Transgender Activists Upset Over ‘White Cis Women March’

[Anti Federalist]

Transgender Activists Upset Over ‘White Cis Women March’

http://freebeacon.com/culture/white-cis-women-march/

Women's march 'dangerous space' with 'oppressive message' that 'having a vagina is essential to womanhood'

BY: Elizabeth Harrington

January 23, 2017 4:10 pm

Transgender activists are upset that the women’s march over the weekend was not inclusive to biological men who identify as women, as the protest presented an “oppressive message” that having a “vagina is essential to womanhood.”

Saturday’s event to oppose the inauguration of Donald Trump was largely a “white cis women march,” with too many pictures of female reproductive organs and pink hats, according to trans women and “nonbinary” individuals interviewed by Mic.com.

A fight is brewing between “trans-exclusionary radical feminists,” or “TERFs,” and transwomen, according to the article, “How the Women’s March’s ‘genital-based’ feminism isolated the transgender community.”

The women’s march had an over-reliance on slogans and posters depicting gender norms, like using pink to represent women and girls, said some transgender activists who boycotted the march.

“The main reason I decided not to go was because of the pussy hats,” said one transwoman from California. “I get that they’re a response to the ‘grab them by the pussy’ thing, but I think some people fixated on it the wrong way.”

“I believe there’s a lot of inequality that has to do with genitals—that’s not something you can separate from the feminist movement,” the transwoman added. “But I feel like I’ve tried to get involved in feminism and there’s always been a blockade there for trans women.”

The “saturation of vagina-related messages and imagery,” such as a giant hand-knit uterus, “set the tone for a march that would focus acutely on genitalia at the expense of the transgender community,” writes Mic.com staff writer Marie Solis.

The signs referencing Trump’s infamous comments made on a hot mic during an Access Hollywood taping more than a decade ago were too heteronormative, trans activists said.

Signs that said “Pussy grabs back,” “Resistance is Fertile,” and “Pussy Power” sent a “clear and oppressive message to trans women, especially: having a vagina is essential to womanhood.”

The article explained that transwomen are weary of “trans-exclusionary radical feminists.” “TERFs” are people who “equate womanhood with having a vagina” or feminists who “argue trans women are actually men in disguise trying to infiltrate their spaces.”

Mic.com also quoted a “nonbinary” individual—a person who does not identify with either male or female, has multiple gender identities, or a gender identity that changes over time, among other things—whose girlfriend is still a biological male.

“For 20-year-old Sam Forrey, a nonbinary student in Ohio, and their girlfriend Lilian McDaniel, who is trans, there had been other warning signs that the Women’s March might be a dangerous space for them,” according to the article.

The couple was upset by the “genital-based womanhood” espoused by the women’s march.

“Since legally McDaniel’s sex is still male, she worried that if she were to be arrested she would be placed in a men’s jail, a concern she said always lingers at the back of her mind,” according to the article. “McDaniel said she’d planned on attending the march despite these fears—until she saw that people were using it as an excuse to invoke what she called ‘genital-based’ womanhood.”

“I think it ended up being a white cis women march,” McDaniel said.

Forrey added that the march—focusing too much on genitals—represented a “rigid, Western concept of gender.”

“This two-gender system, of course, is excluding of Forrey, too,” Solis wrote.

[Anti Federalist]

How the Women's March's "genital-based" feminism isolated the transgender community

https://mic.com/articles/166273/how-the-women-s-march-s-genital-based-feminism-isolated-the-transgender-community#.KxIhO11nt

January 23, 2017

In the weeks approaching the Women's March on Washington, a woman in Los Angeles accidentally created what became the most popular accessory among protesters: a pussy hat.

"I wanted to do something more than just show up," Krista Suh told the Los Angeles Times. "How can I visually show someone what's going on? And I realized as a California girl, I would be really cold in D.C. — it's not tank-top weather year-round. So I thought maybe I could knit myself a hat."

Suh made the knitting pattern freely available online, and soon women across the country were working quickly to finish their own pink hats before the big day. The hats became a movement within a movement, turning President Donald Trump's infamous "grab them by the pussy" comment on its head.

While clever, Suh's pussy hats set the tone for a march that would focus acutely on genitalia at the expense of the transgender community. Signs like "Pussy power," "Viva la Vulva" and "Pussy grabs back" all sent a clear and oppressive message to trans women, especially: having a vagina is essential to womanhood.

