PDA

View Full Version : Women's March




goldenequity
01-21-2017, 12:46 PM
CHICAGO
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2tcW--WgAAT7hD.jpg:large

BOISE
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2tliPDUsAAxacQ.jpg:large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2tj01FXgAAOFjP.jpg:large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2tp7kFUkAEdYwl.jpg:large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2tp7kEUoAABaxF.jpg:large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2tZVv7XUAAV7EW.jpg:large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2tZbG8WgAYgyRG.jpg:large

pcosmar
01-21-2017, 12:53 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ok02ZZMCtPY

CPUd
01-21-2017, 12:53 PM
http://i.imgur.com/cqMQFnp.png

goldenequity
01-21-2017, 12:56 PM
In India, Ireland, France, Sweden, Czech Republic (https://www.novinky.cz/zahranicni/427136-za-prava-zen-a-proti-trumpovi-se-demonstrovalo-po-celem-svete.html), Australia and other countries protests against Trump and for women's rights were held...:

timosman
01-21-2017, 12:58 PM
Would you like to reproduce?:cool:

CPUd
01-21-2017, 12:59 PM
https://i.imgur.com/KWyuVRK.png

Zippyjuan
01-21-2017, 01:20 PM
There were more there for the Women's March than for the inauguration?

CPUd
01-21-2017, 01:31 PM
There were more there for the Women's March than for the inauguration?

The inauguration crowd was more dense, they had chairs packed in there near the Capitol. Today's permit was only for 250,000.

JK/SEA
01-21-2017, 01:32 PM
There were more there for the Women's March than for the inauguration?

so?...just shows there are more idiots than intellectuals...

spudea
01-21-2017, 01:39 PM
meanwhile in Saudi Arabia....

http://www.theweek.co.uk/60339/nine-things-women-cant-do-in-saudi-arabia

SEVEN THINGS WOMEN CAN'T DO IN SAUDI ARABIA

CPUd
01-21-2017, 01:42 PM
822849358257389568
https://twitter.com/dougstafford/status/822849358257389568

CPUd
01-21-2017, 01:52 PM
Meanwhile at KSU:

822559724486934528
https://twitter.com/aheffner24/status/822559724486934528

Elsewhere:

822783310224965633
https://twitter.com/reason/status/822783310224965633

timosman
01-21-2017, 01:59 PM
A lot of FUСK YOUs from Madonna while introducing her song "Human Nature"

timosman
01-21-2017, 02:15 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOijIEH2d0A

Feelgood
01-21-2017, 03:23 PM
Cant stand Trump, but I have to admit, all the feathers he is ruffling makes me a little giddy. :) I havent been able to laugh like this in some time.

Anti Federalist
01-21-2017, 04:08 PM
822849358257389568
https://twitter.com/dougstafford/status/822849358257389568

Not holding my breath...

2013 set a record (40th anniversary of Roe) with estimates around 650,000 attending.

Googling revealed NO government media coverage of this event being returned in searches.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=March+for+Life+2013+mainstream+media +coverage

Fake News.

Anti Federalist
01-21-2017, 04:28 PM
I wonder what she'd think of the reasons why I happen to agree with her about that?

Other than that, classy, real classy.

That broad was trash 35 years ago, and she hasn't improved with age.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOijIEH2d0A

MelissaWV
01-21-2017, 04:31 PM
I marched around in the woods a bit earlier. It was nice. I didn't even have to wear a vulva hat.

(Look it up; I am not posting it.)

Anti Federalist
01-21-2017, 04:36 PM
I marched around in the woods a bit earlier. It was nice. I didn't even have to wear a vulva hat.

(Look it up; I am not posting it.)

No pussy hat?

You must be one of those self hating wymyn.

#triggered

fcreature
01-21-2017, 05:13 PM
Why are these people so sexually obsessed? I don't get it. Everything is somehow an attack on the uterus. No one cares about your "reproductive rights", unless said "reproductive rights" is a euphemism for baby murder.

Speaking of which... want to trigger some serious leftist outrage? Use the phrase "baby murder" instead of "abortion". I had some fun with that earlier today on a post about the march on ACLU's FB page.

69360
01-21-2017, 05:20 PM
Wasn't impressed by Trump's crowd, not impressed by this one either. They are all idiots, the trumpers and these liberals.

PursuePeace
01-21-2017, 05:22 PM
What are these weirdos freaking out about? I don't even think they know.

presence
01-21-2017, 05:32 PM
What are these weirdos freaking out about? I don't even think they know.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wM248Wo54U

NorthCarolinaLiberty
01-21-2017, 05:40 PM
Hate to burst their bubble, but there's no such thing as "Women's Rights." Men's rights, **** rights, or anything like that for that matter.

MelissaWV
01-21-2017, 05:45 PM
Btw people are mixing in with whatever cause. One sign said Save The Grizzlies lol

PursuePeace
01-21-2017, 05:52 PM
Btw people are mixing in with whatever cause. One sign said Save The Grizzlies lol

That goes along with the "Colorado loves Mother Earth" sign I just saw, I guess.

presence
01-21-2017, 06:15 PM
Btw people are mixing in with whatever cause. One sign said Save The Grizzlies lol


5569

http://www.thegoparcade.com/game/trumps-pussy-grabber

Superfluous Man
01-21-2017, 06:38 PM
Why does anybody believe that women in America have any fewer rights than men?

If anything, women are afforded more rights than men.

fisharmor
01-21-2017, 06:52 PM
Best response I've run into so far (not my work)


Remember this, everyone. Soak this in. Today the media has discovered an intense interest in political demonstrations. As thousands of women descend upon DC to whine about the legitimate results of a legal election, incoherently demand "rights" they already possess and have possessed for almost a century, insist on more free birth control, and call for the continued mass slaughter of infants, the media is in a state of utter elation.I turned on CNN for a few minutes and they had dozens of reporters staged all throughout the march, as well as a team of reporters stationed at the "sister marches" across the globe. I've heard over and over again that this march is "historic" and among the biggest ever. They've never seen anything like this. What a beautiful spectacle. What an inspiration. Blah blah etc and so forth.
But, as I peer into the future, I can see a really bizarre phenomenon. Mysteriously, out of nowhere, the media's obsession with covering political marches will completely dissipate. This will happen in precisely 6 days. Strangely, it will coincide with the exact moment when hundreds of thousands of pro-life women and men come to DC to protest abortion. The March For Life will be significantly larger than the "Women's March." I know this for a fact because the March For Life is always the largest political demonstration in America. No left wing protest has ever come close or will ever come close. Yet the media will ignore it. I know this because the media always ignores it.
Looked at objectively, the March For Life is quite a bit more newsworthy than the temper tantrum happening today. For one thing, there are more people. For another, the people are actually protesting something real. For still another, the March For Life represents 40 years of sustained pro-life activism, as opposed to this momentary blip on the radar screen.
If you want to understand why people utterly detest the media and everything it represents, just turn on the TV today. And then turn it on next Friday. That will tell you everything you need to know. Truly despicable.

MelissaWV
01-21-2017, 06:53 PM
Why does anybody believe that women in America have any fewer rights than men?

If anything, women are afforded more rights than men.

I don't really agree with that. There are still a number of situations where women are treated unfairly or downright terribly based purely on being women. These situations aren't new, as opposed to the relatively recent oppression of men (particularly via child support, etc.), so there are old injustices with new ones being piled on every day.

Where I differ, though, is that these are battles that can be fought by people rather than Government. We don't need more laws, or special protection, or pandering speeches. It really is along the lines of all the other "rights" groups. We should be focusing on human, God-given, non-obtrusive rights for everyone rather than imposing laws on people to make life "fair" for others. The only one to profit from that is the entity making the laws --- and enforcing them.

Superfluous Man
01-21-2017, 07:08 PM
I don't really agree with that. There are still a number of situations where women are treated unfairly or downright terribly based purely on being women. These situations aren't new, as opposed to the relatively recent oppression of men (particularly via child support, etc.), so there are old injustices with new ones being piled on every day.

Where I differ, though, is that these are battles that can be fought by people rather than Government. We don't need more laws, or special protection, or pandering speeches. It really is along the lines of all the other "rights" groups. We should be focusing on human, God-given, non-obtrusive rights for everyone rather than imposing laws on people to make life "fair" for others. The only one to profit from that is the entity making the laws --- and enforcing them.

