PDA

View Full Version : Riots?




pcosmar
11-11-2016, 12:46 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/11/us/oregon-protest-riot/

Anti-Trump protesters march for 3rd night; Portland police call it a 'riot'


By Azadeh Ansari, CNN



Police publicly declared a "riot" due to "extensive criminal and dangerous behavior" and called the protest "unlawful," according to posts on the department's Twitter page.
The crowd was dispersed using "less lethal munitions" and at least 26 protesters were arrested, police said.
Protests and marches continued in other US cities including Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Denver, Minneapolis, Baltimore, Dallas and Oakland, California.

I wonder how many of the instigators were paid. (Or just lost their paycheck)?

Been watching Portland _(from a distance) and have family there.

Son_of_Liberty90
11-11-2016, 01:04 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/11/us/oregon-protest-riot/

Anti-Trump protesters march for 3rd night; Portland police call it a 'riot'


I wonder how many of the instigators were paid. (Or just lost their paycheck)?

Been watching Portland _(from a distance) and have family there.

They had to be paid. This is beyond stupid. You can hate trump, demonstrate peacefully, fine. But these retards think that damaging property is ok because they dont like the election results.

Instead of asking "WHY" Trump won, they're just blaming it "BECAUSE RACISM, SEXISM."

it makes me sick.

pcosmar
11-11-2016, 01:14 PM
They had to be paid. This is beyond stupid. You can hate trump, demonstrate peacefully, fine. But these retards think that damaging property is ok because they dont like the election results.

Instead of asking "WHY" Trump won, they're just blaming it "BECAUSE RACISM, SEXISM."

it makes me sick.
Well, it is documented that some were paid.

Video of such was posted here.

Perhaps some professional provocateurs just had funding cut? (or worse,, they didn't)

Lucille
11-11-2016, 01:15 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/11/us/oregon-protest-riot/

Anti-Trump protesters march for 3rd night; Portland police call it a 'riot'

I wonder how many of the instigators were paid. (Or just lost their paycheck)?

Been watching Portland _(from a distance) and have family there.


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-11/smug-media-refuses-condemn-violent-riots-led-anarchist-groups


Meanwhile, the Portland Police Department basically confirmed Trump's original tweet about "professional protesters" being behind the demonstrations. Portland PD even notes that there was a movement within the protest crowds to stop "anarchist groups" from destroying property.

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/soros-trump-protests-revolution/


Now come reports from various protest locations that reveal a substantially coordinated effort, and not the organic grassroots showing by concerned Americans, as the mainstream media is reporting. Photos from Austin, Texas reveal a line of busses the “protestors” arrived in, making their appearance seem substantially less than organic – with a direct implication of being strategically orchestrated.
[...]
Make no mistake that the events you’re seeing transpire nationwide are being orchestrated in part by a billionaire political elite class that is looking to subvert the will of the American people by attempting to foment a new American revolution. Soros’ formula has been duplicated in numerous nations, and it looks as if he now has the U.S. in his sights as the next target.

Obama and Clinton could call off their dogs, but they love this shit.

http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/a5/a56eca5885be36d67e90689387de7dd37375693737e4afa2fb 1c7cadb2ecb5af.jpg

pcosmar
11-11-2016, 01:18 PM
Hmm,,

so again,, it's not just me that sees it.

staerker
11-11-2016, 01:31 PM
Well, it is documented that some were paid.

Video of such was posted here.

Perhaps some professional provocateurs just had funding cut? (or worse,, they didn't)

https://i.sli.mg/VZkiXN.jpg

Valli6
11-11-2016, 01:53 PM
Obama and Clinton could call off their dogs, but they love this shit.

Honestly, I'm hoping that Trump will put them both on the spot, requesting they make a public statement telling rioters to stop! Blocking roads, breaking shit, beating people up, is not "free speech".

pcosmar
11-11-2016, 01:57 PM
Honestly, I'm hoping that Trump will put them both on the spot, requesting they make a public telling rioters to stop!
Blocking roads, breaking $#@!, beating people up, is not "free speech".

Shit.
The people that live there should be stopping it.
And NOT calling someone else to do so.

and that is what is wrong with the whole country.

Anti Federalist
11-11-2016, 02:08 PM
Shit.
The people that live there should be stopping it.
And NOT calling someone else to do so.

and that is what is wrong with the whole country.

No kidding, this.

+rep

Anti Federalist
11-11-2016, 02:09 PM
Shit.
The people that live there should be stopping it.
And NOT calling someone else to do so.

and that is what is wrong with the whole country.

No kidding, this.

+rep

tod evans
11-11-2016, 02:13 PM
Shit.
The people that live there should be stopping it.
And NOT calling someone else to do so.

and that is what is wrong with the whole country.

Get the kops out of the way and put leashes or nooses on the prosecutors and Joe Citizen will step up..

Most people are scared to death to behave like men.

The "rule of law" that everybody screams about is for sorting out who's responsible for which bodies, not preventing people from protecting their shit..

FSP-Rebel
11-11-2016, 02:16 PM
Peaceful protesters.

seapilot
11-11-2016, 02:29 PM
They are scared of President Trump ruining their lives and neighborhoods. Before he can do anything they make sure they do it first!