"The main reason I decided not to go was because of the pussy hats," 28-year-old Jade Lejeck said in an interview Sunday night. "I get that they're a response to the 'grab them by the pussy' thing, but I think some people fixated on it the wrong way."

Lejeck, a trans woman from Modesto, California, said the hats signaled to her that there would be other trans-exclusionary messages at the women's marches.

She expected her local march to have its fair share of trans-exclusionary radical feminists, known as TERFs. As Lejeck described it, there are two categories of TERFS: One is the accidental TERF — "the ones who have signs that equate womanhood with having a vagina," she said.

The other category, Lejeck explained, includes feminists who argue trans women are actually men in disguise trying to infiltrate their spaces.

Lejeck decided she would avoid both kinds of TERFs by abstaining from Modesto's women's march altogether; she had grocery shopping to do anyway.

"I believe there's a lot of inequality that has to do with genitals — that's not something you can separate from the feminist movement," Lejeck said. "But I feel like I've tried to get involved in feminism and there's always been a blockade there for trans women."

"I feel like I've tried to get involved in feminism and there's always been a blockade there for trans women."

For 20-year-old Sam Forrey, a nonbinary student in Ohio, and their girlfriend Lilian McDaniel, who is trans, there had been other warning signs that the Women's March might be a dangerous space for them.

Forrey said that a blurb from the Cut's "Ultimate Guide to Preparing for the Women's March" suggesting trans protesters bring identification that matches their gender identity or use the "buddy system" had been the first red flag.

Since legally McDaniel's sex is still male, she worried that if she were to be arrested she would be placed in a men's jail, a concern she said always lingers at the back of her mind. McDaniel said she'd planned on attending the march despite these fears — until she saw that people were using it as an excuse to invoke what she called "genital-based" womanhood.

A friend told McDaniel about a protester they'd seen marching with a two-foot-tall hand-knit uterus. She was glad she stayed home.

"I think it ended up being a white cis women march," McDaniel said. "There were other marginalized communities there, but it didn't seem like they were the focus."

Forrey suggested that the saturation of vagina-related messages and imagery reinforced the same oppressive structures the march was meant to oppose, which was a loss for everyone.

"As a nonbinary person, the emphasis on genitals just bought into the rigid, Western concept of gender," they said. This two-gender system, of course, is excluding of Forrey, too.

To their credit, the Women's Marches in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., both prominently featured trans women of color Laverne Cox and Janet Mock. In LA, Cox spoke out on North Carolina's House Bill 2, which requires the state's residents to use the bathroom that corresponds to their sex assigned at birth, rather than their gender identity — a direct affront to trans rights.

"If you are a girl like me, a woman like me, a transgender person like me, you live in a country that shames you, that stigmatizes you, that discriminates against you and criminalizes you," Cox said.

Empathy, she maintained, is the only antidote to this societal ill.

On the opposite coast, Mock gave a rousing speech on the importance of intersectional feminism, stating simply, "Our approach to freedom need not be identical but it must be intersectional and inclusive. It must extend beyond ourselves."

However, the need for intersectional feminism had never been more apparent than when the Women's March on Washington's organizers revised a line Mock had contributed to the march's platform on sex workers. Whereas Mock had written that the march would be "in solidarity with the sex workers' rights movement," organizers changed the language to refer to sex workers as "those exploited for labor and sex."

Also in D.C., Raquel Willis, a communications associate at the Transgender Law Center, alleged that her microphone was cut off during her speech at the march, just as she mentioned trans activists Sylvia Rivera and Marsha P. Johnson.

"Still silencing trans women," she wrote on Twitter. "I see you and so does everyone else."

[Anti Federalist]

https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/untitled-17.jpg?w=480&h=340

[Anti Federalist]

https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/untitled-16.jpg

[Anti Federalist]

So, allow me to comment:

http://memeguy.com/photos/thumbs/mrw-i-found-out-that-benedict-cumberbatch-was-named-sexiest-man-of--51208.gif

http://i.imgur.com/SOHCjAi.gif

http://mrwgifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Nicholas-Cage-Tries-Not-To-Laugh.gif

https://media.giphy.com/media/Vgdnagu37fu5W/giphy.gif

http://i.imgur.com/SYGwA97.gif

[Tywysog Cymru]

It goes to show that if the SJWs take power, they will turn on each other and ruthlessly attack each other the same way they attack their "oppressors."


https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/untitled-17.jpg?w=480&h=340

That twitter account is a goldmine of delusion.

