PDA

View Full Version : Erickson agrees with liberals: Snowden is a traiter and should be shot




randomname
06-14-2015, 09:54 AM
Edward Snowden should be shot. Just a reminder he is a traitor, not a hero. - http://thetim.es/1FU3OVQ

https://twitter.com/EWErickson/status/610093116318593024

randomname
06-14-2015, 09:56 AM
All because of an evidence-free article quoting anonymous government officials...

Brian4Liberty
06-14-2015, 10:00 AM
The recent revelations about gaps in TSA security are devastating to our security! Now the terrorists know how to attack us! Who are the traitors that exposed these weaknesses?

phill4paul
06-14-2015, 10:03 AM
If Snowden were a cop Erickson would be getting a SWAT raid right about now.

timosman
06-14-2015, 10:06 AM
How effective our spying activity really is ? I have not heard any success stories, just failure after failure.

r3volution 3.0
06-14-2015, 09:27 PM
Yea, shoot him!

Yea, and he must love Putin, why else won't he come home?!

:rolleyes:

Anti Federalist
06-14-2015, 10:15 PM
Oh go and and fuck yourself, you fascist fuckwad.

Honestly, some people...

BarryDonegan
06-15-2015, 12:54 PM
The recent revelations about gaps in TSA security are devastating to our security! Now the terrorists know how to attack us! Who are the traitors that exposed these weaknesses?

LOL good point.

phill4paul
06-15-2015, 01:39 PM
What does he think of Petraeus?

twomp
06-15-2015, 01:55 PM
What does he think of Petraeus?

Whatever the television and the newspapers tell him to think about it. Dogs only know what their masters teach them.

Ronin Truth
06-15-2015, 02:12 PM
Let's begin shooting all of the traitors, shall we?

Dr.3D
06-15-2015, 02:21 PM
So what ever happened to those people he squealed on? Did anybody get arrested for the unconstitutional stuff he exposed?

specsaregood
06-15-2015, 02:52 PM
So what ever happened to those people he squealed on? Did anybody get arrested for the unconstitutional stuff he exposed?

No they work for govt so its ok to lie and break the law. Snowden was an outside contractor privately employed; so he doesn't get to do that. Glad I could clear that up for you.

Anti Federalist
06-15-2015, 04:19 PM
So what ever happened to those people he squealed on? Did anybody get arrested for the unconstitutional stuff he exposed?

https://cdn1.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/4qJR8J0SfMHmgfEQqovXy9Y0m2M=/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3791004/Nick_Cage_Laugh.0.gif

wizardwatson
06-15-2015, 04:25 PM
We go around shootin' all the traitors we're gonna have to hold elections every 30 days in this country.

Let's be realistic.

Zippyjuan
06-15-2015, 07:10 PM
Rand Paul was in town this week (I unfortunately had to work). He said what Snowden did was wrong but on the other hand praised what it led to. He declined to say if Snowden belonged in jail.

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2015/jun/13/rand-paul-snowden-triggered-surveillance-reforms/


Rand Paul: Snowden led to spying reforms

Sen. Rand Paul said Saturday that former national security contractor Edward Snowden changed the political climate and helped open doors to government surveillance reform.

The GOP presidential candidate stopped short of saying whether Snowden should be prosecuted for leaking documents about secret government mass surveillance programs.

“I don’t think that’s really up to me. I think he did break the law and I think that we can’t have people making their own mind up to reveal secrets,” the Kentucky senator said in an interview at the Hilton San Diego Bayfront hotel. Later, he addressed more than 700 people at the Republican Party of San Diego County’s annual Lincoln Reagan Dinner.

Paul added that Director of National Security James Clapper should also face scrutiny. Clapper misled Congress when he told members that the government wasn’t collecting bulk phone records, when it was, Paul said.

“You can’t have either one,” he said of the acts by Snowden and Clapper. “I’ve kind of flippantly said that they should share the same cell.”

pcosmar
06-15-2015, 07:45 PM
So how come this guy can make a direct threat of Murder,,openly and publicly.

but they want to prosecute anonymous posters in online forums for vague and nebulous "threats".??

a rhetorical question, for contemplation.