PDA

View Full Version : Feds Seek National "Distracted Driving" Ban; <.05 BAC; More Seatbelt Tickets




presence
01-15-2016, 06:38 PM
http://www.ntsb.gov/safety/mwl/Pages/default.aspx


The NTSB believes that not only should more automakers offer collision avoidance technologies as standard features in their vehicles, but that consumers should not have to purchase a luxury option package to get the safety benefits of these technologies. []

Saving lives and reducing injuries from crashes depends on the broad deployment of these technologies in all new passenger and commercial vehicles.



we called for a driver ban for all PEDs. We have issued similar recommendations for aviation, marine, and rail. The public agrees. In June 2014, the National Safety Council reported that 73 percent of drivers think that more enforcement of texting laws is needed.


When it comes to alcohol use, we know that impairment begins before a person’s BAC reaches 0.08 percent, the current legal limit in the United States. In fact, by the time it reaches that level, the risk of a fatal crash has more than doubled. That is why states should lower BAC levels to 0.05— or even lower.


In order to increase seat belt and child restraint use in motor vehicles, we must take a three-pronged approach: legislation, enforcement, and education. Strong occupant restraint laws are critical. Primary enforcement sends a message to motorists that seat belt use is an important safety issue.

DamianTV
01-15-2016, 07:20 PM
More excuses to hide behind under the guise of "making people safer" while just taking more money from people that are already so broke that they cant afford to defend themselves. How long until having a passenger in your car is considered a "distraction"? Yes, slippery slope argument, but Cui Bono, who benefits? Follow the money. Oh, self driving car makers, thats who.


legislation, enforcement, and education

Legislation - Legalize theft of victimless crimes requiring obedience to the law
Enforcement - Force the theft of money for victimless crimes enforcing obedience
Education - Teach people obedience

All about obedience to those that take your money.

rg17
01-15-2016, 07:27 PM
Just another excuse for more authoritarian government.

phill4paul
01-15-2016, 07:43 PM
What they mean...


we must take a three-pronged approach: legislation, enforcement, and education that compliance will be made through enforcement and legislation.

Anti Federalist
01-15-2016, 07:43 PM
When it comes to alcohol use, we know that impairment begins before a person’s BAC reaches 0.08 percent, the current legal limit in the United States. In fact, by the time it reaches that level, the risk of a fatal crash has more than doubled. That is why states should lower BAC levels to 0.05— or even lower.

Just make it zero, and give cops the authority, that they mostly already have, to execute you if they so much as smell a whiff of alcohol.

Anti Federalist
01-15-2016, 07:44 PM
So much safety and authority...having a safety-gasm here.

http://i.imgur.com/YVNwS.jpg

phill4paul
01-15-2016, 07:53 PM
So much safety and authority...having a safety-gasm here.

http://i.imgur.com/YVNwS.jpg

We didn't see this coming did we, brother? Imma all kinds of shocked. Glad MADD is there to take things one step further instead of folding up when they reached their last goal.

pcosmar
01-15-2016, 07:58 PM
would a "told ya so" be out of line?

phill4paul
01-15-2016, 08:17 PM
would a "told ya so" be out of line?

Not at all. I'd say if someone checked the "wayback" on RPF to some of the DWI posts in 2008 you, AF, myself and many others knew it was already in the pipeline.

bunklocoempire
01-16-2016, 02:25 AM
The booze lobby is cool with thi$?

Come on booze lobby, show us what ya got one more time... you finally took a hit in the cannabis war, time to really dig in your heels on this one.

mrsat_98
01-16-2016, 02:34 AM
More excuses to hide behind under the guise of "making people safer" while just taking more money from people that are already so broke that they cant afford to defend themselves. How long until having a passenger in your car is considered a "distraction"? Yes, slippery slope argument, but Cui Bono, who benefits? Follow the money. Oh, self driving car makers, thats who.



Legislation - Legalize theft of victimless crimes requiring obedience to the law
Enforcement - Force the theft of money for victimless crimes enforcing obedience
Education - Teach people obedience

All about obedience to those that take your money.

BS , it's for the children and its contributes to global warming, get your facts right.

Origanalist
01-16-2016, 02:41 AM
If there is anyone here who didn't see this coming, I want some of whatever you're taking.

DamianTV
01-16-2016, 05:22 PM
BS , it's for the children and its contributes to global warming, get your facts right.

My bad!

*reports self*