PaleoPaul
05-02-2016, 12:00 PM
Oh, this is too glorious and too juicy. Once a worshiper of the Floridian robot, she now questions whether he was truly ready for primetime and if he was just a fluke.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/05/02/rubio-a-phenom-who-rose-too-quickly-or-was-he-never-going-to-make-it/?postshare=1481462210026799&tid=ss_tw
And yet there had been warning signs that the exterior charm and eloquence were not matched by internal fortitude and mature judgment. After a heroic effort on immigration reform, he not only went mute when the bill left the Senate, but he also plunged head-long into the inane shutdown effort. He did not lead the charge, but he mimicked the ridiculous arguments (e.g. the president would be the one shutting down the government, the public’s anger over Obamacare would carry the day). It seemed a blatant effort to patch things up with the far right, which had become infuriated with his immigration effort.
Then there was the Syria “red line.” If ever there was an issue that demanded Rubio’s support, this was it. He, more than most, understood the enormity of the ongoing bloodbath, the risk that jihadists would take hold and the essential task of projecting U.S. power. Yet once again he blinked, siding with the far right, refusing to take the intellectually consistent and courageous position in support of a military strike.
Next came Rubio’s opposition to an aid bill for Ukraine, opposed by the far right because it contained a reform of the dreaded International Monetary Fund.
:D
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/05/02/rubio-a-phenom-who-rose-too-quickly-or-was-he-never-going-to-make-it/?postshare=1481462210026799&tid=ss_tw
And yet there had been warning signs that the exterior charm and eloquence were not matched by internal fortitude and mature judgment. After a heroic effort on immigration reform, he not only went mute when the bill left the Senate, but he also plunged head-long into the inane shutdown effort. He did not lead the charge, but he mimicked the ridiculous arguments (e.g. the president would be the one shutting down the government, the public’s anger over Obamacare would carry the day). It seemed a blatant effort to patch things up with the far right, which had become infuriated with his immigration effort.
Then there was the Syria “red line.” If ever there was an issue that demanded Rubio’s support, this was it. He, more than most, understood the enormity of the ongoing bloodbath, the risk that jihadists would take hold and the essential task of projecting U.S. power. Yet once again he blinked, siding with the far right, refusing to take the intellectually consistent and courageous position in support of a military strike.
Next came Rubio’s opposition to an aid bill for Ukraine, opposed by the far right because it contained a reform of the dreaded International Monetary Fund.
:D