PDA

View Full Version : The Globalists’ Russia Game




Brian4Liberty
01-09-2017, 08:14 PM
The Globalists’ Russia Game (https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/01/anne-williamson/globalist-game/)
By Anne Williamson - January 9, 2017


Thanks to Barak Obama’s most recent expression of his low character and a foreign policy weirdly akin to fantasy-baseball gone bad, thirty-five U.S.-resident Russian diplomats and their families targeted for rapid deportation feared a frantic search in the holiday crunch for open seats on flights to Moscow.
...
That’ll fix it, Team Obama thought, “it” being the lack of traction propaganda-wise that the administration’s unsubstantiated claim that President-elect Trump owed his victory to Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary Campaign Chairman John Podesta emails.
...
Then the Russian “thug” Putin really rubbed everybody’s nose in it, and sent holiday good wishes to Obama and his family, to Donald Trump, and – can you believe the nerve? – to the American people.

Team Obama was bewildered. And tongue-tied.

Even John McCain, semi-isolated in the Baltics on a special Christmas warmongering tour of Ukraine, the Baltics, and Georgia, piped down once someone got word to him that the Russians were stalling on the return serve.

It only got worse for the White House once the public had a chance to examine the codicil-ridden mess of speculation and innuendo the CIA and the FBI had assembled as evidence for U.S. charges of Russian interference in the American presidential election to President-elect Trump’s advantage. Talk about no there there. Not a single private sector computer security expert supported the intelligence agencies’ allegations.

After Washington found its voice and held congressional hearings on the matter, it was clear the dud report didn’t and won’t crimp the media or the intel agencies. The Washington Post and the New York Times will keep reporting, restating and rewriting key segments of the report until those same speculations are reported as fact.
...
But other than a cheap attempt to delegitimize President-elect Trump, what led the Obama administration to pursue a gambit that delivered them a very public humiliation?

Team Obama’s Russian election hacking allegations had three additional short term goals:

- To get President-elect Trump crosswise regarding foreign policy with a still largely neocon-aligned U.S. Congress. First came the abstention from voting on the U.N. Security Council’s resolution condemning Israeli settlements as illegal, which was followed by the Russian holiday hacking operetta with a view to next inserting Iran as a rough wedge between the two. (U.S. insistence on Russia forsaking Iran – or China – will make short work of any progress Trump and Rex Tillerson might manage in the U.S.-Russian relationship.)

- To provide Hillary Clinton with a smokescreen to escape the calumny of having spent over a billion and a half dollars of other people’s money on a self-designed electoral bust, which, in turn, is meant to discourage a future Attorney General Jeffrey Sessions from further investigation into the Clinton Foundation’s criminal pay-for-play set-up, the initial attack on F.B.I. director James Comey having been judged unwise and therefore scuttled.

- To have the theme of Russian interference at the ready for Angela Merkel’s re-election campaign later this year. (A glance at the German press will show that this one’s already afoot.)

Those are the short-term goals of what will prove to be an ongoing neo-con vilification of Russia. What then is the long term goal of reanimating cold war nonsense 25 years after the Soviet Union’s demise?
...
The military-congressional-industrial-academic-media complex needs an enemy the public can identify with. Guys wearing what appear to be 400 thread count bed sheets driving around vast deserts in Toyotas armed with guns, swords, knives, and suicide belts just don’t cut it.

With a proper enemy, one capable of organizing, deploying and supplying a well-armed army, the government can establish the fear necessary to squeeze the home team for the money needed to keep the U.S.’s war machine economy, seven decades in the making, turning over.
...
But there’s something more, something even bigger the globalists want so bad out of Russia that they’re willing to risk provoking a nuclear war through encirclement and targeted terrorist intrusions into Russian lands.

When John McCain says Russia is just a gas station, he’s projecting not describing.

What McCain and his ilk really want is to turn Russia into the war machine’s gas station.

