PDA

View Full Version : Boogity “The threat is real, and it comes from the Internet.” boogity




tod evans
07-18-2015, 06:37 AM
“The threat is real, and it comes from the Internet.”

- Rep. Mike McCaul, R-Texas


Tennessee gunman first radicalized, now idolized by Internet jihadists

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/18/tennessee-gunman-first-radicalized-now-idolized-by-internet-jihadists/

U.S. investigators aren't ready to conclude that Thursday’s murder of four Marines was an act of terrorism, but terrorists are.

Dozens of Twitter accounts spewing jihadist bile have placed Mohammad Abdulazeez’s bearded face as their main images, and tweets believed to have been sent out by Islamic State radicals and sympathizers have proclaimed him a martyr. And according to one top federal official, the posthumous praise for the sick slaughter comes over the very forum that may have turned the suburban-bred college graduate into a killer.

“The threat is real, and it comes from the Internet,” said Rep. Mike McCaul, R-Texas. “This is a new generation of terrorist. This is not Bin Laden in caves with couriers anymore. This is what the new threat of terrorism looks like.”

While the FBI is investigating the Chattanooga shooting as a terrorist act, the agency has not yet declared it one. But McCaul said Abdulazeez appears to have been motivated by ISIS to first open fire at a military recruiting center in a Chattanooga strip mall and then at a nearby military training center, where four Marines were killed.

“My judgment and experience is that this was an ISIS inspired attack. And it has been opened as a terrorism investigation by the FBI, which is a very significant event in this case,” McCaul said.

After the attack, Twitter accounts linked to terrorist groups exploded with praise for Abdulazeez. One twitter user with hashtags ‪#IslamicState and ‪#ChattanoogaShooting pledged “The War Has Just Begun. More to come fellas,” another taunts “We are in your homeland, payback time?” and a third attempts to justify the murders of the Marines by proclaiming they “participated in slaughtering Muslim babies.” Other twitter posts with hashtags “Chattanooga”, “ISIS,” and “Islamic State” vow “O American dogs, you will see wonders. Soon” and another mocks in broken English “Taste the blood of Americans …. Are very good.”

The bigger concern, Mauro said, is not only that there may be a “copycat” attempt, but also that the successful attack may lead to even more people being radicalized.

“ISIS feels their success is Allah’s endorsement,” Mauro said. “The success of ISIS attracts more people.”

Twitter is just one of several media outlets where terrorists and their sympathizers congregate to share their latest horrific acts and propaganda. But stopping the use of the web to celebrate and inspire terror is a daunting task, experts said.

Veryan Khan, editorial director for the Florida-based Terrorism Research & Analysis Consortium, said her organization has tracked accounts on FaceBook, MySpace, Instagram, Pinterest, You Tube, Ask.FM, Tumblr, SendVid, Dump.to, Just Paste.it, Nasher.me, Manbar.me WordPress and Scribid. The use of foreign web sites, particularly in Russia, also is on the rise.

Terror groups like Islamic State have become so organized, they have their own media production houses, Khan said. In addition to filming, editing and posting videos of prisoner and traitor executions, they also film outreach and recruitment efforts and speeches by their leaders that glorify their acts.

While spokespeople for U.S. media outlets and others in the UK claim they cannot rid their sites of terrorist related materials in a timely manner because they are so bombarded with content from around the world, the U.S. based software company GIPEC has developed tools its founder said can assist in combating the global threat of on-line terrorism recruitment and the jihadist messaging.

The software, which its developer said also can be used to track piracy, counterfeiting and pornography, said there is no excuse for software companies not to remove terrorist-related content immediately.

“Terrorist organizations are spending time and money and using American social media platforms to recruit and incite sympathizers and ‘lone wolves’ here in the United States and around the world,” said a GIPEC analyst. “The social media companies have a moral responsibility to make their platforms safe from these horrific and directional posts that call for terrorist behavior that we have been witnessing over the past months.”

ClydeCoulter
07-18-2015, 06:44 AM
"But stopping the use of the web to celebrate and inspire terror is a daunting task, experts said."

The only conclusion that can be arrived at is to stifle free speech on the internet, eh?

Occam's Banana
07-18-2015, 06:54 AM
https://techpaul.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/terrified.png

ThePaleoLibertarian
07-18-2015, 07:15 AM
Obscure ideas of all kinds are spread by the internet; good ones, bad ones, and some that have no value at all.

enhanced_deficit
07-18-2015, 09:24 AM
They are right, it comes from these internet photos (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?478447-Shooting-at-Naval-Reserve-center-in-Chatanooga-TN&p=5925708&viewfull=1#post5925708), experts hired by US media owners should suggest a way to limit reckless freedoms where irresponsible people show photos of children killed by USTF bombs on internets.

WTC1/2/7 events happened within 10 years of invention of internet.

In the past, threat used to come from TV when a Palestinian Christian shot Bobby Kennedy after watching candidate Kennedy's pro-Israel speech on TV. It was not reported which company had manufactured that TV that radicalized Sirhan Sirhan.

muh_roads
07-18-2015, 09:33 AM
National TV is just five media outlets where financial terrorists and their war profiteer friends congregate to share their latest staged acts and propaganda to steal more from the citizens.

**fixed**

DamianTV
07-18-2015, 09:43 AM
"But stopping the use of the web to celebrate and inspire terror is a daunting task, experts said."

The only conclusion that can be arrived at is to stifle free speech on the internet, eh?

+Rep, and yes, Free Speech is the target, and elimination of it is the real goal.

First, notice their language. What words to they do that provoke emotional responses?

