PDA

View Full Version : Do we need to understand the enemy in order to win?




Indy Vidual
07-23-2016, 09:55 AM
Option 1:
Simply take away the central power that makes us prisoners in a "free" country by following the words and intent of the 'anti-federal' founding fathers.
Exact path to victory:
Currently unknown.

Option 2: The greatest battle in the history of mankind cannot be won without knowing and understanding the enemy.
Exact path to understanding "the truth":
Currently confusing.

Are we fighting against "human nature", the 1%'ers, an even smaller group of elite criminal families, aliens, NWO, demons, etc?
Do we/you have the time to dive into the rabbit hole and discover the truth?
Will the truth set you free?

Do we need to understand the enemy in order to win?
and/or How can we win without knowing?

Ronin Truth
07-23-2016, 10:49 AM
Sun Tzu would most probably say, yes.

angelatc
07-23-2016, 11:31 AM
Well we certainly do not need them to understand us, that's for sure.

Ronin Truth
07-23-2016, 11:41 AM
"It is hard to fight an enemy who has outposts in your head."

donnay
07-23-2016, 11:43 AM
Option 1:
Simply take away the central power that makes us prisoners in a "free" country by following the words and intent of the 'anti-federal' founding fathers.
Exact path to victory:
Currently unknown.

Option 2: The greatest battle in the history of mankind cannot be won without knowing and understanding the enemy.
Exact path to understanding "the truth":
Currently confusing.

Are we fighting against "human nature", the 1%'ers, an even smaller group of elite criminal families, aliens, NWO, demons, etc?
Do we/you have the time to dive into the rabbit hole and discover the truth?
Will the truth set you free?

Do we need to understand the enemy in order to win?
and/or How can we win without knowing?


I am pretty convinced we are dealing with the supernatural here.

Four hidden dynasties.

Political
Economical
Educational
Demoninational

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMu1yDRqiuQ

Indy Vidual
07-23-2016, 12:03 PM
"It is hard to fight an enemy who has outposts in your head."

I like the quote, but it's hard to tell which side of the question you are on.

Edit: You already answered in the above post ... Oops. :)

Zippyjuan
07-23-2016, 02:09 PM
Can you take away their power without knowing where that power is? Unplugging the microwave won't stop the dishwasher from working. If you want to kill a rat, you don't shoot it in the tail.

oyarde
07-23-2016, 05:55 PM
Sun Tzu would most probably say, yes.
" It is said if you know your enemies and know yourself , you will not be imperiled in 100 battles "

presence
07-23-2016, 06:25 PM
How can we win without knowing?

agorism

CaptUSA
07-23-2016, 06:36 PM
Have you been reading these forums, lately??

http://www.myjewishlearning.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/kelly_pogo_earthday.jpg

Schifference
07-23-2016, 06:40 PM
How could anyone possibly understand the enemy? They are everywhere. Before you can understand you need to identify. Probably easier to identify the non-enemy.

bunklocoempire
07-24-2016, 03:30 AM
" It is said if you know your enemies and know yourself , you will not be imperiled in 100 battles "

My best bet to control someone, is to not let them know their true self, and to help pit them against someone or something else.

There is a very good reason that America is painted as "exceptional".

P3ter_Griffin
07-24-2016, 06:14 PM
If you know the enemy you can see where their resources are being driven and attempt to neutralize those efforts, which if successful will demoralize the enemy and hold them without progress. I think knowledge is power, so even if it is unnecessary to know thy enemy to defeat them it will lead to a more efficient victory. And yet, knowing the enemy doesn't necessarily mean you're going to win either!

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?497750-1958-Interview-With-Aldous-Huxley

specifically this

https://www.scribd.com/doc/290885467/Democracy-Alliance-State-Funds-Fall-2015

If you have this kind of information you can see what is happening and more properly react.