PDA

View Full Version : Marsha Blackburn: New GOP Leadership Needs to Represent Its Constituents




Brian4Liberty
10-12-2015, 02:16 PM
Marsha Blackburn: New GOP Leadership Needs to Represent Its Constituents (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/12/marsha-blackburn-new-gop-leadership-needs-represent-constituents/)
by Julia Hahn - 12 Oct 2015


(Washington D.C.) - Congresswoman Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), a potential candidate for Speaker of the House, says it’s time the House of Representatives to begin prioritizing the interests of its constituents– the American people.

“What the American people want us to do is to deliver for them,” Blackburn declared in an exclusive interview on Breitbart News Sunday SiriusXM Radio. “What they’re looking to is the House to be the agenda setters. So that is where our focus should be and ought to be. And to represent what our constituents want to see we need to put the options and ideas on the table and turn that into legislation and pass it.”

According to a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, an astounding 72 percent of Republican primary voters are dissatisfied with current Republican leadership.

One of Republican voters’ many frustrations with its leadership is not only that GOP leadership fails to advance conservative priorities, but that it often engages in elaborately staged Kabuki theatre to ensure that Republican donors’ agenda is enacted—even if it comes at the expense of the economic and physical security of everyday voters.
...
More: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/12/marsha-blackburn-new-gop-leadership-needs-represent-constituents/

Ronin Truth
10-12-2015, 02:40 PM
Gee, what a novel idea. Do you think it might catch on?

Matt Collins
10-12-2015, 03:49 PM
That's quite ironic considering how awful her voting record is:


http://mickeywhite.blogspot.com/2009/09/tn-congressman-marsha-blackburn-votes.html

Brian4Liberty
10-12-2015, 03:56 PM
Right now she is not supporting the establishment (Paul Ryan) on the new Speaker, so she's an ally on this issue.

ZENemy
10-12-2015, 05:22 PM
LOL, come on, its like saying "Dentist NEED to fix cavities"

well dUHHHH


question is, if the dentist failed to fix cavities, would you keep paying him?

nobody's_hero
10-14-2015, 06:17 AM
I'd be happy even if they weren't able to pass the legislation. Just being able to have it heard on the House floor and debated would be a huge step in the right direction after years of Pelosi and Boehner. I think that's what Daniel Webster was offering but the GOP isn't accustomed to hearing anything that isn't pre-approved by some elite committee.

Working Poor
10-14-2015, 07:56 AM
Oh blah blah I will believe it when I see it...

William Tell
10-14-2015, 08:50 AM
Right now she is not supporting the establishment (Paul Ryan) on the new Speaker, so she's an ally on this issue.

Ryan, like McCarthy, almost certainly won't be the next speaker. So who's next on the establishment side? I don't know enough about Blackburn to know if she would be more of a compromise candidate, or someone the establishment might put up against Daniel Webster.

Slave Mentality
10-14-2015, 09:15 AM
Yeah, that should fix it right up.

Brian4Liberty
10-14-2015, 09:26 AM
Ryan, like McCarthy, almost certainly won't be the next speaker. So who's next on the establishment side? I don't know enough about Blackburn to know if she would be more of a compromise candidate, or someone the establishment might put up against Daniel Webster.

I don't think I'd support Blackburn or anybody unless Massie and Amash support them.

William Tell
10-14-2015, 09:28 AM
I don't think I'd support Blackburn or anybody unless Massie and Amash support them.

Oh I agree, but is she the next in line to get the Boehner/McCarthy vote? I guess only those in Congress know the answer.

Keith and stuff
10-14-2015, 11:35 AM
She is establishment. Don't trust her.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/freedomindex/profile.php?id=B001243

Cumulative Freedom Index Score: 62%

Score Breakdown:
50% (114th Congress: 2015-2016)
61% (113th Congress: 2013-2014)
70% (112th Congress: 2011-2012)
87% (111th Congress: 2009-2010)
66% (110th Congress: 2007-2008)
45% (109th Congress: 2005-2006)
47% (108th Congress: 2003-2004)