PDA

View Full Version : WaPo refuses to add disclosure about $600M CIA contract




timosman
12-31-2016, 01:59 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=274Z97UI158

Zippyjuan
12-31-2016, 01:46 PM
Maybe RT should disclose in every article that they are funded by the Russian government if you want to talk news source biases.

timosman
12-31-2016, 01:49 PM
Maybe RT should disclose in every article that they are funded by the Russian government if you want to talk news source biases.

From the wikipedia page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_(TV_network)


RT (formerly Russia Today) is a Russian international television network. It is funded by the Russian government

What's your problem Zippy?

pcosmar
12-31-2016, 02:07 PM
if you want to talk news source biases.

Mockingbird. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird)

It is not conspiracy theory. It is documented History.

Educate yourself.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDCfTIapds0

Slave Mentality
12-31-2016, 02:15 PM
Maybe RT should disclose in every article that they are funded by the Russian government if you want to talk news source biases.

Well, this is about the Washington Post. Do you have anything to say about this? "But, but, they do it too!!!" is so weak.

RJB
12-31-2016, 02:23 PM
Maybe RT should disclose in every article that they are funded by the Russian government if you want to talk news source biases.

It's not a mystery to anyone but you what the "R" in RT stands for.

bunklocoempire
12-31-2016, 02:43 PM
Does anyone have a favorite liberty alternative to Amazon?

(using FRNs)

nobody's_hero
12-31-2016, 08:23 PM
Maybe RT should disclose in every article that they are funded by the Russian government if you want to talk news source biases.

If I had to rely on Russia TV to let me know about what's really going on in Russian government, I wouldn't watch it.

If I had to rely on US corporate media to tell me about what's happening in US government, I wouldn't watch it.

So now we have to get to who has slightly more credibility between the two, since both are useless for exposing internal politics.

CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, Wapo, NYTimes, et. al all lied about polls. They're lying about hacking. They brushed the emails under the rug. They exaggerated Hillary's support. Operation Mockingbird really happened and is likely still happening. They operate under the guise of being independent, non-biased news entities but instead they push a narrative intended to mentally prepare people to accept and possibly even condone our government's actions.

RT is funded by the Russian government. However, they did not lie about the polls. They are not lying about hacking. They've given the emails more attention than all the US media combined. They knew Hillary was a shitty candidate. Etc. etc. etc.

Let's say that RT is using its influence to get people to do what Putin wants.

Putin says he wants to restore relations with the USA.

Well holy flipping f uck. That's the master plan? I can think of far more horrific ideas RT could be capable of spreading.

You know, like the ideas and accusations OUR MSM is spreading right now?

enhanced_deficit
01-01-2017, 08:53 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=274Z97UI158


This is a very reckless and dangerous video, won't be surprised if WaPo owners tried to get youtube to remove this video.

Zippyjuan
01-01-2017, 11:27 AM
Washington Post is far less biased than RT.

UWDude
01-01-2017, 11:53 AM
Washington Post is far less biased than RT.

Zippyjuan, ladies and gentlemen. Zippyjuan. Let's give him a hand. His next date is at the Laugh factory in Los Angeles! Up next, Daaaaaniel Tosh!

pcosmar
01-01-2017, 12:53 PM
Washington Post is far less biased than RT.

they have good propaganda?

less biased? using what scale exactly?

timosman
01-01-2017, 01:44 PM
Zippyjuan, ladies and gentlemen. Zippyjuan. Let's give him a hand. His next date is at the Laugh factory in Los Angeles! Up next, Daaaaaniel Tosh!

I would however advise against extending his contract for 2017. :cool:

DamianTV
01-01-2017, 03:46 PM
Maybe RT should disclose in every article that they are funded by the Russian government if you want to talk news source biases.


It's not a mystery to anyone but you what the "R" in RT stands for.

Thats the funniest thing I think Ive read yet! Its like saying "hmm, I wonder what country USA Today shows political bias for"!

nobody's_hero
01-01-2017, 03:52 PM
I would however advise against extending his contract for 2017. :cool:

If he was sent here to convert us, they're not really getting their money's worth.

Influenza
01-01-2017, 03:54 PM
Washington Post is far less biased than RT.
Does the news outlet echo the narrative of the US government? If yes, it is unbiased!

timosman
01-01-2017, 04:04 PM
If he was sent here to convert us, they're not really getting their money's worth.

This was always my concern. One day he will simply be gone and all of us will be missing another liberty champion. :cool:

DamianTV
01-01-2017, 04:19 PM
"He with the power to vote has no actual power. Only he who counts the votes has any real power."

"He who reports censored news has no power to spread information. He with the power to determine REAL or FAKE NEWS has ALL the power."

UWDude
01-01-2017, 06:40 PM
Washington Post is far less biased than RT.

And your reputable paper just had to issue a retraction abotu their Russians hacking the power grid story. turns out, a laptop to Burlington Electric, without a connection to the power grid had russian malware, not from the russian government. OOPS fake newsed again!

timosman
01-01-2017, 08:37 PM
And your reputable paper just had to issue a retraction abotu their Russians hacking the power grid story. turns out, a laptop to Burlington Electric, without a connection to the power grid had russian malware, not from the russian government. OOPS fake newsed again!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YaRvbQSjrk

enhanced_deficit
01-14-2017, 12:03 PM
Probably just a coincidence but since this thread was posted, WaPo "top headlines" in online news front pages covering secretive agencies have dropped sharply.

Related

CNN's parent Co. getting paid $Millions per year from CIA; NBC Uni's $Mil tie to BuzzFeed (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?506316-CNN-s-parent-Co-getting-paid-Millions-per-year-from-CIA-NBC-Uni-s-Mil-tie-to-BuzzFeed&)

anaconda
01-15-2017, 02:48 AM
Maybe RT should disclose in every article that they are funded by the Russian government

Good to know. Outstanding. I thought maybe they were funded by a fake news incubator like the U.S. federal government a.k.a. the Council On Foreign Relations.

anaconda
01-15-2017, 02:49 AM
Washington Post is far less biased than RT.

Washington (Com)Post is biased. Fake news. Globalist chicanery. Rockefeller Republicans, etc.