PDA

View Full Version : Jason Lewis was elected to congress this week in MN-02. He has some interesting views.




jct74
11-13-2016, 12:18 AM
Lewis won the election in Minnesota's 2nd congressional district and will be replacing the retiring John Kline.

http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/democrat-angie-craig-bests-republican-jason-lewis-minnesotas-2nd-district



Here are his views on secession, which he strongly supports:


The Republican congressional candidate for Minnesota’s second district wants a constitutional amendment to allow his home state, or any other state, to be able to leave the union.

In his 2011 book “Power Divided is Power Checked: The Argument for States’ Rights,” Lewis pushes for strong state and local powers that would allow for “any state to peaceably leave the union.”

The book also contains Lewis’ proposed constitutional amendment on the subject: “It is also hereby established that any state whose inhabitants desire through legal means and in accordance with state law to leave this union of the several states shall not be forcibly refrained from doing so by the federal government of these United States.”

In 2011, before his bid for public office, The Daily Caller interviewed Lewis on his views (http://dailycaller.com/2011/02/07/thedc-interview-with-libertarian-talk-radio-host-jason-lewis/), where he defended what’s been called “extreme federalism.” States and individuals, Lewis insists, should have the right to free association. Abraham Lincoln, who Lewis insists was the first “big government” president because he prevented secession, and tipped the ultimate power balance toward the federal government.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/31/meet-jason-lewis-the-pro-secession-candidate-for-congress/


on foreign policy:


Lewis is also one of very few Republicans who support the Obama administration’s nuclear deal with Iran.

Although he’s not an Obama supporter by any means, he made clear on an episode of the Bob Davis podcast that “I am in favor of the Iranian Deal. I am.”

Lewis voiced his issue with the United States being the “world policeman,” and said that short of a direct threat from a foreign nation, he disapproves of military intervention.



Below is a couple of op-eds he wrote on the drug war, which he is very critical of. He basically compares it to alcohol prohibition, denounces civil forfeiture laws, dismisses the "gateway" theory, and says the drug war exists partly to provide employment for the prison industry.

Drug war is a failure, so let's experiment -- Without being rash, can we at least appraise the impact of prohibition? (http://www.startribune.com/jason-lewis-drug-war-is-a-failure-so-let-s-experiment/126040478/)

Next on Minnesota's social agenda: Marijuana -- (In which we ponder the nanny state and harm done.) (http://www.startribune.com/next-on-minnesota-s-social-agenda-marijuana/216228691/)



He also appears to be big into Ayn Rand, and started a social media network called galt.io.


Lewis left the radio business in 2014. He made a short film presenting a fictionalized account of his decision to quit called “Going Galt.”

The phrase “Going Galt” refers to the novel Atlas Shrugged by libertarian philosopher Ayn Rand. In the book, John Galt is the leader of a group of elite industrialists who refuse to contribute to a society run by collectivists intent on mooching off their greatness. To “go Galt” means to righteously remove yourself and your wealth from society—and, most importantly, avoid paying taxes.

Lewis seems pretty enamored with Rand’s creation. He’s even formed a social network/cryptocurrency for people choosing to Go Galt called Galt.io:

http://fusion.net/story/335105/minnesota-jason-lewis-gop-nomination/



I don't know if he will stick to this stuff now that he's in office, but it will be interesting to keep an eye on. Also another bonus is that's he replacing John Kline, who was a big government Republican, at least when it comes to the drug war (http://www.marijuana.com/blog/news/2016/08/marijuana-reform-supporter-could-be-next-gop-congressman/).

Occam's Banana
11-13-2016, 08:24 AM
The rest sounds great, but he had me at "secession" ...

But that makes me wonder: what if the rest didn't sound so great?

Suppose you have two people, A and B.
Suppose A is ardently pro-secession, but is also pro-interventionism and pro-Drug-War and pro-other-bad-stuff.
Suppose B is vehemently anti-secession, but is also anti-interventionism and anti-Drug-War and anti-other-bad-stuff.

Which would you support (for whatever meaning of "support" you care to use - e.g., promoting & talking up, contributing to, voting for, etc.)?

I think I would actually "support" A, even if I disagreed strongly with A on almost everything except secessionism.

The right to effectively withdraw consent is much more fundamental than those other things, as important as they may be.

This is why I very much approve the current "CalExit" shenanigans, even though most of the CalExiters may be a bunch whinging sore losers and "social(ist) justice" loonies.

And even though CalExit is just talk and almost certainly won't go any further than that, it is much needed talk that will help put all that "secessionists are racist neoconfederates" bullshit to rest once and for all. More people are coming to realize that it just isn't possible (as a matter of simple mathematics, if nothing else) to effectively "represent" the will of 300+ million people in the person of one President and a few hundred Congressmen.

If Jason Lewis and CalExit and etc. can give greater social visibility and credibility to idea of secession, then so much the better (and as an added bonus, it will give the globalist "unifiers" ulcer-inducing fits).

America is too damn big. Break it up and break it down. Divided we stand. United we fall.

jct74
11-13-2016, 10:53 AM
Israel, Hagel and the politics of the extreme
There's a much more vibrant debate about Israel in Israel than there is here.

By JASON LEWIS
MARCH 2, 2013

How is it that a cabinet nominee who once renounced his country, threw away his war medals and has been a reliably liberal vote in the U.S. Senate gets broad Republican support and thus breezes to confirmation as secretary of state — while a former GOP senator from Nebraska with two purple hearts from Vietnam and endorsements from an array of national-security officials gets sidetracked by his own party?

