PDA

View Full Version : Army refuses to provide Honor Guard for church's July 4th celebration




Anti Federalist
06-10-2015, 04:15 PM
Ha! Take that, Romans 13 "Christians".

Maybe some day the warvangelicals will wake up and realize that this government's enforcement arm is no friend of theirs.


Army refuses to provide Honor Guard for church's July 4th celebration

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/06/09/army-refuses-to-provide-honor-guard-for-church-s-july-4th-celebration.html

For nearly two decades, the U.S. Army has provided an honor guard for an Independence Day celebration at a Baptist church that predates the founding of the nation. But this year – that tradition has come to an end.

Officials at Fort Gordon say they will not be able to send an honor guard to a July 5th service at Abilene Baptist Church because it violates a military policy banning any involvement in a religious service.

“While there are conditions under which the Army can participate in events conducted at a house of worship, we cannot participate in the context of a religious service,” Public Affairs Officer J.C. Mathews told me.

He said officials at Fort Gordon as well as the Office of the Staff Judge Advocate reviewed the church’s request and determined they were in fact holding a “religious service.”

So it’s OK to invite the troops so long as you don’t pray, talk about Jesus or read the Bible?

“As a result, the Army is not permitted to take part,” Mathews said.

That policy would be an offense to most churches in America – but it is especially offensive when you consider the Army just refused to provide an honor guard for a church whose first pastor was a chaplain in the Revolutionary Army.

Abilene Baptist Church was founded in 1774 – one of Georgia’s most historic churches and the second oldest in the state. The founding pastor was arrested by a colonial magistrate for “preaching in Georgia” and the first pastor, Reverend Loveless Savage, was a chaplain in the Revolutionary Army.

(Oh the irony. - AF)

“It was an absolute shock,” said Brad Whitt, the current pastor of Abilene Baptist Church. “What a sad commentary on the state of affairs in America – when we cannot even allow the flags to fly if they are in a church building.”

“We’ve had a tremendous working relationship with the fort,” he told me. “We’ve hosted all sorts of events for military families. We really try to show our love and respect and we try to honor our military folks.”

The July 5th church service is scheduled to be a “God and Country”-themed celebration with patriotic music and lots of red, white and blue. Afterwards, the church is hosting a Sunday picnic – complete with hot dogs and hamburgers. And for the sake of full disclosure, I’ve been invited to speak at the church service – as well as eat a hamburger afterwards.

Pastor Whitt said they were genuinely confused by the Army’s slight – seeing how Fort Gordon has been providing an honor guard for the past 20 years.

“They have participated for the past two decades and now they are saying – no,” he said. “This is just another example of the secularization of America.”

The church sent me photographs of the honor guard on the main platform of the church in 2007 and 2010. Last year, the church held their service in a local park – and once again – the military sent an honor guard.

So what changed?

Fort Gordon’s Public Affairs Office pointed me to Army Regulation 360-1 – dated May 2011.

The lengthy regulation states Army participation must not selectively benefit (or appear to benefit) any religious group. It also mandates that Army Public Affairs not support any event involving the promotion, endorsement or sponsorship of a religious movement.

According to public affairs, the 2007 church service was designated by the military as a “non-sectarian musical and patriotic program.”

According to the military’s calculations, 80 percent of the program was musical and the other 20 percent included narration and other patriotic elements.

“Because this was not a religious service, our participation was permitted,” he said.

He said the key is not whether the event is sponsored by a religious organization or held in a house of worship.

“Instead, the key factor is, whether or not the event is an actual religious service,” Mathews said.

So it’s okay to invite the troops so long as you don’t pray, talk about Jesus or read the Bible?

“That’s what makes this so sad,” Pastor Whitt told me. “This is what we’ve come to in our nation – where even just representing the colors is some sort of political thing.”

While the Pentagon won’t allow an honor guard to set foot in a church, they have no problem allowing them to march in a gay pride parade.

Last year the Department of Defense gave permission for an honor guard to participate in Washington, D.C.’s gay pride parade – a historic first. An honor guard is also expected to march in the 2015 Capital Pride parade.

So if a military honor guard can celebrate gay pride in a public parade, why can’t they celebrate American pride inside a Baptist church?

