PDA

View Full Version : Former Chief of Defense Intelligence Says Obama "Willfullly" Supported and Armed ISIS




James_Madison_Lives
11-23-2015, 12:44 PM
Lieutenant-General Michael T. Flynn (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_T._Flynn) was also senior intelligence officer for the Joint Special Operations Command. Flynn said he had repeatedly warned the administration that it was arming extremist elements aiming for a caliphate in western Syria. The interviewer asked:


INTERVIEWER: So the administration turned a blind eye to your analysis?

FLYNN: I don’t know that they turned a blind eye, I think it was a decision. I think it was a willful decision.

INTERVIEWER: A willful decision to support an insurgency that had Salafists, Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood?

FLYNN: It was a willful decision to do what they’re doing.




Please watch this extremely important 4 minute exchange:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1oEoCRkLRI

Ronin Truth
11-23-2015, 12:57 PM
You make a Chicago community organizer POTUS and this is just what you get. Who's really surprised? :rolleyes:

James_Madison_Lives
11-23-2015, 01:03 PM
You make a Chicago community organizer POTUS and this is just what you get. Who's really surprised? :rolleyes:

When given the chance by the interviewer to soften the assertion to "turn a blind eye," Flynn declined, and went for the word "willfully." This should be enough to bring Obama down if any politician is paying attention.

Yieu
11-23-2015, 01:11 PM
When given the chance by the interviewer to soften the assertion to "turn a blind eye," Flynn declined, and went for the word "willfully." This should be enough to bring Obama down if any politician is paying attention.

I see you're no stranger to comedy.

Cleaner44
11-23-2015, 01:12 PM
You make a Chicago community organizer POTUS and this is just what you get. Who's really surprised? :rolleyes:

Are you thinking Mitt Romney wouldn't have done the same thing? :rolleyes:

Contumacious
11-23-2015, 01:46 PM
Lieutenant-General Michael T. Flynn (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_T._Flynn) was also senior intelligence officer for the Joint Special Operations Command. Flynn said he had repeatedly warned the administration that it was arming extremist elements aiming for a caliphate in western Syria. The interviewer asked:

Please watch this extremely important 4 minute exchange:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1oEoCRkLRI



The policy of arming Daesch , then known as Al Qaeda or Syrian Resistance began with Bush and neocrazies



The $$$$$$$ used to support the Syrian Opposition began flowing in 2006 while Bush was still in power (http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jul/12/syrian-opposition-doing-the-talking)

the effort was coordinated by the neocrazies --- such as Michael Weiss (a zionut)


Both Bush and Obama are owned bu the War Party and AIPAC

.

Brian4Liberty
11-23-2015, 01:48 PM
Wow, that interviewer is a douchebag.

It's great that this Lt-General revealed that there were warnings that this would help ISIS and other radicals, and that the Obama/Hillary Admin ignored those warnings, but you don't keep interrupting the guy while he is spilling his guts! Let him talk all he wants! And when he pauses, say "please elaborate".

TheTexan
11-23-2015, 01:51 PM
Al Jazeera? Not gonna waste my time with that propaganda.

I only trust real news sources, like CNN

Brian4Liberty
11-23-2015, 01:56 PM
If you listen to the whole interview, it sounds like the Lt-General wanted to more aggressively intervene in Syria right from the beginning. He's in the "we should have bombed Assad on day-one" camp. Maybe that's why people weren't listening to him.

Yieu
11-23-2015, 02:04 PM
Are you thinking Mitt Romney wouldn't have done the same thing? :rolleyes:

Haha, no. I was pointing out the comedy in suggesting that things would improve if only any politician is paying attention, and didn't feel like using a smiley face to show sarcasm.

I do hope that this information gets spread and helps to result in us leaving Syria. Ending the wars would result in more liberty than any other act.

James_Madison_Lives
11-23-2015, 05:20 PM
If you listen to the whole interview, it sounds like the Lt-General wanted to more aggressively intervene in Syria right from the beginning. He's in the "we should have bombed Assad on day-one" camp. Maybe that's why people weren't listening to him.

He never said anything even remotely like that, give me the time stamp on the video.

enhanced_deficit
11-24-2015, 04:20 PM
http://static1.businessinsider.com/image/540e51d06bb3f7044f183eca-1200-674/syria-161-1.jpg


ISIS = RM 2.0 (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?459503-ISIS-Revolution-Muslim-2-0&)

William R
11-24-2015, 06:10 PM
bump for future

Brian4Liberty
11-24-2015, 06:49 PM
He never said anything even remotely like that, give me the time stamp on the video.

At :50 seconds in, he starts talking about "where we really blew it was right at the beginning", "when you don't get in and help somebody".

At 2:15, the interviewer says "my understanding it that you say we should have backed the rebels", and the Lt-Gen responds "we should have done more, earlier on."

idiom
11-25-2015, 03:26 AM
At :50 seconds in, he starts talking about "where we really blew it was right at the beginning", "when you don't get in and help somebody".

At 2:15, the interviewer says "my understanding it that you say we should have backed the rebels", and the Lt-Gen responds "we should have done more, earlier on."

The cognitive dissonance is strong.

His brain doesn't have, "we should have stayed the fuck out" as an option so it defaults to doing the same thing, but harder.

idiom
11-25-2015, 03:26 AM
At :50 seconds in, he starts talking about "where we really blew it was right at the beginning", "when you don't get in and help somebody".

At 2:15, the interviewer says "my understanding it that you say we should have backed the rebels", and the Lt-Gen responds "we should have done more, earlier on."

The cognitive dissonance is strong.

His brain doesn't have, "we should have stayed the fuck out" as an option so it defaults to doing the same thing, but harder.

S.Shorland
11-25-2015, 07:00 AM
Very nice.They even have Obama in a green suit (the islamic colour).Hope the artist gets a job at a leading paper one day.

http://static1.businessinsider.com/image/540e51d06bb3f7044f183eca-1200-674/syria-161-1.jpg


ISIS = RM 2.0 (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?459503-ISIS-Revolution-Muslim-2-0&)

Contumacious
11-25-2015, 08:06 AM
Very nice.They even have Obama in a green suit (the islamic colour).Hope the artist gets a job at a leading paper one day.

That's a bullshit poster.

ALL US PRESIDENTS HAVE AND WILL BEND OVER BACKWARDS TO GRANDSTAND FOR ISRAHELL AND SAUDI ARABIA.

SAUDI ARABIA CONTROL ISIS.

TURKEY , A MEMBER OF NATO, SUPPORTS ISIS.

SO , WHILE I OBJECT TO OBAMA'S FOREIGN POLICY , HE IS NOT DOING ANYTHING DIFFERENT THAN HIS PREDECESSORS AND SUCCESSORS.


.