Are there any situations where the law treats men better than women?

MelissaWV
01-21-2017, 07:19 PM
Are there any situations where the law treats men better than women?

Are you discussing laws or rights? I'm surprised to see someone mix the two up on here.

Of course, that's one of the major problems with this march. There really ARE women's health issues that are a huge, systematic problem, but they have very little to do with legislation. Signs that say "stay out of my uterus" would make more sense if those same women were not screeching for funding for things to go in and around their uterus.

If we are referring to laws, it's just going to become a war of anecdotes, and I'm not keen to get into that. I have been through some things where I was quite surprised to find roadblocks I hadn't considered, and that would definitely affect women at a higher rate, but I can also readily predict the arguments that would ensue on this board.

Regardless, whichever gender is being treated "more unfairly," the solution is not going to be more legislation, societal backlash, or reparations.

oyarde
01-21-2017, 07:21 PM
Good God , I was right . There is no hope for america .

Superfluous Man
01-21-2017, 07:33 PM
Are you discussing laws or rights? I'm surprised to see someone mix the two up on here.

I was talking about rights recognized by the government. So in this context I meant rights and laws interchangeably.

I mean, I recognize that things like spousal abuse, of which men are overwhelmingly the perpetrators and women overwhelmingly the victims, are serious problems. But it's not for the lack of a law against it.

oyarde
01-21-2017, 07:45 PM
No pussy hat?

You must be one of those self hating wymyn.

#triggered
The Gambian Leader wears a pussy hat .

Anti Federalist
01-21-2017, 08:01 PM
Best response I've run into so far (not my work)


Remember this, everyone. Soak this in. Today the media has discovered an intense interest in political demonstrations. As thousands of women descend upon DC to whine about the legitimate results of a legal election, incoherently demand "rights" they already possess and have possessed for almost a century, insist on more free birth control, and call for the continued mass slaughter of infants, the media is in a state of utter elation.I turned on CNN for a few minutes and they had dozens of reporters staged all throughout the march, as well as a team of reporters stationed at the "sister marches" across the globe. I've heard over and over again that this march is "historic" and among the biggest ever. They've never seen anything like this. What a beautiful spectacle. What an inspiration. Blah blah etc and so forth.
But, as I peer into the future, I can see a really bizarre phenomenon. Mysteriously, out of nowhere, the media's obsession with covering political marches will completely dissipate. This will happen in precisely 6 days. Strangely, it will coincide with the exact moment when hundreds of thousands of pro-life women and men come to DC to protest abortion. The March For Life will be significantly larger than the "Women's March." I know this for a fact because the March For Life is always the largest political demonstration in America. No left wing protest has ever come close or will ever come close. Yet the media will ignore it. I know this because the media always ignores it.
Looked at objectively, the March For Life is quite a bit more newsworthy than the temper tantrum happening today. For one thing, there are more people. For another, the people are actually protesting something real. For still another, the March For Life represents 40 years of sustained pro-life activism, as opposed to this momentary blip on the radar screen.
If you want to understand why people utterly detest the media and everything it represents, just turn on the TV today. And then turn it on next Friday. That will tell you everything you need to know. Truly despicable.



...

MelissaWV
01-21-2017, 08:02 PM
What, no knitting hundreds of dead fetus hats for that march?

sparebulb
01-21-2017, 08:08 PM
Btw people are mixing in with whatever cause. One sign said Save The Grizzlies lol

By looking at the crowd, I'll read something into that Grizzlies sign.

https://cdn.meme.am/cache/instances/folder424/500x/48331424.jpg

MelissaWV
01-21-2017, 08:10 PM
I was going to go to sleep. Now I will never sleep again.

Anti Federalist
01-21-2017, 08:17 PM
What are these weirdos freaking out about? I don't even think they know.

Because they were told to.

Because racism, sexism, patriarchy, homophobia, Islamophobia and blah blah blah BLAH.

A laundry list of left wing grievances that they will be bitching and protesting and whining about every day for the next four years.

Most of them are the worst sort of hypocrites...everything they are bitching about O-bomb-ya has been doing for eight years.

They better watch their step.

Obama turned out to be the best gun salesman this country has ever seen.

These idiots keep this up and you will start to see neo-Nazis and Klansmen start popping up.

enhanced_deficit
01-21-2017, 08:23 PM
CHICAGO


BOISE


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2tj01FXgAAOFjP.jpg:large



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2tp7kEUoAABaxF.jpg:large






Bit confused, which groups are these and what are they demanding?
Are these pro human rights ,anti-violence women's groups like these?


http://redalertpolitics.com/files/2012/05/NATO-protest-Chicago-Code-Pink-700x425.jpg




Click here to view the original image of 979x637px.
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1345971/images/o-MEDEA-BENJAMIN-SYRIA-facebook.jpg

http://www.targetofopportunity.com/codepink2nv9.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BnMUinrIQAEaBbL.jpg:largehttp://inthesetimes.com/images/30/09/pink.jpg
http://www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/1-code-pink-gaza.jpg




If so, they would appear somewhat consistent and principled.


But if protestors out today have been happily sipping starbucks mochas and lollipops during last 8 years when SWC Hillary and disgraced dronegangsta have been causing massive abuses and destruction of women's rights and now suddenly out calling Trump too mean towards people of other genders, races, religion etc... then they has to be hypocrites and cry babies.

Anti Federalist
01-21-2017, 08:23 PM
I was going to go to sleep. Now I will never sleep again.

That's when it gets you...in your sleep.

A female Wendigo.

That must have been what consumed Danke.

enhanced_deficit
01-21-2017, 08:27 PM
While I'm normally opposed to illogical, unnecessary protests... there could be cathartic benefits for some after a "shock" like recent democratic election outcome.


https://peopledotcom.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/sad-clinton-9.jpg?w=2000&h=1440

http://www.wcbm.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2016/11/OBAMA-STAFF.jpg
Obama staff absorbs the Trump victory



http://i.imgur.com/cqMQFnp.png



Does anyone know if SWC Hillary and Michelle Obama and the ladies of NBC/CNN etc are supporters or opponents of stances of these womens' groups marching today?


http://www.targetofopportunity.com/codepink2nv9.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BnMUinrIQAEaBbL.jpg:largehttp://inthesetimes.com/images/30/09/pink.jpg


https://pics.onsizzle.com/women-have-always-been-the-primary-victims-of-war-women-4966293.png
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cr3hTOlWEAATRBf.jpg




Unrelated

Lt. Col. Ralph Peters Calls Obama ‘Such A Total P**sy, It’s Stunning’ [VIDEO] (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?486362-Lt-Col-Ralph-Peters-Calls-Obama-%E2%80%98Such-A-Total-P**sy-It%E2%80%99s-Stunning%E2%80%99-VIDEO&)

MelissaWV
01-21-2017, 08:32 PM
Because they were told to.

Because racism, sexism, patriarchy, homophobia, Islamophobia and blah blah blah BLAH.

A laundry list of left wing grievances that they will be bitching and protesting and whining about every day for the next four years.

Most of them are the worst sort of hypocrites...everything they are bitching about O-bomb-ya has been doing for eight years.

They better watch their step.

Obama turned out to be the best gun salesman this country has ever seen.

These idiots keep this up and you will start to see neo-Nazis and Klansmen start popping up.

Mostly it's because it's easier to screech for a law (when they're likely to get one) than it is to work to change hearts, minds, and private contracts of any sort.

One of the other images you posted contains a great deal of truth. I could not afford to drop everything and go to DC for several days. Even when I lived in the area, the investment of time would be significant to get to a Metro station, park, take the train into town, get out, navigate this mess, etc.. Many of these women supposedly come from pretty far away. How did they get there? Did the celebrities bus some of them in? If so, how sick is that? Instead of donating to the causes they say they champion, they knit a few more hats and sent people on their way to protest?

Not a one of them can name specific legislation they are against (especially since he hasn't been part of introducing anything yet). They are upset over things he said before, and they are upset over a bunch of petty stuff that has no relation to politics at all. Let's round it all off to 500k from all over the nation. Maybe if they'd been this passionate and this mobilized up front, their Hillary would have won. I am willing to bet a chunk of them stayed home, butthurt they couldn't vote for Bernie. Another portion stayed home because it was easy to do so. A small portion stayed home because they hated both options. That's fine, but then don't get this pissy over Trump winning; it's ridiculous.

