PDA

View Full Version : BREAKING: Longest ARMED STANDOFF in U.S. History Ends With This BIZARRE Finish… Media Silent




mrsat_98
01-12-2016, 05:02 AM
I wonder if he got the taste out of his mouth ?

http://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/2016/01/11/longest-standoff-history-ends/#

TEXAS- After almost 15 years, what is believed to be the longest armed standoff in American history quietly came to a peaceful end.

This longest armed standoff in U.S. history began in 1999 when Gray, a carpenter linked to various anti-government militia groups, was charged with assaulting a police officer during a traffic stop, according to WFAA-TV. The officer initially took issue with the fact that Gray, now 66, was carrying a pistol without a concealed carry permit while Gray insisted that he had a a God-given right to carry his weapon thanks to the Second Amendment.

However, during the ensuing scuffle, Gray admitted to biting the officer, TheBlaze reports.



Gray was jailed and charged with assaulting a state trooper before he was released on bond in 2000. But when he was ordered to appear in court, he opted instead to remain on his 47-acre private property with his wife, his children and his grandchildren — all of whom were armed and ready to patrol the barbed-wire fences surrounding the property, according to the New York Times. Gray did not step off his property for nearly 15 years.

“If they come out after us, bring extra body bags. Those who live by the sword will die by the sword,” Gray Gray told ABC News in a 2000 interview. “We’ve never shot no one yet. But they know, if they come on us, they’ll be surprised what’s going to happen to them.”

And for those 15 years, local government officials heeded his warning and left the Grays alone, isolating the property making sure that nobody was harmed around the property.

Eventually, the standoff came to close in December 2014 when Douglas E. Lowe, then the district attorney of nearby Anderson County, dismissed the charges against Gray — even though no one informed Nutt or the Grays themselves of the dismissal in 2014 until reporters approached them this week.

“I didn’t do that to concede victory to that guy,” Lowe told the Times. “It had been going on for 15 years, and somebody just had to make a decision that it was time to say it’s over.”

phill4paul
01-12-2016, 08:13 AM
Huzzah for John Joe Gray! Huzzah! Huzzah! Huzzah!

otherone
01-12-2016, 08:27 AM
“I didn’t do that to concede victory to that guy,” Lowe told the Times. “It had been going on for 15 years, and somebody just had to make a decision that it was time to say it’s over.”

It's not about the law.
It's not about public safety.
It's about winning.
It's a game to these assholes.

osan
01-12-2016, 02:57 PM
Holy crap... people in government doing something right is now so rare that when it happens I become seriously disoriented.

I am glad he stood his ground. Hopefully, the cop he bit contracted rabies and died. Yeah, I know...

PaulConventionWV
01-13-2016, 04:39 PM
It's not about the law.
It's not about public safety.
It's about winning.
It's a game to these assholes.

Let's not be overly dramatic. There is such a thing as winning a trial while still maintaining its serious nature. You don't turn something into a game just by alluding to the possibility of victory.

otherone
01-13-2016, 05:07 PM
Let's not be overly dramatic. There is such a thing as winning a trial while still maintaining its serious nature. You don't turn something into a game just by alluding to the possibility of victory.

Are you familiar with the innocence project, and prosecutors who refuse to retry innocent men in the face of overwhelming evidence, due to hubris? You understand the prosecutors are judged not by meting justice, but on their win/loss record? Serious nature? How many head coaches were fired this year over a "game"?

PaulConventionWV
01-13-2016, 05:20 PM
Are you familiar with the innocence project, and prosecutors who refuse to retry innocent men in the face of overwhelming evidence, due to hubris? You understand the prosecutors are judged not by meting justice, but on their win/loss record? Serious nature? How many head coaches were fired this year over a "game"?

I'm just saying, the mere term "winning" doesn't trivialize it. It's just the way the language is.