AZJoe
11-11-2016, 02:42 PM
https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s526x395/14962662_1284456481607093_403232982716428038_n.jpg ?oh=2179fa48a56786c3464c17c0099dfbb5&oe=58C4B25C

TheTexan
11-11-2016, 02:46 PM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-11/smug-media-refuses-condemn-violent-riots-led-anarchist-groups



http://thefreethoughtproject.com/soros-trump-protests-revolution/



Obama and Clinton could call off their dogs, but they love this shit.

http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/a5/a56eca5885be36d67e90689387de7dd37375693737e4afa2fb 1c7cadb2ecb5af.jpg

Typical anarchists. (Sigh)

Lucille
11-11-2016, 02:55 PM
Typical anarchists. (Sigh)

I know, they're giving anarchists a bad name. Pisses me off.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d9lm-T87AQ

I love PJW!

angelatc
11-11-2016, 03:53 PM
Beer summit.

MelissaWV
11-11-2016, 06:50 PM
You know, the interesting thing to me was that it was so... delayed. There wasn't some spontaneous pouring out into the streets of angry, disgruntled people who were upset their votes weren't counted. It was quiet, and it was mostly the MSM and little memes, and then suddenly huge groups of people swarming around in a few select cities. Yeah, that doesn't smack of planning on a higher level or anything.

I couldn't go protest if I wanted to (I don't). I had work the next day. I wonder if the fact that a bunch of big schools cancelled exams and brought in counselors had anything to do with this hmm.

Zippyjuan
11-11-2016, 06:57 PM
Blowback.

UWDude
11-11-2016, 07:03 PM
Blowback.

Troll


Honestly, I'm hoping that Trump will put them both on the spot, requesting they make a public statement telling rioters to stop! Blocking roads, breaking $#@!, beating people up, is not "free speech".

Trump is a genius, (156 IQ). He will choose the exact right time, and the exact right words.
He might as well let the protesters just burn down their own cities though. Cities are the core of the democrats.
The mayors are likely hoping this will weaken Trump.
It will make him stronger, and the mayors weaker.
The democrats just have no idea what kind of strategic genius they are up against.

AZJoe
11-12-2016, 02:00 AM
Portland Police looking for this guy who caused $200,000 in property damage:

https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s480x480/14962593_10154114515321448_8620805511385135480_n.j pg?oh=5c65222323f4be8f786a10d3e16db54a&oe=58CE48D3

nobody's_hero
11-12-2016, 02:13 AM
Blowback.

LMAO.

Dude have you not been paying attention . . . at all? These protests (riots) aren't hurting anything more than their own cause.

If I'm trying to get to work, and you and a hundred other SJW's are blocking the highway and burning trash cans in the streets, do you think a light comes on in my head and suddenly I want to get out and learn more about what you stand for? "OMFG it's an epiphany! Let me help you protest! —Oh shit, wait. I forgot I had a job to get to. Kindly GTFO of my way."

I say let them keep acting like this. At the rate they're going, no one will give half a shit about them and their whining, on a good day. Oh and be sure to call people racists and xenophobes as well while you're at it. That really helps.

AngryCanadian
11-12-2016, 02:39 AM
Portland Police looking for this guy who caused $200,000 in property damage:

https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s480x480/14962593_10154114515321448_8620805511385135480_n.j pg?oh=5c65222323f4be8f786a10d3e16db54a&oe=58CE48D3
I noticed his wearing an upside cross?

Brian4Liberty
11-12-2016, 02:59 AM
Saw an interview with Bernie Sanders and the purpose of these riots became crystal clear.

These are a threat, pure and simple. A threat of future violence. This is the local thugs coming in and breaking a few things to extort protection money. Make no mistake, these are planned, organized, executed and funded by the usual suspects (Soros at the top of the list). It's meant to intimidate everyone.

CPUd
11-12-2016, 03:24 AM
Saw an interview with Bernie Sanders and the purpose of these riots became crystal clear.

These are a threat, pure and simple. A threat of future violence. This is the local thugs coming in and breaking a few things to extort protection money. Make no mistake, these are planned, organized, executed and funded by the usual suspects (Soros at the top of the list). It's meant to intimidate everyone.

The Democrats can use these riots to get political leverage. Typically in an election that is split down the middle like this one, the incoming admin will try to bring or keep someone from the opposing party on board to chill folks out and signal their willingness to do bipartisan work. Bush and Obama' admins did this with Chertoff and Gates, respectively.

If something happens, like agreeing to confirm Obama's SCOTUS nominee, or bringing Jim Webb for Defense, I bet these riots will stop.

seapilot
11-12-2016, 12:49 PM
Socialists love cheating, stealing and lying. That does not work resort to violence.

thoughtomator
11-12-2016, 12:53 PM
Blowback.

Sorry, but Soros-purchased civil unrest doesn't qualify as blowback.

The reaction to these incited riots will.

angelatc
11-12-2016, 12:55 PM
These people are the reason I even considered voting for Trump. They made it clear that they were going to do this if he won. I think they were actually hoping for more.

Heck, maybe so was I.

rprprs
11-12-2016, 01:08 PM
Saw an interview with Bernie Sanders and the purpose of these riots became crystal clear.

These are a threat, pure and simple. A threat of future violence. This is the local thugs coming in and breaking a few things to extort protection money. Make no mistake, these are planned, organized, executed and funded by the usual suspects (Soros at the top of the list). It's meant to intimidate everyone.
I agree. But that paid contingent will be supplemented by the low-life thugs that look for ANY excuse to riot, burn and loot. For them, it's a form of recreation. Party time!