[lilymc]

Oh for crying out loud. This world has gone completely mad.

[phill4paul]

So, allow me to comment:

http://memeguy.com/photos/thumbs/mrw-i-found-out-that-benedict-cumberbatch-was-named-sexiest-man-of--51208.gif

http://i.imgur.com/SOHCjAi.gif

http://mrwgifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Nicholas-Cage-Tries-Not-To-Laugh.gif

https://media.giphy.com/media/Vgdnagu37fu5W/giphy.gif

http://i.imgur.com/SYGwA97.gif

This shit is just too much to keep up with. ALL THE ABOVE. I think I just pissed my pants a bit.

[Anti Federalist]

I've pretty much decided to go Gran Torino...done...fuck it...don't care anymore.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8EgASyRoKo

[phill4paul]

I've pretty much decided to go Gran Torino...done...fuck it...don't care anymore.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8EgASyRoKo

Me, too.

[Anti Federalist]

You might be a TERF if…

http://transadvocate.com/you-might-be-a-terf-if_n_10226.htm

By Cristan Williams Cristanwilliams

I’ve noticed that there seems to be some confusion about what a TERF* is so, here’s a quick guide to help you figure out if you’re a TERF. Chances are that you’re a TERF if you believe that you’re a feminist when you…

1.) Claim that trans women are cis men, that trans men are cis women and purposefully misgender trans people.

2.) Out trans people to employers.

3.) Tell trans women their surgery is about supporting rape culture.

4.) Assert that lesbian-identified trans women can’t be lesbian.

5.) Claim that a world without trans people is preferable.1

6.) Find that your anti-trans arguments and the anti-trans arguments of far right-wing groups match.2

7.) Assert cis privilege isn’t real; that non-trans people aren’t privileged in a society that’s hostile to trans people.

8.) Claim that gender isn’t real, but the MAAB/FAAB binary is.

9.) Claim that trans surgeries were pioneered by men in service of the patriarchy.3

10.) Lie about rape and death threats you’ve received from trans people.

11.) Fearmonger about the rape/violence threat trans women pose to cis women in the women’s restroom.

12.) Assert that trans people transition to satisfy their sexual urges.

13.) Degrade and dehumanize the genitals of trans people.

14.) Work to overturn trans equality protections.

15.) Work to halt access to trans medical care.

16.) Appeal to the Klan Fallacy.

17.) Compare transition to a disgusting Frankenstein-like process.

18.) Claim that trans people transition due to political or social pressures.4

19.) Claim that when you work to halt the propagation of anti-feminist stereotypes it’s empowerment, but when trans people work to halt the propagation of anti-trans stereotypes it’s censorship .

20.) Assert that trans women transition because they’re actually gay men and that trans men transition because they’re lesbians wanting to escape the patriarchy.

[phill4paul]

It's no wonder P.T. Barnum shut down the circus. Animal acts, clowns and mental gymnasts are free to watch in the streets these days.

[Anti Federalist]

It's no wonder P.T. Barnum shut down the circus. Animal acts, clowns and mental gymnasts are free to watch in the streets these days.

Exactly.

Tough to get people to pay for admission to a carnival, when the best freak show ever can be watched for free just by sitting down in a mall food court or Wal Marx or street side bistro anywhere in AmeriKa.

[Root]

Cis?

[Anti Federalist]

Cis?

It's a term stolen from chemistry.


cis - denoting or relating to a molecular structure in which two particular atoms or groups lie on the same side of a given plane in the molecule, in particular denoting an isomer in which substituents at opposite ends of a carbon–carbon double bond are on the same side of the bond.

In the gender wars it means:


Cis - Short for cis-gendered, meaning someone who identifies with the sex they were born as. Typically used by whiny tumblr users who complain about not being accepted for who they are and yet bash these "cis" people for being born and being okay with the sex they were born with.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cis

In other words: if you were born with a penis and testes and an XY chromosome pair, and you call yourself a man, and are OK with that, you are "cis gendered".