The U.S. military is the largest consumer of energy on the planet. If the globalists can supply the armies of the West with Russian oil, then they can eliminate Russian influence in Europe after having gained control of Middle Eastern oil on the cheap. The Mideast’s oil and pipelines under U.S. control are destined to fuel Europe. Mexico, Venezuela, Canada and the U.S. domestic fracking industry will fuel North and South America.
...
Control over Russian energy has been the overarching goal of the entire post-Cold War years. In the 1990s, the Americans tried to get control of Russian gas and oil through the share market they themselves built. But Russian-IMF operation of the domestic bond market the Fed built, crashed that scheme in 1998. American finance lost heart and retreated just prior to the steeply rising price of oil whose proceeds benefited the Russian treasury and not themselves. Bad luck, eh?
...
Worse, the Russian president has spent the intervening years clawing back the energy sector from the country’s oligarchs and their pals in the West while restoring the Russian people’s legacy of oil, gas, and pipelines. And he has done it without engaging in over borrowing Western capital, which undermined one of the West’s most potent, sovereign-busting weapons, i.e. debt. Unfortunately, Russian companies were not as prudent as the Russian state and were as beguiled by cheap dollar loans as was everybody else.

Thus, two initiatives are explained:

The first is the economic sanctions the US imposed on Russia in 2014, which were meant to bankrupt those Russian firms with large western loans so that the lenders might lay claim to the defaulting firms’ assets. Putin deployed various schemes and subsidies successfully to prevent just such a debacle, which has only led to the piling on of more and more sanctions, some of the country and some of individuals said to be part of Putin’s inner circle.

The second initiative is the nonstop vilification of Vladimir Putin as an individual, which began many years ago and has now grown shamefully loud. The world of diplomacy is traditionally an inordinately polite one, and the U.S.’s personification of Putin as the end all of the Russian evility is extraordinary. Attaching “thug” “murderer,” and “dictator” to every mention of the Russian president speaks to the likelihood that the globalists believe they have agents in place who are eager to betray Putin to reclaim their former cash flows with the assistance of their western allies.

It is this misunderstanding of the country and the people that is the most dangerous to the rest of us. What’s that old saw? “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.”

The Russians will not be fooled twice.
...
More: http://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/01/anne-williamson/globalist-game/

goldenequity
01-09-2017, 09:10 PM
I always lol when I look at this GDP analogy (http://bigthink.com/strange-maps/131-us-states-renamed-for-countries-with-similar-gdps):

http://assets2.bigthink.com/system/idea_thumbnails/21182/size_896/GDP_Map_o1.jpg?1311177295

Not to 'mock' Russia...
rather the opposite....

Looking at their 'size'. It's almost laughable.
and yet...
they're withstanding the mighty Atlantic Empire; the 'Kings of the Earth'.
It's what drives the neocons to gnashing their teeth. hahaha.

They've really only needed 2 things:
1. Living within their means (as a State/under Putin leadership)
and
2. Keeping their nuclear capability.

The rest is just sheer grit, sacrifice and love of Country.
Pretty amazing.

Imagine 'New Jersey' flying in all the humanitarian aid
out-of-pocket and accomplishing in a single year
all that's been done in and for the Nation of Syria
while building a 12 mile bridge across the Kerch Strait
in that same year bringing power and water to the
blockaded/sanctioned economic hostages in Crimea.
Pretty fuccking amazing indeed.

AZJoe
01-12-2017, 08:19 AM
US Intel Agencies Try to Strong-Arm Trump Into War with Russia
(Is the CIA an Existential Threat?)
http://www.unz.com/mwhitney/us-intel-agencies-try-to-strong-arm-trump-into-war-with-russia/

Powerful elites are using the credibility of the US Intelligence agencies to demonize Russia and prepare the country for war. This is the real meaning of the “Russia hacking” story which, as yet, has not produced any hard evidence of Russian complicity.

Last week’s 25-page report … illustrates to what extent intelligence is being “fixed around the policy”. Just as the CIA generated false information related to Weapons of Mass Destruction … the spurious allegations in the DNI’s politically-motivated report are designed to depict Russia as a growing threat to US national security.

The timing of the report has less to do with the election of Donald Trump as President than it does with critical developments in Syria where the Russian military has defeated US-proxies in Syria’s industrial hub, Aleppo, rolling back Washington’s 15-year War of Terror and derailing the imperialist plan … Russia has become the main obstacle to Washington achieving its strategic vision of pivoting to Asia … The Intelligence Community has been coerced into compromising its credibility to incite fear of Russia and to advance the geopolitical ambitions of deep state powerbrokers.

