PDA

View Full Version : Four more journalists get felony charges after covering inauguration unrest




CPUd
01-24-2017, 07:16 PM
Four more journalists get felony charges after covering inauguration unrest

A documentary producer, a photojournalist, a live-streamer and a freelance reporter were each charged with the most serious level of offense under Washington DC’s law against rioting, after being caught up in the police action against demonstrators.

The Guardian learned of their arrests after reporting on Monday that the journalists Evan Engel of Vocativ and Alex Rubinstein of RT America had also been arrested and charged with felonies while covering the same unrest on Friday morning.

All six were arraigned in superior court on Saturday and released to await further hearings in February and March, according to court filings. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) said late on Tuesday that charges against journalists who were covering the protests should be dropped.

“These charges are clearly inappropriate, and we are concerned that they could send a chilling message to journalists covering future protests,” said Carlos Lauría, the CPJ’s senior Americas program coordinator. “We call on authorities in Washington to drop these charges immediately.”

Jack Keller, a producer for the web documentary series Story of America, said he was charged and detained for about 36 hours after being kettled by police at 12th and L streets on Friday morning and arrested despite telling officers that he was covering the demonstrations as a journalist.

“The way we were treated was an absolute travesty,” said Keller, whose cellphone has been kept by the authorities. Keller’s editor, Annabel Park, said: “It is a maddening and frustrating situation. These are people who were there observing and documenting.”
Trump bans agencies from 'providing updates on social media or to reporters'


Matt Hopard, an independent journalist who was live-streaming the Friday protests, was arrested at the same site as Keller, Engel and Rubinstein, according to metropolitan police records. He said in a message that he denied the charge against him.

Also arrested while covering the demonstrations at 12th and L streets and later charged were Shay Horse, an independent photojournalist and activist, and Aaron Cantú, a freelance journalist and activist, who has written for outlets including the Baffler, the Washington Spectator and the New Inquiry. Both deny wrongdoing.

In all, more than 200 people were arrested on Friday, after property was vandalized in the US capital in the hours around Trump’s swearing-in as president. Police said that six officers suffered minor injuries.

The National Lawyers’ Guild accused Washington DC’s metropolitan police department of having “indiscriminately targeted people for arrest en masse based on location alone” and said they unlawfully used teargas and other weapons.

“These illegal acts are clearly designed to chill the speech of protesters engaging in First Amendment activity,” Maggie Ellinger-Locke, of the guild’s DC branch, said in a statement.

None of the arrest reports for the six journalists makes any specific allegations about what any of them are supposed to have done wrong. Keller’s report, which also covers the arrests of an unknown number of unidentified other people, includes a note that a police vehicle was vandalized. “I had absolutely nothing to do with the vandalism,” said Keller.

Reports on the arrests of five of the six journalists contain identical language alleging that “numerous crimes were occurring in police presence”. They state that windows were broken, fires were lit and vehicles were damaged. “The crowd was observed enticing a riot by organizing, promoting, encouraging and participating in acts of violence in furtherance of the riot,” the police reports said.

The US attorney’s office for Washington DC, which is prosecuting those arrested, declined to comment on the journalists’ specific cases but said it was continuing to review evidence from the day with the police.

“Based on the facts and circumstances, we determined that probable cause existed to support the filing of felony rioting charges,” William Miller, a spokesman for the office, said in a statement. “As in all of our cases, we are always willing to consider additional information that people bring forward.”

Preliminary hearings for Cantú, Hopard, Horse, and Keller were set for mid-March. Hearings for Engel and Rubinstein were scheduled for mid-February.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/jan/24/journalists-charged-felonies-trump-inauguration-unrest

TheTexan
01-24-2017, 07:19 PM
If they were in the area, they're probably guilty. If they are innocent, then they can prove it in court

robert68
01-24-2017, 07:53 PM
http://im.ezgif.com/tmp/ezgif.com-4020bddc83.gif

http://theslot.jezebel.com/melania-trump-definitely-loves-her-husband-and-is-very-1791531766

spudea
01-24-2017, 08:27 PM
now everyone with a phone camera can claim they are a journalist documenting the activities...... As i was watching the protests, there were so many cameras around, it was just a performance of who could be the coolest rioter around and get the best video to post to facebook. so i think that fits in the promoting and encouraging the acts.

