PDA

View Full Version : 15 Years Later, Physics Journal says: All 3 WTC Towers Collapsed Due to Controlled Demolition




Anti Federalist
09-12-2016, 12:18 AM
Shocked, shocked I am...



15 Years Later, Physics Journal Concludes: All 3 WTC Towers Collapsed Due to Controlled Demolition

September 11, 2016

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/physics-study-911-controlled-demolition/

Renowned Physics Journal Concludes in New Study: All 3 WTC Towers Collapsed Due to Controlled Demolition

New York, NY – Over the past 15 years many highly respected academics and experts have come forward to challenge the official narrative on the collapse of the WTC towers forwarded by the U.S. government. The official government position holds that the collapse of all three towers was due to intense heat inside of the buildings.

But a new forensic investigation into the collapse of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11, published in Europhysics News – a highly respected European physics magazine – claims that “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.”

While many in the mainstream have attempted to label anyone questioning the official narrative as “tin foil hat” conspiracy theorist, many highly respected experts have come forward to lampoon the idea that the buildings collapsed due to the intense heat and fires following two terrorist-directed plane crashes.

“Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities,” the four physicists conclude in the damning report.

The new study is the work of Steven Jones, former full professor of physics at Brigham Young University, Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries and Ted Walter, the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a nonprofit organization that today represents more than 2,500 architects and engineers.

The comprehensive study in Europhysics Magazine directly challenges the official narrative and lends to a growing body of evidence that seriously questions the veracity of the government narrative.

In 2002, the National Institute of Standards and Technology remarked that the case was exceptionally bizarre. There were no other known cases of total structural collapses in high-rise buildings caused by fires and so it is deeply unusual that it should have happened three times in the space of one day, noted NIST.

Official investigations have never been able to thoroughly and coherently explain how this might have happened and various teams tasked with examining the collapse have raised difficult questions about the veracity of the government’s story.

Perhaps most damning of all, the experts claimed that after a thorough forensic analysis of video footage of the building’s collapse, it revealed signs of a controlled implosion. Additionally, Jones has co-authored a number of papers documenting evidence of unreacted nano-thermitic material in the WTC dust.

The authors of the study note that the buildings fell with such speed and symmetry that they there was no other feasible explanation for the sudden collapse at free fall speeds – directly refuting studies that attempted to debunk the idea that the building fell without resistance. These respected experts’ new forensic analysis only adds to the growing movement of people calling for a new and impartial investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center.

Revealing the scope and breadth of public disbelief in the official government narrative surrounding the events of 9/11, even presidential candidate Jill Stein has recently called for a new investigation.

Danke
09-12-2016, 12:33 AM
InB4 Zippy.

John F Kennedy III
09-12-2016, 04:08 AM
I remember watching live as they said they were going to "pull" Building 7. It's also visually obvious that Buildings 1 and 2 collapsed at free fall speed. A collapse from fire damage wouldn't have been at free fall speed nor would it have turned the entire building into dust.

libertyjam
09-12-2016, 05:08 AM
I've been thinking about the pile of rubble left, experts have said that there should have been a pile of rubble 20 stories tall if those buildings just fell down. There wasn't, it was only a few stories tall, even accounting for the sub-floors it wasn't enough. Now instead of where did all that material go, wouldn't Occam's be that maybe a lot of it wasn't there to begin with?

John F Kennedy III
09-12-2016, 05:15 AM
I've been thinking about the pile of rubble left, experts have said that there should have been a pile of rubble 20 stories tall if those buildings just fell down. There wasn't, it was only a few stories tall, even accounting for the sub-floors it wasn't enough. Now instead of where did all that material go, wouldn't Occam's be that maybe a lot of it wasn't there to begin with?

Meaning?

libertyjam
09-12-2016, 05:27 AM
Meaning?

What? Meaning it was not there to begin with, what do you mean?

John F Kennedy III
09-12-2016, 05:33 AM
What? Meaning it was not there to begin with, what do you mean?

I figured that's what you meant, but it doesn't make sense. Are you saying supporting structures were hollowed out beforehand?

LibertyEagle
09-12-2016, 05:39 AM
I remember watching live as they said they were going to "pull" Building 7. It's also visually obvious that Buildings 1 and 2 collapsed at free fall speed. A collapse from fire damage wouldn't have been at free fall speed nor would it have turned the entire building into dust.

Yes. The corner of the building was gone, so they apparently expected it to collapse. Something that Alex Jones conveniently didn't show or discuss at the time.

Brian4Liberty
09-12-2016, 09:16 AM
Interesting that the editors issued this caveat about the article:


NOTE FROM THE EDITORS
This feature is somewhat different from our usual purely scientific articles, in that it contains some speculation. However, given the timing and the importance of the issue, we consider that this feature is sufficiently technical and interesting to merit publication for our readers. Obviously, the content of this article is the responsibility of the authors.

Per the conclusion of the actual article, it appears that it is merely a call for a "truly scientific" investigation.


Conclusion

It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? ... Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.

http://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf

libertyjam
09-12-2016, 10:53 AM
I figured that's what you meant, but it doesn't make sense. Are you saying supporting structures were hollowed out beforehand?

Or was never there in the first place, and maybe not supporting structures, but there is a lot that is non-supporting in any building. Cannot draw conclusions it is just an observation. Look around at discussions and there are people who have been investigating different theories on this for quite a while.

Zippyjuan
09-12-2016, 01:11 PM
The new study is the work of Steven Jones,

so not a new work but re-hash of his old ideas.

kfarnan
09-12-2016, 01:53 PM
The truth will be known after they are dead and gone.

Anti Federalist
09-12-2016, 02:12 PM
The truth will be known after they are dead and gone.

This.

The truth will finally come out after everybody that witnessed it or had anything to do with it or remembers it or gives a shit will be dead.

dannno
09-12-2016, 02:20 PM
Yes. The corner of the building was gone, so they apparently expected it to collapse. Something that Alex Jones conveniently didn't show or discuss at the time.

They did not expect it to collapse symmetrically, at near freefall speed, into it's own footprint, because a corner of the building was gone...