PDA

View Full Version : Giving Drunks a Ride Home Could Be a $500 Fine in the “Live Free Or Die” State




EBounding
12-31-2015, 02:03 PM
I think this is literally the definition of a Racket.

http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/giving-drunks-a-ride-home-on-new-years-could-be-a-500-fine-in-the-live-free-or-die-state/


If you’re giving a drunk person a ride home in Portsmouth, New Hampshire this New Year’s Eve you could face a stiff fine. To be sure, you better not accept any gas money or a tip for your time. It’s part of the city’s crackdown aimed at the ride share service Uber. For one local man, the regulation spurred the idea to launch a free ride service for the holiday in protest.

“I just want to get as many people home safely as possible,” said Christopher David when I spoke with him on the phone.

David is a libertarian and a Free State Project activist. He says that the Portsmouth regulation and enforcement of ride share restrictions are motivated by pressure being exerted by special interests; specifically the owner of the area’s largest taxi company, Great Bay Taxi. As is usual in areas where Uber has begun to operate, companies like Great Bay Taxi lobby to restrict Uber’s operation as a way of limiting competition. In Portsmouth, it has gone even farther.

Great Bay’s owner, John Palreiro, actually pulled his cabs out of the city the night before Thanksgiving in protest. He threatened to do the same on New Year’s Eve unless the city cracked down and began enforcing an existing ordinance against Uber.

The restrictions and pressure angered David, who used to drive for Uber.

“There’s police officers chasing down Uber drivers instead of looking for drunk drivers or helping people,” he told me.

In protest, David has organized a free ride share service for the evening. He’s already had 40 passengers sign up for rides. David and the 10 drivers he has organized will be doing a great service for the community, providing safe rides for people who will most likely be inebriated. Originally, David and his drivers were going to accept tips, but when local police got word of their plans their intention were reported as such:

Portsmouth Acting Deputy Police Chief Frank Warchol disagreed. If the drivers offer completely free rides, “then it doesn’t fall under the ordinance,” he said. “If they accept donations, they would fall under the ordinance.”

h/t SeaCostOnline

The penalty for violating the ordinance is $500 for the first offense, $1,000 for any subsequent offense.

So David assures me that for tonight all rides will given completely free of any compensation. But he doesn’t plan on stopping there.

“My plan is to launch a decentralized competitor to Uber,” David informed me.

He’s already in the process of developing an app which he says will launch in about a month’s time. It’s called Arcade City.

“The police are already threatening to fine users and it isn’t even out yet,” David laughed.

For this Free Stater, it’s just another day bucking authority and pushing back against unreasonable restrictions.



Rand interviewed Chris a few months ago:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLMA_6yi9a8

Spikender
12-31-2015, 02:12 PM
More like "Live a Slave and Die Weak".

Great video by the way, never saw that interview with Rand as the interviewer. Nice twist. Though I guess it's more like a dialogue.

nobody's_hero
12-31-2015, 02:16 PM
LOL, if I lived closer I'd definitely be giving free rides. Sounds like Great Bay taxi service needs to go out of business.

invisible
12-31-2015, 02:36 PM
Well, it isn't the driver's fault if a drunk passenger in the back seat happens to drop a few dollars on the floor as they get out of the vehicle.

jkr
12-31-2015, 03:42 PM
Atlas
Drove

presence
12-31-2015, 04:54 PM
example number 981723476 why my country is FUCKED

Danke
12-31-2015, 05:19 PM
Shouldn't the proper term be "under the influence" or inebriated ?

I though "drunk" was a trigger word.

Ronin Truth
01-01-2016, 09:01 AM
No good deed goes unpunished.

donnay
01-01-2016, 09:15 AM
So when the cops drives the drunk to jail, isn't that a violation? After all the cop is getting paid to do this. :rolleyes:

qh4dotcom
01-01-2016, 09:43 AM
It's a bad idea to give drunk people a ride...........because they can vomit while inside the car....as it happened to me once....the cleanup was not fun.

Danke
01-01-2016, 11:08 AM
It's a bad idea to give drunk people a ride...........because they can vomit while inside the car....as it happened to me once....the cleanup was not fun.

Could bring along some bags.

LibertyEagle
01-01-2016, 11:42 AM
LOL, if I lived closer I'd definitely be giving free rides. Sounds like Great Bay taxi service needs to go out of business.

The city probably makes tons off of the license, or whatever it's called, that they sell to taxis. Which is probably why the taxi service is pressuring the city to stop Uber. Get rid of the licenses and voila, no problemo.

FindLiberty
01-01-2016, 01:21 PM
...was a trigger word.

Whoa, THAT ALSO NEEDS A "CONTENT WARNING" since it could invoke scary thoughts regarding the operation of a weapon's kill switch.

Philhelm
01-02-2016, 08:37 AM
The city probably makes tons off of the license, or whatever it's called, that they sell to taxis. Which is probably why the taxi service is pressuring the city to stop Uber. Get rid of the licenses and voila, no problemo.

Not to mention the money they make from DUI's.