Journalists are not above the law.

NorthCarolinaLiberty
01-24-2017, 08:32 PM
http://im.ezgif.com/tmp/ezgif.com-4020bddc83.gif




Looks fake.

presence
01-24-2017, 08:32 PM
now everyone with a phone camera can claim they are a journalist documenting the activities

you're probably right people should only engage in press and peacefully assemble by permit

presence
01-24-2017, 08:52 PM
http://im.ezgif.com/tmp/ezgif.com-4020bddc83.gif


Looks fake.

I don't have the original but it looks more authentic running in reverse

http://i.imgur.com/4dnS8xp.gif

Ender
01-24-2017, 09:20 PM
now everyone with a phone camera can claim they are a journalist documenting the activities...... As i was watching the protests, there were so many cameras around, it was just a performance of who could be the coolest rioter around and get the best video to post to facebook. so i think that fits in the promoting and encouraging the acts.

Journalists are not above the law.

With all the "fake news" BS, it seems like we would want to support freedom of the press and journalists who are out there filming what is really going on.

NorthCarolinaLiberty
01-24-2017, 09:45 PM
Fake news.

CPUd
01-25-2017, 05:42 PM
Bill to crack down on Minnesota protesters appears to be national trend
Minnesota joins other states legislating to discourage large demonstrations

A confrontation between protesters and legislators in St. Paul on Tuesday underscored the nation's deepening political divide in which lawmakers in at least eight states are considering crackdowns on demonstrations.

Chants and shouting erupted after a House committee voted to pass a GOP-led measure that could make protesters financially liable if police must intervene.

Minnesota is joining a growing number of states looking to discourage large, disruptive protests.

Measures aimed at toughening laws against demonstrators have been introduced in North Dakota, Iowa, Michigan, Indiana, Colorado, Virginia and Washington state as protests have proliferated in recent months over issues ranging from police shootings to oil pipelines.

"I don't think this is a coincidence that this is happening at a time in our nation where there are widespread movements led by people of color for racial equality," said Teresa Nelson, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Minnesota. "It is very troubling that we would see this kind of suppression and these attempts to intimidate people who are engaging in constitutionally protected speech and civil disobedience."

In Minnesota, groups have waged large rallies after the police shootings of Jamar Clark and Philando Castile, demonstrations that blocked roadways, disrupted the airport and resulted in a weekslong encampment at a north Minneapolis police station.

Rep. Nick Zerwas, R-Elk River, said residents are tiring of the disruptive protests.

"I think there is a push on the part of the people who I represent and I think Minnesotans think it's time we get tough on people who block freeways and try to close down airports," he said in interview.

Meeting ends abruptly

Tuesday's committee meeting ended abruptly after a House panel passed Zerwas' proposed legislation that would give cities authority to charge protesters for police services if the demonstrators are convicted of illegal assembly or public nuisance. The measure would also give cities the option of suing convicted protesters to recoup expenses from policing the demonstration.

"The meters are running and the taxpayers are holding the bag," Zerwas said.

A large crowd that opposed the bill angrily denounced the lawmakers in the House Civil Law Committee after they passed the measure on a party-line vote. Republicans supported the legislation while DFLers opposed it.

Zerwas said that $2.4 million had been spent over 18 months for the policing of protests in Minneapolis, St. Paul and Bloomington, particularly during the blockades of I-94 in St. Paul and I-35W. Zerwas said he arrived at his total policing cost by adding up estimates in media reports.

Among those testifying against the bill on Tuesday was John Thompson of St. Paul, an employee of the St. Paul Public Schools and a friend of Castile, who was shot by police during a traffic stop. After the vote, a visibly upset Thompson stood and pointed at the legislators.

"My friend's blood is on the streets of St. Anthony," shouted Thompson. "It's a crime to be a black, to be a black man driving down the street. That's why we protested."

Rep. Ilhan Omar, DFL-Minneapolis, said she opposed the measure.

"In Minneapolis there is a lot of money paid out because police use excessive force," Omar said to Zerwas. "Who should be responsible for that?"