If you were born with a penis and testes and an XY chromosome pair, and you call yourself a pansexual tuna fish (or a man "in transition" or any number of equally ridiculous sexual "identities"), because you were not OK with being born with a penis and testes, you are not "cis gendered".

You are, however, batshit insane.

[Chomp]

Trannies go mad !

[Scrapmo]

I do not possess enough patience or cognitive dissonance to entertain these peoples mental delusions and denialisms.

I will no longer attempt to be a voice of reason. Most people are too far gone.

Let them eat each other.

[Brian4Liberty]

This was terribly unfair to Caitlyn Jenner.

[fedupinmo]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dgp9MPLEAqA

[Anti Federalist]

+rep...that is where I'm at as well.


I do not possess enough patience or cognitive dissonance to entertain these peoples mental delusions and denialisms.

I will no longer attempt to be a voice of reason. Most people are too far gone.

Let them eat each other.

[enhanced_deficit]

These March situations are getting bit out of hand, this is no way to denigrate historic first lady's community efforts for women of all genders:




2 Indiana lawmakers under fire for posts after women's march

Indianapolis Star-5 hours ago

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C21CqQMXUAAdLK_.jpg






Un-related

Is Michelle Obama At The Women's March? (https://www.bustle.com/p/is-michelle-obama-at-the-womens-march-shes-championed-feminism-time-time-again-31758)

[Anti Federalist]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dgp9MPLEAqA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgaRd4d8hOY

[GunnyFreedom]

5571

[seapilot]

Its too confusing, I do not understand nor care to understand their world. SETI is having better luck finding alien intelligence than a sane person finding SJW intelligence.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmfRMeU6pQ8

[Anti Federalist]

https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/p720x720/16265495_10154469205843049_2939464216765397192_n.j pg?oh=f76f20f6506b9fb34e1012b109e42700&oe=590688AC

[The Northbreather]

Well it's true that not getting laid will make you bat shit crazy.

[Root]

It's a term stolen from chemistry.



In the gender wars it means:



In other words: if you were born with a penis and testes and an XY chromosome pair, and you call yourself a man, and are OK with that, you are "cis gendered".

If you were born with a penis and testes and an XY chromosome pair, and you call yourself a pansexual tuna fish (or a man "in transition" or any number of equally ridiculous sexual "identities"), because you were not OK with being born with a penis and testes, you are not "cis gendered".

You are, however, batshit insane.
FFS that's way too complicated.

Back to bed

[dean.engelhardt]

Threads like this are the reason I am a member. It's like watching the world burn and laughing your ass off. Too bad I cannot give more plus rep.

[A. Havnes]

One day the National Geographic Channel will run a documentary on some old human fossil they dug up, look at the skeleton and determine it was male or female from it, and then the transactivists will be up in arms because that may not be how that individual identified! You can't use biology anymore to determine sex because biology is a social construct!

https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/untitled-45.jpg?w=480&h=217

https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/untitled-37.jpg?w=480&h=380

https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/untitled-491.jpg?w=480&h=367

https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/untitled-481.jpg?w=480&h=336

Couldn't help the edit. Found another one:

https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/untitled-467.jpg?w=480&h=311

https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/untitled-460.jpg?w=480&h=290

I'm learning a bunch of new nonsense words today!

[Root]

^ this is exactly why I don't use Twitter

[opal]

To all the poor misguided people that even thought they were being oppressed by any demonstration
BLOW IT OUT YOUR ASS AND GET A DAMN JOB
accept the fact that you were raised to be a moron and you are successful at it
if you are a man that's identifying as a women
we don't give a shit
if you are a women that identifies as a man
we don't give a shit
What you have or do not have in your pants is not our business and you're a moron for sharing


Please examine the whole concept of individual rights. It's not about what you wear, worship, do (or don't do) in the bedroom or bathroom, race or anything else but that you are an individual.

[A. Havnes]

To all the poor misguided people that even thought they were being oppressed by any demonstration
BLOW IT OUT YOUR ASS AND GET A DAMN JOB
accept the fact that you were raised to be a moron and you are successful at it
if you are a man that's identifying as a women
we don't give a $#@!
if you are a women that identifies as a man
we don't give a $#@!
What you have or do not have in your pants is not our business and you're a moron for sharing


Please examine the whole concept of individual rights. It's not about what you wear, worship, do (or don't do) in the bedroom or bathroom, race or anything else but that you are an individual.

