PDA

View Full Version : Rand Against the Machine: Chris Hayes reports on Fox News bias and Rand's Patriot Act battle



jct74
05-30-2015, 02:57 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyfJOsES9PI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyfJOsES9PI
Warlord
05-30-2015, 03:09 PM
Brian Darling was amazing
nikcers
05-30-2015, 03:32 PM
I like that Ratm banner @1:05 i think we have some friends @ msnbc
Henry Rogue
05-30-2015, 04:08 PM
They had to stick that ad in there. smh
Matt McGuire
05-30-2015, 06:53 PM
They had to stick that ad in there. smh


almost no voters will actually ever see it

;)
FreedomProsperityPeace
05-30-2015, 06:57 PM
I like that Ratm banner @1:05 i think we have some friends @ msnbcI wouldn't go that far! :D MSNBC will be the most vicious critics ever if Rand comes close to winning the nomination. This is just a useful weapon for them to use to bash their competitor for now.
squirl22
05-30-2015, 07:05 PM
That was really good. But, MSNBC will turn against Rand if he gets the nomination in favor of whoever is the Dem. In the meantime, they may get some of their viewers to participate in the Republican primaries, which is good.
puppetmaster
05-30-2015, 07:31 PM
The machine they refer to would be the rebulican machine....the dems are soft fuzzy bunnies not machines.
afwjam
05-30-2015, 07:32 PM
Nice bit, Rands guy was on top of it.
Sola_Fide
05-30-2015, 07:35 PM
Great video. I'm sure at least 200 people saw it.
Uriel999
05-30-2015, 07:43 PM
Great video. I'm sure at least 200 people saw it.

And only 183 of those views came from this forum.
juleswin
05-30-2015, 08:51 PM
And only 183 of those views came from this forum.

The other 17 said he is a broken clock for the 10th this month.
Inkblots
05-30-2015, 09:50 PM
The other 17 said he is a broken clock for the 10th this month.

My response to that comment is to defy them to name another candidate who is right more than once a day :)
juleswin
05-30-2015, 09:59 PM
My response to that comment is to defy them to name another candidate who is right more than once a day :)

It's the most frustrating thing ever to read on DU. There is no week that passes without reading one of those threads on DU where the masses say things like.

I support him in the war but
I support him in criminal justice reform but
I support him on NSA spying but
He is right about blaming the republicans creation of Isis but
Yea, he is right about assets forfeiture laws but

Usually end with "but that is the only thing we agree on" or the classics "he is a broken clock".
RonPaul4Prez2012
05-31-2015, 01:35 AM
Huh? Hayes said that Ron Paul got blown off the stage during foreign policy debates? When did that happen?
timosman
05-31-2015, 01:51 AM
Rand needs to realize the media is compromised and start hitting them hard, so they can't ignore him. Wake up Neo.
luctor-et-emergo
05-31-2015, 01:57 AM
It's the most frustrating thing ever to read on DU. There is no week that passes without reading one of those threads on DU where the masses say things like.

I support him in the war but
I support him in criminal justice reform but
I support him on NSA spying but
He is right about blaming the republicans creation of Isis but
Yea, he is right about assets forfeiture laws but

Usually end with "but that is the only thing we agree on" or the classics "he is a broken clock".

Rand is the one who's breaking the clock.. The clock that's at 5 minutes before midnight. Rand is the only one talking about and actually serious about turning back the time on the clock of liberty, freedom and justice for ALL.
timosman
05-31-2015, 02:00 AM
Rand needs to realize the media is compromised and start hitting them hard, so they can't ignore him. Wake up Neo.

I could use some reputation. I get lots of negative points from sycophants running the show.
Spikender
05-31-2015, 02:33 AM
I could use some reputation. I get lots of negative points from sycophants running the show.

I love Immortal Technique, so have some rep.
RabbitMan
05-31-2015, 03:55 AM
I thought this Brian guy was a pretty lame interviewee, citing talking points that at times didn't even correspond to the question at hand--a pattern I've begun to see in with Rand as well. The answers are more polished, but if I was actually watching to learn more, it just comes off as incoherent when a question is just blatantly dodged.

Hayes makes objective, thoughtful remarks concerning Rand's chances.
Talking head makes a programmed remark only vaguely intertwined with question.
Rinse, repeat.

Blech.