Root
11-24-2015, 02:13 PM
RICO Case Brought Against State of New Jersey Over Obstruction of Gun Rights
-(Ammoland.com)- (http://www.ammoland.com/)
http://www.ammoland.com/2015/11/rico-case-brought-against-state-of-new-jersey-over-obstruction-of-gun-rights/?utm_content=buffer559d8&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer#axzz3sREzXsiw
Over the past several months a quiet battle has been raging. The leftist power machine, compromised of both State and Federal ideologues, has had its hands full and its wits tested as it deployed dirty trick after dirty trick in its battle to eradicate the lawsuit known as Purpura v. Christie, et al (http://nebula.wsimg.com/35990f0a2ce0e6208b74d5b5a3c9feeb?AccessKeyId=3221A 0C50080D1C903B6&disposition=0&alloworigin=1).
The lawsuit was filed in support of the Bill of Rights and listed several “Claims of Relief” regarding violations perpetrated upon the citizens of New Jersey and which have been reinforced for decades by the state and federal judiciary. The Defendants in this case have failed to provide a timely defense as was required of them by a Court issued Summons and the FRCP (Federal Rules of Civil Procedures ) .
A motion for Default and Summary Judgment has been filed and as of this date and time, the Court has failed to make its announced rulings as the dates that were scheduled for them have come and gone without a word of explanation from the court. It is quite clear from the events thus far, that despite the several very questionable activities which included failing to notify the Petitioner of Court Orders, the delay in posting and submitting letters and documents to Judge Shipp (the assigned jurist), the court and the Defendants find themselves in a tight spot. Mr. Nicholas E. Purpura, a private citizen has taken on the powerful cabal of political and judicial ideologues and has , thus far, anticipated and blocked every unsavory move they have made. This is a great story and its beginning to unfold in an exciting way as the possibility of an investigation of the Court and the Defendants may be about to blow this wide open.
After each announcement of an intended ruling, Mr. Purpura filed an additional document to be added to the Official Court Record. The documents laid out many previous Federal Court rulings and precedents which would be used in the intended appeal of any unconstitutional or illegal ruling. As a result, each of these ruling dates have come and gone, without the scheduled decision.
The SAPPA Group is now ready to reveal the next step in this battle for our Bill of Rights.
Since the Court has refused to answer any questions, nor have they addressed any of the positions Nick made in those documents, nor have they made any rulings, we can only presume they have no idea what to do next. That my friends, is a good thing.
Mr. Purpura, on the other hand, finds himself in no such position. We are now ready to reveal publically what we have been doing to move this case from the obscure shadows of delay and avoidance and bring it further into the light of scrutiny.
There is a little known rule which requires any sitting judge to open an investigation into activities which are unethical or inconsistent with the rules of the court. This applies especially to the Chief Judge of any Federal Court, whether it be the District, the Circuit or the Supreme Court.
We have proof, residing in more than circumstantial, of several unethical and procedurally infirm events having taken place in regards to the Purpura v. Christie, et al, Federal lawsuit. Mr. Purpura prepared a formal request to the Chief Judge of the District Courtin which he laid out, in clear and chronological terms, the unsavory and possibly illegal activity of the Federal District Court in Trenton.
In that package he included several letters and other documentation detailing the goings on. As of this date, that package has been delivered by special USPO Priority mail and we have a notice that the office of the Chief Judge has received it. That letter can be viewed and downloaded here: Letter to Chief Judge Simandle. (http://nebula.wsimg.com/008d336cd23e9b8b990776c2a72d7b8c?AccessKeyId=3221A 0C50080D1C903B6&disposition=0&alloworigin=1)
Once we received the confirmation that Judge Simandle’s office had the letter and the package in its possession and that sufficient time had passed for the Judge to review the documentation the SAPPA Group, in cooperation with TPATH, issued a Press Release informing the media of this action. The Press Release was sent to over 20 Newspapers here in New Jersey. We did get confirmation from a few of them acknowledging the receipt of the Press Release. As of this writing it is not known if any of them intend to cover this story. Read and download that Press Release. (http://nebula.wsimg.com/caf2b0d8e5ceff85fbf33bd2bd723949?AccessKeyId=3221A 0C50080D1C903B6&disposition=0&alloworigin=1)
Also as of this time we do not know the status of the requested investigation that Chief Judge Simandle is required to perform. When we find out, so will our readers.