People are way too into groupthink right now. If they don't like their "group" they just try and hop over into another one. Anytime you get someone who conflates everyone with whatever class or group they should be a part of, libertarianism sounds like the boogey man.

And the boogie man might identify as a boogie woman anyway, so I guess I'm being very cissexist or whatever fancy words exist for it now.

[Anti Federalist]

Read about cultural Marxism...normal rational people would look at this confusing mess of identity politics and react the same way you did.

It is my reaction as well.

The kicker is this: this is happening deliberately.

It is designed to leave you with a sense of confused hopelessness.

What is Cultural Marxism?

http://www.marylandthursdaymeeting.com/Archives/SpecialWebDocuments/Cultural.Marxism.htm

William S. Lind

In his columns on the next conservatism, Paul Weyrich has several times referred to “cultural Marxism.” He asked me, as Free Congress Foundation’s resident historian, to write this column explaining what cultural Marxism is and where it came from. In order to understand what something is, you have to know its history.

Cultural Marxism is a branch of western Marxism, different from the Marxism-Leninism of the old Soviet Union. It is commonly known as “multiculturalism” or, less formally, Political Correctness. From its beginning, the promoters of cultural Marxism have known they could be more effective if they concealed the Marxist nature of their work, hence the use of terms such as “multiculturalism.”

Cultural Marxism began not in the 1960s but in 1919, immediately after World War I. Marxist theory had predicted that in the event of a big European war, the working class all over Europe would rise up to overthrow capitalism and create communism. But when war came in 1914, that did not happen. When it finally did happen in Russia in 1917, workers in other European countries did not support it. What had gone wrong?

Independently, two Marxist theorists, Antonio Gramsci in Italy and Georg Lukacs in Hungary, came to the same answer: Western culture and the Christian religion had so blinded the working class to its true, Marxist class interest that Communism was impossible in the West until both could be destroyed. In 1919, Lukacs asked, “Who will save us from Western civilization?” That same year, when he became Deputy Commissar for Culture in the short-lived Bolshevik Bela Kun government in Hungary, one of Lukacs’s first acts was to introduce sex education into Hungary’s public schools. He knew that if he could destroy the West’s traditional sexual morals, he would have taken a giant step toward destroying Western culture itself.

In 1923, inspired in part by Lukacs, a group of German Marxists established a think tank at Frankfurt University in Germany called the Institute for Social Research. This institute, soon known simply as the Frankfurt School, would become the creator of cultural Marxism.

To translate Marxism from economic into cultural terms, the members of the Frankfurt School - - Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Wilhelm Reich, Eric Fromm and Herbert Marcuse, to name the most important - - had to contradict Marx on several points. They argued that culture was not just part of what Marx had called society’s “superstructure,” but an independent and very important variable. They also said that the working class would not lead a Marxist revolution, because it was becoming part of the middle class, the hated bourgeoisie.

Who would? In the 1950s, Marcuse answered the question: a coalition of blacks, students, feminist women and homosexuals.

Fatefully for America, when Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, the Frankfurt School fled - - and reestablished itself in New York City. There, it shifted its focus from destroying traditional Western culture in Germany to destroying it in the United States. To do so, it invented “Critical Theory.” What is the theory? To criticize every traditional institution, starting with the family, brutally and unremittingly, in order to bring them down. It wrote a series of “studies in prejudice,” which said that anyone who believes in traditional Western culture is prejudiced, a “racist” or “sexist” of “fascist” - - and is also mentally ill.

Most importantly, the Frankfurt School crossed Marx with Freud, taking from psychology the technique of psychological conditioning. Today, when the cultural Marxists want to do something like “normalize” homosexuality, they do not argue the point philosophically. They just beam television show after television show into every American home where the only normal-seeming white male is a homosexual (the Frankfurt School’s key people spent the war years in Hollywood).

After World War II ended, most members of the Frankfurt School went back to Germany. But Herbert Marcuse stayed in America. He took the highly abstract works of other Frankfurt School members and repackaged them in ways college students could read and understand. In his book “Eros and Civilization,” he argued that by freeing sex from any restraints, we could elevate the pleasure principle over the reality principle and create a society with no work, only play (Marcuse coined the phrase, “Make love, not war”). Marcuse also argued for what he called “liberating tolerance,” which he defined as tolerance for all ideas coming from the Left and intolerance for any ideas coming from the Right. In the 1960s, Marcuse became the chief “guru” of the New Left, and he injected the cultural Marxism of the Frankfurt School into the baby boom generation, to the point where it is now America’s state ideology.

