threatening France's EU membership.
Trump is in position to put more Constitutional original intent judges in the Supreme Court than the left desires.
The left is moving less towards Ben "dats gross, dats racist" ideology and more towards now at least giving Sam Harris a fair hearing.... mostly.
Alternative media is going after people like the Young Turks
The left is starting to realize they need to stop being such cucks with guns and get one... even though they will not know how to use it.

I mean one can go on. There is such a new set of dynamics in play, it is no longer the same battle Republicans had with Democrats and with Libertarians, and etc.

Athan
02-09-2017, 03:42 PM
Lots of propaganda heating up turning the dial up to 11. Left is now convinced(thanks to the MSM) the right is Hitler/Facists and end justifies the means for violence. They have turned into full blown communists supporting anti free speech (hate speech) anti self-defense(gun control) and wanting more state rights to become more socialist.

The right are being told by their propagandists the left does not just disagree with them but outright hate them and want to destroy them. They are witnessing them become more violent and unhinged to get their way. Now the right is calling for more state power to deal with the left, when 6 months ago they all believed the state power would be used against them. I do not think anyone would be surprised to see the army involved in massive riot control. In fact many will cheer it on. The country has never been this out of wack politically in my lifetime.

I agree with your assessment, but out of whack is one way of putting it but doesn't feel like the right description. I think "things are different" is more astute. And we have an opportunity to influence one side more than the other. We can advise less state power and be heard if we are able to provide effective solutions like what Ron Paul did with "Letters of Marque and Reprisal", and "mint a 20 trillion dollar coin to pay off the debt overnight".

The left wants to become a belligerent, they think anyone right of Tim Allen is a neo-nazi, and in the process is both alienating themselves with normal people and destroying their argument. For instance, Trump using Obama's rule change on protesting federal events during his Inauguration was a genius move. Suddenly their own tools were turned against them and they see the power they permitted turn on them. Republicans are now able to court historically democrat auto workers for instance and blacks with Rand Paul.

Is it dangerous to put full faith in Trump? Obviously and it goes without saying considering the tempers and personal attacks Trump is weathering that obviously gets him angry. But keep in mind what opportunities we now have that we didn't before. Such as repealing two laws if we pass a new law. Only a fool would look at this in a bad light. Trump is temporary, the damage done by Soros, the Clinton Foundation, the media, a corrupted justice department and CIA, and etc is not just permanent, they and their supporters are something we outright aren't able to work with.

Ron Paul supporters need think of Trump as a car we have on hand instead of the off reliable Road Hummer. The car is a loud corvette called Trump, but it can only take us 1/2 or 3/4 of the way there. After that, we have to walk because we didn't get the Hummer. However that's at least 1/2 the way there we don't have to walk, and we are no longer being pushed back completely any further.

Zippyjuan
02-09-2017, 04:58 PM
But the Pentagon and the U.S. national security structure is increasingly looking towards the shifting demographics around the globe – people have moved from rural areas, and shifted into cities. Where ever conflict stirs, there will be a need for military and SWAT response to the call. Entire cities will be locked down; door to door sweeps will often have violent ends.

This part is true. Wars are more likely to be fought in cities than in forests, jungles, or deserts. Preparing for that make good sense. You want to be ready for all possibilities. To go from there to the government planning to attack their own citizens is a big leap though.

seapilot
02-10-2017, 02:41 PM
Ron Paul supporters need think of Trump as a car we have on hand instead of the off reliable Road Hummer. The car is a loud corvette called Trump, but it can only take us 1/2 or 3/4 of the way there. After that, we have to walk because we didn't get the Hummer. However that's at least 1/2 the way there we don't have to walk, and we are no longer being pushed back completely any further.

Here is my analogy. Trump is a Trebuchet. He was elected by people to throw fire or whatever crap possible to disrupt the DC machine, MSM etc.

There are two walls(outer and an inner) and a castle. The first wall that is currently being damaged is made up of the MSM, Hollywood Elite, entrenched DC politics(Republican establishment, DNC) and lifetime career Federal Bureaucracy. On that wall are the SJW, leftist and socialists, basic pawns of the oligarchs controlled by Soros (behind the second wall). Now that the outer wall is weakened the SJW, leftists are starting to come out.

The second wall is made up of the Banking cartels, MIC, global corporations, IMF, World Bank, and the UN. I doubt Trump is going to do much damage to that wall (maybe the UN) most he might do is nick it. On top of that wall are black ops, mercs, and shadow government.

In the castle are the ruling establishment , goldman sachs, JPMorgan, bilderbergers and rothchilds.

There are also agent saboteurs behind the lines, they inform the castle what is going and have a hand in the activities. If the second wall is threatened in any way then the agents are in place to subvert or takeover. (Goldman sachs appointees/loyalists.)

pcosmar
02-10-2017, 04:11 PM
Here is my analogy. Trump is a Trebuchet. He was elected by people to throw fire or whatever crap possible to disrupt the DC machine, MSM etc.