Sola_Fide
06-10-2015, 04:20 PM
warvangelicals

Haha...I like that.

phill4paul
06-10-2015, 04:41 PM
“What a sad commentary on the state of affairs in America – when we cannot even allow the flags to fly if they are in a church building.”

"Something, something,something...." Alexis de Tocqueville

heavenlyboy34
06-10-2015, 04:48 PM
So much fail I don't know where to begin... :eek:

Occam's Banana
06-10-2015, 05:06 PM
“That’s what makes this so sad,” Pastor Whitt told me. “This is what we’ve come to in our nation – where even just representing the colors is some sort of political thing.”

That's because "representing the colors" is inherently "some sort of political thing" ... it always has been, and it always will be ...


While the Pentagon won’t allow an honor guard to set foot in a church, they have no problem allowing them to march in a gay pride parade.

... and that is "some sort of political thing," too - the only difference is in the "colors" that are being "represented" ...

Laurence Vance (https://www.lewrockwell.com/author/laurence-m-vance/) would tell Pastor Whitt - and the author of the OP article - that they need to decide what they want to do: worship the State, or worship God.

They can't do both.

And in any case, they don't have any business being surprised when the State withdraws its favors and grants them to someone else in order to suit the politics of the day ...

Pericles
06-10-2015, 05:15 PM
It's the Rainbow Army.

phill4paul
06-10-2015, 05:17 PM
It's the Rainbow Army.

There are no straight people in foxholes? :p

Pericles
06-10-2015, 05:24 PM
There are no straight people in foxholes? :p

They aren't foxholes - those are "fighting positions" not that anybody still remembers how to dig one. It seems to be mostly ride around in vehicles and hide behind HESCO barriers.

phill4paul
06-10-2015, 05:29 PM
They aren't foxholes - those are "fighting positions" not that anybody still remembers how to dig one. It seems to be mostly ride around in vehicles and hide behind HESCO barriers.

So that's why they are called "Hummers." :p

Anti Federalist
06-10-2015, 07:04 PM
So that's why they are called "Hummers." :p

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTGuP12o22llFIkcKst-DaF8xQrMf77xp7q-trzHkHBL8OG-XrZ

Christian Liberty
06-10-2015, 07:43 PM
Haha...I like that.

Its from Lew Rockwell IIRC.

@AF


Ha! Take that, Romans 13 "Christians".

I'm certainly not one of the people that uses Romans 13 to justify everything under the sun. But, I'm actually very happy that they refused to do this. They refused to participate in an act of IDOLATRY. That's good :)

Anti Federalist
06-10-2015, 07:47 PM
Haha...I like that.

I wish I could take credit.

It's from Lawrence Vance at LRC Blog

Anti Federalist
06-10-2015, 07:48 PM
Laurence Vance (https://www.lewrockwell.com/author/laurence-m-vance/) would tell Pastor Whitt - and the author of the OP article - that they need to decide what they want to do: worship the State, or worship God.

They can't do both.

No, they cannot.

enhanced_deficit
06-10-2015, 08:01 PM
Ha! Take that, Romans 13 "Christians".

Maybe some day the warvangelicals will wake up and realize that this government's enforcement arm is no friend of theirs.


Army refuses to provide Honor Guard for church's July 4th celebration

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/06/09/army-refuses-to-provide-honor-guard-for-church-s-july-4th-celebration.html

For nearly two decades, the U.S. Army has provided an honor guard for an Independence Day celebration at a Baptist church that predates the founding of the nation. But this year – that tradition has come to an end.


So if a military honor guard can celebrate gay pride in a public parade, why can’t they celebrate American pride inside a Baptist church?

If 9% people of this Church now believed that Obama was a Christian (guessing based on recent poll (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?472016-54-of-GOP-Believe-Deep-Down-Obama-Is-a-Muslim-Only-45-of-Dems-Believe-Obama-Is-Christian&)), after July 4th this number would probably drop to 3%.

Christian Liberty
06-10-2015, 08:06 PM
So if a military honor guard can celebrate gay pride in a public parade, why can’t they celebrate American pride inside a Baptist church?





