Behind the scenes, is Trump a Uniter?

[enhanced_deficit]

This is too early to make a judgment on his future actions/policies but within few days after his win he is being supported by/visited by quite a few of his former fierce critics from R side (Romney, Cruz, Carson, Christie..) and being praised as "pragmatic" from D side (DGP).

Too soon to know for sure but these could be early signs that he may set a less divisive tone than we have seen in recent years. And his "pre-election persona" may have been just that for the consumate deal maker.

[r3volution 3.0]

Trumpkin: "He's going to DESTROY the establishment!!!"

Libertarian: "No, he's best buds with the establishment."

...1 week later

Trumpkin: "Look what a great uniter he is, buddying up with the establishment."

Libertarian: "[facepalm]"

[enhanced_deficit]

You missed one line:

Faux Libertarian: Wall Street money baggers/neocons/ISIS sponsoring mideast dictators funded SWC Hillary-DGP cabal is better than "mind the homefront" Trump



But this is digression from main topic, i.e., does Trump have an ability to sit on table and lead radically different people towards directions he swants to pursue? Would he be less divisive than last occupier of WH?

No one is arguing here that Trump is a Libertarian even if he may be better than neocons preferred candidate on some issues.

[r3volution 3.0]

You missed one line:

Faux Libertarian: Wall Street money baggers/neocons/ISIS sponsoring mideast dictators funded SWC Hillary-DGP cabal is better than "mind the homefront" Trump

Oh, I missed something?

Well let's not be derelict...

Let's go through each of your Dealerific points!


Wall Street money baggers

Like Steve Mnuchin, Goldman Sachs banker, Trump campaign finance chair, and favorite for Treasury Secretary!


ISIS sponsoring mideast dictators funded SWC Hillary-DGP

Must be the same people who funded Trump when he called for the invasion of Libya for humanitarian purposes!

And the invasion of Iraq!

And when he said Hillary did a SWELL job as Sec. of State!


But this is digression from main topic, i.e., does Trump have an ability to sit on table and lead radically different people towards directions he swants to pursue? Would he be less divisive than last occupier of WH?

Well, damn, there's your problem.

He doesn't swant anything, other than 24/7 coverage of the Cunt Trump Show


No one is arguing here that Trump is a Libertarian even if he may be better than neocons preferred candidate on some issues.

Good thing all his cabinet appointees will be neocons, that'll keep them neocons out!

[CPUd]

LOL

[enhanced_deficit]

r3, are you suggesting Hillary Clinton and Trump were both equals in terms of receiving funding from wall street/ISIS sponsoring mideast dictators etc and were both puppets of these interests?
Meeting with someone or associating at some point is not same as receiving 100s of millions of dollars from someone for election campaign.

A "Uniter" itself is just a leadership trait of bringing together people, but ultimaltely such a leader should be praised or condemned depending on for which purpose people of different stripes are brought together. Bush mostly united America with help from media before invasion of Iraq and Hitler united Germany mostly for some very nefarious projects. I'm not reading too much into such gestures so far other than that these could be signs that Trump might surprise people by being less divisive than Obama who ended up dividing America along racial lines to serve political interest of his puppet masters/neocons but not of the minorities.

A question for you, do you think it is conceivable for any "Libertarian" to support someone with a demonstrated record of war lobbies puppetbaggery.. someone like SWC Hillary?

Would you have been just as upset if Hillary had won?


Before you ask, I find it conceivable for a Libetraian to strategically support someone like Trump with no government/military experience & various contradicting statements... to stop 3rd term of SWCs Hillary-DGP puppet masters cabal with a very demonstrated bloody government policies track record.

[Origanalist]

Just the usual political whores coming to kiss the ring.

[nikcers]

Trump got 3 billion in free TV from MSM, is MSM a uniter? Most of you Trump supporters claim for every fault Trump has atleast he's not Hillary, is Hillary Clinton a uniter?

[enhanced_deficit]

Just the usual political whores coming to kiss the ring.

That seems to be true in some of these "change of tune" cases.

On a side note, knowing Trump's high regard for his lofty ego, the appearance of taking the high "uniting" ground also including "ego massage" can't be completely ruled out.



11/17/16
Trump makes 'servile puppy dog' of Ted Cruz

Rachel Maddow shares video of Senator Ted Cruz during the Republican primary condemning Donald Trump in the strongest terms, only to end up speaking in glowing terms about working with now President-elect Trump. ... more (http://www.msnbc.com/)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gh1gj6-_P4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gh1gj6-_P4

[nikcers]

Trump makes 'servile puppy dog' of Ted Cruz


You mean he wasn't already Trumps puppy dog? You want to know the great part. I don't even have to make the analogy of how its rigged like professional wrestling, Ted Cruz does it for us.

http://static.images.publisher.attn.com/sites/default/files/cruz-trump.jpg

[enhanced_deficit]

You mean he wasn't already Trumps puppy dog? You want to know the great part. I don't even have to make the analogy of how its rigged like professional wrestling, Ted Cruz does it for us.

http://static.images.publisher.attn.com/sites/default/files/cruz-trump.jpg




Cruz and Trump acted like friendlies during most of their campaigns but towards the end their rivalry seemed real once field was narrowed.

BTW, some here had claimed Trump was Hillary plant, did you buy that?

[Zippyjuan]

Uniters don't build walls.

[Jamesiv1]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gh1gj6-_P4
Ted Cruz is the epitome if the sleazeball politician.

I hope like hell Trump chooses him for absolutely nothing.

[Origanalist]

Even the terrorists want on board, surprise, surprise....:rolleyes:

798493409057050625

[AuH20]

Uniters don't build walls.

Yes, they do. If the 'chosen peoples' were allowed to decide the election, we would be stuck with a 4th degree witch as POTUS. You see the blue mess below? That's what they would have chosen.

http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa215/sharptalons/Hispanics_1.png

At least we have the luxury of being granted a wildcard candidate. A candidate that Thomas Massie said is 'better than 90% of the congressman that he works with.' Trump nor his family is not mentioned anywhere in Frtiz Springmeier's books on the Illuminati.

[Zippyjuan]

Yes, they do. If the 'chosen peoples' were allowed to decide the election, we would be stuck with a 4th degree witch as POTUS. You see the blue mess below? That's what they would have chosen.

http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa215/sharptalons/Hispanics_1.png

At least we have the luxury of being granted a wildcard candidate. A candidate that Thomas Massie said is 'better than 90% of the congressman that he works with.' Trump nor his family is not mentioned anywhere in Frtiz Springmeier's books on the Illuminati.

Building a wall doesn't change any of that. Who has built walls? China, East Germany, and Israel. Did they unite their people? Did it help their countries to succeed and grow?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCO9BYCGNeY

[Seraphim]

God's word in Isaiah very much disagrees with you :-)

If you are interested in some interesting historical perspective the entire book of Isaiah and the story of Cyrus is rather...fitting :-)


Uniters don't build walls.

"Foreigners will build up your walls, And their kings will minister to you; For in My wrath I struck you, And in My favor I have had compassion on you. 11"

"Mexico is going to pay for the wall. Their gonna pay for it".

I'm currently trying to find the passage in Isaiah where God is giving his account of not being able to find the man to BUILD HIS WALL...and the story of Cyrus unfolds.