The “Russia hacking” flap shows how far the Intel agencies have veered … As we have seen in the last two weeks, the leaders of these organizations feel free to offer opinions on issues that clearly conflict with those of the new President-elect. …

Brennan, of course, provided no evidence for his claims nor did he mention the hundreds of CIA interventions around the world. But Brennan’s accusations are less important than the fact that his appearance on a nationwide broadcast identifies him as a political advocate for policies that conflict with those of the new president. Do we really want unelected intelligence officials … to assume a partisan role in shaping policy? …

Powerful people behind the scenes are obviously pushing the heads of these intelligence agencies … Brennan isn’t calling the shots and neither are Clapper or Comey. They’re all merely agents serving the interests of establishment plutocrats … why would the Intelligence Community stake its reputation on such thin gruel as this Russian hacking gibberish? … The people who launched this campaign are either supremely arrogant or extremely desperate. …

Bottom line: Brennan and his fellow spooks have nothing. The report is little more than a catalogue of unfounded assumptions, baseless speculation and uncorroborated conjecture. In colloquial parlance, it’s bullshit … the authors admit as much in the transcript itself … “Judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact.” … Why have the Intelligence agencies savaged their credibility just to convince people that Russia is up to no good?

The Russia hacking story has more to do with recent developments in Syria than it does with delegitimizing Donald Trump. Aleppo was a real wake up call for the US foreign policy establishment which is beginning to realize that their plans for the next century have been gravely undermined … an armed coalition of allied states (Russia, Iran, Syria, Hezbollah) have actively engaged US jihadist-proxies and soundly beat them to a pulp. The stunning triumph in Aleppo has spurred hope … if Washington’s CIA-armed, trained and funded jihadists can be repelled, then the elitist plan to project US power into Central Asia to dominate the world’s most populous and prosperous region, will probably fail. …

That’s why the Intel agencies have been employed to shape public perceptions on Russia. Their job is to prepare the American people for an escalation of hostilities … Recent articles by elites at the Council on Foreign Relations and the Brookings Institute reveal that they are as committed to partitioning Syria as ever. Washington wants to reassert its exceptional role as the uncontested steward of global security and the lone ‘unipolar’ world power.

That’s what this whole “hacking” fiasco is about. The big shots who run the country are trying to strong-arm ‘the Donald’ into carrying their water so the depredations can continue

CaptainAmerica
01-12-2017, 12:13 PM
I always lol when I look at this GDP analogy (http://bigthink.com/strange-maps/131-us-states-renamed-for-countries-with-similar-gdps):

http://assets2.bigthink.com/system/idea_thumbnails/21182/size_896/GDP_Map_o1.jpg?1311177295

Not to 'mock' Russia...
rather the opposite....

Looking at their 'size'. It's almost laughable.
and yet...
they're withstanding the mighty Atlantic Empire; the 'Kings of the Earth'.
It's what drives the neocons to gnashing their teeth. hahaha.

They've really only needed 2 things:
1. Living within their means (as a State/under Putin leadership)
and
2. Keeping their nuclear capability.

The rest is just sheer grit, sacrifice and love of Country.
Pretty amazing.

Imagine 'New Jersey' flying in all the humanitarian aid
out-of-pocket and accomplishing in a single year
all that's been done in and for the Nation of Syria
while building a 12 mile bridge across the Kerch Strait
in that same year bringing power and water to the
blockaded/sanctioned economic hostages in Crimea.
Pretty fuccking amazing indeed.

you do know that our debt to china means we are incapable of waging any war on the level of russia

goldenequity
01-12-2017, 12:17 PM
you do know that our debt to china means we are incapable of waging any war on the level of russia
Wish it were true.
Wars are 'printed'.
We have an app for that. :)

CaptainAmerica
01-12-2017, 12:19 PM
Wish it were true.
Wars are 'printed'.
We have an app for that. :)

if you mean losing, yes america can easily lose a major war. look at Iraq,afghanistan for instance, that was not even a war against an adversary capable of the things russia is capable of

shakey1
01-12-2017, 12:52 PM
you do know that our debt to china means we are incapable of waging any war on the level of russia

doesn't mean that we wouldn't try... all life on earth be damned!