Is America Fighting a Phony War on ISIS?

[timosman]

http://www.examplesofglobalization.com/2015/12/is-america-fighting-phony-war-on-isis.html


Friday, December 4, 2015

Truth can be stranger than fiction. Is America fighting a phony war against ISIS? We have some evidence that this could be true. I am not making a judgement that it is true, but my judgement is that it is likely true. How will a fake war affect oil prices in the future? I will discuss this at the end of the article.

I wrote a recent article on my personal Talkmarkets blog showing that the war on terror was really a war fostering regime change. In the article West Point Prof Bradford Says If you Oppose the War on Terror You are the Enemy, I state that the war on terror was a massive hoax and that the policy of the United States has always been about regime change. If it can be shown that America is faking the fight against ISIS, that is proof that my conclusions were correct.

Well, we have three proofs that could point to our fake war against ISIS.

The first proof is that we dropped fliers warning the truck drivers of ISIS owned trucks to flee.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-GSvAMgjflsM/VlSadV_QmJI/AAAAAAAAAiE/Q_OKvHRvgrE/s1600/obama-ISIS-leaflets.jpeg

The argument was made by Col. Steve Warren that "This is our first strike against tanker trucks, and to minimize risks to civilians, we conducted a leaflet drop prior to the strike. We did a show of force, by--we had aircraft essentially buzz the trucks at low altitude."
We are so nice to ISIS. It almost makes you want to tear up. The American people are deceived once again? McCain said this about our relationship with ISIS:

"The Whole National Security Team Recommended Arming ISIS."

The second proof that we are not doing much against ISIS is the PBS footage showing Russian bombings of key ISIS resources, while PBS attributed the bombings to the United States! Since I don't believe PBS is lazy, it appears that there simply was no footage available showing American strikes at all.

The third proof that the US is fighting a phony war against ISIS is that America could be taking a page out of the Vietnam War, sending fake missions and recording massive bombings that didn't happen. Veterans Today has reported that bombings took place of abandoned villages and were more practice than actual attacks. Apparently the Russians have footage of these fake attacks.

So, you ask, why would the USA be engaged in a fake war against ISIS. Well, if the US armed ISIS as John McCain has said,, and if America is still committed to the policy of regime change, the government will not seek to destroy the terrorists that actually could be used in the future to effect regime change in Syria and maybe even Iran.

ISIS is part of America's force in the Middle East, which indicates just how far the nation has fallen into darkness. Our people hate ISIS and our government fosters that hatred which spills over to all Muslims, while carrying out a fake war against ISIS. That is a very dirty scheme.

Again, this assumption about the fake war is based upon scarce knowledge, as the war theater is controlled mostly by America. Russia is exposing America, and certainly the US government vacillates between supporting Russia and denouncing Russia. The US could really go after ISIS if it is perceived to be fighting a fake war and finds its hand firmly placed into the cookie jar.

So the fake war that likely exists may turn around in the future, but based on how it looks now, my view that the war on terror is simply a mask hiding the real doctrine of regime change from the bulk of the American people is the real truth.

How this probable fake war could effect oil prices is something to consider. Clearly, a strong ISIS could effect regime change in Iraq and Iran. A strong ISIS could impact China and India and many nations on the face of the earth. The US is crazy for considering the harnessing of ISIS for more regime change, and it could only make oil prices volatile in the future. If oil prices go down due to lack of demand, ISIS becomes a tool for controlling and diminishing supply.

As long as America wants ISIS to exist, oil supply and price stability remains threatened. If America continues to seek to secure oil and pipelines and power for the western world through regime change, this could lead to WW3, which is being pushed by many dangerous thinkers who think it is necessary.

[osan]

I'm thinking that perhaps the more relevant question is whether there is anything real about America anymore. The fake wars are a mere symptom of a far deeper infection.

It would appear we may deserve the fate to which we now seem to be heading. Theye have been doing "it" to us since the first days, but at least the older generations could claim that the transgressions were not so obvious, especially by the perceptual standards of the day, not to mention the broader circumstance. Today, we have no excuses. As Theye do "it", we sit idly by and take it.

For the past fifty, years circumstance has changed, what with the asymptotic rise in our technological capabilities and most especially in the last twenty with the ever increasing sources of information and virtually instant communication. And since 9/11 the Theire behavior has taken on an ever more obviously gloves-off timbre, tightening the grip around our necks. And all we do is sit and complain and lament, or vote harder, or send donations to this candidate or that in the belief that giving absolves us of the responsibilities we think we have pawned off onto the shoulders of others by way of our checkbooks.

And there you have the American problem in a nutshell: run away from responsibility as fast as your shriveled legs will take your corpulent ass in any direction that is "away". We flee from the truth that we all helped to forge. We are become a nation of lazy, avaricious, proudly ignorant, vacuously opinionated, overweight, petty, undernourished, frightened, spiritually bereft creatures who don't even remotely qualify for the labels of "man" or "woman". Children in grown up bodies, addicted to every masturbatory fantasy they dredge up from the sick and rancid bowels of their self-absorbed "minds", and deeming themselves badass, profound, enlightened, evolved.

What a sad little joke we play upon ourselves. So getting back to the point, what about America isn't fake anymore?

