PDA

View Full Version : Students for Liberty member sues cops after they jail him for "Impeach Obama" sign




William Tell
09-11-2015, 08:10 AM
Arrested 'Impeach Obama' Advocate Sues for 1st Amendment Payday

'I'm doing this for other Americans,' says college senior.

http://www.usnews.com/dims4/USNEWS/a52a60b/2147483647/resize/652x%3E/quality/85/?url=%2Fcmsmedia%2F1d%2F36%2Ff25bf60a4cfe9bb445323 f11b150%2F150910-editorial.jpg
This photo from Daniel Martins shows friends protesting at the Long Island Expressway overpass on which he was arrested in June 2014. Martins says the signage was similar, but he was alone.


Amid honking from cars below, Daniel Martins was doing what he often did on Fridays, advocating for the impeachment of President Barack Obama from a pedestrian bridge over the Long Island Expressway.


On the sunny day last June, however, the Hofstra University student was confronted and arrested for disorderly conduct and criminal nuisance by Nassau County police who claimed his signs and flags might cause a car crash.


The criminal case was dismissed on free speech grounds in December and Martins now is seeking $2 million in a federal lawsuit, alleging the arrest was illegal and intended to stop his exercise of First Amendment-protected rights.


“It wasn’t a problem for anybody but the police,” says attorney Thomas Liotti, a two-time Obama voter representing Martins. “It wasn’t distracting. I don’t think anyone took much note of it because these things happen all the time in New York.”




Liotti says if flag burning and neo-Nazi parades are protected by the First Amendment, so, too, is Martins’ speech. “It’s free speech for everyone, that’s what we’re trying to support here,” he says.


The attorney sees the arrest as a clear constitutional violation worthy of swift redress, an opinion bolstered by Nassau District Court Judge Sharon Gianelli, who dismissed the criminal case against Martins.


“Defendant’s conduct is protected by the U.S. Constitution and therefore not criminal,” she ruled. “His conduct is akin to protestors on a sidewalk holding signs. ... They do it to get the attention of passersby, including drivers as well as pedestrians, in order to form support for their positions. If every protestor were arrested and hauled off to jail, that would run afoul of the rights and freedoms that we have fought for throughout our history and which define the very identity of our great union.”


Martins, who filmed the events leading to his arrest, tells U.S. News the lawsuit is about more than just money. The Students for Liberty member also is looking to punish those responsible for his arrest and affirm that such protests are protected by the Constitution.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIZp2L57zlE



http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/09/10/arrested-impeach-obama-advocate-sues-for-1st-amendment-payday

Ronin Truth
09-11-2015, 08:31 AM
What was the charged offense? It wasn't the sign.

enhanced_deficit
09-11-2015, 08:45 AM
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/09/10/arrested-impeach-obama-advocate-sues-for-1st-amendment-payday

This is troubluing news considering that huge %age of liberty minded peoples share their view.

Poll Result: Would you support Obama impeachment? (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?417115-Would-you-support-Obama-impeachment&)

Zippyjuan
09-11-2015, 02:55 PM
Are other signs permitted in the same place? Banners over highways are not permitted in most areas. Yes, I am aware this was just a publicity stunt and the reaction was not about the content of the banners.

muh_roads
09-11-2015, 03:11 PM
Clearly a case of discrimination. Signs exist all over roads that cause ppl to take their eyes off of stuff. The cop hassling him was just an Obama lover...

Weston White
09-12-2015, 12:49 AM
Are other signs permitted in the same place? Banners over highways are not permitted in most areas. Yes, I am aware this was just a publicity stunt and the reaction was not about the content of the banners.

That should only apply if the banners are left unattended, or are advertisements for businesses, otherwise the act would fall under peacefully protesting. However, asking people to honk may be considered a muni-code noise violation.

JK/SEA
09-12-2015, 08:49 AM
That should only apply if the banners are left unattended, or are advertisements for businesses, otherwise the act would fall under peacefully protesting. However, asking people to honk may be considered a muni-code noise violation.

...unless of course you're at a SUPPORT THE TROOPS shindig, then its just fine with cops.

surf
09-12-2015, 10:27 AM
this guy is my second favorite Martins (after Obafemi, of course)

Cleaner44
09-12-2015, 11:34 AM
Wait, what? The cops are worried about signs being a distraction?

Oh I get it, drivers don't know how to deal with signs near roads. :rolleyes:

4536