GunnyFreedom
11-12-2016, 01:24 PM
It is all but guaranteed that a large amount of these protesters are getting paid. What baffles me is why are they doing this? Yes, it just might make Hillary look more exciting in the moment, but this can only saturate the left with negatives into the future, say 2018 and 2020?

The left wingnut propagandists are usually a lot better at grasping the long range consequences of their propaganda efforts. This is out of character because it will do more harm to the left than the right, and it is being allowed to continue.

In the past, something like this would have been used as a springboard to make Obama look like a hero. They would have let this blow up and then trotted Obama out to tell everyone to calm down and go home. Voila, fabricated from nothing and Obama looks like a hero.

I do not, however, understand the strategy behind Obama staying silent. All he's doing right now is making himself look like a coward.

euphemia
11-12-2016, 01:44 PM
I am not sure that Obama is in charge any more, not that he has ever been in charge much. This is way bigger than he is, and I don't think he will be able to stop it.

AZJoe
11-12-2016, 11:54 PM
Story says Protesters beat man's dog in manhattan: http://libertyunyielding.com/2016/11/11/anti-trump-protesters-beat-hospitalize-mans-dog/
http://www.weaselzippers.us/306622-leftists-even-attacked-a-man-and-his-dog-in-anti-trump-violence-in-nyc/

http://silenceisconsent.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Arthur-Schawrtz2.png


And a leftist response: http://silenceisconsent.net/thugs-brutally-beat-trump-supporters-dog/

http://silenceisconsent.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Arthur-Schwartz4.png

osan
11-13-2016, 12:53 AM
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/11/us/oregon-protest-riot/

Anti-Trump protesters march for 3rd night; Portland police call it a 'riot'

I used to live in Portland. All I can say is that it is a very different town now than it was in 2002.

There used to be a demonstration/protest held every Wed. or Thur. by the court house, ca. Salmon St, 3rd and 4th avenues. Mounted police were always there and fast to arrest anyone getting too far out of line. People rarely got too stupid - typical hippie shit, but always peaceful as far as I can recall.

Now this.

I cannot say for sure, but it appears that a day of reckoning is nigh. Many of us have felt/suspected this for years. The election of Trump has reinforced and advanced that suspicion greatly for me, not because he stands to be so great a president, but because it shows the extent to which greater proportion of the people of this land are fed up.

The days between today and 1/20/2017 stand to be the most dangerous this nation has seen since the early 19th century at the very least. It now appears as if George Soros is playing the grand provocateur with his apparent funding of events such as those occurring in Portland. This stands to lead to nothing good.

The only proper solution to unabated rioting would be for the armed and good people of this land to take care of the business at hand with police staying mostly out of it. I believe I am safe in saying that this is a most unlikely prospect for the same or similar reasons that have lead Americans into the frying pan in the first place. Our current circumstance feels like a giant set up such that we the people stand to lose no matter how things pan out.

If this nonsense continues, it will demand a response and that is where a greater danger lies, IMO.

If police respond, it may set a mental precedent of acceptance for this remedy regardless of who is acting or for what reasons. Has it not been the case with all the instances of horrific police abuse of the people that include outright murder? We as a whole have done nothing of substance to rein in cops, including a fundamental redefinition of their function, if not their elimination.

If police do not respond or prove unequal to the task, leaving it to the rest of us, I fear the response of governors and the fedgov, whether it be sending in the National Guard or perhaps even foreign military forces. I may be completely off my rocker, but I could readily see UN troops coming in the "clean things up" here in the event of nationwide violence, as those in the highest strata of effectual power sit back, laughing and licking their chops as their dutifully useful idiots with guns do the dirty work for them.

Does anyone see Americans cleaning this up w/o any great help from "government" and setting the land back to rights? I will not call it impossible by any means, but I also cannot place it as very likely, either. Then again, I thought Clinton was a shoe-in. Here's a cringe-inducing thought: what if Clinton was intentionally torpedoed by Themme in order to put us in precisely the current circumstance? Perhaps that goes too far, but I would not be so fast to dismiss it out of hand.

One thing I do NOT see happening is the people of Portland responding in what I see as the correct manner: taking things into their own hands and putting the riots down. They will almost undoubtedly rely on the "authorities" to bail their stupid, complacent, compliant, dependent asses out regardless of the longer-term costs to those remaining dregs of our freedoms and rights. And when done, they will likely obsequiously lick the boots of police and "government" in thanks for sparing them the need to lift fingers in their own better interest.

One sad aspect if it all is my belief that a very small number of well-placed rifle shots would likely stop the nonsense in its tracks. A few dead rioters would almost certainly give the rest terminal pause.

These are the hazards I see when this brand of violence breaks out in a land whose people are become as helpless infants in their minds.

osan
11-13-2016, 01:54 AM
Honestly, I'm hoping that Trump will put them both on the spot, requesting they make a public statement telling rioters to stop! Blocking roads, breaking shit, beating people up, is not "free speech".