[enhanced_deficit]

http://www.examplesofglobalization.com/2015/12/is-america-fighting-phony-war-on-isis.html
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-GSvAMgjflsM/VlSadV_QmJI/AAAAAAAAAiE/Q_OKvHRvgrE/s1600/obama-ISIS-leaflets.jpeg


Let's wait till the investigations are completed and all the facts come out. But if these claims are confirmed, it could be that great leaders's team does not want to unnecessarily kill some misguided youths who may be just temporary enemy and will come back to our side once Syria's Assad is removed.
Unjustified killing of arabs/jews is inherenetly anti-semitic and there are already such accusations against current US regime.


Israel the Main Buyer of ISIS Oil — Report (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?486242-Israel-the-Main-Buyer-of-ISIS-Oil-%E2%80%94-Report&)


French Source Reports That "More Jews Have Joined ISIS"

French government official claims that several Jews have left the country to join the terrorist organization

By: Daniel Koren
Published: October 13th, 2014
You undoubtedly have a perplexed look on your face as a result of reading that headline, but, according to what a French government official told the country's Channel 2 News, there are actually Jews out there who have left their homes for Syria and/or Iraq, to join the radical terrorist organization known as ISIS.
Given the fact that ISIS is content with murdering members of other religions, especially Jews, it's a very troubling piece of news that a lot of people in the Jewish community are having a tough deal comprehending.
http://www.shalomlife.com/news/26350...e-joined-isis/






Related

Dec 7 2015, 7:56 am ET
Syria Accuses U.S.-Led Coalition of Bombing Its Troops

Syrian President Bashar Assad's government accused the U.S.-led coalition of bombing an army camp and killing three soldiers. A spokesman for the coalition denied the claim on Monday.
The Syrian government said three soldiers were killed and 13 were wounded in the attack, which it called an act of aggression. The jets fired nine missiles at the camp in Deir el-Zour province on Sunday night, Syria's Foreign Ministry said in a statement flashed on state television.
It is the first publicly declared incident of its type since the United States and allied countries began bombing the ISIS in Syria more than a year ago.
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/syria-accuses-u-s-led-coalition-bombing-its-troops-n475321

[ZENemy]

Would it matter if we were? lol Not like anyone cares, or would do anything about it.

[juleswin]

Would it matter if we were? lol Not like anyone cares, or would do anything about it.

This and also, I hate to be the skeptical about the flier, but why would the Americans write the warning in English also? it looks like something someone made to show the western audience. If they are to warn them, they could easily send the message out to their operatives on the ground or just bomb something else like they've been doing all along and show nothing for it. Its not like the american audience ever asks for prove for any of the bombing (an official count of 20k and counting). I have a hard time believing that these people doing the warning care more about the drivers driving those trucks than the very valuable trucks itself.

[timosman]

Would it matter if we were? lol Not like anyone cares, or would do anything about it.

Somebody could call our bluff. Ooops, somebody already did.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dg9TqwlbB_w

[Zippyjuan]

The leaflets were supposed to be to protect against civilian casualties. Note that there are not ISIS forces around the trucks which are being warned about the attacks. If they were warning ISIS soldiers, they would be dropping them on ISIS military locations- not trucks carrying supplies the US was going to destroy. If the US was supporting ISIS, why destroy their supply routes and trucks?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/17/world/middleeast/us-strikes-syria-oil.html?_r=0


U.S. Warplanes Strike ISIS Oil Trucks in Syria

ISTANBUL — Intensifying pressure on the Islamic State, United States warplanes for the first time attacked hundreds of trucks on Monday that the extremist group has been using to smuggle the crude oil it has been producing in Syria, American officials said.

According to an initial assessment, 116 trucks were destroyed in the attack, which took place near Deir al-Zour, an area in eastern Syria that is controlled by the Islamic State.

The airstrikes were carried out by four A-10 attack planes and two AC-130 gunships based in Turkey.

Plans for the strike were developed well before the terrorist attacks in and around Paris on Friday, officials familiar with the operation said, part of a broader operation to disrupt the ability of the Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL, to generate revenue to support its military operations and govern its territory.

American officials have long been frustrated by the ability of the Islamic State to generate tens of million of dollars a month by producing and exporting oil.

The area where the trucks assemble in Syria has been closely monitored by reconnaissance drones. As many as 1,000 trucks have been observed there, waiting to receive their cargo of illicit oil.

On Monday, 295 trucks were in the area, and more than a third of them were destroyed, United States officials said. The A-10s dropped two dozen 500-pound bombs and conducted strafing runs with 30-millimeter Gatling guns. The AC-130s attacked with 30-millimeter Gatling guns and 105-millimeter cannons.


Until Monday, the United States refrained from striking the fleet used to transport oil, believed to include more than 1,000 tanker trucks, because of concerns about causing civilian casualties. As a result, the Islamic State’s distribution system for exporting oil had remained largely intact.

The new campaign is called Tidal Wave II. It is named after the World War II effort to counter Nazi Germany by striking Romania’s oil industry. Lt. Gen. Sean B. MacFarland, who in September assumed command of the international coalition’s campaign in Iraq and Syria, suggested the name.

To reduce the risk of harming civilians, two F-15 warplanes dropped leaflets about an hour before the attack warning drivers to abandon their vehicles, and strafing runs were conducted to reinforce the message.