The next conservatism should unmask multiculturalism and Political Correctness and tell the American people what they really are: cultural Marxism. Its goal remains what Lukacs and Gramsci set in 1919: destroying Western culture and the Christian religion. It has already made vast strides toward that goal. But if the average American found out that Political Correctness is a form of Marxism, different from the Marxism of the Soviet Union but Marxism nonetheless, it would be in trouble. The next conservatism needs to reveal the man behind the curtain - - old Karl Marx himself.


To all the poor misguided people that even thought they were being oppressed by any demonstration
BLOW IT OUT YOUR ASS AND GET A DAMN JOB
accept the fact that you were raised to be a moron and you are successful at it
if you are a man that's identifying as a women
we don't give a shit
if you are a women that identifies as a man
we don't give a shit
What you have or do not have in your pants is not our business and you're a moron for sharing


Please examine the whole concept of individual rights. It's not about what you wear, worship, do (or don't do) in the bedroom or bathroom, race or anything else but that you are an individual.


People are way too into groupthink right now. If they don't like their "group" they just try and hop over into another one. Anytime you get someone who conflates everyone with whatever class or group they should be a part of, libertarianism sounds like the boogey man.

And the boogie man might identify as a boogie woman anyway, so I guess I'm being very cissexist or whatever fancy words exist for it now.

[Anti Federalist]

Threads like this are the reason I am a member. It's like watching the world burn and laughing your ass off. Too bad I cannot give more plus rep.

Ever read "The Camp of the Saints"?

If not, please do - http://www.jrbooksonline.com/pdfs/camp_of_the_saints.pdf

One of the things to take away from that, without spoiling it, is the attitude of the doomed main characters: all is lost but they soldier on, not in gloom and depression and backbiting recriminations of how it all came to this and who was responsible and ineffective navel gazing contemplating their destruction.

No, they face it with good fellowship, jokes, songs and laughter in the face of death.

[Anti Federalist]

It goes to show that if the SJWs take power, they will turn on each other and ruthlessly attack each other the same way they attack their "oppressors."

That's after they take their turns at all of us.

[Tywysog Cymru]

That's after they take their turns at all of us.

Hopefully they'll be too distracted fighting each other. This is what the electoral map of 2040 might look like:

http://uselectionatlas.org/TOOLS/genusmap.php?year=2016&ev_c=1&pv_p=1&ev_p=0&type=calc&AL=1;9;6&AK=1;3;5&AZ=1;11;5&AR=1;6;6&CA=2;55;3&CO=1;9;5&CT=1;7;4&DE=1;3;4&DC=2;3;5&FL=1;29;5&GA=1;16;5&HI=1;4;3&ID=1;4;6&IL=1;20;4&IN=1;11;5&IA=1;6;5&KS=1;6;5&KY=1;8;6&LA=1;8;6&MD=1;10;3&MA=1;11;3&MI=1;16;5&MN=1;10;3&MS=1;6;5&MO=1;10;5&MT=1;3;5&NV=1;6;5&NH=1;4;5&NJ=1;14;4&NM=1;5;4&NY=1;29;3&NC=1;15;5&ND=1;3;6&OH=1;18;5&OK=1;7;6&OR=1;7;4&PA=1;20;5&RI=1;4;5&SC=1;9;5&SD=1;3;6&TN=1;11;6&TX=1;38;5&UT=1;6;6&VT=1;3;3&VA=1;13;4&WA=1;12;3&WV=1;5;6&WI=1;10;5&WY=1;3;6&ME=1;2;5&ME1=1;1;5&ME2=1;1;5&NE=1;2;5&NE1=1;1;5&NE2=1;1;5&NE3=1;1;7

Republicans: 45%
Democrats: 25%
Social Justice Party: 15%
Feminist Liberation Party: 5%
Communism and Safe Spaces Party: 4%
Intersectional Feminist Liberation Party: 3%
Intersectional Non-binary Feminist Liberation Party: 2%
Intersectional Otherkin-inclusive Non-binary Feminist Liberation Party: 1%