Barrex
08-12-2015, 03:05 AM
Idea: Rand does Skype tour.
Basic:
Volunteer organizes party/gathering/get-together/BBQ with a theme "Talk with Rand" in their home, backyard, local bar etc. Rand calls in via Video call and has 15 minute conversation with those who attended party. He says few things and answers few questions...
1. Campaign sends question to volunteers if they are interested in organizing party/gathering/get-together/BBQ with a theme "Talk with Rand".
2. Those who say yes and pledge that there will be more than 10 people attending get date and time when Rand will call them.
3. During party volunteer that organized party collects emails, gives promotional material, links to donate/campaign store...
4. Rand calls them and has conversation, answers few questions. It lasts 10-30 minutes.
5. Campaign conducts polls, campaign staffers answer additional questions, everyone changes Facebook&Twitter profiles to Rand picture or sign etc.
6. Offer incentive to vote and get engaged: After Rand is done campaign sends emails to those who participated with cool picture or something... for some reason people like gifts and when they receive thank you note.
Rand will do a lot of traveling. Some trips will be several hours long. While he is in the car he could do it...
For volunteers: People dont like going out of their comfort zone. Approaching other people and talking to them about politics and your candidate is not easy for most. Solution: Have a party. Having a party and inviting people to it is not outside anyones comfort zone.
Time: How much time is needed to have a speech in Iowa in front of 300 people? Rand needs to travel from Kentucky or D.C., go there, have a speech, travel to another location, have a speech, spend a night, travel back. To reach 300 people you need 48 hours? That would be 9-10 minutes per vote?
Vitrual tour:
average size of the party: 20 people
average time Rand spends: 15 min.
less than 1 min per vote
no cost for renting, travel etc. is needed...only really good internet connection.
To win Iowa candidate will probably need less than 25.000 votes. 5 months to Iowa. If Rand can do 1 hour per day in next 150 days he would reach 9000 people this way. They will be neighbors, friends, business partners and relatives of campaign volunteers. Completely new approach and completely new people that are reached. Since volunteer already knows them he can keep in touch with them and call them when it is time to vote and get engaged.
Best way to get a vote is for a candidate to speak to voters. Mailing (98% of it is not having any impact) and advertising pale in comparison. If Rand does this it could give him another advantage over other candidates, especially in Iowa where he already got strong volunteer network. He would spend far less time and resources and be 90% more effective when you consider time per vote/person ratio. Also in smaller group atmosphere is more intimate and chances for getting persons vote should be better. "Me and some of my friends just had chit-chat with Rand".
I really dislike threads where people sit in their homes as armchair generals and tell campaign what to do... and now I started one myself. :o To me (in my head) it sounded like a really cool idea. BE BRUTALLY HONEST. I dont like pandering. Why would this not work? What did I miss? What do you think?
Basic:
Volunteer organizes party/gathering/get-together/BBQ with a theme "Talk with Rand" in their home, backyard, local bar etc. Rand calls in via Video call and has 15 minute conversation with those who attended party. He says few things and answers few questions...
1. Campaign sends question to volunteers if they are interested in organizing party/gathering/get-together/BBQ with a theme "Talk with Rand".
2. Those who say yes and pledge that there will be more than 10 people attending get date and time when Rand will call them.
3. During party volunteer that organized party collects emails, gives promotional material, links to donate/campaign store...
4. Rand calls them and has conversation, answers few questions. It lasts 10-30 minutes.
5. Campaign conducts polls, campaign staffers answer additional questions, everyone changes Facebook&Twitter profiles to Rand picture or sign etc.
6. Offer incentive to vote and get engaged: After Rand is done campaign sends emails to those who participated with cool picture or something... for some reason people like gifts and when they receive thank you note.
Rand will do a lot of traveling. Some trips will be several hours long. While he is in the car he could do it...
For volunteers: People dont like going out of their comfort zone. Approaching other people and talking to them about politics and your candidate is not easy for most. Solution: Have a party. Having a party and inviting people to it is not outside anyones comfort zone.
Time: How much time is needed to have a speech in Iowa in front of 300 people? Rand needs to travel from Kentucky or D.C., go there, have a speech, travel to another location, have a speech, spend a night, travel back. To reach 300 people you need 48 hours? That would be 9-10 minutes per vote?
Vitrual tour:
average size of the party: 20 people
average time Rand spends: 15 min.
less than 1 min per vote
no cost for renting, travel etc. is needed...only really good internet connection.
To win Iowa candidate will probably need less than 25.000 votes. 5 months to Iowa. If Rand can do 1 hour per day in next 150 days he would reach 9000 people this way. They will be neighbors, friends, business partners and relatives of campaign volunteers. Completely new approach and completely new people that are reached. Since volunteer already knows them he can keep in touch with them and call them when it is time to vote and get engaged.
Best way to get a vote is for a candidate to speak to voters. Mailing (98% of it is not having any impact) and advertising pale in comparison. If Rand does this it could give him another advantage over other candidates, especially in Iowa where he already got strong volunteer network. He would spend far less time and resources and be 90% more effective when you consider time per vote/person ratio. Also in smaller group atmosphere is more intimate and chances for getting persons vote should be better. "Me and some of my friends just had chit-chat with Rand".
I really dislike threads where people sit in their homes as armchair generals and tell campaign what to do... and now I started one myself. :o To me (in my head) it sounded like a really cool idea. BE BRUTALLY HONEST. I dont like pandering. Why would this not work? What did I miss? What do you think?