You know why stuff like "Christian Mingle" and "Farmers Only" and whatever get so much press and so many hits? Because people are desperate to avoid women and men like in the photos. Because I want someone who's never put on a sweater vest, and who doesn't have to think too long about whether they want to put on a bowler, or perhaps a bowtie, to go out to dinner with friends. Someone who opens doors and pays sincere compliments and is nice to old people, waiters, and dogs. He can be mean to cats, though. Cats are awful. Someone who likes to read and be quiet, but also has a sense of humor that may include a few more vulgar items that are only told under the right circumstances. Someone who's not easily offended at all, but does take it to heart if he offends someone else, taking it as an opportunity to learn something new (even if that something new is that people are way too easily offended). Also, at this point, he has to smoke or drink (or both) and be able to maintain all those character traits even when relaxed, drunk, or high. And he has to love my cooking.

You will not find that marching in the streets at these damned protests.

Anti Federalist
01-21-2017, 08:34 PM
http://redalertpolitics.com/files/2012/05/NATO-protest-Chicago-Code-Pink-700x425.jpg

So they agree with Trump?

GunnyFreedom
01-21-2017, 08:38 PM
So does this mean we are allowed to call them cuntheads now?

enhanced_deficit
01-21-2017, 08:42 PM
http://redalertpolitics.com/files/2012/05/NATO-protest-Chicago-Code-Pink-700x425.jpg

So they agree with Trump?



Yeppers.

Anti Federalist
01-21-2017, 08:47 PM
27 Jan 2007 - Anti war protest draws 500,000 people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_27,_2007_anti-war_protest

This was common every year, many times a year, from 2001 to 2008.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_against_the_Iraq_War#March_20.2C_2010

The NYC protest in 2004 was estimated at 800,000 people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Republican_National_Convention_protest_activi ty

From 2009 to now, wiki reports five...five major anti war protests in eight years.

The only one they report hard numbers on was one in Chicago that had 8000 people in 2012.

8000.

Anti Federalist
01-21-2017, 08:52 PM
https://socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/ron_paul-obama_from_nobel_peace_prize_to_pentagon_medal-war_every_single_day_of_obama_admin.jpg?w=500&h=335

Anti Federalist
01-21-2017, 08:52 PM
Truth.

+rep


Mostly it's because it's easier to screech for a law (when they're likely to get one) than it is to work to change hearts, minds, and private contracts of any sort.

One of the other images you posted contains a great deal of truth. I could not afford to drop everything and go to DC for several days. Even when I lived in the area, the investment of time would be significant to get to a Metro station, park, take the train into town, get out, navigate this mess, etc.. Many of these women supposedly come from pretty far away. How did they get there? Did the celebrities bus some of them in? If so, how sick is that? Instead of donating to the causes they say they champion, they knit a few more hats and sent people on their way to protest?

Not a one of them can name specific legislation they are against (especially since he hasn't been part of introducing anything yet). They are upset over things he said before, and they are upset over a bunch of petty stuff that has no relation to politics at all. Let's round it all off to 500k from all over the nation. Maybe if they'd been this passionate and this mobilized up front, their Hillary would have won. I am willing to bet a chunk of them stayed home, butthurt they couldn't vote for Bernie. Another portion stayed home because it was easy to do so. A small portion stayed home because they hated both options. That's fine, but then don't get this pissy over Trump winning; it's ridiculous.

You know why stuff like "Christian Mingle" and "Farmers Only" and whatever get so much press and so many hits? Because people are desperate to avoid women and men like in the photos. Because I want someone who's never put on a sweater vest, and who doesn't have to think too long about whether they want to put on a bowler, or perhaps a bowtie, to go out to dinner with friends. Someone who opens doors and pays sincere compliments and is nice to old people, waiters, and dogs. He can be mean to cats, though. Cats are awful. Someone who likes to read and be quiet, but also has a sense of humor that may include a few more vulgar items that are only told under the right circumstances. Someone who's not easily offended at all, but does take it to heart if he offends someone else, taking it as an opportunity to learn something new (even if that something new is that people are way too easily offended). Also, at this point, he has to smoke or drink (or both) and be able to maintain all those character traits even when relaxed, drunk, or high. And he has to love my cooking.

You will not find that marching in the streets at these damned protests.

Anti Federalist
01-21-2017, 08:55 PM
You know why stuff like "Christian Mingle" and "Farmers Only" and whatever get so much press and so many hits? Because people are desperate to avoid women and men like in the photos. Because I want someone who's never put on a sweater vest, and who doesn't have to think too long about whether they want to put on a bowler, or perhaps a bowtie, to go out to dinner with friends. Someone who opens doors and pays sincere compliments and is nice to old people, waiters, and dogs. He can be mean to cats, though. Cats are awful. Someone who likes to read and be quiet, but also has a sense of humor that may include a few more vulgar items that are only told under the right circumstances. Someone who's not easily offended at all, but does take it to heart if he offends someone else, taking it as an opportunity to learn something new (even if that something new is that people are way too easily offended). Also, at this point, he has to smoke or drink (or both) and be able to maintain all those character traits even when relaxed, drunk, or high. And he has to love my cooking.

You will not find that marching in the streets at these damned protests.


So does this mean we are allowed to call them cuntheads now?

Pardon me for boldness, but, why not Gunny?

oyarde
01-21-2017, 09:12 PM
By looking at the crowd, I'll read something into that Grizzlies sign.

https://cdn.meme.am/cache/instances/folder424/500x/48331424.jpg

There he is , just under the surface , above that hairy belly button .

Anti Federalist
01-21-2017, 09:15 PM
What are these weirdos freaking out about? I don't even think they know.

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2017/01/Anti-Trump-Protesters-DC-01-21-2017-Getty-640x480.jpg

Just some random observations from the hodgepodge of conflicting complaints and grievances:

Keep you laws off my pussy? But you have no problem with sticking your laws in my wallet, in my home or on my property.

Clean water? It was O-Bomb-ya's EPA that poisoned miles of a Colorado river and then refused to pay damages.

Woman wearing a hijab in the manner of an American flag? Why are you proud of a symbol of adherence and allegiance to one of the most misogynistic cultures on the planet?

Gaslighting? Fake government news is gaslighting.

POTUS = Public servant NOT Demigod?

Yeah, right, sure...whatever you people say: :rolleyes:

http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/BA5fuj6CQAAvSE9.jpeg

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/879425/images/h-THE-TRUTH-MICHAEL-DANTUONO-640x362.jpg

http://admin.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2014-04/192166_5_.png

NorthCarolinaLiberty
01-21-2017, 09:26 PM
Pardon me for boldness, but, why not Gunny?


Uh, oh; I sense matchmaking. Heh heh.

So yeah, any single fellas with a pair of eyes should be flooding Melissa's inbox and a few other gals on here. If you don't have any luck there, then might I suggest some of my nieces from the Philippines. They are in the 20s. They have good Spanish blood, traditional, Catholic and all that stuff. Interested guys should contact me. Just be of decent character, which pretty much means not being like me.

Seriously though, my email is northcarolinaliberty@gmail.com. Also, anybody in the area or passing thru is welcome to stay a night or two in our xtra bedroom. Matchmaking or otherwise.

Carlybee
01-21-2017, 09:31 PM
I was in a certificaton class all day. Oh darn, I missed it all.

Anti Federalist
01-21-2017, 09:50 PM
Uh, oh; I sense matchmaking. Heh heh.

Well, sure, just a little.

MelissaWV
01-21-2017, 10:12 PM
Well, sure, just a little.

I missed this earlier.

I have already found a nice fella. Long distance thing, low maintenance; the pet rock of relationships, which is the best thing for me at this stage of life :)

Anti Federalist
01-21-2017, 10:27 PM
I missed this earlier.

I have already found a nice fella. Long distance thing, low maintenance; the pet rock of relationships, which is the best thing for me at this stage of life :)

LOL, well good for you.

Was just throwing it out there, you know.

AngryCanadian
01-22-2017, 03:12 AM
A lot of FUСK YOUs from Madonna while introducing her song "Human Nature"

Shes a great icon for little children.:rolleyes:
Judging how she looked today, i say shes mentally unstable.