#1 Terror
#2 Expert
#3 Internet

We. Must. Control. Everything. This Control is surrendered by the ordinary regular people on both sides of the conflict when there is a strong enough emotional response. "Oh yes master, please tell me what I can say and think and whom I am permitted to communicate with." It ends up being the result of the emotional response. We all got that on the word "Terror" and as Tod pointed out "Boogity Boogity", but the laguange is more subversive than that. The word "Expert" is an Illusion of Authority. That guy is an "Expert at Nose Picking" and all people should consult with the Expert prior to engaging in any olfactory digging. The last key word is Internet. In the context that Clyde pointed out, one of many synonyms was used and in this case, it was "Web". Exactly correct about the emotional response by the people is to surrender someone elses Free Speech by shifting focus to the Exception Bias. Most people dont threaten each other on the internet, but ooh look at that one thing one guy said, now we should ban ALL Free Speech because someone else said something that others responded to. It is more difficult to be accused and convince you that you need to give up all your Rights, including Free Speech, but focus somewhere else, like your neighbor or a manufactured enemy, and that becomes much less of an issue.

The US won the war on terror a long time ago, but winning the war was NEVER the intended goal. The real goal is to sustain the war efforts because they are very profitable for some. Thus, they need to keep them attacking us so we can attack them. Each side "knows" who the "enemy" is because of what they are told to think by the leaders of each side. Dig deeper. Who benefits? Cui bono? Media? Sure, but they survive on sensationalism, not true journalism. Military Industrial Complex benefits because of increased profits. And you have those who point their finger at this American who shot fellow Americans, make sure he doesnt look like an American at all, identify the US as the Victim, then use that as an excuse to sustain the war on all brown people.

When we Blindly follow the orders of Insane Leaders, how can we expect anything but Insanity?

fisharmor
07-18-2015, 10:19 AM
The control is going to be reality as long as we suffer compulsory state schooling.

wizardwatson
07-18-2015, 10:26 AM
“ISIS feels their success is Allah’s endorsement,” Mauro said. “The success of ISIS attracts more people.”

Which is why ISIS is a bunch of Godless morons. God indeed controls events, and uses criminals to execute judgment, but that's no approval of them. God creates and uses evil for his own purposes, but eventually they get destroyed as well.

God doesn't "take sides". It's about the law and HIS people. And his people are those who follow His laws. He cares not for nations, and tribes, and groups, and flags. They are all his pawns. He just uses them as puppets to achieve his objectives.

Christopher A. Brown
07-18-2015, 10:26 AM
Americans, make sure he doesnt look like an American at all, identify the US as the Victim, then use that as an excuse to sustain the war on all brown people.

When we Blindly follow the orders of Insane Leaders, how can we expect anything but Insanity?

Agreed, but there is more to it and a wider perspective.

Consider ISIS was first identified as a Mossad/CIA venture and Muslims don't wear ski masks, or kill groups of boys for listening to soccer; we have the first named groups using mind control on Muslims on this continent (note Kuwaiti origins) to extend terror justifying patriot act, increased security, etc., etc..

And this is deemed a worthy topic while no one can agree that the framers intended for Americans to alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights or that the Ultimate PURPOSE of free speech is to enable the unity to effectively alter or abolish.

How shall we rate Americans here in their ability to select and use information to protect their rights and freedoms?

JK/SEA
07-18-2015, 11:05 AM
Agreed, but there is more to it and a wider perspective.

Consider ISIS was first identified as a Mossad/CIA venture and Muslims don't wear ski masks, or kill groups of boys for listening to soccer; we have the first named groups using mind control on Muslims on this continent (note Kuwaiti origins) to extend terror justifying patriot act, increased security, etc., etc..

And this is deemed a worthy topic while no one can agree that the framers intended for Americans to alter or abolish government destructive to unalienable rights or that the Ultimate PURPOSE of free speech is to enable the unity to effectively alter or abolish.

How shall we rate Americans here in their ability to select and use information to protect their rights and freedoms?

9/11 was an inside job. You do the math.

Christopher A. Brown
07-19-2015, 07:31 PM
9/11 was an inside job. You do the math.

The math tells me that the phrase "9/11 was an inside job" is a cognitive distortion and was applied to pre empt understanding of what happened. It is an "overgeneralization".

I understand what happened, and with what I understand, the math is misrepresented to term the event of the Twin Towers a collapse, is proven wrong.

How shall we rate Americans here in their ability to select and use information to protect their rights and freedoms?

DamianTV
07-19-2015, 08:37 PM
The math tells me that the phrase "9/11 was an inside job" is a cognitive distortion and was applied to pre empt understanding of what happened. It is an "overgeneralization".

I understand what happened, and with what I understand, the math misrepresented to term the event of the Twin Towers a collapse, is proven wrong.

How shall we rate Americans here in their ability to select and use information to protect their rights and freedoms?

Do we rate our precious Rights and Freedoms by depriving other less fortunate peoples of those same Rights and Freedoms?

Christopher A. Brown
07-20-2015, 02:43 PM
Do we rate our precious Rights and Freedoms by depriving other less fortunate peoples of those same Rights and Freedoms?

Not I, but some here do from what I can tell.

I advocate that we restore our constitutional republic with a lawful and peaceful revolution (http://www.politicalforum.com/political-opinions-beliefs/412857-our-lawful-peaceful-revolution-defense-enforcement-constitution.html). From that point we can stop any predations upon less fortunate peoples.

The first step in gaining control over our federal government is controlling our states, making sure that all legislators can properly institute our right to alter or abolish by agreeing with and accepting constitutional intent as only we can define it.

Do you agree and accept these prime intents of our constitution?

Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?