What line are the Pigs On.. They just got heavily reinforced.

:(

AZJoe
02-16-2017, 09:24 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEPdOZbyzbw

CPUd
02-16-2017, 09:29 PM
https://i.imgur.com/n1zAlnQ.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/hLr1cpA.png

https://i.imgur.com/NBxBQf1.png

CaseyJones
02-16-2017, 09:34 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDJgwUeW7_k

NorthCarolinaLiberty
02-16-2017, 09:45 PM
You want to be ready for all possibilities.


This is the chant of the big government safety addict. Along with the ever present Better safe than sorry. You, of course, are a big government advocate, so you are all for this.

My approach is that you weigh probabilities and prepare for the most probable. Lots of things are possible, but you don't obsess over them. You focus on them very little, if at all.

AZJoe
02-16-2017, 09:53 PM
The short film gives the impression of a five minute marketing short advocating the "need" for martial law.


“We are facing a threat that requires us to redefine doctrine and the force in radically new and different ways. The future army will confront a highly sophisticated urban-centric threat that will require that urban operations become the core requirement for the future land-force. The threat is clear. Our direction remains to be defined. The future is urban.”— “Megacities: Urban Future, the Emerging Complexity (https://theintercept.com/2016/10/13/pentagon-video-warns-of-unavoidable-dystopian-future-for-worlds-biggest-cities/),” a Pentagon training video created by the Army for U.S. Special Operations Command


Civil liberties and Constitutional attorney John Whitehead comments:
https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/coming_soon_to_a_city_near_you_the_u.s._militarys_ plan_to_take_over_am
http://freedomoutpost.com/were-enemies-of-the-state-pentagon-produces-video-of-us-militarys-plan-to-take-over-america/

"According to “Megacities: Urban Future, the Emerging Complexity (https://theintercept.com/2016/10/13/pentagon-video-warns-of-unavoidable-dystopian-future-for-worlds-biggest-cities/),” a Pentagon training video created by the Army for U.S. Special Operations Command (https://theintercept.com/2016/10/13/pentagon-video-warns-of-unavoidable-dystopian-future-for-worlds-biggest-cities/), the U.S. military plans to use armed forces to solve future domestic political and social problems. What they’re really talking about is martial law, packaged as a well-meaning and overriding concern for the nation’s security.

The chilling five-minute training video, obtained by The Intercept through a FOIA request and made available online (https://theintercept.com/2016/10/13/pentagon-video-warns-of-unavoidable-dystopian-future-for-worlds-biggest-cities/), paints an ominous picture of the future—a future the military is preparing for—bedeviled by “criminal networks,” “substandard infrastructure,” “religious and ethnic tensions,” “impoverishment, slums,” “open landfills, over-burdened sewers,” a “growing mass of unemployed,” and an urban landscape in which the prosperous economic elite must be protected from the impoverishment of the have nots.

And then comes the kicker. Three-and-a-half minutes into the Pentagon’s dystopian vision (https://theintercept.com/2016/10/13/pentagon-video-warns-of-unavoidable-dystopian-future-for-worlds-biggest-cities/) … the ominous voice of the narrator speaks of a need to “drain the swamps.” … the U.S. military is plotting to drain the swamps of futuristic urban American cities (https://theintercept.com/2016/10/13/pentagon-video-warns-of-unavoidable-dystopian-future-for-worlds-biggest-cities/) of “noncombatants and engage the remaining adversaries in high intensity conflict within.”
And who are these noncombatants? … They are, according to the Pentagon, “adversaries.” They are “threats.” They are the “enemy.” They are people who don’t support the government, people who live in fast-growing urban communities, people who may be less well-off economically than the government and corporate elite, people who engage in protests, people who are unemployed, people who engage in crime (the government’s fast-growing, overly broad definition of what constitutes a crime). In other words, in the eyes of the U.S. military, noncombatants are American citizens a.k.a. domestic extremists a.k.a. enemy combatants who must be identified, targeted, detained, contained and, if necessary, eliminated. ...

The events of recent years: the invasive surveillance, the extremism reports, the civil unrest, the protests, the shootings, the bombings, the military exercises and active shooter drills, the color-coded alerts and threat assessments, the fusion centers, the transformation of local police into extensions of the military, the distribution of military equipment and weapons to local police forces, the government databases containing the names of dissidents and potential troublemakers. This is how you prepare a populace to accept a police state willingly, even gratefully. …

you acclimate them slowly to their prison walls. Persuade the citizenry that their prison walls are merely intended to keep them safe and danger out. Desensitize them to violence, acclimate them to a military presence in their communities and persuade them that there is nothing they can do to alter the seemingly hopeless trajectory of the nation. Before long, no one will even notice the floundering economy, the blowback arising from military occupations abroad, the police shootings, the nation’s deteriorating infrastructure and all of the other mounting concerns. …

The sight of police clad in body armor and gas masks, wielding semiautomatic rifles and escorting an armored vehicle through a crowded street, a scene likened to “a military patrol through a hostile city (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/07/11/why-the-police-in-baton-rouge-look-like-theyre-dressed-for-war/),” no longer causes alarm among the general populace.