All they need to do is remain unresponsive. Trump would have to have them face to face to make it work, I suspect. If the media did its job honestly, they would corner Clinton and ask for her response. But I doubt it would happen. I do, however, like the idea in itself. Make them commit. It would be difficult not to without losing all credibility in the eyes of rational and sane adults. The lefties will always fail on those points, so they don't count. :)

osan
11-13-2016, 01:55 AM
No kidding, this.

+rep

What he wrote.

osan
11-13-2016, 01:58 AM
Blowback.

Please explain.

osan
11-13-2016, 02:00 AM
Portland Police looking for this guy who caused $200,000 in property damage:

https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s480x480/14962593_10154114515321448_8620805511385135480_n.j pg?oh=5c65222323f4be8f786a10d3e16db54a&oe=58CE48D3

One .45 slug would have taken care of this problem. Have the people of Portland no sense?

osan
11-13-2016, 02:04 AM
The Democrats can use these riots to get political leverage. Typically in an election that is split down the middle like this one, the incoming admin will try to bring or keep someone from the opposing party on board to chill folks out and signal their willingness to do bipartisan work. Bush and Obama' admins did this with Chertoff and Gates, respectively.

If something happens, like agreeing to confirm Obama's SCOTUS nominee, or bringing Jim Webb for Defense, I bet these riots will stop.

Have you not been paying attention to Trump's basic approach to such problems? He is most apparently not an appeaser of extortionists.

Try again, please.

osan
11-13-2016, 02:14 AM
It is all but guaranteed that a large amount of these protesters are getting paid. What baffles me is why are they doing this? Yes, it just might make Hillary look more exciting in the moment, but this can only saturate the left with negatives into the future, say 2018 and 2020?

We are not talking about the brightest bulbs in the drawer and the sharpest knives on the tree.


The left wingnut propagandists are usually a lot better at grasping the long range consequences of their propaganda efforts. This is out of character because it will do more harm to the left than the right, and it is being allowed to continue.

Perhaps it really isn't.


In the past, something like this would have been used as a springboard to make Obama look like a hero. They would have let this blow up and then trotted Obama out to tell everyone to calm down and go home. Voila, fabricated from nothing and Obama looks like a hero.

OK, so then put on the analyst's hat. We cannot credibly chalk this up to panic and/or desperation. Theye are in far too strong a position for that. IF Theye are not typically stupid in this way, then perhaps the correct conclusion is that they want things to take this apparently senseless turn. Assuming this, now ask "why?" The mind reels at the possibilities.


I do not, however, understand the strategy behind Obama staying silent. All he's doing right now is making himself look like a coward.

Obama is a sock-puppet who does as he is told. Given that, see the paragraph immediately preceding this.

CPUd
11-13-2016, 02:21 AM
Have you not been paying attention to Trump's basic approach to such problems? He is most apparently not an appeaser of extortionists.

Try again, please.

Doesn't mean they're not trying, since it has worked in the past. Trump cut a deal with the party elites to make sure the grassroots didn't disrupt the convention. He could cut a similar deal with the Democrats, especially if the alternative would interfere with his ability to govern.

osan
11-13-2016, 02:29 AM
He could cut a similar deal with the Democrats, especially if the alternative would interfere with his ability to govern.

Don't hold your breath.

tod evans
11-13-2016, 05:30 AM
I used to live in Portland. All I can say is that it is a very different town now than it was in 2002.

There used to be a demonstration/protest held every Wed. or Thur. by the court house, ca. Salmon St, 3rd and 4th avenues. Mounted police were always there and fast to arrest anyone getting too far out of line. People rarely got too stupid - typical hippie shit, but always peaceful as far as I can recall.

Now this.

I cannot say for sure, but it appears that a day of reckoning is nigh. Many of us have felt/suspected this for years. The election of Trump has reinforced and advanced that suspicion greatly for me, not because he stands to be so great a president, but because it shows the extent to which greater proportion of the people of this land are fed up.

The days between today and 1/20/2017 stand to be the most dangerous this nation has seen since the early 19th century at the very least. It now appears as if George Soros is playing the grand provocateur with his apparent funding of events such as those occurring in Portland. This stands to lead to nothing good.

The only proper solution to unabated rioting would be for the armed and good people of this land to take care of the business at hand with police staying mostly out of it. I believe I am safe in saying that this is a most unlikely prospect for the same or similar reasons that have lead Americans into the frying pan in the first place. Our current circumstance feels like a giant set up such that we the people stand to lose no matter how things pan out.

If this nonsense continues, it will demand a response and that is where a greater danger lies, IMO.

If police respond, it may set a mental precedent of acceptance for this remedy regardless of who is acting or for what reasons. Has it not been the case with all the instances of horrific police abuse of the people that include outright murder? We as a whole have done nothing of substance to rein in cops, including a fundamental redefinition of their function, if not their elimination.

If police do not respond or prove unequal to the task, leaving it to the rest of us, I fear the response of governors and the fedgov, whether it be sending in the National Guard or perhaps even foreign military forces. I may be completely off my rocker, but I could readily see UN troops coming in the "clean things up" here in the event of nationwide violence, as those in the highest strata of effectual power sit back, laughing and licking their chops as their dutifully useful idiots with guns do the dirty work for them.

Does anyone see Americans cleaning this up w/o any great help from "government" and setting the land back to rights? I will not call it impossible by any means, but I also cannot place it as very likely, either. Then again, I thought Clinton was a shoe-in. Here's a cringe-inducing thought: what if Clinton was intentionally torpedoed by Themme in order to put us in precisely the current circumstance? Perhaps that goes too far, but I would not be so fast to dismiss it out of hand.

