PDA

View Full Version : Benghazi Security Sgt "Release the Video". I've seen it it. They Lied.




AZJoe
09-02-2016, 06:16 AM
Benghazi Security Team Sgt. John Tiegen says "Release the consulate video that they have. They have have it. We've seen it." "They knew from the very beginning it was never a protest." Hillary, Obama watched the attack live and then Lied.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBKpBYJuPOk

Release the Video!

juleswin
09-02-2016, 06:35 AM
That was probably the cover story they had for the CIA spooks posing as diplomats out in Al Qaeda land in Benghazi, running weapons to terrorists in Syria. Don't think it would have been better for them to have that in their obituaries.

Talking about things to release, we can also release their agenda at the consulate that fateful night and the names of the people they were meeting with. Regardless of what happened that night, there were working as goons for Hillary and I am sure even they knew that job title came with loads of risks.

AZJoe
09-29-2016, 08:19 PM
https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/benghazi-the-h-is-silent.jpg?w=640

pcosmar
09-29-2016, 08:33 PM
What Consulate?

I can give no credibility for those that can not start honest.


There was no Ambassador and it was not an Embassy. start there.

Arms deals with CIA spooks,,, Whistelblower eliminated.

When some "insider' starts talking about realities rather than the narrative,, I'm interested.

AZJoe
09-30-2016, 05:58 AM
What Consulate?

http://kentimmerman.com/df_files/SpecialMissionCompound.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/96/U.S._mission_and_annex_map_for_2012_Benghazi_attac k.jpg

AZJoe
09-30-2016, 06:10 AM
There was no Ambassador and it was not an Embassy. start there.

The embassy was in Tripoli. The Consulate was in Benghazi. J. Christopher Stevens, the U.S. Ambassador to Libya was at the consulate in Benghazi. The Ambassador was in Benghazi purportedly on a U.S. special mission acting as an arms dealer to coordinate arms shipments to Washington's jihadists to destabilize Libya and overthrow its government. http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/finally-revealed-what-ambassador-in-benghazi-was-really-doing/

pcosmar
09-30-2016, 08:39 AM
The embassy was in Tripoli. The Consulate was in Benghazi. J. Christopher Stevens, the U.S. Ambassador to Libya was at the consulate in Benghazi. The Ambassador was in Benghazi purportedly on a U.S. special mission acting as an arms dealer to coordinate arms shipments to Washington's jihadists to destabilize Libya and overthrow its government. http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/finally-revealed-what-ambassador-in-benghazi-was-really-doing/

Not a consulate.
CIA Staffed..

Calling a Spook House a consulate is dishonest (On the Media/Govt side).

http://www.businessinsider.com/benghazi-stevens-cia-attack-libya-2012-11

"The U.S. effort in Benghazi was at its heart a CIA operation," officials briefed on intelligence told the Wall Street Journal, and there's evidence that U.S. agents—particularly murdered U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens—were at least aware of heavy weapons moving from Libya to Syrian rebels.

Not an Embassy. Not an Ambassador..

An Illegal Arms deal that went sideways. Or perhaps as planned if Stevens was gonna talk.

Ender
09-30-2016, 10:06 AM
That was probably the cover story they had for the CIA spooks posing as diplomats out in Al Qaeda land in Benghazi, running weapons to terrorists in Syria. Don't think it would have been better for them to have that in their obituaries.

Talking about things to release, we can also release their agenda at the consulate that fateful night and the names of the people they were meeting with. Regardless of what happened that night, there were working as goons for Hillary and I am sure even they knew that job title came with loads of risks.

Yep.

pcosmar

What Consulate?

I can give no credibility for those that can not start honest.


There was no Ambassador and it was not an Embassy. start there.

Arms deals with CIA spooks,,, Whistelblower eliminated.

When some "insider' starts talking about realities rather than the narrative,, I'm interested.

And yep.

enhanced_deficit
10-01-2016, 09:59 AM
Some widely reported recent video releases came out after BLM protests. In case of Benghazi, don't think Black Lives Matter has called for release of vid. Do we know what were skin colors of all the folks killed in Benghazi?

AZJoe
10-01-2016, 10:04 AM
Not a consulate. CIA Staffed..

Newsflash for pcosmar: They are all CIA staffed.

pcosmar
10-01-2016, 11:08 AM
Newsflash for pcosmar: They are all CIA staffed.

Not news..

but so are Newsrooms.

AZJoe
10-01-2016, 05:01 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=125&v=6BBAHR4dwNE

AZJoe
10-12-2016, 10:25 PM
Even Hitlary's own advisor, Sidney Blumenthal, blames Hillary for the Benghazi disaster:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CubmjoSUAAEzqag.jpg

Thanks again Wikileaks!

AZJoe
08-03-2017, 05:32 AM
Not an Embassy. Not an Ambassador..

An Illegal Arms deal that went sideways. Or perhaps as planned if Stevens was gonna talk.

Christopher Hitchens was indeed a US ambassador. That is not even in dispute. What he was actually doing was not diplomacy, but covert ops. Which is par for the course for US embassies and consulates.

Saying you are going to ignore all evidence Clinton/Obama wrongdoing at Benghazi because the ambassador was not doing "real" ambassador work (or perhaps that is the real work of US ambassadors these days), is like saying you re going to ignore any evidence of ATF/FBI wrongdoing at Waco because the FBI/ATF were not doing "real" law enforcement at Waco.

Effectively this is saying is that because Clinton/Obama are not being held to account for their operation to arm and support jihadists in Libya, then they should also get off scot free for the intentional decision not to send available rescue and allowing those there to be killed and then lying about it to the American public. One crime does not pardon the other.

nikcers
08-03-2017, 06:48 AM
Effectively this is saying is that because Clinton/Obama are not being held to account for their operation to arm and support jihadists in Libya, then they should also get off scot free for the intentional decision not to send available rescue and allowing those there to be killed and then lying about it to the American public. One crime does not pardon the other.
I think it would be foolish to "punish" the ruling class when there hasn't been sufficient regime change yet. There will be blowback and they are still in control, they can crash this economy or start a war. They would be foolish not to make an example out of biting what they perceive to be "the hand that feeds". I think right now the establishment has enough people fooled but once the people become an actual threat to them they will change their tune, and I hope they don't have a patriot act 2.0 national police state.