AngryCanadian
01-22-2017, 03:14 AM
In India, Ireland, France, Sweden, Czech Republic (https://www.novinky.cz/zahranicni/427136-za-prava-zen-a-proti-trumpovi-se-demonstrovalo-po-celem-svete.html), Australia and other countries protests against Trump and for women's rights were held...:

Noticed what those countries have all in common? =US influence or host US bases. These protests were organized by the same NGOs responablie for the protests in Kiev.

AngryCanadian
01-22-2017, 03:15 AM
This whole women march thing was a complete joke.

timosman
01-22-2017, 03:16 AM
Noticed what those countries have all in common? =US influence or host US bases. These protests were organized by the same NGOs responablie for the protests in Kiev.

No shit, Sherlock! :cool:

AngryCanadian
01-22-2017, 03:19 AM
No $#@!, Sherlock! :cool:

Its sad this shameless Women March didn't march at the US Saudi Embassy fighting for Women's rights there.

timosman
01-22-2017, 03:23 AM
Its sad this shameless Women March didn't march at the US Saudi Embassy fighting for Women's rights there.

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall.

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 03:30 AM
http://media1.giphy.com/media/3o6Mb4YRnph8xlcpu8/giphy.gif

tod evans
01-22-2017, 07:22 AM
This belongs in this thread;


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyI8A0w3PAQ

Jesse James
01-22-2017, 08:01 AM
Would you like to reproduce?:cool:
NOT with one of these ladies...

Jan2017
01-22-2017, 08:34 AM
This whole women march thing was a complete joke.

Big crowd in Denver yesterday, as well as DC, Chicago, Boston, New York and Los Angeles.

These Aerial Photos Show the Size of Women’s March Crowds in 6 Cities

http://time.com/4642399/womens-march-united-states-cities/

timosman
01-22-2017, 08:53 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ti2HHflqPLg

tod evans
01-22-2017, 09:04 AM
^^^^^^ She's just misunderstood you misogynistic bastard. ^^^^^^^^^^^ ;)

timosman
01-22-2017, 09:06 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHhy2Gk_xik

timosman
01-22-2017, 09:17 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8YNXy3GcMY

Madison320
01-22-2017, 09:20 AM
Hate to burst their bubble, but there's no such thing as "Women's Rights." Men's rights, **** rights, or anything like that for that matter.

Exactly. Anytime the government tries to grant "special" rights, all they are doing is violating individual rights. For example the bogus "equal pay right" violates the true right of individuals to enter into a voluntary contract.

specsaregood
01-22-2017, 09:27 AM
THIS IS LIBRARY

Better version:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rsL-o6Sjpc

Madison320
01-22-2017, 09:30 AM
Keep you laws off my pussy? But you have no problem with sticking your laws in my wallet, in my home or on my property.


100% agree. That selective freedom crap really annoys me.

timosman
01-22-2017, 09:38 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAFVst0vfqU

robmpreston
01-22-2017, 09:49 AM
Who knew that The RON PAUL FORUMS would be such a bastion of anti-freedom of speech thought. :D

goldenequity
01-22-2017, 10:04 AM
Who knew that The RON PAUL FORUMS would be such a bastion of anti-freedom of speech thought. :D

I win. :D

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2u5uFJXEAA3JmS.jpg:large

timosman
01-22-2017, 10:27 AM
I win. :D

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2u5uFJXEAA3JmS.jpg:large

These pussies have no power. :cool:

sparebulb
01-22-2017, 10:43 AM
I win. :D

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2u5uFJXEAA3JmS.jpg:large

I think that Danke is being held prisoner/being digested inside this corpulent lesbian.

At least he's going out the way he probably wanted.

AngryCanadian
01-22-2017, 10:48 AM
Big crowd in Denver yesterday, as well as DC, Chicago, Boston, New York and Los Angeles.

These Aerial Photos Show the Size of Women’s March Crowds in 6 Cities

http://time.com/4642399/womens-march-united-states-cities/

Yes all NGO funded and protestors were bused in. Your point again? noticed how in the Boston isn't very large?

phill4paul
01-22-2017, 10:51 AM
http://guelphforlife.com/images/m4l_youth.jpg

http://humanevents.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/March_for_Life-649x4311.jpg

https://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?&id=OIP.Mc3ed46a25eb8344e480c1b66935160b2o0&w=300&h=223&c=0&pid=1.9&rs=0&p=0&r=0

Oh, wait. Wrong march. This'll be next weekend. Don't expect to hear much about it though.

timosman
01-22-2017, 10:54 AM
Oh, wait. Wrong march. This'll be next weekend. Don't expect to hear much about it though.

These people are not angry enough. Probably get laid regularly. :rolleyes:

phill4paul
01-22-2017, 11:29 AM
I win. :D

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2u5uFJXEAA3JmS.jpg:large

https://i.redd.it/k14zlyqx97by.jpg

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 12:18 PM
Wins thread.

Wins RPF.

Wins Internet.

Everybody can go home now.


https://i.redd.it/k14zlyqx97by.jpg

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 12:31 PM
650000 marched in 2013.

On the front page there was only one MSM "hit", blurb on NPR.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=2013+march+for+life+in+washington+dc&start=0


http://guelphforlife.com/images/m4l_youth.jpg

http://humanevents.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/March_for_Life-649x4311.jpg

https://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?&id=OIP.Mc3ed46a25eb8344e480c1b66935160b2o0&w=300&h=223&c=0&pid=1.9&rs=0&p=0&r=0

Oh, wait. Wrong march. This'll be next weekend. Don't expect to hear much about it though.

Ender
01-22-2017, 12:44 PM
This belongs in this thread;


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyI8A0w3PAQ

YEAH!

donnay
01-22-2017, 12:58 PM
Good God , I was right . There is no hope for america .


Because 250,000 people are ignorant in a country that has over 300 milion?

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 01:08 PM
http://i.imgur.com/rmkaLmQ.jpg

phill4paul
01-22-2017, 01:14 PM
https://media.makeameme.org/created/i-am-a-lr5xp7.jpg

Raise ya, and call....

https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/16195337_1207081852732736_2474720861321371133_n.pn g?oh=25acc985012b65f35fabe9ab2cd4963f&oe=592478CC

donnay
01-22-2017, 01:21 PM
Because 250,000 people are ignorant in a country that has over 300 milion?

Case in point:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SQ8IR6TS1o

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 01:29 PM
This belongs in this thread;

So does this:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6PNc9KN50M

euphemia
01-22-2017, 01:49 PM
#notmymarch
#theydon'tspeakforme

AngryCanadian
01-22-2017, 01:58 PM
Some women at protest in Boston were screaming allahu akbar

Zippyjuan
01-22-2017, 02:09 PM
Some women at protest in Boston were screaming allahu akbar

Link? Relevance? Are all the women protesters Muslim?

donnay
01-22-2017, 02:17 PM
#notmymarch
#theydon'tspeakforme

+rep

AngryCanadian
01-22-2017, 02:23 PM
Link? Relevance? Are all the women protesters Muslim?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWX1SKncyOA
Claims Berlin but its in Boston.

These are your people Zippy :rolleyes:

AngryCanadian
01-22-2017, 02:24 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWX1SKncyOA

Its clear liberals have no brains.

Brian4Liberty
01-22-2017, 02:28 PM
The only consistent message I could get out of this "protest" is that "boys are icky", with Trump being their proof. They are behaving like kindergarteners.

The gender wars were ginned up for years in preparation for the Hillary campaign. This is what happens when divide and conquer tactics are used. They gain a life of their own, and continue on. The same with the racial divisiveness that preceded Obama's election. Look where that went.

Mr.NoSmile
01-22-2017, 02:33 PM
Well, with so many on the left fired up, I wonder if we'll get a reverse result of what happened in the 2010 midterms with the right sweeping in so many seats.

Zippyjuan
01-22-2017, 02:49 PM
Claims Berlin but its in Boston.

These are your people Zippy :rolleyes:
Is that why some of the stores in the background have German names on them (you can see parts of some in the last few seconds behind the signs)?

Also: https://twitter.com/Holbornlolz/status/822966907905146881

http://tundratabloids.com/2017/01/berlin-womens-march-for-rights-applauds-allahu-akbar-chant/

No- not "my" people.

GunnyFreedom
01-22-2017, 02:50 PM
Well, with so many on the left fired up, I wonder if we'll get a reverse result of what happened in the 2010 midterms with the right sweeping in so many seats.