Yes, one might think that John Kerry, the Democrat from Massachusetts, would run into more trouble from Lindsey Graham, John McCain and James Inhofe than Chuck Hagel would. Then again, one might think that in the midst of fiscal insolvency, Senate Republicans would not be so fixated on another military adventure in the Middle East.

The problem for Hagel was — and is — that he’s fed up with war. Avoiding more needless American bloodshed is paramount for the decorated vet, and that has driven a wedge between Hagel and his GOP colleagues.

To be sure, the nominee was considered something of an apostate for supporting President Obama in 2008, and he sometimes (as his hearings demonstrated) shoots before he aims. But if Hagel’s willingness to talk with Iran was the deal-breaker, what to make of the fact that Truman talked with Stalin, Nixon with Mao and Reagan with Gorbachev?

Well, can we be honest? It was Chuck Hagel’s criticism of the “Jewish lobby” that required for the first time in history 60 votes to confirm a defense secretary. Had Hagel not uttered, “I am a United States senator, not an Israeli senator,” he’d have been easily ensconced as defense secretary in early February.

...

read more
http://www.startribune.com/israel-hagel-and-the-politics-of-the-extreme/194401041/

jct74
11-13-2016, 11:04 AM
U.S. foreign policy: What would Ike do?
We can find out, in his own words. (Hint: It's not what we're doing.)

By JASON LEWIS
OCTOBER 12, 2013

One troubling aspect of our near-war with Syria is the apparent zeal both political parties have for military action abroad. In fact, no sooner had we dodged the proverbial bullet in Damascus then America’s bipartisan saber-rattlers recalibrated their sites on the big prize, Tehran.

Historically speaking, it’s really no surprise that Wilsonian internationalists like John Kerry gravitate toward government intervention. After all, that’s exactly what liberals do at home. What’s harder to explain is why conservative policy has become so hawkish given Republican Party tradition throughout the 20th century.

While it remains understandably popular in GOP circles to ask “What Would Reagan Do?” it might behoove Republicans to ask what Dwight D. Eisenhower would do — especially since the Gipper took his cue from Ike. So let us, for a moment, channel the ghost of a fellow who knew a little bit about war as the commanding general of allied forces in Europe during World War II. Taken from his memoirs, public papers and biographical record, here, in his own words, is how the 34th president might view things today:

...

read more:
http://www.startribune.com/u-s-foreign-policy-what-would-ike-do/227455971/

jct74
11-13-2016, 02:01 PM
Here's one more foreign policy op-ed I came across. He stands with Rand, and calls out the neoconservatives again.



Rand Paul is the real Republican in the race
Today's war-minded conservatives should heed their GOP heroes.

By JASON LEWIS
JUNE 3, 2015


“Those sons of bitches won’t be happy until we have 25,000 troops in Managua and I’m not going to do it.”

President Ronald Reagan


“Make it a hundred [years] …; we’ve been in Japan for 60 years. We’ve been in South Korea 50 years or so. That would be fine with me.”

Sen. John McCain


“I am very pessimistic about the future of the country — we are certainly being dragged towards war and bankruptcy and socialism all at once.“

Sen. Robert Taft


“We must again show the U.S. is willing and prepared to get into a war in the first place.”

Sen. Tom Cotton


“I believed that it would be undesirable and impracticable … to retain sizable forces permanently in the territory of a jealous and resentful government amid an openly hostile population.”

President Dwight Eisenhower


“I think most Americans want to keep the war away from our shores and understand you’re going to need some troops over there to keep the fight from coming here.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham


Sen. Rand Paul’s de facto filibuster on the Patriot Act’s spying program — not to mention his recent comments blaming Republican hawks for arming ISIL — has finally given the only real story in next year’s GOP presidential nomination battle the airing it deserves.

The backlash against the Kentucky senator has been swift and unanimous — at least from the ranks of fellow would-be nominees for president. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal’s over-the-top rhetoric, suggesting Paul is “unsuited to be the commander in chief,” is only the beginning. The Cheneys (Dick and Liz, that is) have said Paul is “out to lunch” on foreign affairs. And aides to Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina (whose zeal for overseas meddling knows few bounds) have indicated that one reason Graham is seeking the GOP presidential nod is to prevent Paul from getting it.

But the neoconservatives who have taken over the GOP are also running against party tradition. Indeed, the defining characteristic of 20th-century Republicanism could be defined as a wariness of war-minded leaders — from Woodrow Wilson to Lyndon Johnson. All that changed when big-spending interventionists, unhappy with the 1970s pacifism of George McGovern and the “San Francisco Democrats,” jumped ship to the GOP — giving it a much more “muscular” foreign policy than even Ronald Reagan could imagine.

...

http://www.startribune.com/rand-paul-is-the-real-republican-in-the-race/306067771/

jct74
11-13-2016, 02:04 PM
He's also had Ron on his radio show a bunch of times, here are some interviews I found on youtube.


8/22/07
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVBAqrBbqjY
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1TtegjSY08


10/21/09
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9Y3PbEh-xU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHWRNgVE6fY


12/16/10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=524UVLuqNmk


10/31/11
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H61_WT7QKvo


1/30/12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_e7_yC_4OVM


2/7/12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gs05H5TaqUQ

devil21
11-13-2016, 03:40 PM
Looks like someone to keep an eye out for.