Brian4Liberty
11-17-2016, 11:58 AM
Just some ordinary people protesting. Or maybe not.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pDtGj4kcSw
(Yong Jung Cho starts around 5:20 mark. Basic summary: Arrested at Schumer's office for sit-in protest to stop Democrats from accepting Trump. Her parents, family and friends are all scared and afraid. Trump is racist, sexist, fascist, hateful. Democrats should refuse to work with Trump. Bannon and white nationalists. Hillary really won the vote, etc.)
Soros has his minions out in force. The talking point across the mainstream media is simple. Accuse Trump and anyone associated with him of being racists and fascists.
Anti-Trump Protests: Proof Of Professional Activist Involvement
In a story from November 12, USA Today writes an article to discredit the idea that the professional activist community is involved with organizing anti-Trump protests. They invite you to meet the protesters. USA today presents them as ordinary people. However, WikiLeaks exposes them as experienced protest organizers and activists.
USA Today presents the protests as spontaneous, involving people from “all walks of life” – certainly not professional protesters.
...
Ben Wikler, Washington director for the professional activist group MoveOn, is quoted – only to insist that these are not organized protests but an “enormous outpouring of spontaneous energy and concern.”
MoveOn urged Americans to gather peacefully to "take a continued stand against misogyny, racism, Islamophobia and xenophobia." Within hours, about 275 protests and vigils had been organized nationwide Wednesday, Wikler said. "There was an enormous outpouring of spontaneous energy and concern."
So should we expect that everyone quoted in that article is there out of spontaneous concern? Would a reputable newspaper properly identify its sources, noting if they were known activists and organizers? Let’s meet USA Today’s first protester:
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/11/06/yong%202_0.jpg
Yong Jung Cho, 26, who organized a candlelight vigil in front of the White House on Wednesday night, said about 2,000 people showed up. "Together, we sang, we cried and we marched" to Trump's hotel on Pennsylvania Avenue. "In this moment, the protests are showing the people, the country and the world that we are here for each other."
USA Today presents Yong Jung Cho without any introduction. Is she an average citizen, or an experienced protest coordinator? In a February 2016 email from the Podesta files, Yong Jung Cho is described as “350 Action Campaign Coordinator”.
On twitter, she claims credit for organizing the protest in an offhanded way that shows she does not consider herself to be a rookie:
The profile for this promising young activist at netrootsnation highlights her experience as an organizer on the protest scene and her involvement with the presidential primary at the state level:
So USA Today’s first person from “all walks of life” is an organizer who has experience on the activist circuit, and in that capacity she worked on the presidential primary. Not exactly the “spontaneous concern” presented by the newspaper.
...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-13/anti-trump-protests-proof-professional-activist-involvement
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pDtGj4kcSw
(Yong Jung Cho starts around 5:20 mark. Basic summary: Arrested at Schumer's office for sit-in protest to stop Democrats from accepting Trump. Her parents, family and friends are all scared and afraid. Trump is racist, sexist, fascist, hateful. Democrats should refuse to work with Trump. Bannon and white nationalists. Hillary really won the vote, etc.)
Soros has his minions out in force. The talking point across the mainstream media is simple. Accuse Trump and anyone associated with him of being racists and fascists.
Anti-Trump Protests: Proof Of Professional Activist Involvement
In a story from November 12, USA Today writes an article to discredit the idea that the professional activist community is involved with organizing anti-Trump protests. They invite you to meet the protesters. USA today presents them as ordinary people. However, WikiLeaks exposes them as experienced protest organizers and activists.
USA Today presents the protests as spontaneous, involving people from “all walks of life” – certainly not professional protesters.
...
Ben Wikler, Washington director for the professional activist group MoveOn, is quoted – only to insist that these are not organized protests but an “enormous outpouring of spontaneous energy and concern.”
MoveOn urged Americans to gather peacefully to "take a continued stand against misogyny, racism, Islamophobia and xenophobia." Within hours, about 275 protests and vigils had been organized nationwide Wednesday, Wikler said. "There was an enormous outpouring of spontaneous energy and concern."
So should we expect that everyone quoted in that article is there out of spontaneous concern? Would a reputable newspaper properly identify its sources, noting if they were known activists and organizers? Let’s meet USA Today’s first protester:
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/11/06/yong%202_0.jpg
Yong Jung Cho, 26, who organized a candlelight vigil in front of the White House on Wednesday night, said about 2,000 people showed up. "Together, we sang, we cried and we marched" to Trump's hotel on Pennsylvania Avenue. "In this moment, the protests are showing the people, the country and the world that we are here for each other."
USA Today presents Yong Jung Cho without any introduction. Is she an average citizen, or an experienced protest coordinator? In a February 2016 email from the Podesta files, Yong Jung Cho is described as “350 Action Campaign Coordinator”.
On twitter, she claims credit for organizing the protest in an offhanded way that shows she does not consider herself to be a rookie:
The profile for this promising young activist at netrootsnation highlights her experience as an organizer on the protest scene and her involvement with the presidential primary at the state level:
So USA Today’s first person from “all walks of life” is an organizer who has experience on the activist circuit, and in that capacity she worked on the presidential primary. Not exactly the “spontaneous concern” presented by the newspaper.
...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-13/anti-trump-protests-proof-professional-activist-involvement