This is actually an interesting question that I have given some thought. If you look back through history, nearly always (there may be exceptions back in the day I do not know about) when one party sweeps in the next midterm goes the other way. Just 16 years ago it was "common wisdom" that when one party wins the White House the other usually wins the mid terms. Although it is not discussed as axiom anymore, the last 16 years has done nothing but enforce the idea.

So the weight of gravity is pushing for the Democrats to gain ground in 2018 anyway.

But.

Here is something that may be a game changer, and may well affect the paradigm going forward.

Yes, you could argue that if the left stays energized they might bring the votes to the polls in 2018, but HOW they are energized is at least as important as the fact that they are energized.

Just look at what they are doing. If they manage to keep up this level of ... insanity ... over the next 18 months then Republicans maintain or even gain a little in the mid terms despite the weight of history being against it. People are utterly disgusted at the snowflakes. People on the right, on the left, in the middle. People who have never voted before want to find a snowflake and ram a boot up their crotch.

What the snowflake brigades are doing is not energizing the left, they are filling them with shame and apathy. The people the snowflakes are energizing.... are the right and the moderate right and.... wait for it ... the "silent majority" that we Ron Paulers were never quite able to tap.

Trump isn't tapping the silent majority, it's the snowflakes that are pissing them off so much that they are starting to push back.

So if the lunatic fringe of the left figures out how to energize without pissing off pretty much every other socioeconomic group in America then they may be in a position to gain ground in 2018.... but if they continue to keep doing the very things that got Trump elected in the first place, well, then come 2018 they are going to get that "Republican mandate" recently denied by the likes of Senator Tillis.

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 02:53 PM
Well, with so many on the left fired up, I wonder if we'll get a reverse result of what happened in the 2010 midterms with the right sweeping in so many seats.

Oh, more than likely.

Crowd Sizes Matter To The Media Only When The Cause is Liberal

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/444096/media-doesnt-care-about-big-crowds-unless-they-are-liberal

Dan McLaughlin January 21, 2017 2:10 PM

Media and social media liberals have been breathless the past two days over the contrast between the relatively small crowds for President Trump’s inauguration and (1) the large crowds at President Obama’s 2009 inauguration and (2) the large crowds gathering in DC and a number of other big, liberal cities across the country for today’s “Women’s March,” which purports to be a popular movement against Trump but which has pointedly excluded pro-life women.

Three points to bear in mind. One, it was not long ago at all – as recently as the afternoon of Election Day – when liberals were broadly united in scorning crowd sizes as a measure of popularity. As you may recall, a number of pundits had pointed to the crowds drawn by Mitt Romney in 2012 and Sarah Palin in 2008 as a sign of Republican enthusiasm, and they decisively lost the argument to Nate Silver and other data analysts who derided the idea that crowd sizes trumped polls. In 2016, Trump drew yuge crowds all across the country, and he and his supporters bragged about them incessantly. While polls were still a better way of looking at the world than crowd sizes, those crowds did speak to how he activated a particularly devoted segment of the electorate, and certainly everyone on the Democratic side was united all the way through the election in snarking at the significance of Trump’s crowds. It’s hard to credit the sincerity of those same people now getting excited about crowd sizes.

Two, there are obvious reasons of geography, demographics, and history why Obama in 2009 in particular drew large crowds for his inauguration, and Trump did not. Obama was enormously popular in DC and its surrounding areas, winning well over 90% of the vote in the District and carrying Maryland and Northern Virginia by wide margins; Trump did especially badly in those areas in the primaries and the general election. It’s always easier to get people to show up to an event within an hour’s drive than to travel in from Michigan or Iowa or Western Pennsylvania.

That’s doubly true of poor and working-class people who can’t easily take multiple days off of work and pay for hotel rooms and travel (Obama’s inauguration was on a Tuesday in 2009, a Sunday in 2013; Trump’s was on a Friday). And of course, today’s marches are hard to compare, since they’re distributed across the country and held on a Saturday. Also, it’s hardly surprising that Obama drew big crowds in 2009, given that a lot of people who knew or cared little about his politics were inspired by the simple fact of inaugurating the first African-American president.

It was already true that Hillary won tremendous support in the big cities of America, while Trump did unusually poorly there and unusually well in rural areas, so you would expect that marches and demonstrations held in big, media-friendly cities would paint an asymmetrical portrait of a nation of Hillary backers.

Three, the liberal and media enthusiasm for touting large crowds as a sign of popular sentiment is roughly 100% certain to evaporate completely next Friday when the March for Life comes to Washington to commemorate the anniversary of Roe v. Wade and pray and protest for its reversal and the extension of legal protection to all human life in the United States. Held annually for four decades, the March for Life routinely draws massive crowds in DC, as well as local events across the nation, and just as routinely gets a tiny fraction of the media coverage that is being lavished on today’s marches.

Crowd sizes for the March for Life are impossible to ascertain with certainty, in part because of the enormity of the crowds, and in part because the Park Service stopped doing official crowd-size estimates following a threatened lawsuit from Louis Farrakhan twenty years ago. The Wikipedia page for the March, collecting a number of news reports, offers this: Between 2003 and 2009, the march had an attendance of around 250,000,[2] but this number has since increased. The 2011 and 2012 marches drew an estimated 400,000 each, the 2013 march drew an estimated 650,000.[3][4]

Now, organizers of events on all sides of the political spectrum tend to overstate crowd sizes, today’s and the March for Life included; that’s precisely why Farrakhan objected when the Park Service counted a lot less than a million men for his Million Man March. But even discounting some of that 650,000 high-end figure, virtually any reliable source on the March for Life acknowledges the sprawling size of the annual turnout, year in and year out, including busloads arriving from Catholic parishes and colleges across the country.

But the media annually yawns and treats this simply as a ho-hum part of the annual DC landscape, not as a sign of broad popular resistance, after all these years, to the brutality of abortion, and tends to bury the story far from the front page. I can predict with great confidence that they will do so again this year.

Is Trump an unusually unpopular new president? Yes, absolutely he is, by any number of polling measurements; even a great many of his hold-my-nose-and-stop-Hillary voters remain skeptical of the man.

Is he likely to be a galvanizing force that allows the Democrats to regroup and reorganize? Probably. And the ability to draw crowds to today’s marches could be the start of that process, as it was for the Tea Party in 2009. It could also be a dead end of preaching to the converted and dividing into increasingly narrow ideological factions, as Occupy Wall Street was.

It won’t achieve much of anything if the people marching today are almost all people who already voted for Hillary. That all remains to be seen. Democrats may end up learning nothing at all from 2016, and needing to learn nothing, if Trump turns out to be a disaster in office. But the ability to draw crowds consisting mainly of people in big cities who were already reliable Democratic voters doesn’t necessarily tell us very much we didn’t already know. And don’t expect the people telling you otherwise to get excited about the crowds at the March for Life.

AngryCanadian
01-22-2017, 02:56 PM
Is that why some of the stores in the background have German names on them (you can see parts of some in the last few seconds behind the signs)?

Also: https://twitter.com/Holbornlolz/status/822966907905146881

http://tundratabloids.com/2017/01/berlin-womens-march-for-rights-applauds-allahu-akbar-chant/

No- not "my" people.

Yes your people because you support them

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 02:56 PM
#notmymarch
#theydon'tspeakforme

Well, I hear that a lot, but you better put a leash on these people because they do claim to speak for you.

Zippyjuan
01-22-2017, 03:00 PM
Yes your people because you support them

Link?

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 03:02 PM
I'd say it's almost a sure thing, except for what you mentioned and a couple of other things.

A lot will depend on Trump's performance: if he does well, delivers on promises, and keeps the die hards happy, then they will be motivated to get out to vote as well. If he crawfishes, crimps, folds and acts like a typical spineless GOP'er, then yeah, those majorities will be gone in a flash.

It also depends on how further along the country gets divided. As enclaves of frothing progressives continue to expand in the cities they tend to limit their political clout, even with proportional representation. And another census is not until 2020.


This is actually an interesting question that I have given some thought. If you look back through history, nearly always (there may be exceptions back in the day I do not know about) when one party sweeps in the next midterm goes the other way. Just 16 years ago it was "common wisdom" that when one party wins the White House the other usually wins the mid terms. Although it is not discussed as axiom anymore, the last 16 years has done nothing but enforce the idea.