One thing I do NOT see happening is the people of Portland responding in what I see as the correct manner: taking things into their own hands and putting the riots down. They will almost undoubtedly rely on the "authorities" to bail their stupid, complacent, compliant, dependent asses out regardless of the longer-term costs to those remaining dregs of our freedoms and rights. And when done, they will likely obsequiously lick the boots of police and "government" in thanks for sparing them the need to lift fingers in their own better interest.

One sad aspect if it all is my belief that a very small number of well-placed rifle shots would likely stop the nonsense in its tracks. A few dead rioters would almost certainly give the rest terminal pause.

These are the hazards I see when this brand of violence breaks out in a land whose people are become as helpless infants in their minds.

The prevalence of copsuckery has brought us to this point.

People have twisted both scripture and law to where they honestly believe it is their duty as "good people" to rely on government goons to stand in their stead when the time comes to act like men.

I too could type a tome..........To what end though?

Even here on RPF there's a contingent that firmly believes the rule of law must include police.

Interesting times indeed.

rg17
11-13-2016, 07:21 AM
Arrest Soros! He is extremely dangerous!

AZJoe
11-13-2016, 07:25 AM
Hypocrisy of Leftist Temper Tantrum
Paul Joseph Watson


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d9lm-T87AQ

CPUd
11-13-2016, 08:34 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CxGoXS7VIAAndDu.jpg

UWDude
11-13-2016, 09:40 AM
The only proper solution to unabated rioting would be for the armed and good people of this land to take care of the business at hand with police staying mostly out of it. I believe I am safe in saying that this is a most unlikely prospect for the same or similar reasons that have lead Americans into the frying pan in the first place. Our current circumstance feels like a giant set up such that we the people stand to lose no matter how things pan out.

No. the proper solution is to let these people burn their own cities down. Then the people will demand an end to it, and they will be crushed. If paramilitary forces step in early, they anti-democracy rioters will be painted as victims of right wing hatred. the anti-democracy riots will have to continue until the populace at large reaches critical mass in their disdain for these people.

tod evans
11-13-2016, 09:55 AM
No. the proper solution is to let these people burn their own cities down. Then the people will demand an end to it, and they will be crushed. If paramilitary forces step in early, they anti-democracy rioters will be painted as victims of right wing hatred. the anti-democracy riots will have to continue until the populace at large reaches critical mass in their disdain for these people.

If paramilitary forces step in at all it's a really big issue for anyone who believes in either personal liberty or the constitution or both...

Troops on US soil are a big problem, and these are troops;

http://lawofficer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/OldSWATUniformsMinneapolis.jpg

Lucille
11-13-2016, 10:07 AM
So that's why Mr. and Mrs. Clinton wore purple (http://i2.cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/161109123504-01-hillary-clinton-concession-1109-large-169.jpg) the day she conceded.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-12/behold-purple-revolution

https://c1.staticflickr.com/6/5624/22769287728_fa127fbd04_b.jpg

UWDude
11-13-2016, 10:11 AM
If paramilitary forces step in at all it's a really big issue for anyone who believes in either personal liberty or the constitution or both...

Troops on US soil are a big problem, and these are troops;

http://lawofficer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/OldSWATUniformsMinneapolis.jpg

paramilitary can also mean private armed citizens.

tod evans
11-13-2016, 10:36 AM
paramilitary can also mean private armed citizens.

It most certainly can, would you care to clarify which group you alluded to?

I'm 100% behind militia type/non-tax funded groups who take care of their property and families whereas I'm equally against government funded or sanctioned groups who claim to be upholding "the law"...

Too often their laws, 'the law' or 'the rule of law' are used to enforce nefarious purposes and for me it's just easier to discount all government funded or sanctioned groups as being possibly nefarious.

If a person doesn't know those who would lord over him he's certainly justified in fearing them, as in "I feared for my life." ™

UWDude
11-13-2016, 11:17 AM
It most certainly can, would you care to clarify which group you alluded to?

I'm 100% behind militia type/non-tax funded groups who take care of their property and families whereas I'm equally against government funded or sanctioned groups who claim to be upholding "the law"...

Too often their laws, 'the law' or 'the rule of law' are used to enforce nefarious purposes and for me it's just easier to discount all government funded or sanctioned groups as being possibly nefarious.

If a person doesn't know those who would lord over him he's certainly justified in fearing them, as in "I feared for my life." ™

Everybody was saying private citizens need to take care of this, and stop relying on government. Over all, I was just talking about para-military, be it police, militia, or vigilante.

Lucille
11-13-2016, 04:10 PM
Wikileaks is the gift that keeps on giving.

Anti-Trump Protests: Proof Of Professional Activist Involvement
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-13/anti-trump-protests-proof-professional-activist-involvement


In a story from November 12, USA Today writes an article to discredit the idea that the professional activist community is involved with organizing anti-Trump protests. They invite you to meet the protesters. USA today presents them as ordinary people. However, WikiLeaks exposes them as experienced protest organizers and activists.

