PDA

View Full Version : G7 leaders bid 'Auf Wiedersehen' to carbon fuels




Anti Federalist
06-08-2015, 01:12 PM
What they mean is no more carbon fuels for you, mundane.

Giant armored tax tractors that shuttle our Dear Leaders from one jet setting summit to another getting 2 mpg, the fleets of private jets, the armed forces and cops...they will have all the carbon fuels they need.



G7 leaders bid 'Auf Wiedersehen' to carbon fuels

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/08/us-g7-summit-idUSKBN0OM0I320150608

Leaders of the world's major industrial democracies resolved on Monday to wean their energy-hungry economies off carbon fuels, marking a major step in the battle against global warming that raises the chances of a U.N. climate deal later this year.

The Group of Seven's energy pledge capped a successful summit for host Angela Merkel, who revived her credentials as a "climate chancellor" and strengthened Germany's friendship with the United States at the meeting in a Bavarian resort.

Ties between the Cold War allies have been strained in the last couple of years by spying rows but Merkel appeared to put that behind her on welcoming U.S. President Barack Obama, who declared their countries were "inseparable allies".

Meeting in the picturesque Schloss Elmau at the foot of Germany's highest mountain, the Zugspitze, the G7 leaders pressed Greece to accept painful economic reforms to resolve its debt crisis and struck a firm tone on Russia's role in Ukraine.

They agreed that existing sanctions against Russia would remain in place until Moscow and Russian-backed rebels in eastern Ukraine fully respect a ceasefire negotiated in Minsk in February, and said they could escalate sanctions if needed.

On climate change, the G7 leaders pledged in a communique after their two-day meeting to develop long-term low-carbon strategies and abandon fossil fuels by the end of the century.

"We commit to doing our part to achieve a low-carbon global economy in the long-term, including developing and deploying innovative technologies striving for a transformation of the energy sectors by 2050," the communique read.

The leaders invited other countries to join them in their drive, saying they would accelerate access to renewable energy in Africa and intensify their support for vulnerable countries' own efforts to manage climate change.

MERKEL DELIVERS

The summit revitalized Merkel's green credentials, after concern among diplomats and environmental campaigners that Japan and Canada might torpedo her efforts.

The G7 stopped short of agreeing any immediate collective targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, which the Europeans had pressed their partners in the club to embrace. But they said a U.N. climate conference later this year should reach a deal with legal force, including through binding rules, to combat climate change.

Green lobby groups -- routinely critical of the advanced economies' record on climate change -- welcomed the thrust of the summit commitments.

"Merkel's G7 says 'Auf Wiedersehen' (farewell) to fossil fuels," global activist network Avaaz declared in a statement.

"Elmau delivered", enthused environmental pressure group Greenpeace, adding that "the vision of a 100 percent renewable energy future is starting to take shape".

The G7 leaders supported a reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions within a range recommended by the United Nations climate change panel, and backed a global target for limiting the rise in average global temperatures to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) compared with pre-industrial levels.

Their accord helps set up the U.N. Paris conference, at which some 200 countries will try to reach agreement on limiting the rise in global temperatures to 2 degrees Celsius and seal a new worldwide agreement to curb greenhouse gas emissions.

PUTIN "WRONG-HEADED"

The leaders of Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United States and European Union took a firm stance on Russia's involvement in the Ukraine conflict.

Obama and Merkel both said the G7 countries were ready, if necessary, to strengthen sanctions against Moscow.

The leaders want Russia and Ukraine to comply with a Feb. 12 ceasefire agreed in the Belarus capital Minsk that largely halted fighting in eastern Ukraine between pro-Russian separatists and Ukrainian government forces.

"Ultimately this is going to be an issue for Mr (President Vladimir) Putin. He's got to make a decision," Obama told a news conference at the conclusion of the summit.

"Does he continue to wreck his country's economy and continue Russia's isolation in pursuit of a wrong-headed desire to recreate the glories of the Soviet empire, or does he recognize that Russia's greatness does not depend on violating the territorial integrity and sovereignty of other countries?"

Obama said Russian forces were operating inside Ukraine, something Moscow continues to deny.

In the communique, the leaders said they expected Russia to stop its support for separatist forces in Ukraine and implement the Minsk agreements in full. The sanctions, they said, "can be rolled back when Russia meets these commitments".

The leaders discussed the Greek debt crisis as a group and also in bilateral meetings. Merkel said Europe was prepared to show solidarity if Athens implemented economic reforms.

Greece's leftist government last week rejected proposals for a cash-for-reforms deal put forward by European lenders and the International Monetary Fund, but has yet to put forward its own alternative to unlock aid funds that expire at the end of June.

"There isn't much time left," Merkel said. "Every day counts now."

Zippyjuan
06-08-2015, 01:27 PM
"By the end of the Century". Lots of wiggle room.

Also interesting, the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund (which helps finance their social programs) says they will divest from all coal producing companies. Of note- Norway is a major producer of oil and gas- which is where the fund gets most of its revenues. http://www.ipe.com/news/esg/norways-oil-fund-to-sell-all-remaining-coal-stocks/10008186.fullarticle


The Norwegian sovereign wealth fund has been ordered to divest all coal stocks, in a move that will prompt up to NOK50bn (€6bn) of equity sales.

A vote in the Norwegian parliament yesterday ended with agreement backed by all parties that the NOK6.9trn (€812bn) Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) should sell off its holdings in companies which have 30% or more of their activities in the coal business.

Labour party MP Torstein Tvedt Solberg, who is a member of the parliamentary Finance Committee, said: “The decision made in parliament is a clear mandate for the fund to divest its coal mining and coal utility investments.”

The agreement in parliament was followed up today by a corresponding vote by the Finance Committee, he said.


Norwegian NGOs Greenpeace Norway and The Future in Our Hands, along with Germany’s Urgewald, welcomed the decision and said the GPFG was one of the top ten investors in the global coal industry.

Arild Hermstad of The Future in our Hands said coal was bad for all aspects of the environment and the primary threat to the climate.

“Such investments are not in line with the values of Norwegian society, and the unanimous vote of the Finance Committee means that this is now recognised across all party lines,” he said.

The NGOs said the decision meant the pension fund would now shed investments in companies such Germany’s RWE, China’s Shenhua, Duke Energy in the US, AGL Energy in Australia, Reliance Power in India, Japan’s Electric Power Development Corporation as well as Semirara Mining from the Philippines and Poland’s PGE.

In a report published earlier this month, the three NGOs said that although the GPFG had divested from 51 coal companies in 2014, the total sum of its coal industry holdings had grown by over NOK3bn since 2013, and was now NOK85.8bn.

This analysis showed the shortcomings of reports focusing only on divestment actions that did not say where funds had been reinvested, the report said.

“They serve to create the illusion that the pension fund’s coal portfolio has shrunken, while resources have, in fact, only been shifted from one coal company to the next,” it said”

So the money will likely go into shares of other carbon producing companies.

jbauer
06-08-2015, 01:39 PM
Me, let them speak for themselves. Glad they want to hop on a sail ship made by hand (no electrical/fuel based machines) to get home since they'll be leaving their private jets and entourages behind.