So the weight of gravity is pushing for the Democrats to gain ground in 2018 anyway.

But.

Here is something that may be a game changer, and may well affect the paradigm going forward.

Yes, you could argue that if the left stays energized they might bring the votes to the polls in 2018, but HOW they are energized is at least as important as the fact that they are energized.

Just look at what they are doing. If they manage to keep up this level of ... insanity ... over the next 18 months then Republicans maintain or even gain a little in the mid terms despite the weight of history being against it. People are utterly disgusted at the snowflakes. People on the right, on the left, in the middle. People who have never voted before want to find a snowflake and ram a boot up their crotch.

What the snowflake brigades are doing is not energizing the left, they are filling them with shame and apathy. The people the snowflakes are energizing.... are the right and the moderate right and.... wait for it ... the "silent majority" that we Ron Paulers were never quite able to tap.

Trump isn't tapping the silent majority, it's the snowflakes that are pissing them off so much that they are starting to push back.

So if the lunatic fringe of the left figures out how to energize without pissing off pretty much every other socioeconomic group in America then they may be in a position to gain ground in 2018.... but if they continue to keep doing the very things that got Trump elected in the first place, well, then come 2018 they are going to get that "Republican mandate" recently denied by the likes of Senator Tillis.

GunnyFreedom
01-22-2017, 03:04 PM
Well, I hear that a lot, but you better put a leash on these people because they do claim to speak for you.

Just as much as the males at the event claim to speak for all rational men.

For all their public spectacle, I guarantee you that the percent of the 'general public' who would even entertain the idea that these lunatics are actually speaking for women will be at an all time low. The thing that makes this moment different from most in history, is that uniquely in this hour, almost no American trusts anything that is being told to them. Even to a blue liberal moderate this spectacle is probably just "more ridiculousness that will drive me to apathy."

I don't think anyone really needs to make a special effort to disassociate themselves with the lunatic brigades, unless that someone is say a "liberal feminist" and they too are appalled at it, then they would likely need to make that clear.

GunnyFreedom
01-22-2017, 03:17 PM
I'd say it's almost a sure thing, except for what you mentioned and a couple of other things.

A lot will depend on Trump's performance: if he does well, delivers on promises, and keeps the die hards happy, then they will be motivated to get out to vote as well. If he crawfishes, crimps, folds and acts like a typical spineless GOP'er, then yeah, those majorities will be gone in a flash.

I want to split that hair a little. Performance. Operational performance vs Theatrical performance.

The reality is over the last 100 years government power slowly waxes but on an 8 to 16 year scale nothing changes enough to shock the conscience. Operationally, performance is almost irrelevant. Theatrically, however, performance means the difference between a happy or a sad, or a rich or a poor America, because 90% of what is happening around us is based on what people get into their heads.

My biggest fear is that this administration will be Operationally destructive (which people will not notice) but Theatrically sublime (which will energize people into behaving as though prosperous, spending money and voila) and then blame his policies for the success, when the long term effect will be, well, utterly terrible.


It also depends on how further along the country gets divided. As enclaves of frothing progressives continue to expand in the cities they tend to limit their political clout, even with proportional representation. And another census is not until 2020.

Yes, especially when the "right" gets fed up and starts shouting, "THIS FAR, AND NO FURTHER" then the lunatic fringe left will tend more to segregate themselves into rainbow sanctuary cities to centralize their power, and the group (mostly composed of millennials) will still fail to grasp the effect of the Electoral College.

One thing I find interesting is something I've been screaming at Republicans since 2004, that the origin of power on the "right" is not found in compromising with liberals but in standing your ground. Not that the current group identified as the "right" will do anything good with it lol, but the sociological impact of these factors is kind of fascinating.

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 03:32 PM
Raise ya, and call....

https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/16195337_1207081852732736_2474720861321371133_n.pn g?oh=25acc985012b65f35fabe9ab2cd4963f&oe=592478CC

Classy.

And the idiot males there as well.

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 03:49 PM
One thing I find interesting is something I've been screaming at Republicans since 2004, that the origin of power on the "right" is not found in compromising with liberals but in standing your ground. Not that the current group identified as the "right" will do anything good with it lol, but the sociological impact of these factors is kind of fascinating.

Oh boy this +1776

There is no compromise or common cause to be found with these people.

Ignore them and carry on about the business you were sent to do.

timosman
01-22-2017, 03:52 PM
Classy.

And the idiot males there as well.

There might be a pussy in there for you if you support our cause. :rolleyes:

AZJoe
01-22-2017, 03:58 PM
Funny comment


Trump has gotten more fat women to walk in one day then Michelle Obama did in eight years.

Origanalist
01-22-2017, 04:08 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWX1SKncyOA
Claims Berlin but its in Boston.

These are your people Zippy :rolleyes:

They don't look like women...??? :confused:

Origanalist
01-22-2017, 04:09 PM
823209762535849984

donnay
01-22-2017, 04:09 PM
Well, I hear that a lot, but you better put a leash on these people because they do claim to speak for you.

Did the million man march speak for you?

timosman
01-22-2017, 04:11 PM
They don't look like women...??? :confused:

I am guessing they don't taste like women either.:cool:

Origanalist
01-22-2017, 04:17 PM
I am guessing they don't taste like women either.:cool:

I'm gonna say you're probably right on that.

dannno
01-22-2017, 04:33 PM
I don't really agree with that. There are still a number of situations where women are treated unfairly or downright terribly based purely on being women..

Ya, let's compare that with the fact that mostly men have fought and died in wars, by the tens of millions or more for the last few thousand years, and continue to do so, to protect women.

Then there is divorce courts that take half of men's stuff and make them pay alimony just because the woman wakes up some day and says "she isn't satisfied" with her marriage anymore.

Did you know that they made labor saving devices such as washing machines for women before they invented masks to help protect men in the coal mines from black lung?

The death rate of men on the job is STILL significantly higher for men than women, and always has been.

Do you like toilets? Running water? Rooves? Having your garbage and your neighbor's garbage removed from your property and taken far away? Not a lot of women out there making that happen.

GunnyFreedom
01-22-2017, 04:34 PM
I am guessing they don't taste like women either.:cool:


I'm gonna say you're probably right on that.

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view7/3408783/fire-marshall-bill-on-cruise-o.gif

http://gifsoup.com/view/3408783/fire-marshall-bill-on-cruise.html
http://gifsoup.com

MelissaWV
01-22-2017, 04:37 PM
Yeah... I have no idea why I didn't want to elaborate earlier.

Thank goodness that no one dug back and pulled a few anecdotes out of their rear ends in their hurry to... agree... with me. I'm assuming you're agreeing with me, since my entire point is that if there IS discrimination, the solution is NOT Government. Of course that would mean that you only felt like being a spiteful jackass.

Ah, that part of RPFs which believes divorces are only sought or caused by women, that deaths on the job constitute gender bias (but yet that gender also consistently talks about the virtues of the good old days where men worked and women stayed at home), and that sexual assault is usually just a boogeyman made up by women to get out of being ashamed of things.

It'll be the last part to die, sadly. The very last.

timosman
01-22-2017, 04:40 PM
Do you like toilets? Running water? Rooves? Having your garbage and your neighbor's garbage removed from your property and taken far away?

We can clean your carpet too! :cool:

NorthCarolinaLiberty
01-22-2017, 04:56 PM
Link?



http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?17293-Zippyjuan

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 05:35 PM
Did the million man march speak for you?

Apples and bowling balls.

The million man march never claimed to speak for me, a middle aged white man.

The marching pussies are claiming they are marching for ALL women.

818949026448084992

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 05:36 PM
Who's that directed at?


Yeah... I have no idea why I didn't want to elaborate earlier.

Thank goodness that no one dug back and pulled a few anecdotes out of their rear ends in their hurry to... agree... with me. I'm assuming you're agreeing with me, since my entire point is that if there IS discrimination, the solution is NOT Government. Of course that would mean that you only felt like being a spiteful jackass.

Ah, that part of RPFs which believes divorces are only sought or caused by women, that deaths on the job constitute gender bias (but yet that gender also consistently talks about the virtues of the good old days where men worked and women stayed at home), and that sexual assault is usually just a boogeyman made up by women to get out of being ashamed of things.

It'll be the last part to die, sadly. The very last.