-(Ammoland.com)- (http://www.ammoland.com/)
http://www.ammoland.com/2015/11/rico-case-brought-against-state-of-new-jersey-over-obstruction-of-gun-rights/?utm_content=buffer559d8&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer#axzz3sREzXsiw
Over the past several months a quiet battle has been raging. The leftist power machine, compromised of both State and Federal ideologues, has had its hands full and its wits tested as it deployed dirty trick after dirty trick in its battle to eradicate the lawsuit known as Purpura v. Christie, et al (http://nebula.wsimg.com/35990f0a2ce0e6208b74d5b5a3c9feeb?AccessKeyId=3221A 0C50080D1C903B6&disposition=0&alloworigin=1).
The lawsuit was filed in support of the Bill of Rights and listed several “Claims of Relief” regarding violations perpetrated upon the citizens of New Jersey and which have been reinforced for decades by the state and federal judiciary. The Defendants in this case have failed to provide a timely defense as was required of them by a Court issued Summons and the FRCP (Federal Rules of Civil Procedures ) .
A motion for Default and Summary Judgment has been filed and as of this date and time, the Court has failed to make its announced rulings as the dates that were scheduled for them have come and gone without a word of explanation from the court. It is quite clear from the events thus far, that despite the several very questionable activities which included failing to notify the Petitioner of Court Orders, the delay in posting and submitting letters and documents to Judge Shipp (the assigned jurist), the court and the Defendants find themselves in a tight spot. Mr. Nicholas E. Purpura, a private citizen has taken on the powerful cabal of political and judicial ideologues and has , thus far, anticipated and blocked every unsavory move they have made. This is a great story and its beginning to unfold in an exciting way as the possibility of an investigation of the Court and the Defendants may be about to blow this wide open.
After each announcement of an intended ruling, Mr. Purpura filed an additional document to be added to the Official Court Record. The documents laid out many previous Federal Court rulings and precedents which would be used in the intended appeal of any unconstitutional or illegal ruling. As a result, each of these ruling dates have come and gone, without the scheduled decision.
The SAPPA Group is now ready to reveal the next step in this battle for our Bill of Rights.
Since the Court has refused to answer any questions, nor have they addressed any of the positions Nick made in those documents, nor have they made any rulings, we can only presume they have no idea what to do next. That my friends, is a good thing.
Mr. Purpura, on the other hand, finds himself in no such position. We are now ready to reveal publically what we have been doing to move this case from the obscure shadows of delay and avoidance and bring it further into the light of scrutiny.
There is a little known rule which requires any sitting judge to open an investigation into activities which are unethical or inconsistent with the rules of the court. This applies especially to the Chief Judge of any Federal Court, whether it be the District, the Circuit or the Supreme Court.
We have proof, residing in more than circumstantial, of several unethical and procedurally infirm events having taken place in regards to the Purpura v. Christie, et al, Federal lawsuit. Mr. Purpura prepared a formal request to the Chief Judge of the District Courtin which he laid out, in clear and chronological terms, the unsavory and possibly illegal activity of the Federal District Court in Trenton.
In that package he included several letters and other documentation detailing the goings on. As of this date, that package has been delivered by special USPO Priority mail and we have a notice that the office of the Chief Judge has received it. That letter can be viewed and downloaded here: Letter to Chief Judge Simandle. (http://nebula.wsimg.com/008d336cd23e9b8b990776c2a72d7b8c?AccessKeyId=3221A 0C50080D1C903B6&disposition=0&alloworigin=1)
Once we received the confirmation that Judge Simandle’s office had the letter and the package in its possession and that sufficient time had passed for the Judge to review the documentation the SAPPA Group, in cooperation with TPATH, issued a Press Release informing the media of this action. The Press Release was sent to over 20 Newspapers here in New Jersey. We did get confirmation from a few of them acknowledging the receipt of the Press Release. As of this writing it is not known if any of them intend to cover this story. Read and download that Press Release. (http://nebula.wsimg.com/caf2b0d8e5ceff85fbf33bd2bd723949?AccessKeyId=3221A 0C50080D1C903B6&disposition=0&alloworigin=1)
Also as of this time we do not know the status of the requested investigation that Chief Judge Simandle is required to perform. When we find out, so will our readers.