USA Today presents the protests as spontaneous, involving people from “all walks of life” – certainly not professional protesters.
[...]
So should we expect that everyone quoted in that article is there out of spontaneous concern? Would a reputable newspaper properly identify its sources, noting if they were known activists and organizers? Let’s meet USA Today’s [protesters]:
[...]
If the demonstrations aren’t premeditated, then why are all these average citizens actually well-connected activists and protest organizers? USA Today has misrepresented its sources in a way that falsifies their own narrative that the closest we have to protesters are old-timers who “haven’t toted a protest sign since their anti-war days in the 1970s”. USA Today has instead helped demonstrate that the professional protest community is in fact behind the current political protests.
[...]
USA Today may not have accurately introduced anyone quoted in that article other than a high school student and the MoveOn activist.

There is one more WikiLeaks connection for this article: USA Today appears in the WikiLeaks, and not always in a capacity different from the activists. In this leaked email, the DNC schedule for an upcoming “earned media” campaign shows complete confidence that the editorial board of USA Today and other organizations will coordinate their schedules and their editorial priorities to suit the DNC.
[...]
The DNC treats reporters, newspapers, activist groups and PACs as all part of the campaign. The DNC draws no distinction between key allies and reporters. This USA Today story shows that the DNC is probably right about that.

Lovecraftian4Paul
11-13-2016, 04:43 PM
Let them keep rioting, Trump will get even more support. I feel bad for everyone getting their property or lives damaged by these numbskulls, of course. The amazing thing is they're too stupid to realize they are alienating everyone from their cause except the most virulent anti-Trumpers of the left.

Anti Federalist
11-13-2016, 04:45 PM
Expect this every week from here on out.

The anti war left will re-emerge as well.

phill4paul
11-13-2016, 04:59 PM
Tolerant Peaceful Anti Trump Love protest ! Watch: Anti-Trump Protestors Attack Pregnant Women In Car In Portland! Pregnant Women Defenseless!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9zXlOsMg7w

Wonder how fast these sunsabitches could run with some 00 buck chasing their ass?

tod evans
11-13-2016, 05:25 PM
WTF is wrong with the males of the species?

Even that idiot with the camera stood around making a fucking video...:mad:

RJB
11-13-2016, 05:27 PM
Wonder how fast these sunsabitches could run with some 00 buck chasing their ass?

Not faster than the double O, I bet.

GunnyFreedom
11-13-2016, 05:29 PM
Expect this every week from here on out.

The anti war left will re-emerge as well.

depends. If Trumplestilskin turns out to be a warmonger then the antiwar dems will come back. If, on the other hand, Trumplestilskin turns out to be a peacemonger, then it will be the neocon dems that emerge.

69360
11-13-2016, 05:34 PM
They call that a riot? I've seen sports fans do worse when their team won.

UWDude
11-13-2016, 05:37 PM
They call that a riot? I've seen sports fans do worse when their team won.

I have to say, as an occupier, these are not riots, they are peaceful protests with smatterings of violence.

RJB
11-13-2016, 05:45 PM
WTF is wrong with the males of the species?

Even that idiot with the camera stood around making a $#@!ing video...:mad:
Yeah, I don't care who it is. I can't let a mob screw with a pregnant woman. That just goes against everything that I am made of.

Which leads me to wonder what these "men" are made of.

timosman
11-13-2016, 07:35 PM
https://i.redd.it/l5dywq5pkgxx.jpg

seapilot
11-13-2016, 10:46 PM
Soros busing people around. Watch this vid and see all the buses they used to move the "paid agitators" near the end.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEa8Z_xLRqE

DamianTV
11-14-2016, 04:41 AM
Hmm...

http://www.rense.com/1.mpicons/craigANIM.gif

Oh yeah! And these same people would have paid people to go out and protest Hittlary if she had won also. Agent Provocateurs.

LibertyEagle
11-14-2016, 08:38 AM
The Democrats can use these riots to get political leverage. Typically in an election that is split down the middle like this one, the incoming admin will try to bring or keep someone from the opposing party on board to chill folks out and signal their willingness to do bipartisan work. Bush and Obama' admins did this with Chertoff and Gates, respectively.

If something happens, like agreeing to confirm Obama's SCOTUS nominee, or bringing Jim Webb for Defense, I bet these riots will stop.

Interesting. Be sure and tell them to eat dirt.

LibertyEagle
11-14-2016, 08:41 AM
depends. If Trumplestilskin turns out to be a warmonger then the antiwar dems will come back. If, on the other hand, Trumplestilskin turns out to be a peacemonger, then it will be the neocon dems that emerge.

His name is Trump. Try using it.

GunnyFreedom
11-14-2016, 09:17 AM
His name is Trump. Try using it.

No.

GunnyFreedom
11-14-2016, 09:20 AM
I actually have historically used Trumpaloon's correct name properly at a rate of ~70%

now thanks to LE's panty-wadding I pledge to never use his proper name again outside of a formal context where such is actually required.

Thanks LE!

Root
11-14-2016, 09:49 AM
Trumphumpers gonna hump Trump :rolleyes:

Lucille
11-14-2016, 11:05 AM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-13/blocks-anti-trump-protest-buses-caught-tape


Now, courtesy of a Zero Hedge reader, we have visual confirmation of how a substantial portion of these professional, paid protesters arrive at the site of the protest, in this case Chicago.

As our reader notes, "I have a video of 5 city blocks on the West side of Chicago lined with busses from Wisconsin (Badger Bus Lines) bringing in protestors. The Sears tower is visible in the background."