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 05:41 PM
Ah, that part of RPFs which believes divorces are only sought or caused by women

Not only women, but women statistically initiate divorce two to one over men.

More than likely because men realize, and any competent lawyer will advise them not to under most circumstances, for the clear and simple reason: they will get creamed in the "family court" system.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/women-more-likely-than-men-to-initiate-divorces-but-not-breakups-study-finds_us_55d61f03e4b0ab468da049bb

donnay
01-22-2017, 05:57 PM
Apples and bowling balls.

The million man march never claimed to speak for me, a middle aged white man.

The marching pussies are claiming they are marching for ALL women.

818949026448084992

They can say whatever the hell they want. THEY DO NOT SPEAK FOR ME!

I am against Saudi Arabia who oppress women. These women that followed in this march are just plain ignorant. If they did some research they would be aghast. Hillary Clinton got lots of money for her campaign from Saudi Arabia--Donald Trump did not.

Billionaire George Soros has ties to more than 50 ‘partners’ of the Women’s March on Washington
http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenintheworld/2017/01/20/billionaire-george-soros-has-ties-to-more-than-50-partners-of-the-womens-march-on-washington/


Organizer For DC Women’s March, Linda Sarsour Is Pro Sharia Law with Ties To Hamas
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/01/figrues-organizer-dc-womens-march-linda-sarsour-pro-sharia-law-ties-hamas/

Women’s March Organizer Accused Of Having Ties To Hamas
https://milo.yiannopoulos.net/2017/01/womens-march-hamas/

Women’s March Leader Tied To Terrorism
https://www.worldnewspolitics.com/2017/01/21/womens-march-leader-tied-terrorism/

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 06:02 PM
Don't tell me, tell them.

Log in on some SJW website, or tumblr (hahaha) and tell them so, just for starters.

Maybe hop on the Acela and be in DC next week for the Life march and add your number there.

You're more of a Trump supporter than I am, you have a more solid belief in him.

This is war: the progs, leftists, SJWs, communists, jihadists, globalists and all the rest of the assorted rabble are never going to stop, never going to go away, every single day they will be out there raising hell in front of a sympathetic media.

You and the millions and millions and millions of other women that the pussy marchers do not speak for need to make their voices heard even louder (and I highlighted women only because men like me are already dismissed as being "responsible" for Trump).


They can say whatever the hell they want. THEY DO NOT SPEAK FOR ME!

I am against Saudi Arabia who oppress women. These women that followed in this march are just plain ignorant. If they did some research they would be aghast. Hillary Clinton got lots of money for her campaign from Saudi Arabia--Donald Trump did not.

Billionaire George Soros has ties to more than 50 ‘partners’ of the Women’s March on Washington
http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenintheworld/2017/01/20/billionaire-george-soros-has-ties-to-more-than-50-partners-of-the-womens-march-on-washington/


Organizer For DC Women’s March, Linda Sarsour Is Pro Sharia Law with Ties To Hamas
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/01/figrues-organizer-dc-womens-march-linda-sarsour-pro-sharia-law-ties-hamas/

Women’s March Organizer Accused Of Having Ties To Hamas
https://milo.yiannopoulos.net/2017/01/womens-march-hamas/

Women’s March Leader Tied To Terrorism
https://www.worldnewspolitics.com/2017/01/21/womens-march-leader-tied-terrorism/

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 06:47 PM
They don't look like women...??? :confused:

In the screen still, the only one I can be sure of is the one in pink lipstick with the Mrs. Grundy glasses.

Origanalist
01-22-2017, 06:50 PM
We can clean your carpet too! :cool:

And install air conditioning. Don't forget the HVAC techs..

MelissaWV
01-22-2017, 06:55 PM
And install air conditioning. Don't forget the HVAC techs..

I'm familiar with timosman's euphemism, but not yours. Must have something to do with iceplay.

Origanalist
01-22-2017, 06:58 PM
I'm familiar with timosman's euphemism, but not yours. Must have something to do with iceplay.

That's because I'm a dumbass and didn't get the joke. :(

specsaregood
01-22-2017, 07:17 PM
Apples and bowling balls.

The million man march never claimed to speak for me, a middle aged white man.

The marching pussies are claiming they are marching for ALL women.

818949026448084992

wait, trannies are prevented from voting?

timosman
01-22-2017, 07:19 PM
wait, trannies are prevented from voting?

no, but imagine if this was true :rolleyes:

GunnyFreedom
01-22-2017, 07:27 PM
That's because I'm a dumbass gentleman and didn't get the joke. :(
fify

Origanalist
01-22-2017, 08:40 PM
///

AZJoe
01-22-2017, 08:57 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_EwFdLSEN0

GunnyFreedom
01-22-2017, 09:57 PM
http://i.imgur.com/oIKQqFi.png

Makes Interesting Points
01-22-2017, 10:02 PM
I don't like it when feminist women pressure other women into being liberal. It's as if some are saying "in order to be a legitimate feminist, you have to be pro-choice, not afraid of big government, and vote mainly based on social issues". True feminism in my opinion should be politically balanced, and allow women to think whatever they want politically. Diversity of thought is the most important type of diversity, and accommodation of other points of view is the most important accommodation. I didn't actually watch the womens' march, so I don't know for sure how much it advocated for liberal political positions, but these things tend to do that. If it was called the Progressive Women's March, then I would be fine with it promoting Democrat ideas. However, if it's just called the "Women's March", then it should probably stick to being a protest against Trump's sexism. I do think it's absolutely crazy that we elected someone as insensitive and sexist as Trump, but we have to remember that Clinton being a puppet of the Establishment and special interests is an even bigger moral flaw.

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 10:07 PM
I do think it's absolutely crazy that we elected someone as insensitive and sexist as Trump

http://a.abcnews.com/images/Entertainment/abc_clinton_photobombs_kelly_clarkson_inauguration _thg_130123_wmain.jpg

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 10:09 PM
http://downtrend.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/bct2.jpg

Anti Federalist
01-22-2017, 10:10 PM
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-RnA_WSnjiVI/VSFHs0CrnqI/AAAAAAAABBI/NEGlfjTNs8o/s1600/ObamaSarkozy.png

timosman
01-23-2017, 01:26 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnERQIhsCFc

A. Havnes
01-23-2017, 11:50 AM
I don't like it when feminist women pressure other women into being liberal. It's as if some are saying "in order to be a legitimate feminist, you have to be pro-choice, not afraid of big government, and vote mainly based on social issues". True feminism in my opinion should be politically balanced, and allow women to think whatever they want politically. Diversity of thought is the most important type of diversity, and accommodation of other points of view is the most important accommodation. I didn't actually watch the womens' march, so I don't know for sure how much it advocated for liberal political positions, but these things tend to do that. If it was called the Progressive Women's March, then I would be fine with it promoting Democrat ideas. However, if it's just called the "Women's March", then it should probably stick to being a protest against Trump's sexism. I do think it's absolutely crazy that we elected someone as insensitive and sexist as Trump, but we have to remember that Clinton being a puppet of the Establishment and special interests is an even bigger moral flaw.

Libertarian feminism is a thing. There are actually many divisions of feminism, in the same way that not every racial minority believes that big government is the way to solve everything.

A. Havnes
01-23-2017, 11:53 AM
Big problem, though. The women's march forgot all about the transwomen! Lots of triggering going on on Twitter. Just a couple examples...

https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/untitled-17.jpg?w=480&h=340
https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/untitled-16.jpg

undergroundrr
01-23-2017, 12:05 PM
https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/16195429_10212024698241583_1459418434587900733_n.j pg?oh=2ba5b6c9337ac17c04a31c8318ec4f0e&oe=590CA0E0

timosman
01-23-2017, 12:08 PM
https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/16195429_10212024698241583_1459418434587900733_n.j pg?oh=2ba5b6c9337ac17c04a31c8318ec4f0e&oe=590CA0E0

If you learned one thing in your life you should know arguing with women does not work :cool:

Carlybee
01-23-2017, 01:03 PM
Nothing says treat me as an equal like dressing up as a giant vagina.

tod evans
01-23-2017, 01:08 PM
Nothing says treat me as an equal like dressing up as a giant vagina.

Equal?

