PDA

View Full Version : Judicial Watch: Newly Released Documents Confirm White House Officials Set Hillary Clinton’s B




Suzanimal
06-29-2015, 04:29 PM
Judicial Watch: Newly Released Documents Confirm White House Officials Set Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi Response


(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released new State Department documents showing that Hillary Clinton and the State Department’s response to the Benghazi attack was immediately determined by top Obama White House officials, particularly Ben Rhodes, then-White House deputy strategic communications adviser, and Bernadette Meehan, a spokesperson for the National Security Council. The new documents were forced from the U.S. State Department under court order in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01511)).

Judicial Watch filed a FOIA request on June 13, 2014, and subsequently a lawsuit on September 4, 2014, seeking:

Any and all records concerning, regarding, or related to notes, updates, or reports created in response to the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. This request includes, but is not limited to, notes taken by then Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton or employees of the Office of the Secretary of State during the attack and its immediate aftermath.

A September 11, 2012, email sent at 6:21 p.m. by State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland to Meehan, Under Secretary for Management Patrick F. Kennedy, and Clinton’s personal aide Jacob Sullivan shows that the State Department deferred to the White House on the official response to the Benghazi attack. Referencing pending press statements by Barack Obama and Clinton, Nuland wrote: “We are holding for Rhodes clearance. BMM, pls advise asap.”

Meehan responded three minutes later, at 6:24 p.m.: “Ben is good with these and is on with Jake now too.”

Rhodes sent an email at 9:48 p.m. to senior White House and State officials on the issue: “We should let the State Department statement be our comment for the night.”

An email from Meehan, sent at 10:15 p.m. on September 11 to Rhodes, Nuland, Sullivan, Kennedy and Clinton aide Philippe Reines, further confirms the White House approval of Hillary Clinton’s statement tying the Benghazi terrorist attack to an Internet video: “All, the Department of State just released the following statement. Per Ben [Rhodes’] email below, this should be the USG comment for the night.”

The “USG comment” turned out to be Clinton’s notorious public statement, made hours after the initial terrorist attack, falsely suggesting that the Benghazi assault was a “response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet.”

Rhodes emailed Meehan, Sullivan and Reines at 11:45 p.m. on September 11, writing, “Fyi – we are considering releasing this tonight.” The next line is redacted. The email also included a “Readout of President’s Call to Secretary Clinton,” the contents of which are also completely redacted.

...

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-newly-released-documents-confirm-white-house-officials-set-hillary-clintons-benghazi-response/

morfeeis
06-30-2015, 12:49 AM
We all knew it was a lie but nice to see some proof...

twomp
06-30-2015, 01:12 AM
Not to defend Clinton's corruptness here but what is the controversy with this? Isn't the Secretary of State supposed to say what the President tells them to? He is the boss is he not?

Acala
06-30-2015, 09:50 AM
How convenient for Hillary to be able to pass the buck.

enhanced_deficit
06-30-2015, 03:07 PM
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released new State Department documents showing that Hillary Clinton and the State Department’s response to the Benghazi attack was immediately determined by top Obama White House officials, particularly Ben Rhodes, then-White House deputy strategic communications adviser, and Bernadette Meehan, a spokesperson for the National Security Council. The new documents were forced from the U.S. State Department under court order in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01511)).

Let's wait till all the investigations are completed. DDG is known to be honest and leads by example.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/34/Ben_Rhodes_and_Barack_Obama.jpg



http://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/ben-rhodes-1.jpg
http://www.somosprimos.com/sp2013/spjun13/husbandwife.jpg









OTOH to be devil's advocate, if DGP's masters needed jihadi gorillas training camps in Libya, removing Gadaffi was necessary.

Tue Jun 30, 2015 3:20pm EDT
Tunisia hotel gunman trained in Libya jihadist camp: government
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/30/us-tunisia-security-idUSKCN0PA0GM20150630

The Northbreather
06-30-2015, 04:28 PM
Surname Rhodes brings red flags

RonPaulGeorge&Ringo
06-30-2015, 10:44 PM
This has always been the fake media "controversy" on Benghazi. Who told who to go lie on Meet The Press? It's misdirection to keep people from talking about who the US assets were at this base and why and how they were shipping arms off to ISIS in Syria. The only people talking about that are Sy Hersh and Rand Paul.


Not to defend Clinton's corruptness here but what is the controversy with this? Isn't the Secretary of State supposed to say what the President tells them to? He is the boss is he not?