View Full Version : Carl Bernstein: Bill Weld may quit race to help Hillary Clinton

09-18-2016, 03:14 PM
Was there ever any doubt this NWO creep was only in this to stop anti-NWO Trump?

And how stupid is Gary Johnson for wanting him on the ticket?





09-18-2016, 03:19 PM
I don't care what party Weld claims to be from, he is a liberal statist and nothing like a Libertarian.

09-18-2016, 04:46 PM

09-18-2016, 04:55 PM

The key words are "could" and "may"- sounds like someone's BS-in' for some publicity & to make sure Johnson takes no states.

09-18-2016, 05:04 PM
The key words are "could" and "may"- sounds like someone's BS-in' for some publicity & to make sure Johnson takes no states.

Yeah. The "WTF" covers a lot of ground.

09-18-2016, 05:05 PM
Yeah. The "WTF" covers a lot of ground.

Agreed. ;)

09-18-2016, 05:07 PM
to stop anti-NWO Trump?

just how many reminders does one need.

James Otis, Jr.
09-18-2016, 06:44 PM
I'm not happy with the Johnson/Weld campaign to say the least. But, come on. I can't believe people on this site are actually buying this complete b.s. Johnson is peeling off young voters from Hillary and the Clinton campaign knows it.

09-18-2016, 06:57 PM
Reporters should stick to reporting the news, not inventing it.

Weld has refuted this story.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/18/media/gary-johnson-debates/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_allpolitics+%28RSS% 3A+CNN+-+Politics%29

In a statement on Sunday afternoon, Weld responded: "Gary Johnson and I will campaign with all our strength to make that case to the American people from now until November 8th. Under no circumstances will our energies be diverted from our goal of winning the election and serving our country."

09-18-2016, 07:01 PM
Bill Weld: Carl Bernstein’s Speculation That I Will Drop Out to Help Hillary Clinton Is ‘Wishful Thinking’

Another beattle boy thread debunked.

09-19-2016, 03:25 AM
Complete bullshit title by somebody who is obviously biased.

If anybody watches the clip the man simply starts it all by saying, "I believe". Then the OP uses the false narrative to attack Gary.

Goddamn, why do we have to go through this sht with some supposed veteran RPF members?

I'd like to think that most of us are above being thrown silly terms like, "NWO" to turn us away from all logical thought. We have to give each other more credit than that.


09-24-2016, 11:19 PM
Gary Johnson blames ‘troll army’ for rumor that running mate might quit

“What happened was that The New York Times came out with an article, saying that somehow we’re a threat to Hillary,” Johnson said. “Overnight, there was an internet troll army unleashed on our campaign. Not only that, but a whole bunch of political pundits somehow came out of the woodwork. It was all very coordinated and it all happened, amazingly, right after that article.”
“Bill Weld does not want to be Ralph Nader, and help elect a president of the United States such as Nader did in Florida in the case of George Bush,” Bernstein said, referring to the 2000 election. “There’s a real underlying story here, and I think in the next few days we’re going to have a chance to look at it.”

Weld quickly dismissed the story as “wishful thinking” and said in a statement that “under no circumstances will our energies be diverted from our goal of winning the election and serving our country.”

Looks like these are sponsored by Priorities USA.

The principal “super PAC (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/c/campaign_finance/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier)” supporting Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy, Priorities USA Action, has concluded from its polling and other research that the reluctance to embrace the Democratic nominee among those who intensely dislike Mr. Trump is not going away and must be confronted.

“We’ll be launching a multimillion-dollar digital campaign that talks about what’s at stake and how a vote for a third-party candidate is a vote for Donald Trump, who is against everything these voters stand for,” said Justin Barasky, a strategist for Priorities USA.

Is it really easier for them to convince libertarians to stay home then actually earn votes?

09-25-2016, 01:11 PM
Even suggesting there's a lesser evil/strategic voting/quitting is death for third parties. The Green Party nominated David Cobb over Nader in 2004, who pushed a safe states strategic voting strategy, and they never recovered. Really weak.