Well, because I thought our pagan bloodthirsty military and "gay pride" had something in common that Baptist churches did not... lack of morality.

But... I guess I was wrong about at least some of the Baptists :p

I mean, seriously, you really WANT the same people who marched in a gay pride parade (even leaving their unjust wars aside) marching for your church? Seriously?

pcosmar
06-10-2015, 08:23 PM
I mean, seriously, you really WANT the same people who marched in a gay pride parade (even leaving their unjust wars aside) marching for your church? Seriously?

Just the fact that they want soldiers there and honoring a flag is something to be concerned about.
I have seen and been disgusted with that in churches as well. several churches.

It is just one of many reasons that I am an irreligious believer.

GunnyFreedom
06-10-2015, 08:35 PM
Its from Lew Rockwell IIRC.

@AF



I'm certainly not one of the people that uses Romans 13 to justify everything under the sun. But, I'm actually very happy that they refused to do this. They refused to participate in an act of IDOLATRY. That's good :)

It's no less idolatry just because the idol ups and leaves the premises.

GunnyFreedom
06-10-2015, 08:38 PM
They aren't foxholes - those are "fighting positions" not that anybody still remembers how to dig one. It seems to be mostly ride around in vehicles and hide behind HESCO barriers.

They probably don't even teach how to dig a proper grenade sump anymore.

pcosmar
06-10-2015, 08:46 PM
They probably don't even teach how to dig a proper grenade sump anymore.

They teach that to Marines? :D

I thought only us grunts did that.

Pericles
06-10-2015, 08:53 PM
They probably don't even teach how to dig a proper grenade sump anymore.

I assure you that at least one militia unit understands the concept:

http://www.dallascitytroop.org/about_files/position.jpg

4 hours work in hard ground

GunnyFreedom
06-10-2015, 08:54 PM
They teach that to Marines? :D

I thought only us grunts did that.

Well, you know they expect all jarheads to be a grunt first, and only then whatever MOS. Used to be they even taught Food Service Specialists how to dig a proper fighting hole with a grenade sump, fields of fire, etc. Lord alone knows what they are teaching kids now.

pcosmar
06-10-2015, 09:04 PM
Lord alone knows what they are teaching kids now.

To rely on Armor plates, Technology and Medevac,,, from what I can tell by observation.

Pericles
06-10-2015, 09:09 PM
To rely on Armor plates, Technology and Medevac,,, from what I can tell by observation.

It is very easy for ignorant people to think that success in war may be gained by the use of some wonderful invention rather than by hard fighting and superior leadership. GEN Patton

Christian Liberty
06-10-2015, 09:13 PM
Just the fact that they want soldiers there and honoring a flag is something to be concerned about.
I have seen and been disgusted with that in churches as well. several churches.

It is just one of many reasons that I am an irreligious believer.

There are a lot of bad churches, but keep in mind that THE church is the body of Christ.

@GunnyFreedom- Yeah, I know they're still idolaters. I'm just celebrating the fact that they didn't have a service devoted to their idolatry. Were I in that church, I'd find another one. My own church does have a US flag (and violates the 2nd commandment with a picture of Jesus) but they don't do anything like that.

libertariantexas
06-13-2015, 02:18 AM
They aren't foxholes - those are "fighting positions" not that anybody still remembers how to dig one. It seems to be mostly ride around in vehicles and hide behind HESCO barriers.

It's been a while (probably nearly 30 years) but I think I can still remember how to dig a proper fighting position.

And FWIW, I don't have any problem with the Army not sending a color guard to a church service/4th of July event.

nobody's_hero
06-13-2015, 06:02 AM
Yet we have armed forces chaplains? I mean what do they do, talk about nascar?

Pericles
06-13-2015, 03:39 PM
Yet we have armed forces chaplains? I mean what do they do, talk about nascar?

The coolest Chaplain I ever saw in the Army was a Rabbi with a woodland BDO camo kippa.

Uriel999
06-13-2015, 03:52 PM
I assure you, my last two workups involved lots of fighting holes with proper grenade sumps and all. Workups are still done with the emphasis on conventional fights against conventional forces for the average grunt.