Authoritarians for Ron Paul?

[Politicallore]

"t is well known that the 18 - 24 year old demographic is strongly behind the Ron Paul candidacy. Usually this group is associated with radicalism, socialism and anarchy. As usual most of these youngsters see themselves on the vanguard of a revolution; however their beliefs differ from the young radicals of the past."



READ THE REST OF THE GREAT ARTICLE AND DIGG HERE!

http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Authoritarians_for_Ron_Paul


Thank R. J. Burle- the author

[Politicallore]

digg, stumble, reddit!

[RobS]

Dugg.

[forsmant]

Anarchy means without rulers, not without rules. If there were no rulers (we couldn't measure anything:D) that does not mean there would be war or mob rule.

The people you claimed to be anarchists are really authoritarians. They wish to control your life in several different ways.

Your definitions are backwards. The youth are not authoritarian at all, but very libertarian.


If you really want to know what a viable anarchy would be like read the story in the link below.

[Politicallore]

bump

[RegularRon]

Good artical. It is a strange movement to say the least. Being a Republican, and seeing so many 18-25 year olds becoming Repubs is pretty amazing. I remember when I registered back in 94 my senior of high school as one and my friends ripping me a new one, because I wasn't a Clinton fan, and loved Reagan. Or getting into arguments my freshmen year in college with people who thought Che was some kind of hero. Back then I was called a fascist, because I believed people needed to be responable for themselves and we needed to follow the laws of the Constitution. (Tell that to some femi-nazi you're trying to hook up with at a frat party, doesn't go over well)

Granted, the anti-war crowd is what is bringing in alot of it and then they discover the amazing ideas the Doc does have. It's very hearting to say the least.

We just need to remember we are trying to get the REPUBLICAN nomination. Then it's on to the White House.

[RJB]

Anarchy means without rulers, not without rules. If there were no rulers (we couldn't measure anything:D) that does not mean there would be war or mob rule.

The people you claimed to be anarchists are really authoritarians. They wish to control your life in several different ways.

Your definitions are backwards. The youth are not authoritarian at all, but very libertarian.


If you really want to know what a viable anarchy would be like read the story in the link below.

I was playing on the fact that we're sick of the leaders with out a ruling authority. The essence of the Ron Paul revolution is that we want the constitution to hold our leaders in control. Right now Bush and the congress can basically do anything they want. I want Bush, Clinton, Giuliani to have the constitution to hold them under control. Hence we as the RP revolutionaries want the politicians under our authority.

I guess I wasn't clear...

[Politicallore]

bump

[Politicallore]

bump

[Politicallore]

bump

[Politicallore]

bumpsy

[Politicallore]

bump

[Politicallore]

bump

[Politicallore]

bump

[Politicallore]

Up to the top!