Few seem to care about the government’s endless wars abroad that leave communities shattered, families devastated and our national security at greater risk of blowback. …

We’ve allowed ourselves to be acclimated to the occasional lockdown of government buildings, Jade Helm (http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/03/31/why-the-new-special-operations-exercise-freaking-out-the-internet-is-no-big-deal/) military drills in small towns so that special operations forces can get “realistic military training (http://www.chron.com/news/article/Covert-warfare-comming-to-Texas-6157685.php)” in “hostile” territory, and Live Active Shooter Drill (http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/national/wp/2014/11/14/i-thought-he-was-going-to-shoot-me-unsuspecting-middle-school-students-terrified-by-active-shooter-drill/) training exercises, carried out at schools, in shopping malls, and on public transit, …

In 2009, reports by the Department of Homeland Security surfaced that labelled right-wing and left-wing activists and military veterans (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/8/6/1117242/-Remember-the-DHS-Right-Wing-Extremist-Report) as extremists (a.k.a. terrorists) and called on the government to subject such targeted individuals to full-fledged pre-crime surveillance. Almost a decade later, after spending billions to fight terrorism, the DHS concluded that the greater threat is not ISIS (http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/02/21/leaked-dhs-reports-greatest-threat-us-national-security-domestic-right-wing-extremists) but domestic right-wing extremism.

Meanwhile, the government has been amassing an arsenal of military weapons for use domestically (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jan/7/golden-hammer-feds-spending-millions-to-arm-agenci/) .... Even government agencies with largely administrative functions such as the Food and Drug Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Smithsonian have been acquiring body armor, riot helmets and shields, cannon launchers and police firearms and ammunition. …

Rounding out this profit-driven campaign to turn American citizens into enemy combatants ... is a technology sector that has been colluding with the government to create a Big Brother that is all-knowing, all-seeing and inescapable (http://www.techinsider.io/how-youre-tracked-on-a-regular-basis-2016-6). ... fusion centers (https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/dhs-fusion-centers-portrayed-as-pools-of-ineptitude-and-civil-liberties-intrusions/2012/10/02/10014440-0cb1-11e2-bd1a-b868e65d57eb_story.html), license plate readers, stingray devices and the NSA t… You’re also being tracked by the black boxes in your cars (http://www.techinsider.io/how-youre-tracked-on-a-regular-basis-2016-6), your cell phone (http://amazon.com/s/ref=as_li_bk_tl/?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=cell%20phone&tag=freedomoutpos-20&linkId=39fc85a865ab3e1a1a9d26de6380928e&linkCode=ktl), smart devices (http://amazon.com/s/ref=as_li_bk_tl/?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=smart%20devices&tag=freedomoutpos-20&linkId=cf33b4e98433bc9ebc3e4d8d9ba1028d&linkCode=ktl) in your home, grocery loyalty cards, social media accounts, credit cards, streaming services such as Netflix (http://amazon.com/s/ref=as_li_bk_tl/?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=Netflix&tag=freedomoutpos-20&linkId=e095cafd470dd285666367fb05f937c3&linkCode=ktl), Amazon (http://amazon.com/s/ref=as_li_bk_tl/?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=Amazon&tag=freedomoutpos-20&linkId=93458de03f6e23b65f6b615ddfc91e8a&linkCode=ktl), and e-book reader (http://amazon.com/s/ref=as_li_bk_tl/?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=e-book%20reader&tag=freedomoutpos-20&linkId=40c6e4a93b838f16791e4dbdfcf52348&linkCode=ktl) accounts.

All of this has taken place right under our noses ... in broad daylight …

So what exactly is the government preparing for? … I’m referring to “government” with a capital “G,” the entrenched Deep State that is unaffected by elections, unaltered by populist movements, and has set itself beyond the reach of the law. … the corporatized, militarized, entrenched bureaucracy ... running the country and calling the shots in Washington DC, no matter who sits in the White House. … What is the government preparing for? You tell me. ...

By waging endless wars abroad, by bringing the instruments of war home, by transforming police into extensions of the military, by turning a free society into a suspect society, by treating American citizens like enemy combatants, by discouraging and criminalizing a free exchange of ideas, by making violence its calling card through SWAT team raids and militarized police, by fomenting division and strife among the citizenry, by acclimating the citizenry to the sights and sounds of war, …

For years, the government has been warning against the dangers of domestic terrorism (http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/19/politics/terror-threat-homeland-security/), erecting surveillance systems (http://www.cbsnews.com/feature/nsa-surveillance-exposed/) to monitor its own citizens, creating classification systems (https://theintercept.com/2014/07/23/blacklisted/) to label any viewpoints that challenge the status quo as extremist, and training law enforcement agencies (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opinion/the-other-terror-threat.html) to equate anyone possessing anti-government views as a domestic terrorist. ..."