Rand Paul Monday Morning News Blitz.

[hells_unicorn]

Rather than create 3 different threads, I'll just embed all 3 videos on a single thread. I think Rand did well in all 3 interviews.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxCg3A9izWA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6DiBTScI-g


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqjOdLgB2to

[SilentBull]

Nice. This morning, on the local radio show, when they were going over the news of the day and talked about Obama's speech, they played a clip of Rand responding to it.

[kahless]

I just wish they would have him on for these interviews during prime time when most people are watching. Instead we get Rubio bashing Rand over NSA after the Presidents speech followed by a Rubio love fest. It is hard to compete when people are only getting to hear one side.

[Origanalist]

I just wish they would have him on for these interviews during prime time when most people are watching. Instead we get Rubio bashing Rand over NSA after the Presidents speech followed by a Rubio love fest. It is hard to compete when people are only getting to hear one side.

Let's try to help.

673908162076905472

( I know it's not as good as prime time)

[hells_unicorn]

I just wish they would have him on for these interviews during prime time when most people are watching. Instead we get Rubio bashing Rand over NSA after the Presidents speech followed by a Rubio love fest. It is hard to compete when people are only getting to hear one side.

I think Rand should also be pushing for more prime time slots as well, if he can get them, particularly on Fox News programs other than O'Reilly's show (his audience is too stupid to comprehend anything that Rand says), and he needs to be just as forceful in his words regarding Rubio, Christie and Bush on the issue of open-borders and the 4th Amendment as he was in the CNN and NBC interviews. With Cruz taking similar positions, Rand doesn't have to worry about being the only guy saying these things so he shouldn't be shy about it.

[timosman]

From the comment section:


"How can we fix the "loophole" that allows people to have constitutional rights without government approval."


He should have also called Mika: Hey, it was your father who orchestrated this shit we are in!

[Crashland]

I'm not quite convinced that O'Reilly's show is a bad idea. Yes O'Reilly is a POS but there is a high risk/reward. Even if Rand gets shut down and marginalized, it has potential to make waves and headlines. Just as long as Rand stands up for himself.

[nikcers]

They didn't even serve softball questions on foreign policy he was firm and seemed like the smartest guy in the room, not like he doesn't normally but he did great at explaining his policy in the short time he was given.

[Peace&Freedom]

They didn't even serve softball questions on foreign policy he was firm and seemed like the smartest guy in the room, not like he doesn't normally but he did great at explaining his policy in the short time he was given.

What Rand has become adept at doing is carefully stringing a number of related soundbites together back to back, such that they work to both create a flow, and to reposition the issues in his favor. Judge Nap has also had to develop this 'serial Haiku' style of liberty speak on Fox, which overcomes time constraints and frequent interruptions by an interviewer.

[bronc_fan23]

He was on Laura Ingram this morning, as well.

[georgiaboy]

He was on Laura Ingram this morning, as well.

Really good interview, approx. 13 mins. , link here, starts at the 54-ish minute mark:

http://www.podcastone.com/The-Laura-Ingraham-Show-Podcast

discusses NSA/surveillance and immigration from ME related to the recent terrorist attacks, along with boots on the ground in Syria, and omnibus spending bill.

Laura seems to really be in Rand's court.

[ClydeCoulter]

Let's try to help.

673908162076905472

( I know it's not as good as prime time)

rt'ed, thanks.

And to Rand -> :toady:

[LatinsforPaul]

Here is a fourth, bi**h gets owned...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3rJXhXxAu0

[LatinsforPaul]

And another...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKND1J1IBV8

[hells_unicorn]

Good catches there LatinsforPaul, for some reason I didn't see these interviews up on Youtube while I was doing my searches this afternoon. He's definitely staying on a consistent message, and hopefully it will start gain traction in the polls in the next couple weeks.

[bronc_fan23]

Here is a fourth, bi**h gets owned...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3rJXhXxAu0


*standing O*

Smacked down all her talking points. Loved it.

[CPUd]

Here is a fourth, bi**h gets owned...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3rJXhXxAu0

I think someone is playing a prank on her by passing her those talking points. She thinks she is throwing curve balls, but they are actually softballs.

[TER]

Great thread! Thanks!

[PCKY]

I'm not quite convinced that O'Reilly's show is a bad idea. Yes O'Reilly is a POS but there is a high risk/reward. Even if Rand gets shut down and marginalized, it has potential to make waves and headlines. Just as long as Rand stands up for himself.
O'Reilly is a waste of time...he just screams...pointless. He doesn't lose arguments...he just proclaims you as daft...he's a total ass and it wouldn't end well no matter how much sense Rand makes.

[PCKY]

*standing O*

Smacked down all her talking points. Loved it.
Is there a liberty lover in the production crew? The text of the Fourth Amendment was on the screen while she was pouting and I'm not sure but there might have been an off camera hair flip.