PDA

View Full Version : Same Judge who Covered Up CIA Torture Dismisses Suit Against NSA Surveillance




Lucille
10-26-2015, 11:12 AM
I can't take much more shock today.

http://strike-the-root.com/same-judge-who-covered-up-cia-torture-dismisses-suit-against-nsa-surveillance


Responsible for helping cover up the CIA’s torture program, the same judge dismissed a lawsuit on Friday filed by the ACLU, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Wikipedia, and other organizations accusing the NSA of conducting mass surveillance. Although it is now common knowledge that the NSA can retroactively access phone records, text messages, emails, internet activity, GPS locations, and metadata, the judge dismissed the suit because the NSA refuses to admit that they are incessantly violating our constitutional rights.

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/judge-responsible-covering-cia-torture-dismisses-aclu-lawsuit-nsa-surveillance/


By playing the national security card, the NSA proved once again that it is currently immune to public scrutiny and accountability. If the ruling stands, the ACLU believes it will be impossible to challenge the NSA in civil court. Although Judge T.S. Ellis III said the suit relied on “the subjective fear of surveillance,” the ACLU plans to file an appeal.

Ellis proved his loyalty to the State when he dismissed a suit in 2006 against the CIA for torturing an innocent man. In a case of mistaken identity, German citizen Khalid El-Masri was abducted by the Macedonian police and handed over to the CIA. After months of beatings and forced rectal suppositories, El-Masri was released without charges.

Instead of dismissing the case on merit, Ellis dismissed the suit on the grounds that a trial would risk national security. Caught torturing innocent people and spying on U.S. citizens, the CIA and NSA have caused more damage to national security than any lawsuit ever could. Willing to sacrifice justice in the name of state-sponsored torture and mass surveillance programs, Ellis represents a judicial system that no longer participates in the political pastime of checks and balances.

kpitcher
10-26-2015, 10:29 PM
Wow, so now the guilty party has to admit they were doing something illegal before a case can even move forward?

This should cut down on work the courts will have to do. Judges won't have to go in but a few days a year and people won't have to worry much about being called for jury duty.

Danke
10-26-2015, 10:44 PM
Wow, so now the guilty party has to admit they were doing something illegal before a case can even move forward?

This should cut down on work the courts will have to do. Judges won't have to go in but a few days a year and people won't have to worry much about being called for jury duty.

The IRS says you must pay up before you can got to court to dispute the amount they say you owe.

timosman
10-26-2015, 10:47 PM
The IRS says you must pay up before you can got to court to dispute the amount they say you owe.

I guess I got lucky. :D