PDA

View Full Version : Twitter's Orwellian Trust and Safety Council




Lucille
02-20-2016, 02:35 PM
I quit following RSM's twitter and blog when he stopped featuring Ron, and started sucking up to the neocons and pushing for moar war. That said, Anita Sarkeesian is a lying, misandric, fascist bitch.

Twitter has made a huge mistake, and is going to destroy itself.

https://reason.com/blog/2016/02/20/did-twitters-orwellian-trust-and-safety


Remember a few days ago, when Twitter elevated anti-GamerGate leader Anita Sarkeesian to its “Trust and Safety Council,” an imperious-sounding committee with Robespierre-esque powers to police discussion on the social media platform? The goal, according to Twitter, was to make it easier for users to express themselves freely and safely.

One user who won’t be expressing himself at all is Robert Stacy McCain: a conservative journalist, blogger, self-described anti-feminist, and prominent GamerGate figure who was banned from Twitter on Friday night. Clicking on his page redirects to this “account suspended” message that encourages users to re-read Twitter’s policies on abusive behavior.

But as with other Twitter suspensions, it’s impossible to tell which specific policy McCain is accused of violating, or which of his tweets were flagged as abusive. McCain is an animated and uncompromising opponent of leftist views. His statements are extreme, and I don’t often agree with them, but I would be reluctant to label them as abusive (at least the ones I’ve seen).

In a response to his banning that is in many ways emblematic of his worldview and behavior, McCain explicitly blamed Sarkeesian and her crew:


This is why you can’t even state FACTS about these people on Twitter without being accused of “harassment.” Facts are harassment and truth is hate and Oceania Has Always Been at War With Eastasia. Sarkesian is anti-freedom because she is anti-truth. She and her little squad of soi-disant “feminists” are just hustlers looking for a free ride, and the only way they can get that ride is to silence anyone who speaks the truth about them and calls them out as the cheap bullshit artists they actually are.
[...]
Twitter is a private company, of course, and if it wants to outlaw strong language, it can. In fact, it’s well within its rights to have one set of rules for Robert Stacy McCain, and another set of rules for everyone else. It’s allowed to ban McCain for no reason other than its bosses don’t like him. If Twitter wants to take a side in the online culture war, it can. It can confiscate Milo Yiannopoulos’s blue checkmark. This is not about the First Amendment.

But if that’s what Twitter is doing, it’s certainly not being honest about it—and its many, many customers who value the ethos of free speech would certainly object. In constructing its Trust and Safety Council, the social media platform explicitly claimed it was trying to strike a balance between allowing free speech and prohibiting harassment and abuse. But its selections for this committee were entirely one-sided—there’s not a single uncompromising anti-censorship figure or group on the list. It looks like Twitter gave control of its harassment policy to a bunch of ideologues, and now their enemies are being excluded from the platform.

Banning McCain wasn’t even Twitter’s only questionable activity last night. It seems that Twitter also suppressed the pro-McCain hashtag subsequently created by his supporters, #FreeStacy. After it started trending, Twitter made it so that the hashtag wouldn’t autocomplete when people typed it. “The #FreeStacy tag would be in the US top 10 now, but Twitter has scrubbed it,” wrote Popehat’s Patrick on Twitter.


They're shadowbanning even more.

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2016/02/shadowbanned-by-sjws.html


Rumours that Twitter has begun ‘shadowbanning’ politically inconvenient users have been confirmed by a source inside the company, who spoke exclusively to Breitbart Tech. His claim was corroborated by a senior editor at a major publisher.

According to the source, Twitter maintains a ‘whitelist’ of favoured Twitter accounts and a ‘blacklist’ of unfavoured accounts. Accounts on the whitelist are prioritised in search results, even if they’re not the most popular among users. Meanwhile, accounts on the blacklist have their posts hidden from both search results and other users’ timelines.

Lucille
02-21-2016, 10:07 AM
The "Tweet Police" Strike!
http://wendymcelroy.com/news.php?extend.6954


Well, that didn't take long. From Instapundit I learn that conservative journalist Robert Stacy McCain ("The Other McCain") has been banned from Twitter....for no stated reason.

Robby Soave at Reason: Did Twitter's Orwellian 'Trust and Safety' Council Get Robert Stacy McCain Banned?

Banning McCain wasn’t even Twitter’s only questionable activity last night. It seems that Twitter also suppressed the pro-McCain hashtag subsequently created by his supporters, #FreeStacy. After it started trending, Twitter made it so that the hashtag wouldn’t autocomplete when people typed it. “The #FreeStacy tag would be in the US top 10 now, but Twitter has scrubbed it,” wrote Popehat’s Patrick on Twitter.

McCain was known to be critical of Anita Sarkeesian, a professional complainer who was inexplicably given a place on Twitter's "Trust and Safety" council. (Or as I call it, MiniSafe.) So there you have it: cross Sarkeesian, and say goodbye to your Twitter account.

More at Da Tech Guy Blog (with several more links there), Legal Insurrection, and McCain's own blog. Update: also Popehat.

"MiniSafe." That's good!

ThePaleoLibertarian
02-21-2016, 05:07 PM
Why do profit-driven corporations give so much credence to these SJWs? Outside of their university social-justice bubble, they look like complete morons to everyone else. Companies that tell them to fuck themselves will do well, those that bend will lose share price. It's like clockwork.

mikey
02-21-2016, 08:13 PM
Why do profit-driven corporations give so much credence to these SJWs? Outside of their university social-justice bubble, they look like complete morons to everyone else. Companies that tell them to fuck themselves will do well, those that bend will lose share price. It's like clockwork.

The main headquarters is located in San Francisco, the SJW capital. In fact, if you look at a lot of these SJW businesses they are most likely based in San Francisco.

Lucille
10-03-2016, 02:32 PM
Twitter shadowbanned Adams. He thought it was a conspiracy theory until he became an object of twitter's conspiracy.

783032227797999616

783036505858068480

I'm in line for Gab: https://gab.ai/

Lucille
10-03-2016, 02:38 PM
Of course, Milo was perma-banned for what other people were saying under his tweets. He's at Gab, which is why I signed up.

http://regated.com/2016/08/gab-ai-sees-continued-success-week-one/


Gab.ai has also already started to gain attention from high-profile celebrity like Milo Yiannopoulos, the controversial technology editor from Breitbart News. Milo, or “@m” as he is known as on Gab, was permanently banned from Twitter in July after being suspended various times and also “unverified” without any logical reason given by Twitter. High profile cases of censorship like Milo’s will surely help Gab gain traction, and it seems it already has.

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/09/34534545-640x480.png

http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/09/29/screwnero-written-blackboard-twitter-hq/