The video was taken at 3:30pm on South Canal Street in Chicago on Saturday. As our reader points out, hundreds of the participants that took part in the downtown Chicago protests from November 12 were bused in using these vehicles. Other arrived by train.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OVHb-zc4Lw

The Clintons And Soros Launch America's Purple Revolution
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?503938-The-Clintons-And-Soros-Launch-America-s-Purple-Revolution

AZJoe
11-14-2016, 11:10 AM
Letter to the Protesters: http://www.globalresearch.ca/to-the-anti-trump-protesters/5556731


To the protestors: My friends and I missed you when we were protesting the bombing of hospitals and illegal wars.
We missed you at Occupy Peace and the other anti-war rallies we attended and helped organize over the last 8 years.
I have not seen you working to expose the destruction of our civil liberties or the illegal spying on citizens that Obama promised to stop.
I doubt very much that you have donated to or volunteered to work for anti-war and pro-liberty groups who are fighting to stop senseless wars before they start and restore our basic freedoms. (Like I have).
Itís been lonely out there.
I guess you have just been very busy in the last 8 years

tod evans
11-14-2016, 11:12 AM
Do they need gas?

Why aren't these fine cities in ashes by now?

Lucille
11-14-2016, 12:12 PM
Reminds me of cops who yell, "STOP RESISTING!" as they beat people.

Caught On Tape: Portland Rioters Chant "Peaceful Protest" While Throwing Bricks At Trump Motorist
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-14/caught-tape-portland-rioters-chant-peaceful-protest-while-throwing-bricks-trump-moto


In a bit on an ironic twist, the Portland rioters have been caught on film chanting "peaceful protest" all while violently attacking a Trump supporter's vehicle by launching bricks at his windows. Seems these poor, pampered, disaffected snowflakes have completely lost touch with their own "Stronger Together" slogan.

797434677564997632

RJB
11-14-2016, 12:28 PM
I think a good way to judge the character of someone is to ask if they were ever at a rally and chanted, "Hey hey! Ho ho! (Fill in the blank) has got to go!"

Zippyjuan
11-14-2016, 12:37 PM
Please explain.

Politics of division causing a reaction. The country is very divided and the election enhanced the divisions. If Trump lost there would probably still be protesters out- claiming the election was rigged.

seapilot
11-14-2016, 01:02 PM
Politics of division causing a reaction. The country is very divided and the election enhanced the divisions. If Trump lost there would probably still be protesters out- claiming the election was rigged.

I imagine not many would be getting paid like soros agents are . Trump is already indirectly creating jobs and helping unemployment.

Zippyjuan
11-14-2016, 01:14 PM
I see. People only protest if they are paid to do so. Even the Tea Party protesters must have been paid.

UWDude
11-14-2016, 02:19 PM
I see. People only protest if they are paid to do so. Even the Tea Party protesters must have been paid.

"only"

Jamesiv1
11-14-2016, 02:40 PM
Anybody still talking smack about DJ DonMaster Trump is no better than these lame-ass protesters. You need to check yourself, and then come together in peace and love and what not.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gl-UwXwwbOA

pcosmar
11-14-2016, 02:50 PM
I see. People only protest if they are paid to do so. Even the Tea Party protesters must have been paid.

People protest for many reasons.

but the people of Portland are not protesting,,

They are at home hiding from the protests. I know,, because I have family there.

misterx
11-14-2016, 03:04 PM
They had to be paid. This is beyond stupid. You can hate trump, demonstrate peacefully, fine. But these retards think that damaging property is ok because they dont like the election results.

Instead of asking "WHY" Trump won, they're just blaming it "BECAUSE RACISM, SEXISM."

it makes me sick.

They don't have to ask. Certain groups have been told that anything that goes wrong in their lives is the result of racism or sexism, and other groups have been told that they are to blame because of racism and sexism. There's no need to understand anything.

Zippyjuan
11-14-2016, 05:10 PM
Trump said the election was rigged anyways.

misterx
11-14-2016, 07:02 PM
Trump said the election was rigged anyways.

It was. Over 100k absentee ballots filled out by Dems in Broward County.

AZJoe
11-14-2016, 07:05 PM
https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/15036501_1108724725915478_3006743741326689683_n.jp g?oh=a6a6ac32715542f978a44845fdf29241&oe=58932CA0

pcosmar
11-14-2016, 07:56 PM
Trump said the election was rigged anyways.

no doubt.

That was clear when Trump became a Republican.

timosman
11-14-2016, 08:06 PM
I see. People only protest if they are paid to do so. Even the Tea Party protesters must have been paid.

Zippy's logic at work. :cool:

seapilot
11-14-2016, 09:02 PM
Portland, Oregon "protesters" or rioters get arrested and charges likely will be dropped.

http://www.kptv.com/story/33706399/charges-dropped-for-more-than-100-arrested-protesters-pending-further-review?autostart=true


PORTLAND, OR (KPTV) -
Criminal charges against more than 100 people arrested during last week's post-election protests and riot in Portland have been dismissed for the time being, pending further review.

The Portland Police Bureau and the Multnomah County District Attorney's Office released a joint statement saying nearly all off the criminal cases would not be charged and arraigned Monday.

Police and the district attorney said that while those arrested will learn that their cases have been no-complainted for the time being, they will still be reviewed and evaluated for possible prosecution at a later date.