That was so last century.......

donnay
01-23-2017, 01:23 PM
The feminist movement was set up to make sure women would not be equals. It's a shame so many women have fallen for the trap. Most of these women calling for equality look down their noses at women who do not agree with them. Hypocrisy knows no bounds.

phill4paul
01-23-2017, 03:30 PM
Big problem, though. The women's march forgot all about the transwomen! Lots of triggering going on on Twitter. Just a couple examples...

https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/untitled-17.jpg?w=480&h=340
https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/untitled-16.jpg

Bwahaha! This shit is soooo damn funny.

TER
01-23-2017, 03:39 PM
These sad people are choosing death. Lord have mercy.


https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-UgnHWPY_ZbQ/WIZyHAi0v0I/AAAAAAAA7fc/gaBpJG49OVoLGG9zfD-LEZMCoEOqZyQ0gCLcB/s1600/16238049_757436146309_1745225925_n.jpg

Anti Federalist
01-23-2017, 04:45 PM
Rejecting life, salvation, light and truth all to be hip.


These sad people are choosing death. Lord have mercy.


https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-UgnHWPY_ZbQ/WIZyHAi0v0I/AAAAAAAA7fc/gaBpJG49OVoLGG9zfD-LEZMCoEOqZyQ0gCLcB/s1600/16238049_757436146309_1745225925_n.jpg

Anti Federalist
01-23-2017, 04:49 PM
LOL classic...But what is TERF?


Big problem, though. The women's march forgot all about the transwomen! Lots of triggering going on on Twitter. Just a couple examples...

https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/untitled-17.jpg?w=480&h=340
https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/untitled-16.jpg

Anti Federalist
01-23-2017, 04:57 PM
Ah OK...got it:

Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist

Basically a feminist who hates men so much, that even when they turn themselves into science project freak shows, pump themselves full of hormones and grow tits and chop off their penises, they still will not regard them as fellow wymyn, presumably because they don't bleed monthly.

A furious internal debate rages within the intellectual insane asylum that is radical feminism and politicized homosexuality on how to deal with trans qu eers.


I’ve noticed that there seems to be some confusion about what a TERF* is so, here’s a quick guide to help you figure out if you’re a TERF. Chances are that you’re a TERF if you believe that you’re a feminist when you…

1.) Claim that trans women are cis men, that trans men are cis women and purposefully misgender trans people.

2.) Out trans people to employers.

3.) Tell trans women their surgery is about supporting rape culture.

4.) Assert that lesbian-identified trans women can’t be lesbian.

5.) Claim that a world without trans people is preferable.1

6.) Find that your anti-trans arguments and the anti-trans arguments of far right-wing groups match.2

7.) Assert cis privilege isn’t real; that non-trans people aren’t privileged in a society that’s hostile to trans people.

8.) Claim that gender isn’t real, but the MAAB/FAAB binary is.

9.) Claim that trans surgeries were pioneered by men in service of the patriarchy.3

10.) Lie about rape and death threats you’ve received from trans people.

11.) Fearmonger about the rape/violence threat trans women pose to cis women in the women’s restroom.

12.) Assert that trans people transition to satisfy their sexual urges.

13.) Degrade and dehumanize the genitals of trans people.

14.) Work to overturn trans equality protections.

15.) Work to halt access to trans medical care.

16.) Appeal to the Klan Fallacy.

17.) Compare transition to a disgusting Frankenstein-like process.

18.) Claim that trans people transition due to political or social pressures.4

19.) Claim that when you work to halt the propagation of anti-feminist stereotypes it’s empowerment, but when trans people work to halt the propagation of anti-trans stereotypes it’s censorship .

20.) Assert that trans women transition because they’re actually gay men and that trans men transition because they’re lesbians wanting to escape the patriarchy.

http://transadvocate.com/you-might-be-a-terf-if_n_10226.htm

Anti Federalist
01-23-2017, 04:58 PM
Well, now, I've come to a conclusion.

All ya'll are fucking nuts.

GunnyFreedom
01-23-2017, 05:11 PM
Well, now, I've come to a conclusion.

All ya'll are fucking nuts.

That's all folks!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBzJGckMYO4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBzJGckMYO4

AZJoe
01-23-2017, 06:47 PM
http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/women-trash-575x767.jpg

donnay
01-23-2017, 07:24 PM
http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/women-trash-575x767.jpg

Something tells me that is what most of these women's houses look like. Disgusting filth.

Carlybee
01-23-2017, 08:12 PM
What is cis?

timosman
01-23-2017, 08:16 PM
What is cis?

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cis

Carlybee
01-23-2017, 08:18 PM
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cis

Life is confusing

Anti Federalist
01-23-2017, 08:19 PM
What is cis?

Cisgender (often abbreviated to simply cis) is a term for people who have a gender identity that matches the sex that they were assigned at birth. Cisgender may also be defined as those who have "a gender identity or perform a gender role society considers appropriate for one's sex."[1] It is the opposite of the term transgender.[2]

There are two versions of the term: cis male for "male assigned male at birth" or cis female for "female assigned female at birth". Further derivations analogously include "cis man" and "cis woman", as well as cissexism (or "cissexual assumption" or "cisnormativity").

Anti Federalist
01-23-2017, 08:26 PM
Life is confusing

Only when a larger movement is dedicated to making it that way deliberately, for the purpose of alienating and disaffecting people, to put them in a mental state of confusion, isolation and fear to make any action or defend any societal norm impossible.

GunnyFreedom
01-23-2017, 08:59 PM
http://i.imgur.com/uiwne6S.png

Anti Federalist
01-23-2017, 10:14 PM
I wonder how many of these marching pussies got their pussy grabbed by some TSA stranger while on the way to protest somebody saying they grabbed somebody by the pussy?

But of course, that groping is OK because safety.

http://img-aws.ehowcdn.com/560x560p/photos.demandstudios.com/getty/article/188/51/107093312.jpg

Brian4Liberty
01-23-2017, 10:26 PM
We should be more specific. This was not a "woman's march", as many women were not welcome, and some men were welcome. This was a hysterical leftist march. (Men that fit into the hysterical leftist category were welcome to come along, just not allowed to hold any leadership or speaking positions).

enhanced_deficit
01-23-2017, 11:36 PM
These March situations are getting bit out of hand, this is no way to denigrate historic first lady's community efforts for women of all genders:




2 Indiana lawmakers under fire for posts after women's march

Indianapolis Star-5 hours ago

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C21CqQMXUAAdLK_.jpg

Anti Federalist
01-24-2017, 01:44 AM
https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/p720x720/16265495_10154469205843049_2939464216765397192_n.j pg?oh=f76f20f6506b9fb34e1012b109e42700&oe=590688AC

Scrapmo
01-24-2017, 02:20 AM
Pet sitters must have made a killing looking after all the unattended cats during these marches.

donnay
01-25-2017, 02:06 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHAhtT0CEec&index=1&list=PLM_tVXBx-AANkszoePvrX0kkS801IqEPg

afwjam
01-25-2017, 02:09 PM
Maybe we could all head over to the Rand Paul forum and talk about something that matters?

Jamesiv1
01-25-2017, 02:31 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C21CqQMXUAAdLK_.jpglol

CaptainAmerica
01-25-2017, 02:51 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CA3ZLFDVEAIZlK9.jpg

agitator
01-26-2017, 06:01 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8oMY1sF-E0

Chomp
01-26-2017, 06:03 PM
Filthy feminists and witches. Hell soon will meet them !

AZJoe
01-27-2017, 08:04 PM
Man participating in women's march in support of "women's rights" punches woman reporter's camera into her face.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=34&v=S1eb9vQ1vAk

timosman
01-27-2017, 08:15 PM
Man participating in women's march in support of "women's rights" punches woman reporter's camera into her face.

Canadians! http://www.edmontonpolice.ca/News/MediaReleases/assaultutterthreatcharge.aspx

timosman
01-29-2017, 08:52 AM
http://i.imgur.com/FenO6yZ.png

AZJoe
01-29-2017, 10:00 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUDtoDAGVE8

timosman
01-29-2017, 10:10 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUDtoDAGVE8

Trolling the trolls. :cool:

AZJoe
01-29-2017, 09:03 PM
https://scontent-lax3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p480x480/16195525_663114247201344_1439118891236045044_n.jpg ?oh=33cf7ab6db9085f686b9f7449d96ac89&oe=59079354

timosman
02-22-2017, 12:19 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sREyrKc7EiQ