PDA

View Full Version : John Cox: CA Ballot Initiative Would Require Legislators to Wear Top Donor Logos




timosman
12-28-2015, 04:07 PM
http://www.californiaisnotforsale.com/2015/11/06/new-ballot-initiative-launches-that-will-require-politicians-to-wear-logos-of-top-donors/


San Diego entrepreneur John Cox filed the California Is Not For Sale ballot initiative on the 27th of October 2015, a reform that will require members of the California State Assembly and Senate to wear the logos of their top 10 campaign contributors while acting in any official capacity.

The campaign is being launched in three cities this week: San Diego, Los Angeles, and San Jose. The California Is Not For Sale initiative will be staging protests using cutouts of all 120 current Assembly members and Senators who will be covered in the logos of their campaign supporters. Last September, the campaign was run in Sacramento on the steps of the California State Capitol (see attached photos).

The initiative comes on the heels of major corruption cases, like California State Senator Ron Calderon who was arrested earlier this year. Time Magazine reported in late 2014 that money spent on political campaigns nationally has increased by 500% since 1985.

“That money comes from wealthy companies and special interests that curry favor with elected officials. It is totally legal according to the laws on the books, but they are able to wield incredible power in our State,” said Cox.

The new rules have a purpose. According to the California Is Not For Sale organization, when elected officials stand on the floor of the Assembly or Senate to advocate for policy that will affect everyone in the State, potential conflicts of interest stemming from their campaign finance will be visible on their person.

“If an Assemblyman argues for oil companies to have the right to drill in our state forests because he is generously funded by wealthy oil corporations, the average citizen would not know,” said Cox. “Under these new rules, that conflict of interest would be sewn onto his chest for everyone to see.”

Title and Summary is expected to be approved by December and the organization will launch an active signature gathering campaign on January 1, 2016.


http://www.oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/15-0097%20%28Political%20Contributions%29.pdf


87102.9. (a) When providing testimony or participating in any vote of a State legislative
committee or subcommittee, or any rollcall vote on the floor of the Senate or Assembly, every
elected state officer shall display on his or her person the names of the persons who have made
the ten highest cumulative contributions to the officer's controlled comrnittee(s). The disclosure
required by this Section shall be printed clearly and legibly, be conspicuous and in a type size
sufficient that it can be read by a member of the public observing any public session of the
Legislature or a Committee thereof.

dannno
12-28-2015, 04:14 PM
Not as good as Rand's idea to prevent companies who contract with government from making political donations, but pretty creative. I think I can support this.

I presume unions are included?

Dr.3D
12-28-2015, 04:19 PM
It would be interesting to see them looking like NASCAR drivers.

timosman
12-28-2015, 04:27 PM
I presume unions are included?

Seems so - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jessica-riley-/the-most-hilarious-politi_b_8084136.html


these cutouts weren't just random people, they were the 120 members of the California Legislature and those logos covering their bodies, weren't selected at random. They were custom placed based on which company or union had contributed to each individual politician.

UWDude
12-28-2015, 05:41 PM
what a day that would be.

enhanced_deficit
12-29-2015, 11:45 AM
I don't know this could start a troubling trend for other jurisdictions too.
If such a law passed in Congress, sitting nTool could look like this.



John Cox: CA Ballot Initiative Would Require Legislators to Wear Top Donor Logos





http://static.libsyn.com/p/assets/f/e/0/c/fe0cfae1abb641bb/DGP_Logo.jpghttp://www.oratorio.com/wp-content/timthumb.php?src=http://www.oratorio.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Goldman-Sachs.gif&h=100&w=200&zc=0http://www.baylorpress.com/media/SWC_logo.jpg (http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/04/20/obama.goldman.donations/)


Goldman Sachs was top Obama donor
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/04/20/obama.goldman.donations/
Apr 20, 2010


Pastor: Obama a puppet of bankers (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7plDxu-0rBA&feature=player_detailpage#t=171s)

nobody's_hero
12-29-2015, 11:54 AM
I'd be surprised if it actually made any difference.

Finding out who funds who is not all that difficult. http://www.opensecrets.org/ , and there are others.

The problem is that people want to remain willfully ignorant that their chosen candidate could ever be tainted by dirty money.

timosman
12-29-2015, 12:00 PM
The problem is that people want to remain willfully ignorant that their chosen candidate could ever be tainted by dirty money.

This would take ignorance to a next level. It might be hard to pretend initially but I am sure we would get a good spin on it with time and things would get back to "normal".

timosman
01-27-2016, 12:38 PM
dup - http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?489090-California-politicians-to-don-donor-logos-if-ballot-initiative-succeeds

Zippyjuan
01-27-2016, 02:41 PM
I'd be surprised if it actually made any difference.

Finding out who funds who is not all that difficult. http://www.opensecrets.org/ , and there are others.

The problem is that people want to remain willfully ignorant that their chosen candidate could ever be tainted by dirty money.


Can you imagine Ron Paul wearing his "Top Donors" logos according to Open Secrets? http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/contrib.php?cycle=2012&id=n00005906


US Army $113,933
US Navy $91,100
US Air Force $88,102
US Dept of Defense $42,500
Google Inc $42,478
Boeing Co $30,724
US Marine Corps $30,708
Microsoft Corp $30,259
IBM Corp $26,998
US Government $26,467
Intel Corp $24,046
Lockheed Martin $23,370
Northrop Grumman $22,684

However- they note:


This table lists the top donors to this candidate in the 2012 election cycle. The organizations themselves did not donate , rather the money came from the organizations' PACs, their individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.

Zippyjuan
01-27-2016, 02:41 PM
Double post.

Suzanimal
01-27-2016, 03:17 PM
Double post.

I double posted timmy.:o