"That's a good question for your City Council and mayor," responded Zerwas.

Omar then told Zerwas he might want to co-author a bill with her that would make police who engage in excessive force responsible for the payouts to victims.

Zerwas did not reply.

Other states in line

Lawmakers in other states have their own ideas for containing demonstrators. A bill in Iowa would make it a felony for people to intentionally block traffic on highways. North Dakota is considering legislation that would protect drivers from legal consequences if they inadvertently hit, injure or kill pedestrians who are obstructing traffic. The bill is a direct response to the massive protests to stop construction of an oil pipeline near the Standing Rock Indian Reservation.

In Indiana, a lawmaker introduced a bill that directs law enforcement to use "any means necessary" to break up mass gatherings that block traffic, and a Washington state lawmaker is preparing a bill that would create a crime of "economic terrorism" — blocking streets and causing property damage.

Zerwas also introduced a measure to raise penalties from a misdemeanor to a gross misdemeanor for people who block traffic or access to freeways, airports or light rail tracks, all actions that have taken place in connection with Black Lives Matter protests in Minnesota.

Attorney Jordan Kushner, who is on the coordinating committee of the Minnesota chapter of the National Lawyers Guild and represents several protesters cited on I-94 last July, criticized the national trend.

"These are reactionary voices who are out to quash dissent, all directed at Black Lives Matter — right wing legislators who are catering to the prejudices of their base," said Kushner. "It's the Donald Trump trend at the state level."

Zerwas said he found the comment offensive.

"My voters in Elk River and Big Lake are not prejudiced," he said. "That's ridiculous. What we've heard time and time again is that these groups of protesters believe their rights supersede others by thinking they can block roads and have no consequences."

Although Zerwas' bill would allow city attorneys to sue for reimbursement of public safety costs incurred for illegal blockages, St. Paul city attorney Samuel Clark opposes it.

"As a city, we are always looking to strike the right balance between First Amendment rights and public safety," Clark said. "This bill is a misguided attempt to solve the real costs cities like ours incur when responding to large scale, mass protests. We will continue to be open to ideas for solving for those costs while still supporting First Amendment rights."

http://www.startribune.com/house-hearing-ends-amid-protest-after-bill-cracking-down-on-demonstrators-moves-forward/411660166/

NorthCarolinaLiberty
01-25-2017, 05:45 PM
crack


..

RJB
01-25-2017, 05:50 PM
Organizations like cop block are journalistic. If someone takes pictures, reports stuff and doesn't throw used tampons at people, I am cool with them.

dean.engelhardt
01-25-2017, 07:21 PM
If they were in the area, they're probably guilty. If they are innocent, then they can prove it in court

Liberty is strong in this one

Anti Federalist
01-25-2017, 07:51 PM
"These are reactionary voices who are out to quash dissent, all directed at Black Lives Matter — right wing legislators who are catering to the prejudices of their base," said Kushner. "It's the Donald Trump trend at the state level."

This is why we can't have nice things.

Reah, that's me Kushner: a rightwing, cop loving, reactionary.

FFS...

ThePaleoLibertarian
01-25-2017, 07:54 PM
Antifa shouldn't be arrested. They should be shot if they destroy property or hurt people.

RandallFan
01-25-2017, 07:58 PM
The title makes it sound likes of Jake Tapper, Chuck Todd & Katy Tur were detained.

It's some ****** hipsters probably witnessing or encouraging violence against non-leftists.

Anti Federalist
01-25-2017, 08:09 PM
The title makes it sound likes of Jake Tapper, Chuck Todd & Katy Tur were detained.

It's some ****** hipsters probably witnessing or encouraging violence against non-leftists.

Maybe.

I'm never going to be in favor rounding people up who have not clearly engaged in any demonstrable harm to anybody.

CPUd
01-25-2017, 08:33 PM
Maybe.

I'm never going to be in favor rounding people up who have not clearly engaged in any demonstrable harm to anybody.

This, plus making more unnecessary laws.

NorthCarolinaLiberty
01-25-2017, 08:52 PM
This, plus making more unnecessary laws.


But wait, you like government and are for more laws. :confused: