Former Ron Paul staffer house RAIDED by FBI (full video)

[Matt Collins]

The FBI violently raided the house of the family of a former Ron Paul staffer who is being accused of campaign finance law violations. The FBI also made his teenage daughters stand out side on a busy street in their underwear in front of the whole neighborhood and passing traffic. Raiding the house with guns drawn at young kids is beyond what is acceptable for an alleged crime of this nature.


Here is the full video of what happened, and write-up:

http://www.gofundme.com/defendliberty

[timosman]

Couldn't you guys just send a note to appear in your office ?

[JK/SEA]

any cops hurt?

[Indy Vidual]

"... The FBI also made his teenage daughters stand out side on a busy street in their underwear in front of the whole neighborhood and passing traffic..."
Are they over 18, and is this safe to view at work?
/ just asking...

[Keith and stuff]

"... The FBI also made his teenage daughters stand out side on a busy street in their underwear in front of the whole neighborhood and passing traffic..."
Are they over 18, and is this safe to view at work?
/ just asking...
I didn't pay too much attention but it looked like almost complete coverage of everything by a large bathrobe.

[Brian4Liberty]

636614292977004544

[tod evans]

[Whoops Brian beat me to it] :o


Here's a tube without Mats obvious trolling for dollars link...:mad:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-qSTwJ0Z5A

Obviously if you have extra money burning a hole in your pocket this dude would appreciate a hand out...

[TaftFan]

"... The FBI also made his teenage daughters stand out side on a busy street in their underwear in front of the whole neighborhood and passing traffic..."
Are they over 18, and is this safe to view at work?
/ just asking...

15, according to the GoFundMe note.

[dannno]

I didn't pay too much attention but it looked like almost complete coverage of everything by a large bathrobe.

No, she was underage and in her panties/t-shirt in the tube at the link Matt posted, and the news station showed it over and over and over again. One of the backside images was blurred out, but a couple of the others were not.

However I'd be willing to bet that while she wasn't too happy that the cops made her stand outside and not be able to put on some clothes in the cold weather while random people drove by, she is likely welcoming the attention it gets her on TV.

[Sola_Fide]

No, she was underage and in her panties/t-shirt in the tube at the link Matt posted, and the news station showed it over and over and over again. One of the backside images was blurred out, but a couple of the others were not.

However I'd be willing to bet that while she wasn't too happy that the cops made her stand outside and not be able to put on some clothes in the cold weather while random people drove by, she is likely welcoming the attention it gets her on TV.

No, I think that's your pedophilia talking

[Keith and stuff]

However I'd be willing to bet that while she wasn't too happy that the cops made her stand outside and not be able to put on some clothes in the cold weather while random people drove by, she is likely welcoming the attention it gets her on TV.

Sorry. I didn't notice. Thanks for correcting me. I rewatched it and was all blurred out. Anyway, to the question asked, maybe people shouldn't be reading news videos on work computers in the office anyway? :)

[RonPaulIsGreat]

More humiliation at the hands of people that are pro government.

[dannno]

No, I think that's your pedophilia talking

She's 15...most girls her age have been hooking up with guys for 1-3 years.

[William Tell]

However I'd be willing to bet that while she wasn't too happy that the cops made her stand outside and not be able to put on some clothes in the cold weather while random people drove by, she is likely welcoming the attention it gets her on TV. You are so full of crap. Any kid's heart will sink to his or her stomach when the authorities hits the family house in a raid. There's nothing glamorous about it to them. She's thinking about how her daddy might go to prison forever, not how awesome it is that thousands of dannno's will be gawking at her.

[dannno]

You are so full of crap. Any kid's heart will sink to his or her stomach when the authorities hits the family house in a raid. There's nothing glamorous about it to them. She's thinking about how her daddy might go to prison forever, not how awesome it is that thousands of dannno's will be gawking at her.

My point was that she seemed to be upset about the raid, upset about how the police treated her family and her father, upset that she had to sit out in the cold while being stared at by police officers and random passerbys and not be able to put clothes on, but not so upset that the news was going to show the footage she took of herself in her underwear over and over and over and over again. I could be wrong, just what I picked up.

Honestly I'm not sure why it was necessary to show it over and over, and some of the images were not blurred out.

[Dianne]

It could be any one of us, at any time. I would be tempted to sue the Feds for child endangerment, statutory rape (well those guys were raping that little girl in her underwear, with their eyes), lewd and lascivious conduct with a child, and bullying.

These are the type crimes the ACLU should be tackling. Of course they are too busy now they are owned by the drug cartels.

[Sola_Fide]

She's 15...most girls her age have been hooking up with guys for 1-3 years.

1 to 3 huh?

[2young2vote]

"He violated campaign finance laws? Guess we should point firearms at his children and raid his house. And why not publicly shame his kids while we're at it?"

[ChristianAnarchist]

It seems youtube is putting the kabash on this video. Can't view it at all...

[phill4paul]

So...how is the investigation going about his involvement in the missing laptop of Jared Gamble?

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

No, she was underage and in her panties/t-shirt in the tube at the link Matt posted, and the news station showed it over and over and over again. One of the backside images was blurred out, but a couple of the others were not.

However I'd be willing to bet that while she wasn't too happy that the cops made her stand outside and not be able to put on some clothes in the cold weather while random people drove by, she is likely welcoming the attention it gets her on TV.
I noticed the same thing. The first shot is blurred out, then they decided not to bother blurring out the rest. What the hell?

A better question. Why did they even show that footage in the first place?

[Jan2017]

Effecting an arrest, so the young girl / daughter gets taken outside in her undies at 6am . . .

I'm sure the LEOs had a big laugh back at the FBI office . . .
Did they ever "effect the arrest" , as the presumed warrant would be for them to do all this ?

[Matt Collins]

Bump

[Anti Federalist]

This is called Freedumb