Due to the fluid nature of the ongoing protests over the past several days, most of the arresting officers were on duty, working to protect the city during an emergent event. As such, work is continuing by officers and detectives to complete the necessary reports but they will not be finished in time for today's arraignments and for review by the Multnomah County District Attorney's Office.
Police said hundreds of hours of video evidence must also be collected and reviewed.

Nearly everyone arrested in connection with the protests has at least received or will receive citations on the charge of failing to obey a police officer. Those citations will require a court appearance in a month and carry a fine up to $1,000.

"The sheer number of arrests during protests over the last several days has been an exceptional event and the charges being 'no complainted' today is not unexpected and is a procedural matter given the extensive amount of work left to do in these cases," according to a statement from investigators.

The Portland Police Bureau is continuing to ask for the public's help to identify criminal suspects involved in last week's protests and riot. Officers are also seeking photos or video, apart from already available media coverage, that may identify suspects of the widespread vandalism.

Zippyjuan
11-14-2016, 09:13 PM
Soros busing people around. Watch this vid and see all the buses they used to move the "paid agitators" near the end.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEa8Z_xLRqE

I see busses parked along the streets in a major city (which can be seen all of the time) but I don't see any rioters getting on or off them. What is the proof they were used by them? Anybody find any cancelled checks from their "riot pay"?

UWDude
11-14-2016, 10:27 PM
Mobile home burned down, fuck trump sprayed on neighbor's house, because Trump signs and MAGA sidewalk chalk
http://www.tbo.com/news/crime/hillsborough-authorities-investigating-mobile-home-fire-and-anti-trump-graffiti-in-mango-20161114/

So on one side, we have a bunch of tweets and hoaxes about "guys in trump hats" saying mean things or pulling off burkas, some are proven to be hoaxes.

On the other side are arson, beatings, and vandalism against people for supporting Trump.

Guess which ones get more news coverage. Guess which ones Trump gets asked about on the 60 minutes interview?

pcosmar
11-14-2016, 10:28 PM
I see busses parked along the streets in a major city (which can be seen all of the time) but I don't see any rioters getting on or off them. What is the proof they were used by them? Anybody find any cancelled checks from their "riot pay"?

How about a video documentary of organizers admitting it with their own mouths?

not to mention the already posted advertisements for such employment.

UWDude
11-14-2016, 10:31 PM
How about a video documentary of organizers admitting it with their own mouths?

not to mention the already posted advertisements for such employment.

Russians

pcosmar
11-14-2016, 10:33 PM
Russians
there is that.

but they like my cigarettes and I like their vodka. we trade and party.

seapilot
11-14-2016, 11:00 PM
How about a video documentary of organizers admitting it with their own mouths?

not to mention the already posted advertisements for such employment.

Lots of past proof of same type of activity, but always a few skeptical individuals need to be reminded its the same groups, same organizers, different date. Here is a bit of evidence for these current protesters being paid. There might be some tag a longs protesters, but for the most part it is not authentic and counterfeit.

counterfeit protest at Trump's golf course in Palo Verdes
https://imgur.com/6YWaINp

sponsor: https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=default&q=%23fightthepower

scroll down and read the one post: I will not keep calm...I will raise hell and break sh*t. Nice peaceful people eh!

angelatc
11-15-2016, 09:04 AM
Saw an interview with Bernie Sanders and the purpose of these riots became crystal clear.

These are a threat, pure and simple. A threat of future violence. This is the local thugs coming in and breaking a few things to extort protection money. Make no mistake, these are planned, organized, executed and funded by the usual suspects (Soros at the top of the list). It's meant to intimidate everyone.

When radical Islamists do we call it terrorism.

UWDude
11-16-2016, 12:01 AM
And swatsikas and penisnes and Trump painted on a church brought to you by... ...a pair of liberal Jews now charged with a hate crime,. $50,000 bail each:
http://conservativetribune.com/public-learns-who-was-behind/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=Huckabee&utm_content=2016-11-15&utm_campaign=manualpost

ThePaleoLibertarian
11-16-2016, 01:56 AM
You know, the interesting thing to me was that it was so... delayed. There wasn't some spontaneous pouring out into the streets of angry, disgruntled people who were upset their votes weren't counted. It was quiet, and it was mostly the MSM and little memes, and then suddenly huge groups of people swarming around in a few select cities. Yeah, that doesn't smack of planning on a higher level or anything.
That's not true, at least not entirely. I was in Oakland election night and literally, minutes after Hillary conceded, I heard helicopters and saw at least a couple hundred people in the streets protesting coming from Berkeley.

I don't doubt some protestors are paid, but I'm not sure the rioters are this time. Soros and his ilk are smart enough to know rioting makes their side look bad. There are violent black bloc anarchists who will take any opportunity to riot, and plain crazy people who think that the US just elected Hitler 2.0. When the media portrays a populist who would be at home among the Cold War liberal wing of the Democrat party as a fascist, you can't be surprised when some people freak the fuck out.

goldenequity
11-17-2016, 01:02 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNegGEoohK4#t=199

AZJoe
11-19-2016, 09:00 AM
https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14937293_10154075956577596_2160951350865679885_n.j pg?oh=ef27a3dbec6e162ea6f723f7e30ad02a&oe=58BB657A