PDA

View Full Version : Do you see "superpredator" and "predator drone" as offensive terms?




enhanced_deficit
02-27-2016, 07:39 PM
Regardless of whther you are R/D/Indie.. are for or against SWCs Hillary/dronegangsta, do you see "superpredator" and "predator drone" as offensive terms?

Hillary Clinton Interrupted [2/24/16] "I am NOT a Superpredator."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqLfvQfuvsA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqLfvQfuvsA

This Video SHOULD Cost Hillary Clinton The Black Vote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8k4nmRZx9nc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8k4nmRZx9nc

Obama Jokes About Predator Drones

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArlKPSEHGLg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArlKPSEHGLg


http://radio.foxnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/obama-predator-drone.jpg

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-07-29-15droneC1.png
http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-07-29-15droneC1.png

http://lybio.net/wp-content/uploads/Hillary-Clinton-Black-Lives-Matter-Activist-Not-A-Superpredator.jpg

CPUd
02-27-2016, 08:54 PM
http://i.imgur.com/L0o1rJv.jpg

Dianne
02-27-2016, 10:32 PM
They are all so cute.. The chosen ones, but I certainly whish a super predator would come from nowhere and rid this universe from these sleeze balls. Jesus? Please?

Weston White
02-28-2016, 12:59 AM
http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/880/998/0f9.jpg

Voluntarist
02-28-2016, 02:03 PM
xxxxx

DamianTV
02-28-2016, 06:07 PM
Please explain "offensive term" a bit more clearly, I see two possible interpretations: #1 emotionally offended, and #2 considered as "military offensive weapons". If #1 then no, if #2 then yes.

enhanced_deficit
02-28-2016, 11:44 PM
Messed up in edit, option 4 was meant to be:

"predator drone is not an offensive term"



Please explain "offensive term" a bit more clearly, I see two possible interpretations: #1 emotionally offended, and #2 considered as "military offensive weapons". If #1 then no, if #2 then yes.


It is a subjective question and answer would depend on individual emotional/political/social sensibilities and priorities I suppose. If I have to pick one, I guess "emotionally offensive" would be close enough.

On second thought, quantification of opinions here may not be so crucial but rather views of others for terms like superpredator/predator drone would be informative.

Ronin Truth
02-29-2016, 09:04 AM
Not as offensive as 'superprey' and 'prey drone' terms.

DamianTV
02-29-2016, 04:43 PM
Messed up in edit, option 4 was meant to be:

"predator drone is not an offensive term"





It is a subjective question and answer would depend on individual emotional/political/social sensibilities and priorities I suppose. If I have to pick one, I guess "emotionally offensive" would be close enough.

On second thought, quantification of opinions here may not be so crucial but rather views of others for terms like superpredator/predator drone would be informative.

Thanks for the clarification.

Honestly, Im not sure if its offensive. Im all about saving lives, and at the same time, I think its a chickenshit way to fight when far too often, its innocent civilians that get killed and then the value of their lives is ignored because they were considered "collateral damage". Then we look at the survivors to those that are killed and wonder "why they hate us"?

I think the "drone" part itself is more offensive than either "predator" or "superpredator". Its like the status quo is so mentally ill that they genuinely believe they are doing the world good by putting drones that both kill and conduct surveillance, not just over enemy land, but our own as well. If their conclusion is "all people need to have all their human behaviors regulated by autonomous drones", then whether any person is truly innocent or is truly guilty, they are treated as if they are all guilty, and true innocence itself offers zero protections from their authority, and because so many people feel threatened, it undermines the concept of security.

Perhaps my own reaction of offense to the "drone" part comes not from the drone itself, but the ways in which the powers that be seek to abuse that power.

Suzanimal
02-29-2016, 05:12 PM
I find droning people offensive, I don't give a fuck what they call 'em.

Dr.3D
02-29-2016, 05:21 PM
I suspect those being droned find those terms more offensive than those who are not being droned.

Slave Mentality
03-02-2016, 03:49 PM
- Superpredator is a trigger word for me to go to Safe Space and watch Arnold kick some ass.

- Predator Drone = Danny Glover's acting in Predator 2

Now I feel as if this whole thread is a microagression.

Superpredator --> Watch Predator -- > Think about Danny Glover --> He was in Lethal Weapon --> And Gone Fishin' --> Joe Pesci was in lethal weapon AND Gone Fishing too --> Joe Pesci's voice is offensive to me --> I hate Joe Pesci for no reason and I think Danny Glover isn't very smart for no reason --> Hearing that dumb SOB yelling "Riggs" makes me want to punch faces --> Mel Gibson is "Riggs" --> Mel Gibson knows how to get drunk as a pig --> Lethal Weapon was a police state propoganda film --> That hurts my feelings and now my Safe Space has been violated!

Thread reported for being offensive.

RonPaulIsGreat
03-02-2016, 09:32 PM
Media tells me all males are natural predators that wish to subjugate and rape, and only via intense education and systems of control can males be stopped from destroying the world. Black males according to the crime stats act most violently of all male racial groups, therefore they would be according to modern day wisdom deemed super predators.

enhanced_deficit
07-09-2016, 10:02 AM
Thanks for the clarification.

Honestly, Im not sure if its offensive. Im all about saving lives, and at the same time, I think its a chicken$#@! way to fight when far too often, its innocent civilians that get killed and then the value of their lives is ignored because they were considered "collateral damage". Then we look at the survivors to those that are killed and wonder "why they hate us"?

I think the "drone" part itself is more offensive than either "predator" or "superpredator". Its like the status quo is so mentally ill that they genuinely believe they are doing the world good by putting drones that both kill and conduct surveillance, not just over enemy land, but our own as well. If their conclusion is "all people need to have all their human behaviors regulated by autonomous drones", then whether any person is truly innocent or is truly guilty, they are treated as if they are all guilty, and true innocence itself offers zero protections from their authority, and because so many people feel threatened, it undermines the concept of security.

Perhaps my own reaction of offense to the "drone" part comes not from the drone itself, but the ways in which the powers that be seek to abuse that power.


Good analysis.